Yep – sounds fair to me. From: Malcolm Hutty [mailto:malcolm@linx.net] Sent: Tuesday, 6 October 2015 9:16 AM To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> Cc: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] RV: A way to avoid the 'The Single Member Can Do Anything!' problem On 4 Oct 2015, at 22:18, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au<mailto:Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>> wrote:
- the co-decision model, however, is useful - we have already proposed it for the change process for Fundamental Bylaws. I'd be much happier to explore whether that could be usefully explored for other powers.
Agreed. I think you make a useful distinction. I support both the Board and the community having a say in changing bylaws. The Board has the exclusive power of initiation for changes to the bylaws. I'd say that counts as a pretty significant say. Malcolm.