If I may make a suggestion now that it appears there is some movement to consensus on " What we need are agreed to general principles and people who understand them and what the INTENT of the ALAC and At-Large is" , maybe the ALAC will now attend to that; Deliver a writing to serve as guide to representatives clearly stating *the principles, intent and redlines* pertaining. Where you don't know what you know, state that too, without ambiguity. -Carlton -Carlton ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 9:33 AM Jonathan Zuck <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org> wrote:
Makes sense. General principles will do.
-----Original Message----- From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca] Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2018 10:33 PM To: asoto@ibero-americano.org Cc: Jonathan Zuck <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org>; ALAC < alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [ALAC] Consensus Call: EDPD - Proposed way forward
You have to be careful here. If all that out Members could say was exactly what the ALAC had formally agreed, it would always be very out of date and we would not need three people to do this, we could send an e-mail!
This EPDP will be moving very quickly and there is no way we can have formal or informal approval while meetings are going on and other people are putting out new ideas and proposals.
What we need are agreed to general principles and people who understand them and what the INTENT of the ALAC and At-Large is. ANd regular opportunities to share what is going on and ask for direction if the way forward is not clear.
Alan
At 07/07/2018 09:32 PM, asoto@ibero-americano.org wrote:
Agree, but prior agreement. Otherwise, it would be the personal opinions of our representatives, not the opinions of ALAC.
Regards
Alberto
El 2018-07-07 18:42, Alan Greenberg escribió:
Indeed, thus the last sentence of #1 and #6 as well as time requirement to attend At-Large calls. As the EPDP runs, there will no doubt be many details to be defined, but the overall guidance will be to look at what maximizes the benefits to Internet users and what minimizes the potential harms. Alan At 07/07/2018 05:38 PM, Jonathan Zuck wrote:
Links: ------ [1] https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/prop osed-epdp-membership-structure-temp-spec-27jun18-en.pdf [2] https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac [3] http://www.atlarge.icann.org/ [4] https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committe e+(ALAC _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki:
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)