Hi Alan Although I was ok with the original statement and have voted accordingly, I dont mind the change. Maureen On 6/01/2017 7:07 am, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
A wording problem was brought to my attention regarding the statement that is currently undergoing a vote. I have reviewed the statement again and must admit that this slipped by me the first time.
The 4th point currently reads:
4. The ALAC recommends that an ongoing observation of this new IRP Supplementary Procedures is performed to foster the continued improvement exercise for the benefit of end users.
I find the wording awkward, and it conflicks with the closing remarks which correctly say that users are only affected indirectly.
I am proposing that instead we say:
4. The ALAC recommends that as we gain experience with these new procedures, there is ongoing monitoring ensure continued improvement.
I have discussed this with Leon who authored the statement and he has no problem with it.
If anyone has a concern with this, please let me know immediately. At this point, only six people have voted. If any of them wish to alter their vote, that is fine.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/di splay/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)