IMPORTANT: Statement on Supplementary Procedures for Independent Review Process (IRP)
A wording problem was brought to my attention regarding the statement that is currently undergoing a vote. I have reviewed the statement again and must admit that this slipped by me the first time. The 4th point currently reads: 4. The ALAC recommends that an ongoing observation of this new IRP Supplementary Procedures is performed to foster the continued improvement exercise for the benefit of end users. I find the wording awkward, and it conflicks with the closing remarks which correctly say that users are only affected indirectly. I am proposing that instead we say: 4. The ALAC recommends that as we gain experience with these new procedures, there is ongoing monitoring ensure continued improvement. I have discussed this with Leon who authored the statement and he has no problem with it. If anyone has a concern with this, please let me know immediately. At this point, only six people have voted. If any of them wish to alter their vote, that is fine. Alan
Hi Alan Although I was ok with the original statement and have voted accordingly, I dont mind the change. Maureen On 6/01/2017 7:07 am, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
A wording problem was brought to my attention regarding the statement that is currently undergoing a vote. I have reviewed the statement again and must admit that this slipped by me the first time.
The 4th point currently reads:
4. The ALAC recommends that an ongoing observation of this new IRP Supplementary Procedures is performed to foster the continued improvement exercise for the benefit of end users.
I find the wording awkward, and it conflicks with the closing remarks which correctly say that users are only affected indirectly.
I am proposing that instead we say:
4. The ALAC recommends that as we gain experience with these new procedures, there is ongoing monitoring ensure continued improvement.
I have discussed this with Leon who authored the statement and he has no problem with it.
If anyone has a concern with this, please let me know immediately. At this point, only six people have voted. If any of them wish to alter their vote, that is fine.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/di splay/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
+1 as well Cheers! Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 6 Jan 2017 6:13 p.m., "Maureen Hilyard" <maureen.hilyard@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Alan
Although I was ok with the original statement and have voted accordingly, I dont mind the change.
Maureen On 6/01/2017 7:07 am, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
A wording problem was brought to my attention regarding the statement that is currently undergoing a vote. I have reviewed the statement again and must admit that this slipped by me the first time.
The 4th point currently reads:
4. The ALAC recommends that an ongoing observation of this new IRP Supplementary Procedures is performed to foster the continued improvement exercise for the benefit of end users.
I find the wording awkward, and it conflicks with the closing remarks which correctly say that users are only affected indirectly.
I am proposing that instead we say:
4. The ALAC recommends that as we gain experience with these new procedures, there is ongoing monitoring ensure continued improvement.
I have discussed this with Leon who authored the statement and he has no problem with it.
If anyone has a concern with this, please let me know immediately. At this point, only six people have voted. If any of them wish to alter their vote, that is fine.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/di splay/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
Alan, I agree withi the new version. Regards Alberto -----Mensaje original----- De: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Alan Greenberg Enviado el: Friday, January 6, 2017 2:07 PM Para: ALAC <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Asunto: [ALAC] IMPORTANT: Statement on Supplementary Procedures for Independent Review Process (IRP) A wording problem was brought to my attention regarding the statement that is currently undergoing a vote. I have reviewed the statement again and must admit that this slipped by me the first time. The 4th point currently reads: 4. The ALAC recommends that an ongoing observation of this new IRP Supplementary Procedures is performed to foster the continued improvement exercise for the benefit of end users. I find the wording awkward, and it conflicks with the closing remarks which correctly say that users are only affected indirectly. I am proposing that instead we say: 4. The ALAC recommends that as we gain experience with these new procedures, there is ongoing monitoring ensure continued improvement. I have discussed this with Leon who authored the statement and he has no problem with it. If anyone has a concern with this, please let me know immediately. At this point, only six people have voted. If any of them wish to alter their vote, that is fine. Alan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA C)
Hello All, Please note that the text has been changed accordingly on the wiki. Vote credentials with additional explanatory note have been sent to the ALAC members who haven’t voted. The ones who have voted were followed up. Thank you, Ariel On 1/6/17, 12:07 PM, "alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Alan Greenberg" <alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote: A wording problem was brought to my attention regarding the statement that is currently undergoing a vote. I have reviewed the statement again and must admit that this slipped by me the first time. The 4th point currently reads: 4. The ALAC recommends that an ongoing observation of this new IRP Supplementary Procedures is performed to foster the continued improvement exercise for the benefit of end users. I find the wording awkward, and it conflicks with the closing remarks which correctly say that users are only affected indirectly. I am proposing that instead we say: 4. The ALAC recommends that as we gain experience with these new procedures, there is ongoing monitoring ensure continued improvement. I have discussed this with Leon who authored the statement and he has no problem with it. If anyone has a concern with this, please let me know immediately. At this point, only six people have voted. If any of them wish to alter their vote, that is fine. Alan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__atlarge-2Dlists.icann.o... At-Large Online: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.atlarge.icann.org&d=... ALAC Working Wiki: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_dis...
Hi, Alan, I have voted already, but agree with the rewording. Kaili ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> To: "ALAC" <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2017 1:07 AM Subject: [ALAC] IMPORTANT: Statement on Supplementary Procedures for Independent Review Process (IRP)
A wording problem was brought to my attention regarding the statement that is currently undergoing a vote. I have reviewed the statement again and must admit that this slipped by me the first time.
The 4th point currently reads:
4. The ALAC recommends that an ongoing observation of this new IRP Supplementary Procedures is performed to foster the continued improvement exercise for the benefit of end users.
I find the wording awkward, and it conflicks with the closing remarks which correctly say that users are only affected indirectly.
I am proposing that instead we say:
4. The ALAC recommends that as we gain experience with these new procedures, there is ongoing monitoring ensure continued improvement.
I have discussed this with Leon who authored the statement and he has no problem with it.
If anyone has a concern with this, please let me know immediately. At this point, only six people have voted. If any of them wish to alter their vote, that is fine.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
I have voted - and do not wish to change my vote Holly On 7 Jan 2017, at 4:07 am, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
A wording problem was brought to my attention regarding the statement that is currently undergoing a vote. I have reviewed the statement again and must admit that this slipped by me the first time.
The 4th point currently reads:
4. The ALAC recommends that an ongoing observation of this new IRP Supplementary Procedures is performed to foster the continued improvement exercise for the benefit of end users.
I find the wording awkward, and it conflicks with the closing remarks which correctly say that users are only affected indirectly.
I am proposing that instead we say:
4. The ALAC recommends that as we gain experience with these new procedures, there is ongoing monitoring ensure continued improvement.
I have discussed this with Leon who authored the statement and he has no problem with it.
If anyone has a concern with this, please let me know immediately. At this point, only six people have voted. If any of them wish to alter their vote, that is fine.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
participants (7)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Alberto Soto -
Ariel Liang -
Holly Raiche -
Kan Kaili -
Maureen Hilyard -
Seun Ojedeji