The fact is that most of us will not be present at the meeting. So what is your role in making sure we all attend the meeting. Its not a debate. Address that FACT On Sat, 26 Oct 2019, 16:56 Johan Helsingius, <julf@julf.com> wrote:
On 26-10-19 16:41, Peters Omoragbon wrote:
I felt there was no need for me to respond to Evan, s contribution because it made no value to the issue on hand. Seems you actually are responding, but without actually addressing his points.
If half of 60 selected delegates are absent because of institutionalised selective racial bias coloured in administrative bottlenecks, of what impact would the program have?
Evan pointed out that the cause might not be racial bias.
I think it would help to be fact-based instead of resorting to pure rhetoric and accusations based on assumptions.
Julf _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.