Why does ICANN set up a new structure with RALOs and then decide to review it, before they even did any work? I'm certainly confused here. On 4/5/07, Denise Michel <denise.michel@icann.org> wrote:
Dear members of the At-Large community:
Please be advised that, on 30 March 2006, ICANN posted for public comments proposed Terms of Reference detailing questions that would guide the independent review of ICANN's At-Large Advisory Committee and global At-Large structures and processes <http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm>. The public comment period will conclude on 29 April 2007. Please send comments to: <alac-review-tor@icann.org>. View comments at: <http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/>.
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Franck Martin franck.martin@gmail.com "Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question" G. Bachelard