Resolution of the Board of Directors related to the proposed Summit
Re: "Do I get it well?" Yes, Vittorio, you get it well. While other advisory bodies will be busy working, finalizing serious documents on issues that actually concern the community, performing analyses, making concrete recommendations and such, the at-large will be busy wasting a half million dollars of registrant monies on a giant group hug. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Danny, #1 - See my e-mail to Vittorio wherein I correct the amount. I know you got that amount from me in the first place but we have worked really hard this week to bring that down. #2 - Its rather hard for ALSs to finalize serious documents on issues that actually concern the community, perform analyses, make concrete recommentations and such if they aren't adequately engaged or educated on the issues at stake. This is precisely what the Summit is geared to correct. Darlene ________________________________ From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Danny Younger Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 7:57 AM To: 'At-Large Worldwide' Cc: vb@bertola.eu Subject: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related to theproposed Summit Re: "Do I get it well?" Yes, Vittorio, you get it well. While other advisory bodies will be busy working, finalizing serious documents on issues that actually concern the community, performing analyses, making concrete recommendations and such, the at-large will be busy wasting a half million dollars of registrant monies on a giant group hug. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org <http://www.alac.icann.org/> ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org <http://www.icannalac.org/>
Darlene, 1. As per the ICANN Policy VP "US$7,000 is the estimate ICANN uses for international travel and is based on business class purchased 45+ days in advance through ICANN's travel agents." -- see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04282.html If the At-Large intends to provide travel funding for each of the 100+ ALSs, then the budgeted amount will exceed $700,000 (by standard calculations). 2. I'm really getting tired of hearing this song and dance about the poor uneducated, unengaged non-contributing ALSs. Each one of them agreed upon signing up to a defined set of responsibilities (that most all have ignored) that boil down to this -- paying attention to what's going on, and reporting back with policy advice. Since the Los Angeles session we have seen the following developments: a. Network Solutions engaging in front-running (or, more properly, "domain reservation" activities). b. registrants at Belgiumdomains being unable to manage their accounts as their registrar has been locked-out of VeriSign by Court Order stemming from the Dell typosquatting lawsuit c. the CADNA submission/research on drop-catching issues d. the change put through by .travel management allowing for PPC speculation in dot travel, along with the .travel registry being put up for sale e. a board member (Rita Rodin), who functions as legal counsel for Telnic, engaged in active discussions on the .tel contractual amendments (a slight conflict of interest, wouldn't you think?). Yet the ALAC and the ALSs have had nothing to say about any of these issues... poor babies, they can't use a computer like the rest of us to keep current on issues -- they have to be led by the hand and "educated". Sorry, but this is a waste of money that will produce no beneficial results. Those that care make an effort to pay attention and manage to participate (as evinced by years of member participation in the GA that saw a subscriber list in excess of 1000 participants). None of them had to be spoon fed on the registrant's dime. --- "Thompson, Darlene" <DThompson@GOV.NU.CA> wrote:
Danny,
#1 - See my e-mail to Vittorio wherein I correct the amount. I know you got that amount from me in the first place but we have worked really hard this week to bring that down.
#2 - Its rather hard for ALSs to finalize serious documents on issues that actually concern the community, perform analyses, make concrete recommentations and such if they aren't adequately engaged or educated on the issues at stake. This is precisely what the Summit is geared to correct.
Darlene
________________________________
From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Danny Younger Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 7:57 AM To: 'At-Large Worldwide' Cc: vb@bertola.eu Subject: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related to theproposed Summit
Re: "Do I get it well?"
Yes, Vittorio, you get it well.
While other advisory bodies will be busy working, finalizing serious documents on issues that actually concern the community, performing analyses, making concrete recommendations and such, the at-large will be busy wasting a half million dollars of registrant monies on a giant group hug.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org <http://www.alac.icann.org/> ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org <http://www.icannalac.org/>
____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
At 15:59 15/02/2008, Danny Younger wrote:
Sorry, but this is a waste of money that will produce no beneficial results. Those that care make an effort to pay attention and manage to participate (as evinced by years of member participation in the GA that saw a subscriber list in excess of 1000 participants). None of them had to be spoon fed on the registrant's dime.
Or blocked by Danny's lobbying against them at NCUC :-) Danny, we all know you paid some of your travels as I did for all: shame on ICANN for that. But you cannot oppose when ICANN improves. ALAC has not the common duty you define as your lonely own. There are certainly other ways to make ALAC work, but these are those ICANN lead to. You cannot object for the ALAC demanding now, what you complained we had not for so long. You cannot ALAC wishing to do more than it does and taking the availble steps. No one demanded $ 7000 where the expence can be half of it. Take care. jfc
Danny, 1. I wasn't involved in this particular budget, although I will be for Cairo. I will have to get back to you on the budget calculations when I get back home which won't be for about a week and a half as I am presenting at another conference in Vancouver in the interim. 2. I hear ya but we cannot all judge the rest of the world by the usual "North American white male"-centric standard. I am hearing from other regions that just cannot get input from their ALSs. Why? Various reasons. Although, I look at myself, with all of the advantages in the world, and its taken 3 ICANN meetings and a year and a half for me to finally start putting everything together and in perspective and become up to speed on the issues. And I'm still not anywhere NEAR where you are but doing my best. Many others have not had the benefits of the meetings and discussions that I have had so I can only imagine how they are feeling. Especially when they see discussions like this happening on list. Can you imagine how discouraging that is? 3. The ALSs that MIGHT already have a clue in NA won't become an ALS because of mistrust of ICANN (imagine!) so we cannot even engage those ones. This needs to be cleared up and both you and I know the reasons behind this. 4. Of the five issues that you pointed out below, even *I* was only aware of one of them. Better lines of communication are REALLY necessary. I really hope that my friends in other regions will respond to your e-mail as this is the last one that I will send on this topice but they are probably in the air right now. As I am still available and on-line I am acting as a stop-gap to try to answer your questions but am probably not the most experienced person in the world to do so. Darlene ________________________________ From: Danny Younger [mailto:dannyyounger@yahoo.com] Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 9:59 AM To: Thompson, Darlene; At-Large Worldwide Cc: vb@bertola.eu Subject: RE: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related to theproposed Summit Darlene, 1. As per the ICANN Policy VP "US$7,000 is the estimate ICANN uses for international travel and is based on business class purchased 45+ days in advance through ICANN's travel agents." -- see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04282.html If the At-Large intends to provide travel funding for each of the 100+ ALSs, then the budgeted amount will exceed $700,000 (by standard calculations). 2. I'm really getting tired of hearing this song and dance about the poor uneducated, unengaged non-contributing ALSs. Each one of them agreed upon signing up to a defined set of responsibilities (that most all have ignored) that boil down to this -- paying attention to what's going on, and reporting back with policy advice. Since the Los Angeles session we have seen the following developments: a. Network Solutions engaging in front-running (or, more properly, "domain reservation" activities). b. registrants at Belgiumdomains being unable to manage their accounts as their registrar has been locked-out of VeriSign by Court Order stemming from the Dell typosquatting lawsuit c. the CADNA submission/research on drop-catching issues d. the change put through by .travel management allowing for PPC speculation in dot travel, along with the .travel registry being put up for sale e. a board member (Rita Rodin), who functions as legal counsel for Telnic, engaged in active discussions on the .tel contractual amendments (a slight conflict of interest, wouldn't you think?). Yet the ALAC and the ALSs have had nothing to say about any of these issues... poor babies, they can't use a computer like the rest of us to keep current on issues -- they have to be led by the hand and "educated". Sorry, but this is a waste of money that will produce no beneficial results. Those that care make an effort to pay attention and manage to participate (as evinced by years of member participation in the GA that saw a subscriber list in excess of 1000 participants). None of them had to be spoon fed on the registrant's dime. --- "Thompson, Darlene" <DThompson@GOV.NU.CA> wrote:
Danny,
#1 - See my e-mail to Vittorio wherein I correct the amount. I know you got that amount from me in the first place but we have worked really hard this week to bring that down.
#2 - Its rather hard for ALSs to finalize serious documents on issues that actually concern the community, perform analyses, make concrete recommentations and such if they aren't adequately engaged or educated on the issues at stake. This is precisely what the Summit is geared to correct.
Darlene
________________________________
From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Danny Younger Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 7:57 AM To: 'At-Large Worldwide' Cc: vb@bertola.eu Subject: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related to theproposed Summit
Re: "Do I get it well?"
Yes, Vittorio, you get it well.
While other advisory bodies will be busy working, finalizing serious documents on issues that actually concern the community, performing analyses, making concrete recommendations and such, the at-large will be busy wasting a half million dollars of registrant monies on a giant group hug.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org <http://www.alac.icann.org/> <http://www.alac.icann.org/> ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org <http://www.icannalac.org/> <http://www.icannalac.org/>
____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
From the ICANN announcement:
"The ICANN board passed a number of resolutions at the meeting, including: A request to the Generic Names Supporting Organization Council to launch a policy-development process on whether and how to restrict GTLD registries or registrars or both from engaging in warehousing of and/or speculating in domain names; "http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-15feb08.htm I listened to the entire first segment (before the obligatory thanks to the host) and never heard this resolution being passed... perhaps I dozed off... can anyone on Staff confirm or deny this announcement? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Darlene and all, Pardon me, but I didn't read any ""North American white male"-centric standard'" expressed in Danny's earlier remarks. However I do detect a significant unqualified and seemingly unjustified determination of desiring improperly at you attempting to bash Danny on such a false basis... The North American as well as most of the EU nations mistrust of ICANN is well justified and ICANN has well earned that mistrust. Given the a few weeks ago Peter had sent the NTIA a letter desiring to be released for the DOC/NTIA's oversight would seem to indicate not only from a timing stand point, but from a growing/mounting mound of evidence that ICANN is in violation of a number of US federal statutes, and is likely to desire to seek refuge in any country to host ICANN in order to avoid future prosecution. Additionally as the IPC is loosing some of the public advantage it once enjoyed due mainly to one of it's members, namely the RIAA constant and misguided legal strategy to control the DNS and Domain name system amongst other areas of the Internet experience, it is obvious to even the casual observer that ICANN's board now populated with IPC centric members, is very concerned as to their creditability and future personal freedom or financial where with all... And the should be given the IPC's members errant activities! Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827 "Thompson, Darlene" wrote:
Danny,
1. I wasn't involved in this particular budget, although I will be for Cairo. I will have to get back to you on the budget calculations when I get back home which won't be for about a week and a half as I am presenting at another conference in Vancouver in the interim.
2. I hear ya but we cannot all judge the rest of the world by the usual "North American white male"-centric standard. I am hearing from other regions that just cannot get input from their ALSs. Why? Various reasons. Although, I look at myself, with all of the advantages in the world, and its taken 3 ICANN meetings and a year and a half for me to finally start putting everything together and in perspective and become up to speed on the issues. And I'm still not anywhere NEAR where you are but doing my best. Many others have not had the benefits of the meetings and discussions that I have had so I can only imagine how they are feeling. Especially when they see discussions like this happening on list. Can you imagine how discouraging that is?
3. The ALSs that MIGHT already have a clue in NA won't become an ALS because of mistrust of ICANN (imagine!) so we cannot even engage those ones. This needs to be cleared up and both you and I know the reasons behind this.
4. Of the five issues that you pointed out below, even *I* was only aware of one of them. Better lines of communication are REALLY necessary.
I really hope that my friends in other regions will respond to your e-mail as this is the last one that I will send on this topice but they are probably in the air right now. As I am still available and on-line I am acting as a stop-gap to try to answer your questions but am probably not the most experienced person in the world to do so.
Darlene
----------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Danny Younger [mailto:dannyyounger@yahoo.com] Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 9:59 AM To: Thompson, Darlene; At-Large Worldwide Cc: vb@bertola.eu Subject: RE: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related to theproposed Summit
Darlene,
1. As per the ICANN Policy VP "US$7,000 is the estimate ICANN uses for international travel and is based on business class purchased 45+ days in advance through ICANN's travel agents." -- see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04282.html
If the At-Large intends to provide travel funding for each of the 100+ ALSs, then the budgeted amount will exceed $700,000 (by standard calculations).
2. I'm really getting tired of hearing this song and dance about the poor uneducated, unengaged non-contributing ALSs. Each one of them agreed upon signing up to a defined set of responsibilities (that most all have ignored) that boil down to this -- paying attention to what's going on, and reporting back with policy advice.
Since the Los Angeles session we have seen the following developments:
a. Network Solutions engaging in front-running (or, more properly, "domain reservation" activities). b. registrants at Belgiumdomains being unable to manage their accounts as their registrar has been locked-out of VeriSign by Court Order stemming from the Dell typosquatting lawsuit c. the CADNA submission/research on drop-catching issues d. the change put through by .travel management allowing for PPC speculation in dot travel, along with the .travel registry being put up for sale e. a board member (Rita Rodin), who functions as legal counsel for Telnic, engaged in active discussions on the .tel contractual amendments (a slight conflict of interest, wouldn't you think?).
Yet the ALAC and the ALSs have had nothing to say about any of these issues... poor babies, they can't use a computer like the rest of us to keep current on issues -- they have to be led by the hand and "educated".
Sorry, but this is a waste of money that will produce no beneficial results. Those that care make an effort to pay attention and manage to participate (as evinced by years of member participation in the GA that saw a subscriber list in excess of 1000 participants). None of them had to be spoon fed on the registrant's dime.
--- "Thompson, Darlene" <DThompson@GOV.NU.CA> wrote:
Danny,
#1 - See my e-mail to Vittorio wherein I correct the amount. I know you got that amount from me in the first place but we have worked really hard this week to bring that down.
#2 - Its rather hard for ALSs to finalize serious documents on issues that actually concern the community, perform analyses, make concrete recommentations and such if they aren't adequately engaged or educated on the issues at stake. This is precisely what the Summit is geared to correct.
Darlene
________________________________
From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Danny Younger Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 7:57 AM To: 'At-Large Worldwide' Cc: vb@bertola.eu Subject: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related to theproposed Summit
Re: "Do I get it well?"
Yes, Vittorio, you get it well.
While other advisory bodies will be busy working, finalizing serious documents on issues that actually concern the community, performing analyses, making concrete recommendations and such, the at-large will be busy wasting a half million dollars of registrant monies on a giant group hug.
___________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
ttp://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org <http://www.alac.icann.org/> ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org <http://www.icannalac.org/>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
---------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
Jeffrey, That statement was not aimed at Danny in any kind of a way personally but expresses the views of many in the rest of the world about NA's stance on many things. Don't see it as bashing Danny on a personal level but, in many ways, bashing the lot of us in NA. Jeffrey, nothing else that I said was in any way bashing Danny but responding, point by point, to his comments. Yes, Danny's comments were "rather harshly put" and until Danny can learn to express his points in a more polite way, then he should expect to get bashed right back - althoug I made VERY certain not to do so as I refuse to lower myself in such a way any more. Its amazing that, in person, Danny doesn't do this and seems to be a great guy to hang around. In e-mails, however, things seem to change. Perhaps its the medium that makes him think that his language is appropriate but it certainly discourages people from participating in other regions and actually adds to the problem. I have heard many a comment on this. Thank you, Darlene ________________________________ From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Jeffrey A. Williams Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 8:01 PM To: At-Large Worldwide; aheineman@ntia.doc.gov Cc: IPC Subject: Re: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related totheproposed Summit Darlene and all, Pardon me, but I didn't read any ""North American white male"-centric standard'" expressed in Danny's earlier remarks. However I do detect a significant unqualified and seemingly unjustified determination of desiring improperly at you attempting to bash Danny on such a false basis... The North American as well as most of the EU nations mistrust of ICANN is well justified and ICANN has well earned that mistrust. Given the a few weeks ago Peter had sent the NTIA a letter desiring to be released for the DOC/NTIA's oversight would seem to indicate not only from a timing stand point, but from a growing/mounting mound of evidence that ICANN is in violation of a number of US federal statutes, and is likely to desire to seek refuge in any country to host ICANN in order to avoid future prosecution. Additionally as the IPC is loosing some of the public advantage it once enjoyed due mainly to one of it's members, namely the RIAA constant and misguided legal strategy to control the DNS and Domain name system amongst other areas of the Internet experience, it is obvious to even the casual observer that ICANN's board now populated with IPC centric members, is very concerned as to their creditability and future personal freedom or financial where with all... And the should be given the IPC's members errant activities! Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827 "Thompson, Darlene" wrote: Danny, 1. I wasn't involved in this particular budget, although I will be for Cairo. I will have to get back to you on the budget calculations when I get back home which won't be for about a week and a half as I am presenting at another conference in Vancouver in the interim. 2. I hear ya but we cannot all judge the rest of the world by the usual "North American white male"-centric standard. I am hearing from other regions that just cannot get input from their ALSs. Why? Various reasons. Although, I look at myself, with all of the advantages in the world, and its taken 3 ICANN meetings and a year and a half for me to finally start putting everything together and in perspective and become up to speed on the issues. And I'm still not anywhere NEAR where you are but doing my best. Many others have not had the benefits of the meetings and discussions that I have had so I can only imagine how they are feeling. Especially when they see discussions like this happening on list. Can you imagine how discouraging that is? 3. The ALSs that MIGHT already have a clue in NA won't become an ALS because of mistrust of ICANN (imagine!) so we cannot even engage those ones. This needs to be cleared up and both you and I know the reasons behind this. 4. Of the five issues that you pointed out below, even *I* was only aware of one of them. Better lines of communication are REALLY necessary. I really hope that my friends in other regions will respond to your e-mail as this is the last one that I will send on this topice but they are probably in the air right now. As I am still available and on-line I am acting as a stop-gap to try to answer your questions but am probably not the most experienced person in the world to do so. Darlene ________________________________ From: Danny Younger [mailto:dannyyounger@yahoo.com] Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 9:59 AM To: Thompson, Darlene; At-Large Worldwide Cc: vb@bertola.eu Subject: RE: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related to theproposed Summit Darlene, 1. As per the ICANN Policy VP "US$7,000 is the estimate ICANN uses for international travel and is based on business class purchased 45+ days in advance through ICANN's travel agents." -- see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04282.html If the At-Large intends to provide travel funding for each of the 100+ ALSs, then the budgeted amount will exceed $700,000 (by standard calculations). 2. I'm really getting tired of hearing this song and dance about the poor uneducated, unengaged non-contributing ALSs. Each one of them agreed upon signing up to a defined set of responsibilities (that most all have ignored) that boil down to this -- paying attention to what's going on, and reporting back with policy advice. Since the Los Angeles session we have seen the following developments: a. Network Solutions engaging in front-running (or, more properly, "domain reservation" activities). b. registrants at Belgiumdomains being unable to manage their accounts as their registrar has been locked-out of VeriSign by Court Order stemming from the Dell typosquatting lawsuit c. the CADNA submission/research on drop-catching issues d. the change put through by .travel management allowing for PPC speculation in dot travel, along with the .travel registry being put up for sale e. a board member (Rita Rodin), who functions as legal counsel for Telnic, engaged in active discussions on the .tel contractual amendments (a slight conflict of interest, wouldn't you think?). Yet the ALAC and the ALSs have had nothing to say about any of these issues... poor babies, they can't use a computer like the rest of us to keep current on issues -- they have to be led by the hand and "educated". Sorry, but this is a waste of money that will produce no beneficial results. Those that care make an effort to pay attention and manage to participate (as evinced by years of member participation in the GA that saw a subscriber list in excess of 1000 participants). None of them had to be spoon fed on the registrant's dime. --- "Thompson, Darlene" <DThompson@GOV.NU.CA> wrote: > Danny, > > #1 - See my e-mail to Vittorio wherein I correct the > amount. I know you got that amount from me in the > first place but we have worked really hard this week > to bring that down. > > #2 - Its rather hard for ALSs to finalize serious > documents on issues that actually concern the > community, perform analyses, make concrete > recommentations and such if they aren't adequately > engaged or educated on the issues at stake. This is > precisely what the Summit is geared to correct. > > Darlene > > ________________________________ > > From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf > of Danny Younger > Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 7:57 AM > To: 'At-Large Worldwide' > Cc: vb@bertola.eu > Subject: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of > Directors related to theproposed Summit > > > > Re: "Do I get it well?" > > Yes, Vittorio, you get it well. > > While other advisory bodies will be busy working, > finalizing serious documents on issues that actually > concern the community, performing analyses, making > concrete recommendations and such, the at-large will > be busy wasting a half million dollars of registrant > monies on a giant group hug. > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org <http://www.alac.icann.org/> > <http://www.alac.icann.org/> > ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org <http://www.icannalac.org/> > <http://www.icannalac.org/> > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ ________________________________ _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org <http://www.alac.icann.org/> ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org <http://www.icannalac.org/>
Darlene and all, Although I can appriciate a womans point of view very well, using emotive terms towards any Man stating anyting in a harsh manner, which I am well known for myself, in no way diminishes and in fact emphisizes his, or in some instances HER, point. This was indeed my point in my earlier response, and remains so. Ergo you did make your response one of a more personal nature accordingly, where Danny did not, especially not in a sexist manner. I would prefer, and strongly request, that sexist remarks or overtones be left out of any expression on any ICANN related issue if you don't mind... I too have also strongly disagreed with Danny on a number of issues, and still do as do most of our members which are about an even split of women vs men, BTW. Certainly women have a different view towards most issues, which is both expected and not at all at least unusual. That is as it may or should be, depending. And again, polite expression is usually preferable, but is not always adaquate in expressing the strength and varasity of expression, which is why multipul means of expression exist in most languages and nationalities that I am aware of. So as to being harsh as contributing in a negitive way to any discussion on any issue is pure nonsense. And even worse than nonsense if felt or considered and than not expressed in such a manner! To conclude, I thought that Dannys expressed thoughts were spot on and properly expressed, this time. Maybe not next time? Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827 "Thompson, Darlene" wrote:
Jeffrey,
That statement was not aimed at Danny in any kind of a way personally but expresses the views of many in the rest of the world about NA's stance on many things. Don't see it as bashing Danny on a personal level but, in many ways, bashing the lot of us in NA.
Jeffrey, nothing else that I said was in any way bashing Danny but responding, point by point, to his comments. Yes, Danny's comments were "rather harshly put" and until Danny can learn to express his points in a more polite way, then he should expect to get bashed right back - althoug I made VERY certain not to do so as I refuse to lower myself in such a way any more.
Its amazing that, in person, Danny doesn't do this and seems to be a great guy to hang around. In e-mails, however, things seem to change. Perhaps its the medium that makes him think that his language is appropriate but it certainly discourages people from participating in other regions and actually adds to the problem. I have heard many a comment on this.
Thank you,
Darlene
----------------------------------------------------------------------- From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Jeffrey A. Williams Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 8:01 PM To: At-Large Worldwide; aheineman@ntia.doc.gov Cc: IPC Subject: Re: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related totheproposed Summit
Darlene and all,
Pardon me, but I didn't read any ""North American white male"-centric standard'" expressed in Danny's earlier remarks. However I do detect a significant unqualified and seemingly unjustified determination of desiring improperly at you attempting to bash Danny on such a false basis...
The North American as well as most of the EU nations mistrust of ICANN is well justified and ICANN has well earned that mistrust. Given the a few weeks ago Peter had sent the NTIA a letter desiring to be released for the DOC/NTIA's oversight would seem to indicate not only from a timing stand point, but from a growing/mounting mound of evidence that ICANN is in violation of a number of US federal statutes, and is likely to desire to seek refuge in any country to host ICANN in order to avoid future prosecution. Additionally as the IPC is loosing some of the public advantage it once enjoyed due mainly to one of it's members, namely the RIAA constant and misguided legal strategy to control the DNS and Domain name system amongst other areas of the Internet experience, it is obvious to even the casual observer that ICANN's board now populated with IPC centric members, is very concerned as to their creditability and future personal freedom or financial where with all... And the should be given the IPC's members errant activities!
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827
"Thompson, Darlene" wrote:
Danny,
1. I wasn't involved in this particular budget, although I will be for Cairo. I will have to get back to you on the budget calculations when I get back home which won't be for about a week and a half as I am presenting at another conference in Vancouver in the interim.
2. I hear ya but we cannot all judge the rest of the world by the usual "North American white male"-centric standard. I am hearing from other regions that just cannot get input from their ALSs. Why? Various reasons. Although, I look at myself, with all of the advantages in the world, and its taken 3 ICANN meetings and a year and a half for me to finally start putting everything together and in perspective and become up to speed on the issues. And I'm still not anywhere NEAR where you are but doing my best. Many others have not had the benefits of the meetings and discussions that I have had so I can only imagine how they are feeling. Especially when they see discussions like this happening on list. Can you imagine how discouraging that is?
3. The ALSs that MIGHT already have a clue in NA won't become an ALS because of mistrust of ICANN (imagine!) so we cannot even engage those ones. This needs to be cleared up and both you and I know the reasons behind this.
4. Of the five issues that you pointed out below, even *I* was only aware of one of them. Better lines of communication are REALLY necessary.
I really hope that my friends in other regions will respond to your e-mail as this is the last one that I will send on this topice but they are probably in the air right now. As I am still available and on-line I am acting as a stop-gap to try to answer your questions but am probably not the most experienced person in the world to do so.
Darlene
--------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Danny Younger [mailto:dannyyounger@yahoo.com] Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 9:59 AM To: Thompson, Darlene; At-Large Worldwide Cc: vb@bertola.eu Subject: RE: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related to theproposed Summit Darlene,
1. As per the ICANN Policy VP "US$7,000 is the estimate ICANN uses for international travel and is based on business class purchased 45+ days in advance through ICANN's travel agents." -- see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04282.html
If the At-Large intends to provide travel funding for each of the 100+ ALSs, then the budgeted amount will exceed $700,000 (by standard calculations).
2. I'm really getting tired of hearing this song and dance about the poor uneducated, unengaged non-contributing ALSs. Each one of them agreed upon signing up to a defined set of responsibilities (that most all have ignored) that boil down to this -- paying attention to what's going on, and reporting back with policy advice.
Since the Los Angeles session we have seen the following developments:
a. Network Solutions engaging in front-running (or, more properly, "domain reservation" activities). b. registrants at Belgiumdomains being unable to manage their accounts as their registrar has been locked-out of VeriSign by Court Order stemming from the Dell typosquatting lawsuit c. the CADNA submission/research on drop-catching issues d. the change put through by .travel management allowing for PPC speculation in dot travel, along with the .travel registry being put up for sale e. a board member (Rita Rodin), who functions as legal counsel for Telnic, engaged in active discussions on the .tel contractual amendments (a slight conflict of interest, wouldn't you think?).
Yet the ALAC and the ALSs have had nothing to say about any of these issues... poor babies, they can't use a computer like the rest of us to keep current on issues -- they have to be led by the hand and "educated".
Sorry, but this is a waste of money that will produce no beneficial results. Those that care make an effort to pay attention and manage to participate (as evinced by years of member participation in the GA that saw a subscriber list in excess of 1000 participants). None of them had to be spoon fed on the registrant's dime.
--- "Thompson, Darlene" <DThompson@GOV.NU.CA> wrote:
Danny,
#1 - See my e-mail to Vittorio wherein I correct the amount. I know you got that amount from me in the first place but we have worked really hard this week to bring that down.
#2 - Its rather hard for ALSs to finalize serious documents on issues that actually concern the community, perform analyses, make concrete recommentations and such if they aren't adequately engaged or educated on the issues at stake. This is precisely what the Summit is geared to correct.
Darlene
________________________________
From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Danny Younger Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 7:57 AM To: 'At-Large Worldwide' Cc: vb@bertola.eu Subject: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related to theproposed Summit
Re: "Do I get it well?"
Yes, Vittorio, you get it well.
While other advisory bodies will be busy working, finalizing serious documents on issues that actually concern the community, performing analyses, making concrete recommendations and such, the at-large will be busy wasting a half million dollars of registrant monies on a giant group hug.
___________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
ttp://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org <http://www.alac.icann.org/> ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org <http://www.icannalac.org/>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
-------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
Jeffrey, Darlene and all: I was trying to stay out of this conversation but It´s impossible fot my at this time. When Darlene says: "have heard many a comment on this", I was making some comments about danny, but not for him being unpolite. Mi point has nothing to do with politeness, gender, or nationality. There is something more important to discuss. The main issue who bothers Darlene, me and many other members (recent as us or not) is the whole concept that Danny express. I don´t know him personally (I only had the chance to attend to 1 meeting) and I really don´t know anything about his contributions to Icann´s world. He must be a commited person, for sure. But there are many aspects that he is really far away to understand. ICANN all and the Board specially gives importance to Internet Users Imput and Participation. He agrees with this, as an individual user and that´s the reason for being so commited with At Large. But it´s impossible for him to get the principal matters about the way of participating. ICANN needs a particular sort of imput, the one provided by a particular kind of entities. It´s impossible for a billon of users worldwide to get involved in At Large. The ALS are kind of repressentatives of those individual users. There is a special profile of ORGANIZATIONS where the Board and ICANN bylaws are looking for the imput. These organizations are the ones who can be familiar to the ideas of Outreach, Capacity Building, etc. Not every individual user is capable of provide opinions, discuss and work with "group desition making" or "participate leadership". Those are the reasons that justify the requirement of being an organization to be an ALS. ALS make (or should) a repressentative imput when they discuss in At Large. The opinions of every delegate are not his personal ideas, only, but also a result of an internal discussion. This is the first fase of Bottom Up Consensus. Danny Younger may be a really qualified and commited user, but he can´t provide himself the class of imput that ICANN needs from internet users. Not even 100 of Danny´s would´n be able to provide that. Global representation, different points of views are also required. To get this kind of imput is also really hard to do. Members of ALS are not (mostly) english speakers. For them (us) is harder to find out things in other language (even for those who are fluent), read tons of mails a day and catch up with the process, and answer quickly (for me, also, if I have to write this mail in spanish, I would ended faster). Members of ALS not only have to write and post our personal opinions in every issue (as Danny does), but we also have to discuss, educate, agree with the other members of our organizations. This is not an easy way to create opinions. But, for me (and for ICANN´s community) that kind of results are more valuable. Members of ALS are not (mostly) from North America. This means that it´s harder to understand the whole idea that repressents this space of participation, and specially to trust in it, and get commited with an organization which exists based in a MOU with US Government. Danny never is going to believe how hard is to explain an individual user that participating in ICANN is a way of making a better internet for everyone (registrars included), which is my opinion, if you have to destroy the pre-judgement (in many moments) that we probable are being a tool to benefit the imperial american interests. When you have hundreds of reppresentatives, you have to build alliances, to trust, to argue, and to work together. One, ocasional, face to face meeting is really important for that. I can still making points the whole night... ALS´s imput is hard to get (Harder than Danny is able to imagine). All valuable things are. The Board and ICANN are aware of this fact and also know that is useful for them to get it. The new concept of At Large, in a year of existence, has developed many changes. 100 "uneducated" ALS, 10 real representatives in ALAC and 1 new (brillant) liason attracted the Board´s attention as never before. A change is coming, ICANN community is waiting for it and thinks it´s worth to spend a little part of ICANNs budget (still an enormous amount) in it. But not everyone is capable enough to undestand this. This is only the very beggening. Let´s make it happen. Andres (from the undeveloped Argentina, the south-end of the globe) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:24:22 -0800From: jwkckid1@ix.netcom.comTo: DThompson@GOV.NU.CACC: info@ipconstituency.org; alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org; aheineman@ntia.doc.govSubject: Re: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors relatedtotheproposed SummitDarlene and all, Although I can appriciate a womans point of view very well, using emotive terms towards any Man stating anyting in a harsh manner, which I am well known for myself, in no way diminishes and in fact emphisizes his, or in some instances HER, point. This was indeed my point in my earlier response, and remains so. Ergo you did make your response one of a more personal nature accordingly, where Danny did not, especially not in a sexist manner. I would prefer, and strongly request, that sexist remarks or overtones be left out of any expression on any ICANN related issue if you don't mind... I too have also strongly disagreed with Danny on a number of issues, and still do as do most of our members which are about an even split of women vs men, BTW. Certainly women have a different view towards most issues, which is both expected and not at all at least unusual. That is as it may or should be, depending. And again, polite expression is usually preferable, but is not always adaquate in expressing the strength and varasity of expression, which is why multipul means of expression exist in most languages and nationalities that I am aware of. So as to being harsh as contributing in a negitive way to any discussion on any issue is pure nonsense. And even worse than nonsense if felt or considered and than not expressed in such a manner! To conclude, I thought that Dannys expressed thoughts were spot on and properly expressed, this time. Maybe not next time? Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827 "Thompson, Darlene" wrote: Jeffrey, That statement was not aimed at Danny in any kind of a way personally but expresses the views of many in the rest of the world about NA's stance on many things. Don't see it as bashing Danny on a personal level but, in many ways, bashing the lot of us in NA. Jeffrey, nothing else that I said was in any way bashing Danny but responding, point by point, to his comments. Yes, Danny's comments were "rather harshly put" and until Danny can learn to express his points in a more polite way, then he should expect to get bashed right back - althoug I made VERY certain not to do so as I refuse to lower myself in such a way any more. Its amazing that, in person, Danny doesn't do this and seems to be a great guy to hang around. In e-mails, however, things seem to change. Perhaps its the medium that makes him think that his language is appropriate but it certainly discourages people from participating in other regions and actually adds to the problem. I have heard many a comment on this. Thank you, Darlene From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Jeffrey A. Williams Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 8:01 PM To: At-Large Worldwide; aheineman@ntia.doc.gov Cc: IPC Subject: Re: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related totheproposed Summit Darlene and all, Pardon me, but I didn't read any ""North American white male"-centric standard'" expressed in Danny's earlier remarks. However I do detect a significant unqualified and seemingly unjustified determination of desiring improperly at you attempting to bash Danny on such a false basis... The North American as well as most of the EU nations mistrust of ICANN is well justified and ICANN has well earned that mistrust. Given the a few weeks ago Peter had sent the NTIA a letter desiring to be released for the DOC/NTIA's oversight would seem to indicate not only from a timing stand point, but from a growing/mounting mound of evidence that ICANN is in violation of a number of US federal statutes, and is likely to desire to seek refuge in any country to host ICANN in order to avoid future prosecution. Additionally as the IPC is loosing some of the public advantage it once enjoyed due mainly to one of it's members, namely the RIAA constant and misguided legal strategy to control the DNS and Domain name system amongst other areas of the Internet experience, it is obvious to even the casual observer that ICANN's board now populated with IPC centric members, is very concerned as to their creditability and future personal freedom or financial where with all... And the should be given the IPC's members errant activities! Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827 "Thompson, Darlene" wrote: Danny, 1. I wasn't involved in this particular budget, although I will be for Cairo. I will have to get back to you on the budget calculations when I get back home which won't be for about a week and a half as I am presenting at another conference in Vancouver in the interim. 2. I hear ya but we cannot all judge the rest of the world by the usual "North American white male"-centric standard. I am hearing from other regions that just cannot get input from their ALSs. Why? Various reasons. Although, I look at myself, with all of the advantages in the world, and its taken 3 ICANN meetings and a year and a half for me to finally start putting everything together and in perspective and become up to speed on the issues. And I'm still not anywhere NEAR where you are but doing my best. Many others have not had the benefits of the meetings and discussions that I have had so I can only imagine how they are feeling. Especially when they see discussions like this happening on list. Can you imagine how discouraging that is? 3. The ALSs that MIGHT already have a clue in NA won't become an ALS because of mistrust of ICANN (imagine!) so we cannot even engage those ones. This needs to be cleared up and both you and I know the reasons behind this. 4. Of the five issues that you pointed out below, even *I* was only aware of one of them. Better lines of communication are REALLY necessary. I really hope that my friends in other regions will respond to your e-mail as this is the last one that I will send on this topice but they are probably in the air right now. As I am still available and on-line I am acting as a stop-gap to try to answer your questions but am probably not the most experienced person in the world to do so. Darlene From: Danny Younger [mailto:dannyyounger@yahoo.com] Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 9:59 AM To: Thompson, Darlene; At-Large Worldwide Cc: vb@bertola.eu Subject: RE: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related to theproposed SummitDarlene, 1. As per the ICANN Policy VP "US$7,000 is the estimate ICANN uses for international travel and is based on business class purchased 45+ days in advance through ICANN's travel agents." -- see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04282.html If the At-Large intends to provide travel funding for each of the 100+ ALSs, then the budgeted amount will exceed $700,000 (by standard calculations). 2. I'm really getting tired of hearing this song and dance about the poor uneducated, unengaged non-contributing ALSs. Each one of them agreed upon signing up to a defined set of responsibilities (that most all have ignored) that boil down to this -- paying attention to what's going on, and reporting back with policy advice. Since the Los Angeles session we have seen the following developments: a. Network Solutions engaging in front-running (or, more properly, "domain reservation" activities). b. registrants at Belgiumdomains being unable to manage their accounts as their registrar has been locked-out of VeriSign by Court Order stemming from the Dell typosquatting lawsuit c. the CADNA submission/research on drop-catching issues d. the change put through by .travel management allowing for PPC speculation in dot travel, along with the .travel registry being put up for sale e. a board member (Rita Rodin), who functions as legal counsel for Telnic, engaged in active discussions on the .tel contractual amendments (a slight conflict of interest, wouldn't you think?). Yet the ALAC and the ALSs have had nothing to say about any of these issues... poor babies, they can't use a computer like the rest of us to keep current on issues -- they have to be led by the hand and "educated". Sorry, but this is a waste of money that will produce no beneficial results. Those that care make an effort to pay attention and manage to participate (as evinced by years of member participation in the GA that saw a subscriber list in excess of 1000 participants). None of them had to be spoon fed on the registrant's dime. --- "Thompson, Darlene" <DThompson@GOV.NU.CA> wrote:
Danny, > > #1 - See my e-mail to Vittorio wherein I correct the > amount. I know you got that amount from me in the > first place but we have worked really hard this week > to bring that down. > > #2 - Its rather hard for ALSs to finalize serious > documents on issues that actually concern the > community, perform analyses, make concrete > recommentations and such if they aren't adequately > engaged or educated on the issues at stake. This is > precisely what the Summit is geared to correct. > > Darlene > > ________________________________ > > From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf > of Danny Younger > Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 7:57 AM > To: 'At-Large Worldwide' > Cc: vb@bertola.eu > Subject: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of > Directors related to theproposed Summit > > > > Re: "Do I get it well?" > > Yes, Vittorio, you get it well. > > While other advisory bodies will be busy working, > finalizing serious documents on issues that actually > concern the community, performing analyses, making > concrete recommendations and such, the at-large will > be busy wasting a half million dollars of registrant > monies on a giant group hug. > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org > <http://www.alac.icann.org/> > ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org > <http://www.icannalac.org/> > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
Andreas, Darlene, (I've removed a number of recepients to that thread, who have nothing to do with the At-Large; it is a common feature of some people here to massively spam and cross-post their views. My understanding is that if someone is interested in the AL, they will subscribe for the list, and I should not force them to read it) Danny has this way of expressing himself; I know him, and on at least one ocasion I've called to ask him why he woild attack personally; his explanation made sense then, but unfortunately he continues to be aggressive, which does not help the discussions on the list. Here's my proposal: whenever someone here makes personal attacks, just ignore them. The moment we start responding, that generates lots of noise, where the substance is being lost. We can't change someone's behaviour, and if they are not polite, then fine. I've been personally responding here ( ISOC - Bulgaria is represented on this list) when there have been personal attacks against people, but the truth is these attacks will never stop, and they are always by email. I don't remember seeing anyone being so negative at an ICANN meeting. So, let's focus on the substance, and forget about the lack of proper manners. Also, being from a developing country, I share the view that the discussions are often "occupied" by the Americans and Westerners, and we don't have chances against this "westernization". However, the broader participation I see at the JPA mid-term review from countried like Russia (ccTLD), Bulgaria (government, users) and others make me believe this status quo starts to change, and our voice will be heard. So, let's leave the personal attacks, and if anyone feels obliged to respnd, perhaps it could be with only a few lines, e.g. "Thanks for your email. It contains false, unfair, and unjust statements to the extent that it is pointless to respond to it in a rightful manner." Hope that is helpful, and let's try to focus on the constructive discussion about the At Large. Veni Sent from Gmail for mobile On 2/16/08, Andres Piazza <andrespiazzagpj@hotmail.com> wrote:
Jeffrey, Darlene and all:
I was trying to stay out of this conversation but It´s impossible fot my at this time. When Darlene says: "have heard many a comment on this", I was making some comments about danny, but not for him being unpolite.
Mi point has nothing to do with politeness, gender, or nationality. There is something more important to discuss.
The main issue who bothers Darlene, me and many other members (recent as us or not) is the whole concept that Danny express. I don´t know him personally (I only had the chance to attend to 1 meeting) and I really don´t know anything about his contributions to Icann´s world. He must be a commited person, for sure.
But there are many aspects that he is really far away to understand. ICANN all and the Board specially gives importance to Internet Users Imput and Participation. He agrees with this, as an individual user and that´s the reason for being so commited with At Large.
But it´s impossible for him to get the principal matters about the way of participating. ICANN needs a particular sort of imput, the one provided by a particular kind of entities. It´s impossible for a billon of users worldwide to get involved in At Large. The ALS are kind of repressentatives of those individual users. There is a special profile of ORGANIZATIONS where the Board and ICANN bylaws are looking for the imput. These organizations are the ones who can be familiar to the ideas of Outreach, Capacity Building, etc. Not every individual user is capable of provide opinions, discuss and work with "group desition making" or "participate leadership".
Those are the reasons that justify the requirement of being an organization to be an ALS. ALS make (or should) a repressentative imput when they discuss in At Large. The opinions of every delegate are not his personal ideas, only, but also a result of an internal discussion. This is the first fase of Bottom Up Consensus.
Danny Younger may be a really qualified and commited user, but he can´t provide himself the class of imput that ICANN needs from internet users. Not even 100 of Danny´s would´n be able to provide that. Global representation, different points of views are also required. To get this kind of imput is also really hard to do.
Members of ALS are not (mostly) english speakers. For them (us) is harder to find out things in other language (even for those who are fluent), read tons of mails a day and catch up with the process, and answer quickly (for me, also, if I have to write this mail in spanish, I would ended faster).
Members of ALS not only have to write and post our personal opinions in every issue (as Danny does), but we also have to discuss, educate, agree with the other members of our organizations. This is not an easy way to create opinions. But, for me (and for ICANN´s community) that kind of results are more valuable.
Members of ALS are not (mostly) from North America. This means that it´s harder to understand the whole idea that repressents this space of participation, and specially to trust in it, and get commited with an organization which exists based in a MOU with US Government. Danny never is going to believe how hard is to explain an individual user that participating in ICANN is a way of making a better internet for everyone (registrars included), which is my opinion, if you have to destroy the pre-judgement (in many moments) that we probable are being a tool to benefit the imperial american interests.
When you have hundreds of reppresentatives, you have to build alliances, to trust, to argue, and to work together. One, ocasional, face to face meeting is really important for that.
I can still making points the whole night...
ALS´s imput is hard to get (Harder than Danny is able to imagine). All valuable things are. The Board and ICANN are aware of this fact and also know that is useful for them to get it.
The new concept of At Large, in a year of existence, has developed many changes. 100 "uneducated" ALS, 10 real representatives in ALAC and 1 new (brillant) liason attracted the Board´s attention as never before. A change is coming, ICANN community is waiting for it and thinks it´s worth to spend a little part of ICANNs budget (still an enormous amount) in it. But not everyone is capable enough to undestand this.
This is only the very beggening. Let´s make it happen.
Andres (from the undeveloped Argentina, the south-end of the globe)
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:24:22 -0800From: jwkckid1@ix.netcom.comTo: DThompson@GOV.NU.CACC: info@ipconstituency.org; alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org; aheineman@ntia.doc.govSubject: Re: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors relatedtotheproposed SummitDarlene and all, Although I can appriciate a womans point of view very well, using emotive terms towards any Man stating anyting in a harsh manner, which I am well known for myself, in no way diminishes and in fact emphisizes his, or in some instances HER, point. This was indeed my point in my earlier response, and remains so. Ergo you did make your response one of a more personal nature accordingly, where Danny did not, especially not in a sexist manner. I would prefer, and strongly request, that sexist remarks or overtones be left out of any expression on any ICANN related issue if you don't mind... I too have also strongly disagreed with Danny on a number of issues, and still do as do most of our members which are about an even split of women vs men, BTW. Certainly women have a different view towards most issues, which is both expected and not at all at least unusual. That is as it may or should be, depending. And again, polite expression is usually preferable, but is not always adaquate in expressing the strength and varasity of expression, which is why multipul means of expression exist in most languages and nationalities that I am aware of. So as to being harsh as contributing in a negitive way to any discussion on any issue is pure nonsense. And even worse than nonsense if felt or considered and than not expressed in such a manner! To conclude, I thought that Dannys expressed thoughts were spot on and properly expressed, this time. Maybe not next time? Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827 "Thompson, Darlene" wrote:
Jeffrey,
That statement was not aimed at Danny in any kind of a way personally but expresses the views of many in the rest of the world about NA's stance on many things. Don't see it as bashing Danny on a personal level but, in many ways, bashing the lot of us in NA.
Jeffrey, nothing else that I said was in any way bashing Danny but responding, point by point, to his comments. Yes, Danny's comments were "rather harshly put" and until Danny can learn to express his points in a more polite way, then he should expect to get bashed right back - althoug I made VERY certain not to do so as I refuse to lower myself in such a way any more.
Its amazing that, in person, Danny doesn't do this and seems to be a great guy to hang around. In e-mails, however, things seem to change. Perhaps its the medium that makes him think that his language is appropriate but it certainly discourages people from participating in other regions and actually adds to the problem. I have heard many a comment on this.
Thank you,
Darlene
From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Jeffrey A. Williams Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 8:01 PM To: At-Large Worldwide; aheineman@ntia.doc.gov Cc: IPC Subject: Re: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related totheproposed Summit Darlene and all, Pardon me, but I didn't read any ""North American white male"-centric standard'" expressed in Danny's earlier remarks. However I do detect a significant unqualified and seemingly unjustified determination of desiring improperly at you attempting to bash Danny on such a false basis... The North American as well as most of the EU nations mistrust of ICANN is well justified and ICANN has well earned that mistrust. Given the a few weeks ago Peter had sent the NTIA a letter desiring to be released for the DOC/NTIA's oversight would seem to indicate not only from a timing stand point, but from a growing/mounting mound of evidence that ICANN is in violation of a number of US federal statutes, and is likely to desire to seek refuge in any country to host ICANN in order to avoid future prosecution. Additionally as the IPC is loosing some of the public advantage it once enjoyed due mainly to one of it's members, namely the RIAA constant and misguided legal strategy to control the DNS and Domain name system amongst other areas of the Internet experience, it is obvious to even the casual observer that ICANN's board now populated with IPC centric members, is very concerned as to their creditability and future personal freedom or financial where with all... And the should be given the IPC's members errant activities! Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827 "Thompson, Darlene" wrote:
Danny,
1. I wasn't involved in this particular budget, although I will be for Cairo. I will have to get back to you on the budget calculations when I get back home which won't be for about a week and a half as I am presenting at another conference in Vancouver in the interim.
2. I hear ya but we cannot all judge the rest of the world by the usual "North American white male"-centric standard. I am hearing from other regions that just cannot get input from their ALSs. Why? Various reasons. Although, I look at myself, with all of the advantages in the world, and its taken 3 ICANN meetings and a year and a half for me to finally start putting everything together and in perspective and become up to speed on the issues. And I'm still not anywhere NEAR where you are but doing my best. Many others have not had the benefits of the meetings and discussions that I have had so I can only imagine how they are feeling. Especially when they see discussions like this happening on list. Can you imagine how discouraging that is?
3. The ALSs that MIGHT already have a clue in NA won't become an ALS because of mistrust of ICANN (imagine!) so we cannot even engage those ones. This needs to be cleared up and both you and I know the reasons behind this.
4. Of the five issues that you pointed out below, even *I* was only aware of one of them. Better lines of communication are REALLY necessary.
I really hope that my friends in other regions will respond to your e-mail as this is the last one that I will send on this topice but they are probably in the air right now. As I am still available and on-line I am acting as a stop-gap to try to answer your questions but am probably not the most experienced person in the world to do so.
Darlene
From: Danny Younger [mailto:dannyyounger@yahoo.com] Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 9:59 AM To: Thompson, Darlene; At-Large Worldwide Cc: vb@bertola.eu Subject: RE: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related to theproposed SummitDarlene, 1. As per the ICANN Policy VP "US$7,000 is the estimate ICANN uses for international travel and is based on business class purchased 45+ days in advance through ICANN's travel agents." -- see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04282.html If the At-Large intends to provide travel funding for each of the 100+ ALSs, then the budgeted amount will exceed $700,000 (by standard calculations). 2. I'm really getting tired of hearing this song and dance about the poor uneducated, unengaged non-contributing ALSs. Each one of them agreed upon signing up to a defined set of responsibilities (that most all have ignored) that boil down to this -- paying attention to what's going on, and reporting back with policy advice. Since the Los Angeles session we have seen the following developments: a. Network Solutions engaging in front-running (or, more properly, "domain reservation" activities). b. registrants at Belgiumdomains being unable to manage their accounts as their registrar has been locked-out of VeriSign by Court Order stemming from the Dell typosquatting lawsuit c. the CADNA submission/research on drop-catching issues d. the change put through by .travel management allowing for PPC speculation in dot travel, along with the .travel registry being put up for sale e. a board member (Rita Rodin), who functions as legal counsel for Telnic, engaged in active discussions on the .tel contractual amendments (a slight conflict of interest, wouldn't you think?). Yet the ALAC and the ALSs have had nothing to say about any of these issues... poor babies, they can't use a computer like the rest of us to keep current on issues -- they have to be led by the hand and "educated". Sorry, but this is a waste of money that will produce no beneficial results. Those that care make an effort to pay attention and manage to participate (as evinced by years of member participation in the GA that saw a subscriber list in excess of 1000 participants). None of them had to be spoon fed on the registrant's dime. --- "Thompson, Darlene" <DThompson@GOV.NU.CA> wrote:
Danny, > > #1 - See my e-mail to Vittorio wherein I correct the > amount. I know you got that amount from me in the > first place but we have worked really hard this week > to bring that down. > > #2 - Its rather hard for ALSs to finalize serious > documents on issues that actually concern the > community, perform analyses, make concrete > recommentations and such if they aren't adequately > engaged or educated on the issues at stake. This is > precisely what the Summit is geared to correct. > > Darlene > > ________________________________ > > From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf > of Danny Younger > Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 7:57 AM > To: 'At-Large Worldwide' > Cc: vb@bertola.eu > Subject: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of > Directors related to theproposed Summit > > > > Re: "Do I get it well?" > > Yes, Vittorio, you get it well. > > While other advisory bodies will be busy working, > finalizing serious documents on issues that actually > concern the community, performing analyses, making > concrete recommendations and such, the at-large will > be busy wasting a half million dollars of registrant > monies on a giant group hug. > > > > > >
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org > <http://www.alac.icann.org/> > ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org > <http://www.icannalac.org/> > > >
____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
-- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
Veni, Your points are VERY well taken by myself and consider them implemented for the future. Thanks a bunch! Darlene ________________________________ From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Veni Markovski Sent: Sat 2/16/2008 6:23 AM To: At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directorsrelatedtotheproposed Summit Andreas, Darlene, (I've removed a number of recepients to that thread, who have nothing to do with the At-Large; it is a common feature of some people here to massively spam and cross-post their views. My understanding is that if someone is interested in the AL, they will subscribe for the list, and I should not force them to read it) Danny has this way of expressing himself; I know him, and on at least one ocasion I've called to ask him why he woild attack personally; his explanation made sense then, but unfortunately he continues to be aggressive, which does not help the discussions on the list. Here's my proposal: whenever someone here makes personal attacks, just ignore them. The moment we start responding, that generates lots of noise, where the substance is being lost. We can't change someone's behaviour, and if they are not polite, then fine. I've been personally responding here ( ISOC - Bulgaria is represented on this list) when there have been personal attacks against people, but the truth is these attacks will never stop, and they are always by email. I don't remember seeing anyone being so negative at an ICANN meeting. So, let's focus on the substance, and forget about the lack of proper manners. Also, being from a developing country, I share the view that the discussions are often "occupied" by the Americans and Westerners, and we don't have chances against this "westernization". However, the broader participation I see at the JPA mid-term review from countried like Russia (ccTLD), Bulgaria (government, users) and others make me believe this status quo starts to change, and our voice will be heard. So, let's leave the personal attacks, and if anyone feels obliged to respnd, perhaps it could be with only a few lines, e.g. "Thanks for your email. It contains false, unfair, and unjust statements to the extent that it is pointless to respond to it in a rightful manner." Hope that is helpful, and let's try to focus on the constructive discussion about the At Large. Veni Sent from Gmail for mobile On 2/16/08, Andres Piazza <andrespiazzagpj@hotmail.com> wrote:
Jeffrey, Darlene and all:
I was trying to stay out of this conversation but It´s impossible fot my at this time. When Darlene says: "have heard many a comment on this", I was making some comments about danny, but not for him being unpolite.
Mi point has nothing to do with politeness, gender, or nationality. There is something more important to discuss.
The main issue who bothers Darlene, me and many other members (recent as us or not) is the whole concept that Danny express. I don´t know him personally (I only had the chance to attend to 1 meeting) and I really don´t know anything about his contributions to Icann´s world. He must be a commited person, for sure.
But there are many aspects that he is really far away to understand. ICANN all and the Board specially gives importance to Internet Users Imput and Participation. He agrees with this, as an individual user and that´s the reason for being so commited with At Large.
But it´s impossible for him to get the principal matters about the way of participating. ICANN needs a particular sort of imput, the one provided by a particular kind of entities. It´s impossible for a billon of users worldwide to get involved in At Large. The ALS are kind of repressentatives of those individual users. There is a special profile of ORGANIZATIONS where the Board and ICANN bylaws are looking for the imput. These organizations are the ones who can be familiar to the ideas of Outreach, Capacity Building, etc. Not every individual user is capable of provide opinions, discuss and work with "group desition making" or "participate leadership".
Those are the reasons that justify the requirement of being an organization to be an ALS. ALS make (or should) a repressentative imput when they discuss in At Large. The opinions of every delegate are not his personal ideas, only, but also a result of an internal discussion. This is the first fase of Bottom Up Consensus.
Danny Younger may be a really qualified and commited user, but he can´t provide himself the class of imput that ICANN needs from internet users. Not even 100 of Danny´s would´n be able to provide that. Global representation, different points of views are also required. To get this kind of imput is also really hard to do.
Members of ALS are not (mostly) english speakers. For them (us) is harder to find out things in other language (even for those who are fluent), read tons of mails a day and catch up with the process, and answer quickly (for me, also, if I have to write this mail in spanish, I would ended faster).
Members of ALS not only have to write and post our personal opinions in every issue (as Danny does), but we also have to discuss, educate, agree with the other members of our organizations. This is not an easy way to create opinions. But, for me (and for ICANN´s community) that kind of results are more valuable.
Members of ALS are not (mostly) from North America. This means that it´s harder to understand the whole idea that repressents this space of participation, and specially to trust in it, and get commited with an organization which exists based in a MOU with US Government. Danny never is going to believe how hard is to explain an individual user that participating in ICANN is a way of making a better internet for everyone (registrars included), which is my opinion, if you have to destroy the pre-judgement (in many moments) that we probable are being a tool to benefit the imperial american interests.
When you have hundreds of reppresentatives, you have to build alliances, to trust, to argue, and to work together. One, ocasional, face to face meeting is really important for that.
I can still making points the whole night...
ALS´s imput is hard to get (Harder than Danny is able to imagine). All valuable things are. The Board and ICANN are aware of this fact and also know that is useful for them to get it.
The new concept of At Large, in a year of existence, has developed many changes. 100 "uneducated" ALS, 10 real representatives in ALAC and 1 new (brillant) liason attracted the Board´s attention as never before. A change is coming, ICANN community is waiting for it and thinks it´s worth to spend a little part of ICANNs budget (still an enormous amount) in it. But not everyone is capable enough to undestand this.
This is only the very beggening. Let´s make it happen.
Andres (from the undeveloped Argentina, the south-end of the globe)
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:24:22 -0800From: jwkckid1@ix.netcom.comTo: DThompson@GOV.NU.CACC: info@ipconstituency.org; alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org; aheineman@ntia.doc.govSubject: Re: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors relatedtotheproposed SummitDarlene and all, Although I can appriciate a womans point of view very well, using emotive terms towards any Man stating anyting in a harsh manner, which I am well known for myself, in no way diminishes and in fact emphisizes his, or in some instances HER, point. This was indeed my point in my earlier response, and remains so. Ergo you did make your response one of a more personal nature accordingly, where Danny did not, especially not in a sexist manner. I would prefer, and strongly request, that sexist remarks or overtones be left out of any expression on any ICANN related issue if you don't mind... I too have also strongly disagreed with Danny on a number of issues, and still do as do most of our members which are about an even split of women vs men, BTW. Certainly women have a different view towards most issues, which is both expected and not at all at least unusual. That is as it may or should be, depending. And again, polite expression is usually preferable, but is not always adaquate in expressing the strength and varasity of expression, which is why multipul means of expression exist in most languages and nationalities that I am aware of. So as to being harsh as contributing in a negitive way to any discussion on any issue is pure nonsense. And even worse than nonsense if felt or considered and than not expressed in such a manner! To conclude, I thought that Dannys expressed thoughts were spot on and properly expressed, this time. Maybe not next time? Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827 "Thompson, Darlene" wrote:
Jeffrey,
That statement was not aimed at Danny in any kind of a way personally but expresses the views of many in the rest of the world about NA's stance on many things. Don't see it as bashing Danny on a personal level but, in many ways, bashing the lot of us in NA.
Jeffrey, nothing else that I said was in any way bashing Danny but responding, point by point, to his comments. Yes, Danny's comments were "rather harshly put" and until Danny can learn to express his points in a more polite way, then he should expect to get bashed right back - althoug I made VERY certain not to do so as I refuse to lower myself in such a way any more.
Its amazing that, in person, Danny doesn't do this and seems to be a great guy to hang around. In e-mails, however, things seem to change. Perhaps its the medium that makes him think that his language is appropriate but it certainly discourages people from participating in other regions and actually adds to the problem. I have heard many a comment on this.
Thank you,
Darlene
From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Jeffrey A. Williams Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 8:01 PM To: At-Large Worldwide; aheineman@ntia.doc.gov Cc: IPC Subject: Re: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related totheproposed Summit Darlene and all, Pardon me, but I didn't read any ""North American white male"-centric standard'" expressed in Danny's earlier remarks. However I do detect a significant unqualified and seemingly unjustified determination of desiring improperly at you attempting to bash Danny on such a false basis... The North American as well as most of the EU nations mistrust of ICANN is well justified and ICANN has well earned that mistrust. Given the a few weeks ago Peter had sent the NTIA a letter desiring to be released for the DOC/NTIA's oversight would seem to indicate not only from a timing stand point, but from a growing/mounting mound of evidence that ICANN is in violation of a number of US federal statutes, and is likely to desire to seek refuge in any country to host ICANN in order to avoid future prosecution. Additionally as the IPC is loosing some of the public advantage it once enjoyed due mainly to one of it's members, namely the RIAA constant and misguided legal strategy to control the DNS and Domain name system amongst other areas of the Internet experience, it is obvious to even the casual observer that ICANN's board now populated with IPC centric members, is very concerned as to their creditability and future personal freedom or financial where with all... And the should be given the IPC's members errant activities! Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827 "Thompson, Darlene" wrote:
Danny,
1. I wasn't involved in this particular budget, although I will be for Cairo. I will have to get back to you on the budget calculations when I get back home which won't be for about a week and a half as I am presenting at another conference in Vancouver in the interim.
2. I hear ya but we cannot all judge the rest of the world by the usual "North American white male"-centric standard. I am hearing from other regions that just cannot get input from their ALSs. Why? Various reasons. Although, I look at myself, with all of the advantages in the world, and its taken 3 ICANN meetings and a year and a half for me to finally start putting everything together and in perspective and become up to speed on the issues. And I'm still not anywhere NEAR where you are but doing my best. Many others have not had the benefits of the meetings and discussions that I have had so I can only imagine how they are feeling. Especially when they see discussions like this happening on list. Can you imagine how discouraging that is?
3. The ALSs that MIGHT already have a clue in NA won't become an ALS because of mistrust of ICANN (imagine!) so we cannot even engage those ones. This needs to be cleared up and both you and I know the reasons behind this.
4. Of the five issues that you pointed out below, even *I* was only aware of one of them. Better lines of communication are REALLY necessary.
I really hope that my friends in other regions will respond to your e-mail as this is the last one that I will send on this topice but they are probably in the air right now. As I am still available and on-line I am acting as a stop-gap to try to answer your questions but am probably not the most experienced person in the world to do so.
Darlene
From: Danny Younger [mailto:dannyyounger@yahoo.com] Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 9:59 AM To: Thompson, Darlene; At-Large Worldwide Cc: vb@bertola.eu Subject: RE: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related to theproposed SummitDarlene, 1. As per the ICANN Policy VP "US$7,000 is the estimate ICANN uses for international travel and is based on business class purchased 45+ days in advance through ICANN's travel agents." -- see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04282.html If the At-Large intends to provide travel funding for each of the 100+ ALSs, then the budgeted amount will exceed $700,000 (by standard calculations). 2. I'm really getting tired of hearing this song and dance about the poor uneducated, unengaged non-contributing ALSs. Each one of them agreed upon signing up to a defined set of responsibilities (that most all have ignored) that boil down to this -- paying attention to what's going on, and reporting back with policy advice. Since the Los Angeles session we have seen the following developments: a. Network Solutions engaging in front-running (or, more properly, "domain reservation" activities). b. registrants at Belgiumdomains being unable to manage their accounts as their registrar has been locked-out of VeriSign by Court Order stemming from the Dell typosquatting lawsuit c. the CADNA submission/research on drop-catching issues d. the change put through by .travel management allowing for PPC speculation in dot travel, along with the .travel registry being put up for sale e. a board member (Rita Rodin), who functions as legal counsel for Telnic, engaged in active discussions on the .tel contractual amendments (a slight conflict of interest, wouldn't you think?). Yet the ALAC and the ALSs have had nothing to say about any of these issues... poor babies, they can't use a computer like the rest of us to keep current on issues -- they have to be led by the hand and "educated". Sorry, but this is a waste of money that will produce no beneficial results. Those that care make an effort to pay attention and manage to participate (as evinced by years of member participation in the GA that saw a subscriber list in excess of 1000 participants). None of them had to be spoon fed on the registrant's dime. --- "Thompson, Darlene" <DThompson@GOV.NU.CA> wrote:
Danny, > > #1 - See my e-mail to Vittorio wherein I correct the > amount. I know you got that amount from me in the > first place but we have worked really hard this week > to bring that down. > > #2 - Its rather hard for ALSs to finalize serious > documents on issues that actually concern the > community, perform analyses, make concrete > recommentations and such if they aren't adequately > engaged or educated on the issues at stake. This is > precisely what the Summit is geared to correct. > > Darlene > > ________________________________ > > From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf > of Danny Younger > Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 7:57 AM > To: 'At-Large Worldwide' > Cc: vb@bertola.eu > Subject: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of > Directors related to theproposed Summit > > > > Re: "Do I get it well?" > > Yes, Vittorio, you get it well. > > While other advisory bodies will be busy working, > finalizing serious documents on issues that actually > concern the community, performing analyses, making > concrete recommendations and such, the at-large will > be busy wasting a half million dollars of registrant > monies on a giant group hug. > > > > > >
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org <http://www.alac.icann.org/> > <http://www.alac.icann.org/> > ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org <http://www.icannalac.org/> > <http://www.icannalac.org/> > > >
____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org <http://www.alac.icann.org/> ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org <http://www.icannalac.org/> _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
-- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org <http://www.alac.icann.org/> ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org <http://www.icannalac.org/>
Veni and all my friends, I agree and have stated clearly such that personal attacks such as Darlene's, are not viable or consistent with good and/or productive discussion or debate. Thank you very much for acknowledging such. Thank you! >:) Danny's aggressiveness in word or phrase are like anyone else's, of good and productive intent and product result from time to time, and should in no way be considered such. Danny's valuable participation is well recognized even if from time to time there are those of us that may disagree, and even strongly so, with his ideas. However this is not unlike anyone else. Censorship in any of it's ugly forms Veni, is very wrong. I am sure you recognize such. So I hope, and would kindly request that suggesting directly or indirectly to censorship be discontinued. Working together requires inclusiveness, understanding, and temperance, rhetorical remarks or comments, not necessarily withstanding... Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827 Veni Markovski wrote:
Andreas, Darlene, (I've removed a number of recepients to that thread, who have nothing to do with the At-Large; it is a common feature of some people here to massively spam and cross-post their views. My understanding is that if someone is interested in the AL, they will subscribe for the list, and I should not force them to read it)
Danny has this way of expressing himself; I know him, and on at least one ocasion I've called to ask him why he woild attack personally; his explanation made sense then, but unfortunately he continues to be aggressive, which does not help the discussions on the list.
Here's my proposal: whenever someone here makes personal attacks, just ignore them. The moment we start responding, that generates lots of noise, where the substance is being lost. We can't change someone's behaviour, and if they are not polite, then fine.
I've been personally responding here ( ISOC - Bulgaria is represented on this list) when there have been personal attacks against people, but the truth is these attacks will never stop, and they are always by email. I don't remember seeing anyone being so negative at an ICANN meeting.
So, let's focus on the substance, and forget about the lack of proper manners. Also, being from a developing country, I share the view that the discussions are often "occupied" by the Americans and Westerners, and we don't have chances against this "westernization". However, the broader participation I see at the JPA mid-term review from countried like Russia (ccTLD), Bulgaria (government, users) and others make me believe this status quo starts to change, and our voice will be heard.
So, let's leave the personal attacks, and if anyone feels obliged to respnd, perhaps it could be with only a few lines, e.g. "Thanks for your email. It contains false, unfair, and unjust statements to the extent that it is pointless to respond to it in a rightful manner."
Hope that is helpful, and let's try to focus on the constructive discussion about the At Large.
Veni
Sent from Gmail for mobile
On 2/16/08, Andres Piazza <andrespiazzagpj@hotmail.com> wrote:
Jeffrey, Darlene and all:
I was trying to stay out of this conversation but It´s impossible fot my at this time. When Darlene says: "have heard many a comment on this", I was making some comments about danny, but not for him being unpolite.
Mi point has nothing to do with politeness, gender, or nationality. There is something more important to discuss.
The main issue who bothers Darlene, me and many other members (recent as us or not) is the whole concept that Danny express. I don´t know him personally (I only had the chance to attend to 1 meeting) and I really don´t know anything about his contributions to Icann´s world. He must be a commited person, for sure.
But there are many aspects that he is really far away to understand. ICANN all and the Board specially gives importance to Internet Users Imput and Participation. He agrees with this, as an individual user and that´s the reason for being so commited with At Large.
But it´s impossible for him to get the principal matters about the way of participating. ICANN needs a particular sort of imput, the one provided by a particular kind of entities. It´s impossible for a billon of users worldwide to get involved in At Large. The ALS are kind of repressentatives of those individual users. There is a special profile of ORGANIZATIONS where the Board and ICANN bylaws are looking for the imput. These organizations are the ones who can be familiar to the ideas of Outreach, Capacity Building, etc. Not every individual user is capable of provide opinions, discuss and work with "group desition making" or "participate leadership".
Those are the reasons that justify the requirement of being an organization to be an ALS. ALS make (or should) a repressentative imput when they discuss in At Large. The opinions of every delegate are not his personal ideas, only, but also a result of an internal discussion. This is the first fase of Bottom Up Consensus.
Danny Younger may be a really qualified and commited user, but he can´t provide himself the class of imput that ICANN needs from internet users. Not even 100 of Danny´s would´n be able to provide that. Global representation, different points of views are also required. To get this kind of imput is also really hard to do.
Members of ALS are not (mostly) english speakers. For them (us) is harder to find out things in other language (even for those who are fluent), read tons of mails a day and catch up with the process, and answer quickly (for me, also, if I have to write this mail in spanish, I would ended faster).
Members of ALS not only have to write and post our personal opinions in every issue (as Danny does), but we also have to discuss, educate, agree with the other members of our organizations. This is not an easy way to create opinions. But, for me (and for ICANN´s community) that kind of results are more valuable.
Members of ALS are not (mostly) from North America. This means that it´s harder to understand the whole idea that repressents this space of participation, and specially to trust in it, and get commited with an organization which exists based in a MOU with US Government. Danny never is going to believe how hard is to explain an individual user that participating in ICANN is a way of making a better internet for everyone (registrars included), which is my opinion, if you have to destroy the pre-judgement (in many moments) that we probable are being a tool to benefit the imperial american interests.
When you have hundreds of reppresentatives, you have to build alliances, to trust, to argue, and to work together. One, ocasional, face to face meeting is really important for that.
I can still making points the whole night...
ALS´s imput is hard to get (Harder than Danny is able to imagine). All valuable things are. The Board and ICANN are aware of this fact and also know that is useful for them to get it.
The new concept of At Large, in a year of existence, has developed many changes. 100 "uneducated" ALS, 10 real representatives in ALAC and 1 new (brillant) liason attracted the Board´s attention as never before. A change is coming, ICANN community is waiting for it and thinks it´s worth to spend a little part of ICANNs budget (still an enormous amount) in it. But not everyone is capable enough to undestand this.
This is only the very beggening. Let´s make it happen.
Andres (from the undeveloped Argentina, the south-end of the globe)
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:24:22 -0800From: jwkckid1@ix.netcom.comTo: DThompson@GOV.NU.CACC: info@ipconstituency.org; alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org; aheineman@ntia.doc.govSubject: Re: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors relatedtotheproposed SummitDarlene and all, Although I can appriciate a womans point of view very well, using emotive terms towards any Man stating anyting in a harsh manner, which I am well known for myself, in no way diminishes and in fact emphisizes his, or in some instances HER, point. This was indeed my point in my earlier response, and remains so. Ergo you did make your response one of a more personal nature accordingly, where Danny did not, especially not in a sexist manner. I would prefer, and strongly request, that sexist remarks or overtones be left out of any expression on any ICANN related issue if you don't mind... I too have also strongly disagreed with Danny on a number of issues, and still do as do most of our members which are about an even split of women vs men, BTW. Certainly women have a different view towards most issues, which is both expected and not at all at least unusual. That is as it may or should be, depending. And again, polite expression is usually preferable, but is not always adaquate in expressing the strength and varasity of expression, which is why multipul means of expression exist in most languages and nationalities that I am aware of. So as to being harsh as contributing in a negitive way to any discussion on any issue is pure nonsense. And even worse than nonsense if felt or considered and than not expressed in such a manner! To conclude, I thought that Dannys expressed thoughts were spot on and properly expressed, this time. Maybe not next time? Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827 "Thompson, Darlene" wrote:
Jeffrey,
That statement was not aimed at Danny in any kind of a way personally but expresses the views of many in the rest of the world about NA's stance on many things. Don't see it as bashing Danny on a personal level but, in many ways, bashing the lot of us in NA.
Jeffrey, nothing else that I said was in any way bashing Danny but responding, point by point, to his comments. Yes, Danny's comments were "rather harshly put" and until Danny can learn to express his points in a more polite way, then he should expect to get bashed right back - althoug I made VERY certain not to do so as I refuse to lower myself in such a way any more.
Its amazing that, in person, Danny doesn't do this and seems to be a great guy to hang around. In e-mails, however, things seem to change. Perhaps its the medium that makes him think that his language is appropriate but it certainly discourages people from participating in other regions and actually adds to the problem. I have heard many a comment on this.
Thank you,
Darlene
From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Jeffrey A. Williams Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 8:01 PM To: At-Large Worldwide; aheineman@ntia.doc.gov Cc: IPC Subject: Re: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related totheproposed Summit Darlene and all, Pardon me, but I didn't read any ""North American white male"-centric standard'" expressed in Danny's earlier remarks. However I do detect a significant unqualified and seemingly unjustified determination of desiring improperly at you attempting to bash Danny on such a false basis... The North American as well as most of the EU nations mistrust of ICANN is well justified and ICANN has well earned that mistrust. Given the a few weeks ago Peter had sent the NTIA a letter desiring to be released for the DOC/NTIA's oversight would seem to indicate not only from a timing stand point, but from a growing/mounting mound of evidence that ICANN is in violation of a number of US federal statutes, and is likely to desire to seek refuge in any country to host ICANN in order to avoid future prosecution. Additionally as the IPC is loosing some of the public advantage it once enjoyed due mainly to one of it's members, namely the RIAA constant and misguided legal strategy to control the DNS and Domain name system amongst other areas of the Internet experience, it is obvious to even the casual observer that ICANN's board now populated with IPC centric members, is very concerned as to their creditability and future personal freedom or financial where with all... And the should be given the IPC's members errant activities! Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827 "Thompson, Darlene" wrote:
Danny,
1. I wasn't involved in this particular budget, although I will be for Cairo. I will have to get back to you on the budget calculations when I get back home which won't be for about a week and a half as I am presenting at another conference in Vancouver in the interim.
2. I hear ya but we cannot all judge the rest of the world by the usual "North American white male"-centric standard. I am hearing from other regions that just cannot get input from their ALSs. Why? Various reasons. Although, I look at myself, with all of the advantages in the world, and its taken 3 ICANN meetings and a year and a half for me to finally start putting everything together and in perspective and become up to speed on the issues. And I'm still not anywhere NEAR where you are but doing my best. Many others have not had the benefits of the meetings and discussions that I have had so I can only imagine how they are feeling. Especially when they see discussions like this happening on list. Can you imagine how discouraging that is?
3. The ALSs that MIGHT already have a clue in NA won't become an ALS because of mistrust of ICANN (imagine!) so we cannot even engage those ones. This needs to be cleared up and both you and I know the reasons behind this.
4. Of the five issues that you pointed out below, even *I* was only aware of one of them. Better lines of communication are REALLY necessary.
I really hope that my friends in other regions will respond to your e-mail as this is the last one that I will send on this topice but they are probably in the air right now. As I am still available and on-line I am acting as a stop-gap to try to answer your questions but am probably not the most experienced person in the world to do so.
Darlene
From: Danny Younger [mailto:dannyyounger@yahoo.com] Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 9:59 AM To: Thompson, Darlene; At-Large Worldwide Cc: vb@bertola.eu Subject: RE: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related to theproposed SummitDarlene, 1. As per the ICANN Policy VP "US$7,000 is the estimate ICANN uses for international travel and is based on business class purchased 45+ days in advance through ICANN's travel agents." -- see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04282.html If the At-Large intends to provide travel funding for each of the 100+ ALSs, then the budgeted amount will exceed $700,000 (by standard calculations). 2. I'm really getting tired of hearing this song and dance about the poor uneducated, unengaged non-contributing ALSs. Each one of them agreed upon signing up to a defined set of responsibilities (that most all have ignored) that boil down to this -- paying attention to what's going on, and reporting back with policy advice. Since the Los Angeles session we have seen the following developments: a. Network Solutions engaging in front-running (or, more properly, "domain reservation" activities). b. registrants at Belgiumdomains being unable to manage their accounts as their registrar has been locked-out of VeriSign by Court Order stemming from the Dell typosquatting lawsuit c. the CADNA submission/research on drop-catching issues d. the change put through by .travel management allowing for PPC speculation in dot travel, along with the .travel registry being put up for sale e. a board member (Rita Rodin), who functions as legal counsel for Telnic, engaged in active discussions on the .tel contractual amendments (a slight conflict of interest, wouldn't you think?). Yet the ALAC and the ALSs have had nothing to say about any of these issues... poor babies, they can't use a computer like the rest of us to keep current on issues -- they have to be led by the hand and "educated". Sorry, but this is a waste of money that will produce no beneficial results. Those that care make an effort to pay attention and manage to participate (as evinced by years of member participation in the GA that saw a subscriber list in excess of 1000 participants). None of them had to be spoon fed on the registrant's dime. --- "Thompson, Darlene" <DThompson@GOV.NU.CA> wrote:
Danny, > > #1 - See my e-mail to Vittorio wherein I correct the > amount. I know you got that amount from me in the > first place but we have worked really hard this week > to bring that down. > > #2 - Its rather hard for ALSs to finalize serious > documents on issues that actually concern the > community, perform analyses, make concrete > recommentations and such if they aren't adequately > engaged or educated on the issues at stake. This is > precisely what the Summit is geared to correct. > > Darlene > > ________________________________ > > From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf > of Danny Younger > Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 7:57 AM > To: 'At-Large Worldwide' > Cc: vb@bertola.eu > Subject: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of > Directors related to theproposed Summit > > > > Re: "Do I get it well?" > > Yes, Vittorio, you get it well. > > While other advisory bodies will be busy working, > finalizing serious documents on issues that actually > concern the community, performing analyses, making > concrete recommendations and such, the at-large will > be busy wasting a half million dollars of registrant > monies on a giant group hug. > > > > > >
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org > <http://www.alac.icann.org/> > ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org > <http://www.icannalac.org/> > > >
____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
-- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
The ALAC travel support has been always with economy class, not business class unless there were special reasosn approved. Previously, only NomCom appointed members were flying with business class, but that was a long time ago, before any ALSs were given travel support. Here are ALAC travel policy in several languages now. https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?policies_and_procedures The one quoted was for general ICANN travel policy like for the Board, but not applied to ALAC and ALSes. I have asked for the economy ticket with upgradable price this time and used my miles to upgrade so this time. Last time even ICANN paid for the upgraded price (a few hundred dollars higher), I could not get upgrade seats until I paid the difference for LA meeting's return flight. Many of our colleagues are spending long hours in the packed coach seats. I agree that the travel cost be minimal, but I hope the debate be based on proven facts. izumi 2008/2/15, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@yahoo.com>:
Darlene,
1. As per the ICANN Policy VP "US$7,000 is the estimate ICANN uses for international travel and is based on business class purchased 45+ days in advance through ICANN's travel agents." -- see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04282.html
If the At-Large intends to provide travel funding for each of the 100+ ALSs, then the budgeted amount will exceed $700,000 (by standard calculations).
Danny and all, Nearly a complete list, but I believe you left out at least one significant event/issue that remains unresolved, that being the remaining Ex-RegistryFly registrants whom have not been compensated for loss of their Domain's sense GoDaddy has "Taken over". Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827 Danny Younger wrote:
Darlene,
1. As per the ICANN Policy VP "US$7,000 is the estimate ICANN uses for international travel and is based on business class purchased 45+ days in advance through ICANN's travel agents." -- see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04282.html
If the At-Large intends to provide travel funding for each of the 100+ ALSs, then the budgeted amount will exceed $700,000 (by standard calculations).
2. I'm really getting tired of hearing this song and dance about the poor uneducated, unengaged non-contributing ALSs. Each one of them agreed upon signing up to a defined set of responsibilities (that most all have ignored) that boil down to this -- paying attention to what's going on, and reporting back with policy advice.
Since the Los Angeles session we have seen the following developments:
a. Network Solutions engaging in front-running (or, more properly, "domain reservation" activities). b. registrants at Belgiumdomains being unable to manage their accounts as their registrar has been locked-out of VeriSign by Court Order stemming from the Dell typosquatting lawsuit c. the CADNA submission/research on drop-catching issues d. the change put through by .travel management allowing for PPC speculation in dot travel, along with the .travel registry being put up for sale e. a board member (Rita Rodin), who functions as legal counsel for Telnic, engaged in active discussions on the .tel contractual amendments (a slight conflict of interest, wouldn't you think?).
Yet the ALAC and the ALSs have had nothing to say about any of these issues... poor babies, they can't use a computer like the rest of us to keep current on issues -- they have to be led by the hand and "educated".
Sorry, but this is a waste of money that will produce no beneficial results. Those that care make an effort to pay attention and manage to participate (as evinced by years of member participation in the GA that saw a subscriber list in excess of 1000 participants). None of them had to be spoon fed on the registrant's dime.
--- "Thompson, Darlene" <DThompson@GOV.NU.CA> wrote:
Danny,
#1 - See my e-mail to Vittorio wherein I correct the amount. I know you got that amount from me in the first place but we have worked really hard this week to bring that down.
#2 - Its rather hard for ALSs to finalize serious documents on issues that actually concern the community, perform analyses, make concrete recommentations and such if they aren't adequately engaged or educated on the issues at stake. This is precisely what the Summit is geared to correct.
Darlene
________________________________
From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Danny Younger Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 7:57 AM To: 'At-Large Worldwide' Cc: vb@bertola.eu Subject: [At-Large] Resolution of the Board of Directors related to theproposed Summit
Re: "Do I get it well?"
Yes, Vittorio, you get it well.
While other advisory bodies will be busy working, finalizing serious documents on issues that actually concern the community, performing analyses, making concrete recommendations and such, the at-large will be busy wasting a half million dollars of registrant monies on a giant group hug.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org <http://www.alac.icann.org/> ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org <http://www.icannalac.org/>
____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
Danny and all, Interesting way of expressing it to be sure, but relitively accurate none the less... Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827 Danny Younger wrote:
Re: "Do I get it well?"
Yes, Vittorio, you get it well.
While other advisory bodies will be busy working, finalizing serious documents on issues that actually concern the community, performing analyses, making concrete recommendations and such, the at-large will be busy wasting a half million dollars of registrant monies on a giant group hug.
____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
Jeffrey A. Williams wrote:
Interesting way of expressing it to be sure, but relitively accurate none the less..
Not at all. ALAC is not NCUC-lite. It is not a haven for policy wonks who spend their waking hours reading obtuse legal verbiage. Indeed, many of the current ALSs do not have ICANN issues -- or even Internet governance -- as primary areas of focus. This is as is should be, as the public at large does not have such issues at the top of its priority lists either. Folks like Danny -- and other NCUC members -- have the time, the initiative, and the policy-specific analytic skill to pore through it all, and produce policy opinions whether ICANN asks for them or not. At-Large is not so fortunate -- its ALSs generally have none of those traits in substantial quantity, which is what IMO distinguishes us from NCUC. So why are we here? Generally, because we were invited -- sometimes nearly begged -- to become involved, indeed BECAUSE of our lack of primary focus on Internet issues. In this regard I think of At-Large as a massive focus group, and as such the tactics of extracting of useful policy advice are far different than they are for other constituencies which generally are already defined by the nature of their self-interested motivation. The Summit is an attempt at this different set of tactics, of multi-directional education in which the "advisors" have as much to learn as they have to teach. Danny may be surprised to learn that many ALSs indeed have policy priorities; the fact that they're not the same as his priorities, or that they're not expressed as well as he can express them, or that there's a diversity of views, is not a reason to belittle their need for more active support. Garbage in, garbage out, and all that. We're lucky to have Danny in NARALO because he offers a good historical perspective and has a sharp eye in this field. Almost by definition, the ALSs being brought in -- with the possible exception of Internet Society branches -- don't have that, so it's reasonable to request help so that we have have enough grounding to give ICANN the "public" feedback it wants. It's simply unfair to complain that the Summit, as a policy-making tool, is unnecessary simply because not every ALS has its own Danny. If ICANN really wants At-Large to offer even a taste of real public sentiment, that just won't happen, and the Summit is justifiable. - Evan
Evan and all my friends, well I've been around ICANN allot longer than Danny, yet I still realize that Danny is very well diversified and can be very knowledgeable and perceptive on a number of policy issues. Legal verbiage and sifting through it is a necessary activity if one is to learn, and than be able to formulate with some reasonable conviction and competency, social or technical issues in respect to ICANN and users. Users can and do, as our members do whom are all users, do frequently and garner a very good understanding in what they are reading well enough to not need teaching, and can formulate their own opinions collectively or individually as to what is, or can be a good policy direction and/or decision. So with all due respect and candor, I cannot agree with some of your sentiment expressed below in response to my earlier post on this thread. A wise past president of the United states once uttered, "there is no one smarter than the average man". Harry Truman. He was than, and is now quite right. and he is often quoted by present day leaders on all sides of the political spectrum... Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827 Evan Leibovitch wrote:
Jeffrey A. Williams wrote:
Interesting way of expressing it to be sure, but relitively accurate none the less..
Not at all.
ALAC is not NCUC-lite. It is not a haven for policy wonks who spend their waking hours reading obtuse legal verbiage. Indeed, many of the current ALSs do not have ICANN issues -- or even Internet governance -- as primary areas of focus. This is as is should be, as the public at large does not have such issues at the top of its priority lists either.
Folks like Danny -- and other NCUC members -- have the time, the initiative, and the policy-specific analytic skill to pore through it all, and produce policy opinions whether ICANN asks for them or not. At-Large is not so fortunate -- its ALSs generally have none of those traits in substantial quantity, which is what IMO distinguishes us from NCUC.
So why are we here? Generally, because we were invited -- sometimes nearly begged -- to become involved, indeed BECAUSE of our lack of primary focus on Internet issues. In this regard I think of At-Large as a massive focus group, and as such the tactics of extracting of useful policy advice are far different than they are for other constituencies which generally are already defined by the nature of their self-interested motivation.
The Summit is an attempt at this different set of tactics, of multi-directional education in which the "advisors" have as much to learn as they have to teach. Danny may be surprised to learn that many ALSs indeed have policy priorities; the fact that they're not the same as his priorities, or that they're not expressed as well as he can express them, or that there's a diversity of views, is not a reason to belittle their need for more active support. Garbage in, garbage out, and all that.
We're lucky to have Danny in NARALO because he offers a good historical perspective and has a sharp eye in this field. Almost by definition, the ALSs being brought in -- with the possible exception of Internet Society branches -- don't have that, so it's reasonable to request help so that we have have enough grounding to give ICANN the "public" feedback it wants. It's simply unfair to complain that the Summit, as a policy-making tool, is unnecessary simply because not every ALS has its own Danny. If ICANN really wants At-Large to offer even a taste of real public sentiment, that just won't happen, and the Summit is justifiable.
- Evan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
participants (8)
-
Andres Piazza -
Danny Younger -
Evan Leibovitch -
Izumi AIZU -
Jeffrey A. Williams -
JFC Morfin -
Thompson, Darlene -
Veni Markovski