FW: Action Wanted: GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report - Published for Public CommentAct
Dear Colleagues, Annebeth Lange, our co-chair on Work Track 5 (GNSO PDP SubPro), has informed us that the draft Final Report of the GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures working group has been published for public comment at: <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-r...> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-r... The draft report includes without modification the Final Report produced by Work Track 5. Annebeth urged everyone to pay special attention to: - Topic 21 Reserved Names (see footnote 120), page 92/93 under letter c) on reservation of two-character letter-number combination at the top-level. Public Comment for Geographic Names is included in Topic 21, under 21.1, referring to Annex I, which contains the Final Report of Work Track 5. <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20191102/ab9a...> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20191102/ab9a... It will strengthen the recommendations of Work Track 5 if supporting those under 21.1, question 117. - Topic 24 – String Similarity Evaluations and Topic 25 IDNs, Topic 32 Limited Challenge/ Appeal Mechanisms (see page 156 for referral to Annex I) Public comment period is open until 30 September. I would like to ask your thoughts: should we prepare and submit a Council statement? If yes, who would volunteer to prepare the first draft? Thank you! Kind regards, ]{atrina
Dear Katrina, Thank you very much for bringing this to our attention. Those sections are extremely important. Best regards, This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:21 AM Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
Annebeth Lange, our co-chair on Work Track 5 (GNSO PDP SubPro), has informed us that the draft Final Report of the GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures working group has been published for public comment at:
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-r...
The draft report includes without modification the Final Report produced by Work Track 5. Annebeth urged everyone to pay special attention to:
- Topic 21 Reserved Names (see footnote 120), page 92/93 under letter c) on reservation of two-character letter-number combination at the top-level. Public Comment for Geographic Names is included in Topic 21, under 21.1, referring to Annex I, which contains the Final Report of Work Track 5.
https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20191102/ab9a...
It will strengthen the recommendations of Work Track 5 if supporting those under 21.1, question 117.
- Topic 24 – String Similarity Evaluations and Topic 25 IDNs, Topic 32 Limited Challenge/ Appeal Mechanisms (see page 156 for referral to Annex I)
Public comment period is open until 30 September. I would like to ask your thoughts: should we prepare and submit a Council statement? If yes, who would volunteer to prepare the first draft?
Thank you!
Kind regards,
]{atrina
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Dear Colleagues, I haven’t heard back from you – so, we do not respond at all, do we? Kind regards, ]{atrina From: Ccnso-council [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2020 6:21 PM To: 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] FW: Action Wanted: GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report - Published for Public CommentAct Dear Colleagues, Annebeth Lange, our co-chair on Work Track 5 (GNSO PDP SubPro), has informed us that the draft Final Report of the GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures working group has been published for public comment at: <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-r...> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-r... The draft report includes without modification the Final Report produced by Work Track 5. Annebeth urged everyone to pay special attention to: - Topic 21 Reserved Names (see footnote 120), page 92/93 under letter c) on reservation of two-character letter-number combination at the top-level. Public Comment for Geographic Names is included in Topic 21, under 21.1, referring to Annex I, which contains the Final Report of Work Track 5. <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20191102/ab9a...> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20191102/ab9a... It will strengthen the recommendations of Work Track 5 if supporting those under 21.1, question 117. - Topic 24 – String Similarity Evaluations and Topic 25 IDNs, Topic 32 Limited Challenge/ Appeal Mechanisms (see page 156 for referral to Annex I) Public comment period is open until 30 September. I would like to ask your thoughts: should we prepare and submit a Council statement? If yes, who would volunteer to prepare the first draft? Thank you! Kind regards, ]{atrina
Hi Katrina, It would be very helpful if the ccNSO responded to this call for comments. The current draft is in line with what ccTLDs have been advocating (through our representatives in this WT5) and it is important that the ccNSO confirms this. While it looks daunting, there are only two relevant questions for us: completing it is basically ticking two ‘support output as written’ boxes in a 46 page form. Even if one might doubt the relevance of this additional round of comments, there is no downside to responding. Peter Van: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> Namens Katrina Sataki Verzonden: maandag 21 september 2020 10:14 Aan: 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org> Onderwerp: [ccnso-council] FW: FW: Action Wanted: GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report - Published for Public CommentAct Dear Colleagues, I haven’t heard back from you – so, we do not respond at all, do we? Kind regards, ]{atrina From: Ccnso-council [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2020 6:21 PM To: 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Subject: [ccnso-council] FW: Action Wanted: GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report - Published for Public CommentAct Dear Colleagues, Annebeth Lange, our co-chair on Work Track 5 (GNSO PDP SubPro), has informed us that the draft Final Report of the GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures working group has been published for public comment at: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-r... The draft report includes without modification the Final Report produced by Work Track 5. Annebeth urged everyone to pay special attention to: * Topic 21 Reserved Names (see footnote 120), page 92/93 under letter c) on reservation of two-character letter-number combination at the top-level. Public Comment for Geographic Names is included in Topic 21, under 21.1, referring to Annex I, which contains the Final Report of Work Track 5. https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20191102/ab9a... It will strengthen the recommendations of Work Track 5 if supporting those under 21.1, question 117. * Topic 24 – String Similarity Evaluations and Topic 25 IDNs, Topic 32 Limited Challenge/ Appeal Mechanisms (see page 156 for referral to Annex I) Public comment period is open until 30 September. I would like to ask your thoughts: should we prepare and submit a Council statement? If yes, who would volunteer to prepare the first draft? Thank you! Kind regards, ]{atrina
Hi Katrina, I believe the ccNSO should comment on the string similarity element of that monumental report. Topic 24 is a serious failure of ICANN.org. We – the ccNSO community – has highlighted the inconsistencies in the assessment process of confusing similarity at: 1) ccTLD, 2)IDN ccTLD and 3) gTLD on numerous occasions. ICANN.org should have coordinated the process in a much more structured. We, the ccNSO Council, tried to suggest a common work/approach to fix this aspect. To say that we were simply ignored is an understatement. Best, Giovanni [cid:image002.jpg@01D69005.69004570]<http://www.eurid.eu/>Giovanni Seppia / External Relations Manager EURid vzw Telecomlaan 9, 1831 Diegem, Belgium T: +32 2 401 27 50 | M: +39 335 8141733 www.eurid.eu<http://www.eurid.eu/> RPR Brussel – VAT BE 0864.240.405 [cid:image003.jpg@01D4F6BF.C28BB830]<https://twitter.com/EUregistry> [cid:image004.jpg@01D4F6BF.C28BB830] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/eurid/> [cid:image005.jpg@01D4F6BF.C28BB830] <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki Sent: 21 September 2020 10:14 To: 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] FW: FW: Action Wanted: GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report - Published for Public CommentAct Dear Colleagues, I haven’t heard back from you – so, we do not respond at all, do we? Kind regards, ]{atrina From: Ccnso-council [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2020 6:21 PM To: 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Subject: [ccnso-council] FW: Action Wanted: GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report - Published for Public CommentAct Dear Colleagues, Annebeth Lange, our co-chair on Work Track 5 (GNSO PDP SubPro), has informed us that the draft Final Report of the GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures working group has been published for public comment at: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-r... The draft report includes without modification the Final Report produced by Work Track 5. Annebeth urged everyone to pay special attention to: - Topic 21 Reserved Names (see footnote 120), page 92/93 under letter c) on reservation of two-character letter-number combination at the top-level. Public Comment for Geographic Names is included in Topic 21, under 21.1, referring to Annex I, which contains the Final Report of Work Track 5. https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20191102/ab9a... It will strengthen the recommendations of Work Track 5 if supporting those under 21.1, question 117. - Topic 24 – String Similarity Evaluations and Topic 25 IDNs, Topic 32 Limited Challenge/ Appeal Mechanisms (see page 156 for referral to Annex I) Public comment period is open until 30 September. I would like to ask your thoughts: should we prepare and submit a Council statement? If yes, who would volunteer to prepare the first draft? Thank you! Kind regards, ]{atrina Disclaimer: This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EURid. Any processing of personal data via email is done in accordance with our Privacy Policy. While all care has been taken to avoid any known viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for presence of viruses. http://www.eurid.eu/en/legal-disclaimer https://eurid.eu/en/other-infomation/privacy-policy
Hi Katrina The continued reservation of the two letters for ccTLDs clearly needs to be publicly supported, and similarly the alpha-3 codes corresponding to the 3166 list (this was a big fight and we should be thankful they continue to be reserved, even if you would be a fan of a .GIN new gTLD!) I am happy to do a first draft on the geo names, if that would be helpful? Best wishes Nick From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 9:14 AM To: 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] FW: FW: Action Wanted: GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report - Published for Public CommentAct Dear Colleagues, I haven’t heard back from you – so, we do not respond at all, do we? Kind regards, ]{atrina From: Ccnso-council [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2020 6:21 PM To: 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Subject: [ccnso-council] FW: Action Wanted: GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report - Published for Public CommentAct Dear Colleagues, Annebeth Lange, our co-chair on Work Track 5 (GNSO PDP SubPro), has informed us that the draft Final Report of the GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures working group has been published for public comment at: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-r... The draft report includes without modification the Final Report produced by Work Track 5. Annebeth urged everyone to pay special attention to: * Topic 21 Reserved Names (see footnote 120), page 92/93 under letter c) on reservation of two-character letter-number combination at the top-level. Public Comment for Geographic Names is included in Topic 21, under 21.1, referring to Annex I, which contains the Final Report of Work Track 5. https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20191102/ab9a... It will strengthen the recommendations of Work Track 5 if supporting those under 21.1, question 117. * Topic 24 – String Similarity Evaluations and Topic 25 IDNs, Topic 32 Limited Challenge/ Appeal Mechanisms (see page 156 for referral to Annex I) Public comment period is open until 30 September. I would like to ask your thoughts: should we prepare and submit a Council statement? If yes, who would volunteer to prepare the first draft? Thank you! Kind regards, ]{atrina
Hi All! Thanks a lot for ideas! Yes, Nick, please prepare a first draft! Thank you, ]{atrina From: Nick Wenban-Smith [mailto:Nick.Wenban-Smith@nominet.uk] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 2:00 PM To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>; 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] FW: FW: Action Wanted: GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report - Published for Public CommentAct Hi Katrina The continued reservation of the two letters for ccTLDs clearly needs to be publicly supported, and similarly the alpha-3 codes corresponding to the 3166 list (this was a big fight and we should be thankful they continue to be reserved, even if you would be a fan of a .GIN new gTLD!) I am happy to do a first draft on the geo names, if that would be helpful? Best wishes Nick From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> > On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 9:14 AM To: 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org> > Subject: [ccnso-council] FW: FW: Action Wanted: GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report - Published for Public CommentAct Dear Colleagues, I haven’t heard back from you – so, we do not respond at all, do we? Kind regards, ]{atrina From: Ccnso-council [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2020 6:21 PM To: 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org> > Subject: [ccnso-council] FW: Action Wanted: GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report - Published for Public CommentAct Dear Colleagues, Annebeth Lange, our co-chair on Work Track 5 (GNSO PDP SubPro), has informed us that the draft Final Report of the GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures working group has been published for public comment at: <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-r...> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-r... The draft report includes without modification the Final Report produced by Work Track 5. Annebeth urged everyone to pay special attention to: - Topic 21 Reserved Names (see footnote 120), page 92/93 under letter c) on reservation of two-character letter-number combination at the top-level. Public Comment for Geographic Names is included in Topic 21, under 21.1, referring to Annex I, which contains the Final Report of Work Track 5. <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20191102/ab9a...> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20191102/ab9a... It will strengthen the recommendations of Work Track 5 if supporting those under 21.1, question 117. - Topic 24 – String Similarity Evaluations and Topic 25 IDNs, Topic 32 Limited Challenge/ Appeal Mechanisms (see page 156 for referral to Annex I) Public comment period is open until 30 September. I would like to ask your thoughts: should we prepare and submit a Council statement? If yes, who would volunteer to prepare the first draft? Thank you! Kind regards, ]{atrina
Fully agree with Nick's comments below... (also with Giovanni's points) best demi On 21/09/2020 07:59, Nick Wenban-Smith wrote:
Hi Katrina
The continued reservation of the two letters for ccTLDs clearly needs to be publicly supported, and similarly the alpha-3 codes corresponding to the 3166 list (this was a big fight and we should be thankful they continue to be reserved, even if you would be a fan of a .GIN new gTLD!)
I am happy to do a first draft on the geo names, if that would be helpful?
Best wishes
Nick
*From:*Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Katrina Sataki *Sent:* Monday, September 21, 2020 9:14 AM *To:* 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org> *Subject:* [ccnso-council] FW: FW: Action Wanted: GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report - Published for Public CommentAct
Dear Colleagues,
I haven’t heard back from you – so, we do not respond at all, do we?
Kind regards,
]{atrina
*From:*Ccnso-council [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Katrina Sataki *Sent:* Thursday, September 03, 2020 6:21 PM *To:* 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> *Subject:* [ccnso-council] FW: Action Wanted: GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report - Published for Public CommentAct
Dear Colleagues,
Annebeth Lange, our co-chair on Work Track 5 (GNSO PDP SubPro), has informed us that the draft Final Report of the GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures working group has been published for public comment at:
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-r...
The draft report includes without modification the Final Report produced by Work Track 5. Annebeth urged everyone to pay special attention to:
* Topic 21 Reserved Names (see footnote 120), page 92/93 under letter c) on reservation of two-character letter-number combination at the top-level. Public Comment for Geographic Names is included in Topic 21, under 21.1, referring to Annex I, which contains the Final Report of Work Track 5.
https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20191102/ab9a...
It will strengthen the recommendations of Work Track 5 if supporting those under 21.1, question 117.
* Topic 24 – String Similarity Evaluations and Topic 25 IDNs, Topic 32 Limitetwo letterd Challenge/ Appeal Mechanisms (see page 156 for referral to Annex I)
Public comment period is open until 30 September. I would like to ask your thoughts: should we prepare and submit a Council statement? If yes, who would volunteer to prepare the first draft?
Thank you!
Kind regards,
]{atrina
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Katrina, Apologies for the delayed response. It is imperative that the ccNSO responds to the gNSO report. I concur with Givanni's comments and thank Nick for volunteering to draft a response. Best regards, This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 4:14 AM Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
I haven’t heard back from you – so, we do not respond at all, do we?
Kind regards,
]{atrina
*From:* Ccnso-council [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Katrina Sataki *Sent:* Thursday, September 03, 2020 6:21 PM *To:* 'ccnso-council' <ccnso-council@icann.org> *Subject:* [ccnso-council] FW: Action Wanted: GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report - Published for Public CommentAct
Dear Colleagues,
Annebeth Lange, our co-chair on Work Track 5 (GNSO PDP SubPro), has informed us that the draft Final Report of the GNSO New gTLD Subsequent Procedures working group has been published for public comment at:
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-draft-final-r...
The draft report includes without modification the Final Report produced by Work Track 5. Annebeth urged everyone to pay special attention to:
- Topic 21 Reserved Names (see footnote 120), page 92/93 under letter c) on reservation of two-character letter-number combination at the top-level. Public Comment for Geographic Names is included in Topic 21, under 21.1, referring to Annex I, which contains the Final Report of Work Track 5.
https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20191102/ab9a...
It will strengthen the recommendations of Work Track 5 if supporting those under 21.1, question 117.
- Topic 24 – String Similarity Evaluations and Topic 25 IDNs, Topic 32 Limited Challenge/ Appeal Mechanisms (see page 156 for referral to Annex I)
Public comment period is open until 30 September. I would like to ask your thoughts: should we prepare and submit a Council statement? If yes, who would volunteer to prepare the first draft?
Thank you!
Kind regards,
]{atrina
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (6)
-
Demi Getschko -
Giovanni Seppia -
Katrina Sataki -
Nick Wenban-Smith -
Pablo Rodriguez -
Peter Van Roste