Dear Bart, all, I agree with Giovanni's amendment. On top of that, I have 3 comments. (1) first sentence of section 3 : Is "The Review Team should not to propose solutions ..." a correct English? Shouldn't it be "should not be to propose" or "should not propose"? (2) section 4 begins with section 4.2, not with 4.1 (3) The terms 'WG' (Working Group) and 'Team' (as in PRT), both are used many times, confuse me. Do they refer to the same entity? Or 'WG' means the evolved form of PRT? If they are the same, how about changing the term 'WG' to 'PRT' or 'Team'? If they are different, I think the term 'WG' should be defined. Hiro On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:32:13 +0000 Giovanni Seppia <Giovanni.Seppia@eurid.eu> wrote:

Hi Bart,

Thanks for it.

I just corrected few typos.

I am fine with the rest.

Best,

Giovanni

[cid:image002.jpg@01D4F6C5.0D319350]<http://www.eurid.eu/>Giovanni Seppia / External Relations Manager

Phone: +32 (0)2 401 27 50 Mobile: +39 335 8141733 Website: www.eurid.eu<http://www.eurid.eu> Address: Woluwelaan 150 - 1831 Diegem - Belgium

[cid:image007.jpg@01D45651.A8F4EB30]<https://twitter.com/EUregistry> [cid:image008.jpg@01D45651.A8F4EB30] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/eurid/> [cid:image009.jpg@01D45651.A8F4EB30] <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry>

From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel Sent: Friday, 19 April 2019 11:13 To: ccnso-council@icann.org Subject: [ccnso-council] Decision needed: Approval Terms of Reference

Dear all, As proposed on the 18 April 2019 Council call included for adoption the Terms of Reference for the Review Team, which is to conduct a Preliminary review of the IDN ccTLD recommended policy. Please note that after re-reading the text section 5.2 sub 1 has been slightly changed: it now reads Conduct a review of the relevant documentation referenced in Section 6 of these Terms of Reference, and other material considered relevant by the PRT. The marked text has been added to ensure that the Review team can take all documentation it deems relevant into account.

Please let us know your vote, in particular whether you object or abstain from taken a decision by 26 April 2019, 17.00 UTC.

Thank you, and kind regards, Bart Boswinkel

Disclaimer: This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EURid. Any processing of personal data via email is done in accordance with our Privacy Policy. While all care has been taken to avoid any known viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for presence of viruses. http://www.eurid.eu/en/legal-disclaimer https://eurid.eu/en/other-infomation/privacy-policy

Dear Hiro, Thank you very much for your comments! I have updated Giovanni's version to include your suggestions. The updated version is included. Kind regards, Bart On 23/04/2019, 05:41, "hotta@jprs.co.jp on behalf of HiroHOTTA" <hotta@jprs.co.jp> wrote: Dear Bart, all, Here goes my fourth comment. (4) In section 4.2.1, the notation "(IDN) ccTLD" is used twice. This notation may be ambiguous. How about changing it to something like "(ASCII/IDN) ccTLD" or "ccTLD either in ASCII or IDN"? Hiro On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:48:03 +0900 HiroHOTTA <hotta@jprs.co.jp> wrote: > Dear Bart, all, > > I agree with Giovanni's amendment. > > On top of that, I have 3 comments. > > (1) first sentence of section 3 : > Is "The Review Team should not to propose solutions ..." a correct > English? Shouldn't it be "should not be to propose" or "should not > propose"? > > (2) section 4 begins with section 4.2, not with 4.1 > > (3) The terms 'WG' (Working Group) and 'Team' (as in PRT), both are > used many times, confuse me. Do they refer to the same entity? Or > 'WG' means the evolved form of PRT? If they are the same, how about > changing the term 'WG' to 'PRT' or 'Team'? If they are different, I > think the term 'WG' should be defined. > > Hiro > > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:32:13 +0000 > Giovanni Seppia <Giovanni.Seppia@eurid.eu> wrote: > > Hi Bart, > > > > Thanks for it. > > > > I just corrected few typos. > > > > I am fine with the rest. > > > > Best, > > > > Giovanni > > > > > > > > [cid:image002.jpg@01D4F6C5.0D319350]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.eurid.eu_&d=DwICAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=nC4gfbyyEQpMRtwgTZRqwi_KEPkorJJN6BPIwtsjBWQ&m=X9VEwlsbGVt8zTz_saLXXqRjSc9lxB8-Y_MRLzrrPRg&s=616B4G7gzzoc9Viuhlu80SNuE3d3xpMLG1bLftRzi64&e=>Giovanni Seppia / External Relations Manager > > > > Phone: +32 (0)2 401 27 50 > > Mobile: +39 335 8141733 > > Website: www.eurid.eu<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.eurid.eu&d=DwICAg&c=...> > > Address: Woluwelaan 150 - 1831 Diegem - Belgium > > > > [cid:image007.jpg@01D45651.A8F4EB30]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_EUregistry&...> [cid:image008.jpg@01D45651.A8F4EB30] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_compan...> [cid:image009.jpg@01D45651.A8F4EB30] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_EUregi...> > > > > From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel > > Sent: Friday, 19 April 2019 11:13 > > To: ccnso-council@icann.org > > Subject: [ccnso-council] Decision needed: Approval Terms of Reference > > > > Dear all, > > As proposed on the 18 April 2019 Council call included for adoption the Terms of Reference for the Review Team, which is to conduct a Preliminary review of the IDN ccTLD recommended policy. Please note that after re-reading the text section 5.2 sub 1 has been slightly changed: it now reads Conduct a review of the relevant documentation referenced in Section 6 of these Terms of Reference, and other material considered relevant by the PRT. > > The marked text has been added to ensure that the Review team can take all documentation it deems relevant into account. > > > > Please let us know your vote, in particular whether you object or abstain from taken a decision by 26 April 2019, 17.00 UTC. > > > > Thank you, and kind regards, > > Bart Boswinkel > > > > > > Disclaimer: > > This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EURid. Any processing of personal data via email is done in accordance with our Privacy Policy. While all care has been taken to avoid any known viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for presence of viruses. > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.eurid.eu_en_legal-2D... > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__eurid.eu_en_other-2Dinf... > > > _______________________________________________ > Ccnso-council mailing list > Ccnso-council@icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council >

I'm fine with the current version as well. Hiro On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 08:42:05 +0000 Giovanni Seppia <Giovanni.Seppia@eurid.eu> wrote:

Hi Bart,

Thanks for it.

No further comments at my end.

Best,

Giovanni

Giovanni Seppia / External Relations Manager ? Phone: +32 (0)2 401 27 50 Mobile: +39 335 8141733 Website: www.eurid.eu Address: Woluwelaan 150?- 1831 Diegem - Belgium ??????????? ??? ????? ????????

-----Original Message----- From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel Sent: Tuesday, 23 April 2019 11:39 To: hotta@jprs.co.jp Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] [Ext] Re: Decision needed: Approval Terms of Reference

Dear Hiro, Thank you very much for your comments! I have updated Giovanni's version to include your suggestions. The updated version is included. Kind regards, Bart

?On 23/04/2019, 05:41, "hotta@jprs.co.jp on behalf of HiroHOTTA" <hotta@jprs.co.jp> wrote:

Dear Bart, all,

Here goes my fourth comment.

(4) In section 4.2.1, the notation "(IDN) ccTLD" is used twice. This notation may be ambiguous. How about changing it to something like "(ASCII/IDN) ccTLD" or "ccTLD either in ASCII or IDN"?

Hiro

On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:48:03 +0900 HiroHOTTA <hotta@jprs.co.jp> wrote: > Dear Bart, all, > > I agree with Giovanni's amendment. > > On top of that, I have 3 comments. > > (1) first sentence of section 3 : > Is "The Review Team should not to propose solutions ..." a correct > English? Shouldn't it be "should not be to propose" or "should not > propose"? > > (2) section 4 begins with section 4.2, not with 4.1 > > (3) The terms 'WG' (Working Group) and 'Team' (as in PRT), both are > used many times, confuse me. Do they refer to the same entity? Or > 'WG' means the evolved form of PRT? If they are the same, how about > changing the term 'WG' to 'PRT' or 'Team'? If they are different, I > think the term 'WG' should be defined. > > Hiro > > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:32:13 +0000 > Giovanni Seppia <Giovanni.Seppia@eurid.eu> wrote: > > Hi Bart, > > > > Thanks for it. > > > > I just corrected few typos. > > > > I am fine with the rest. > > > > Best, > > > > Giovanni > > > > > > > > [cid:image002.jpg@01D4F6C5.0D319350]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.eurid.eu_&d=DwICAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=nC4gfbyyEQpMRtwgTZRqwi_KEPkorJJN6BPIwtsjBWQ&m=X9VEwlsbGVt8zTz_saLXXqRjSc9lxB8-Y_MRLzrrPRg&s=616B4G7gzzoc9Viuhlu80SNuE3d3xpMLG1bLftRzi64&e=>Giovanni Seppia / External Relations Manager > > > > Phone: +32 (0)2 401 27 50 > > Mobile: +39 335 8141733 > > Website: www.eurid.eu<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.eurid.eu&d=DwICAg&c=...> > > Address: Woluwelaan 150 - 1831 Diegem - Belgium > > > > [cid:image007.jpg@01D45651.A8F4EB30]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_EUregistry&...> [cid:image008.jpg@01D45651.A8F4EB30] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_compan...> [cid:image009.jpg@01D45651.A8F4EB30] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_EUregi...> > > > > From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel > > Sent: Friday, 19 April 2019 11:13 > > To: ccnso-council@icann.org > > Subject: [ccnso-council] Decision needed: Approval Terms of Reference > > > > Dear all, > > As proposed on the 18 April 2019 Council call included for adoption the Terms of Reference for the Review Team, which is to conduct a Preliminary review of the IDN ccTLD recommended policy. Please note that after re-reading the text section 5.2 sub 1 has been slightly changed: it now reads Conduct a review of the relevant documentation referenced in Section 6 of these Terms of Reference, and other material considered relevant by the PRT. > > The marked text has been added to ensure that the Review team can take all documentation it deems relevant into account. > > > > Please let us know your vote, in particular whether you object or abstain from taken a decision by 26 April 2019, 17.00 UTC. > > > > Thank you, and kind regards, > > Bart Boswinkel > > > > > > Disclaimer: > > This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EURid. Any processing of personal data via email is done in accordance with our Privacy Policy. While all care has been taken to avoid any known viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for presence of viruses. > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.eurid.eu_en_legal-2D... > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__eurid.eu_en_other-2Dinf... > > > _______________________________________________ > Ccnso-council mailing list > Ccnso-council@icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council >

Disclaimer: This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EURid. Any processing of personal data via email is done in accordance with our Privacy Policy. While all care has been taken to avoid any known viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for presence of viruses. http://www.eurid.eu/en/legal-disclaimer https://eurid.eu/en/other-infomation/privacy-policy

Dear All I made a few edits in form, not in substance. Please find in attachment. Overall I approve the document. Best, Alejandra -- [image: Photograph] *Alejandra Reynoso*Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt *P:* +502 23688565 *E:* alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt 18 Ave. 11 <https://maps.google.com/?q=18+Ave.+11&entry=gmail&source=g>-42 Zona 15, V.H. III. Guatemala, Guatemala www.gt On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 8:47 AM Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr> wrote:

Hi Bart, I have no objections with the current version. regards,

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 5:13 AM Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> wrote:

...

Dear all,

As proposed on the 18 April 2019 Council call included for adoption the Terms of Reference for the Review Team, which is to conduct a Preliminary review of the IDN ccTLD recommended policy. Please note that after re-reading the text section 5.2 sub 1 has been slightly changed: it now reads *Conduct a review of the relevant documentation referenced in Section 6 of these Terms of Reference, and other material considered relevant by the PRT.*

The *marked* text has been added to ensure that the Review team can take all documentation it deems relevant into account.

Please let us know *your vote*, in particular whether you object or abstain from taken a decision by *26 April 2019, 17.00 UTC.*

Thank you, and kind regards,

Bart Boswinkel

_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council

_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council

Hi Nick, Thanks for asking. The role of the group is effectively triaging the draft overall IDN ccTLD policy on what needs to be done and after this triage provide guidance on how it the updating could be done as efficiently and effectively as possible.   The issues that (may) need to be fixed are multiple: Overall draft policy is outdated because of evolution of Fast Track Process, in area of confusing similarity. Related is the divergence between GNSO and ccNSO policies ( initially the structure and criteria were the same) Overall draft policy has at least one placeholder ( on variant management) that needs to be included ( also by GNSO in subpro process) Parts of the draft policy need to reviewed, on whether outdated/overtaken by events or not ( for example requirement of list) Should part of inclusion of IDN ccTLD in ccNSO be updated? Who to review? And ask for Bylaw change asap? The processes on how to fix the different issues may be differ: ultimately everything needs to come together through a ccNSO PDP to turn the selection of IDNccTLD strings into an ICANN Policy. However some parts need to be worked on as sub-part/outside the PDP and then feed-into the policy development effort ( for example for the variance management, the Board requested the ccNSO and GNSO to work together) Hope this helps, Kind regards, Bart From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Nick Wenban-Smith <Nick.Wenban-Smith@nominet.uk> Date: Thursday, 25 April 2019 at 21:54 To: Alejandra Reynoso <alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt>, Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr> Cc: "ccnso-council@icann.org" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Decision needed: Approval Terms of Reference OK thanks for this. I think I support the intent of this initiative. Having read through this document however (and with no real background in IDNs or the fast track process etc) I am still struggling a bit to work out what exactly is going on here. I remain unsure what exactly the problem is that this is trying to fix. Could that be made clearer perhaps? Also as a general comment there are a lot of long sentences which I didn’t really understand or had to read several times to try and work out what they were trying to say. Sorry if I am sounding negative here. But I think it’s important to be as clear as we can because I’m sure many of the folks we are trying to reach out to here will be in the same position as me. Best wishes Nick From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Alejandra Reynoso Sent: 25 April 2019 18:23 To: Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr> Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Decision needed: Approval Terms of Reference Dear All I made a few edits in form, not in substance. Please find in attachment. Overall I approve the document. Best, Alejandra -- Alejandra Reynoso Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt P: +502 23688565 E: alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt 18 Ave. 11 [maps.google.com]-42 Zona 15, V.H. III. Guatemala, Guatemala www.gt [gt] On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 8:47 AM Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr> wrote: Hi Bart, I have no objections with the current version. regards, This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 5:13 AM Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> wrote: Dear all, As proposed on the 18 April 2019 Council call included for adoption the Terms of Reference for the Review Team, which is to conduct a Preliminary review of the IDN ccTLD recommended policy. Please note that after re-reading the text section 5.2 sub 1 has been slightly changed: it now reads Conduct a review of the relevant documentation referenced in Section 6 of these Terms of Reference, and other material considered relevant by the PRT. The marked text has been added to ensure that the Review team can take all documentation it deems relevant into account. Please let us know your vote, in particular whether you object or abstain from taken a decision by 26 April 2019, 17.00 UTC. Thank you, and kind regards, Bart Boswinkel _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council

Thank you Bart for the background – much clearer! I need I need to sit down with you at some point with lots of coffee (or something stronger) and try to understand what all these policies are. As you say there’s been evolution and there is a lot of complicated interaction between the different pieces. So in terms of the paper I think I get now what it is after. Just wondered if there was a target date for them to conclude their deliberations? Best wishes Nick From: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> Sent: 26 April 2019 01:08 To: Nick Wenban-Smith <Nick.Wenban-Smith@nominet.uk>; Alejandra Reynoso <alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt>; Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr> Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Decision needed: Approval Terms of Reference Hi Nick, Thanks for asking. The role of the group is effectively triaging the draft overall IDN ccTLD policy on what needs to be done and after this triage provide guidance on how it the updating could be done as efficiently and effectively as possible. The issues that (may) need to be fixed are multiple: * Overall draft policy is outdated because of evolution of Fast Track Process, in area of confusing similarity. Related is the divergence between GNSO and ccNSO policies ( initially the structure and criteria were the same) * Overall draft policy has at least one placeholder ( on variant management) that needs to be included ( also by GNSO in subpro process) * Parts of the draft policy need to reviewed, on whether outdated/overtaken by events or not ( for example requirement of list) * Should part of inclusion of IDN ccTLD in ccNSO be updated? Who to review? And ask for Bylaw change asap? The processes on how to fix the different issues may be differ: ultimately everything needs to come together through a ccNSO PDP to turn the selection of IDNccTLD strings into an ICANN Policy. However some parts need to be worked on as sub-part/outside the PDP and then feed-into the policy development effort ( for example for the variance management, the Board requested the ccNSO and GNSO to work together) Hope this helps, Kind regards, Bart From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Nick Wenban-Smith <Nick.Wenban-Smith@nominet.uk<mailto:Nick.Wenban-Smith@nominet.uk>> Date: Thursday, 25 April 2019 at 21:54 To: Alejandra Reynoso <alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt<mailto:alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt>>, Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr<mailto:pablo@nic.pr>> Cc: "ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>" <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Decision needed: Approval Terms of Reference OK thanks for this. I think I support the intent of this initiative. Having read through this document however (and with no real background in IDNs or the fast track process etc) I am still struggling a bit to work out what exactly is going on here. I remain unsure what exactly the problem is that this is trying to fix. Could that be made clearer perhaps? Also as a general comment there are a lot of long sentences which I didn’t really understand or had to read several times to try and work out what they were trying to say. Sorry if I am sounding negative here. But I think it’s important to be as clear as we can because I’m sure many of the folks we are trying to reach out to here will be in the same position as me. Best wishes Nick From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Alejandra Reynoso Sent: 25 April 2019 18:23 To: Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr<mailto:pablo@nic.pr>> Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Decision needed: Approval Terms of Reference Dear All I made a few edits in form, not in substance. Please find in attachment. Overall I approve the document. Best, Alejandra -- [Photograph] Alejandra Reynoso Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt P: +502 23688565 E: alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt<mailto:alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt> 18 Ave. 11 [maps.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__maps.google.com_-3Fq-3D18-2BAve.-2B11-26entry-3Dgmail-26source-3Dg&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=nC4gfbyyEQpMRtwgTZRqwi_KEPkorJJN6BPIwtsjBWQ&m=P-cyFgzQ5sKWcc1IdIl-r8XqJmGWoEFBJAhjh0No92E&s=7_tCjPAHKbCHQXfRJSuGnVr-77hVvu5H9ZW8sZlfsvc&e=>-42 Zona 15, V.H. III. Guatemala, Guatemala www.gt [gt]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.gt_&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u...> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 8:47 AM Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr<mailto:pablo@nic.pr>> wrote: Hi Bart, I have no objections with the current version. regards, [https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1nFpUjuvTcUAF9A8iWoBwZZOwCmwBf...] This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 5:13 AM Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org<mailto:bart.boswinkel@icann.org>> wrote: Dear all, As proposed on the 18 April 2019 Council call included for adoption the Terms of Reference for the Review Team, which is to conduct a Preliminary review of the IDN ccTLD recommended policy. Please note that after re-reading the text section 5.2 sub 1 has been slightly changed: it now reads Conduct a review of the relevant documentation referenced in Section 6 of these Terms of Reference, and other material considered relevant by the PRT. The marked text has been added to ensure that the Review team can take all documentation it deems relevant into account. Please let us know your vote, in particular whether you object or abstain from taken a decision by 26 April 2019, 17.00 UTC. Thank you, and kind regards, Bart Boswinkel _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council