April 2019 - comments-org-renewal-18mar19@icann.org

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Stop your capitalist behavior and focus on your real job
by Bart Luyckx April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

"the price cap provisions in the current .org agreement, which limited the price of registrations and allowable price increases for registrations, are removed from the .org renewal agreement. " I don't want to pay even more to keep my .org website up! You guys are clearly lobbying for the speculative market players. Ever since ICANN I have trouble to keep my websites up and running. I am (and always was) a legit domain owner with the sole purpose of providing FREE information to the public, but ever since your annoying interventions came along the Internet is STILL filled with malicious sites and their corrupt owners. The only thing that changed since your existence is that registration became more complex, my personal information came up for grabs in whois AND NOW you're going to allow miljonairs to charge even more money from private site owners like me!? You guys aren't worthy of your jobs. Bart Luyckx Belgium

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] The proposed .org agreement is a bad idea
by MIRKO CUCULIZA April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

To whom it may concern: I am a .org registrant and a not-for-profit or non-profit organization. ICANN does not seem to recognize the difference between a legacy extension created with the support of the US government, that predates the existence of ICANN and that has millions of existing users and the brand new extensions that started off with a new set of rules, in particular no price controls, and no existing registrants. They have completely different characteristics, history, and ownership structure. It is not acceptable for ICANN to ignore these differences and to propose that they be treated the same. Removing price caps is not fair to .org domain owners. Many of them have websites that they have used for years. If price caps are removed, the cost to renew their domain names may become too expensive, and they could be forced to give up websites that are important to them. The Uniform Rapid Suspension policy is too new and untested to apply on domain names that may be 20 years old or more. With the URS, the domain names could be taken down in a matter of days with little notice. ICANN should be doing more to protect owners of .org domain names. Why is ICANN trying to remove price protections for .org domain owners, so many of which are non-profits, so that they can be overcharged for their domain names? Best Regards Mirko

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Price cap
by Andres Avella April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

Non profit organizations are making huge efforts in addressing funds to the people who needs them. What is the point in taking advantage of their work in such an unjust and absurd way? What is it being offered in return? ICANN should not remove the price cap for .org domains.

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Please reconsider price caps on org TLD
by Dan Littlepage April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

As a domain registrant for a non-profit, I am writing to request that ICANN reconsiders removing registration price caps on .org domains. ICANN, please accept the responsibility you have to the millions of organizations that use .org TLD. If price caps are removed, registration and renewal of these domains could potentially become uneconomical, forcing many important organizations to change their addresses and threatening the prominence of .org. Unlike newer gTLD’s, .org is already very established. Allowing PIR, the registry operator, to act monopolistically with such a prominent TLD goes against what the Web should be. Dan Littlepage Director of Technology Holy Cross Church holycrossdewitt.org

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Writing to express opposition to the terms of the proposed renewal of the .org registry agreement
by Mike King April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

I am a .org registrant. Legacy gTLDs are fundamentally different from for-profit new gTLDs and should be treated that way. Legacy TLDs are what the internet was built on. They are essentially a public trust. They are very different than new gTLDs which were created, bought and paid for by private parties. Registrants of these legacy extensions should be entitled to price predictability & stability. Advancements in technology should be driving the cost of operating a registry down, yet prices keep going up? Removing price caps is unfair to the millions of domain registrants. They will have no price protections. Every registrant will be at the complete mercy and whims of the registry. This could result in a transfer of funds from millions of non-profits to one non-profit, with no benefits to the domain registrants. ICANN is supposed to represent a "bottom up, consensus-driven multistakeholder model". ICANN should not unilaterally impose URS in legacy TLDs when that issue is precisely what is being examined by the volunteer ICANN Working Group who has been mandated to review this issue. ICANN should be looking out for the .org registrants, in particular the non-profits. There is no "public benefit" justification to these changes. It is just a handout to business at the expense of registrants’ rights and protections. Where are the protections for the millions of domain registrants that this could effect in a negative way? These changes would give way too much power to the registry. This is not acceptable for a "public benefit" organization that exists to represent many stakeholders. -- -Mike King

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Proposed Renewal of .org Registry Agreement
by Daniel Schwabe April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

I am a .org registrant for a not-for-profit project. I reiterate here comments made by fellow registrants: ICANN staff should not unilaterally impose URS in legacy TLDs when that issue is precisely what is being examined by the volunteer ICANN Working Group who has been mandated to review this issue. ICANN policy making is supposed to be a ‘bottom up, multi-stakeholder model’. I believe that legacy gTLDs are fundamentally different from for-profit new gTLDs. Legacy TLDs are essentially a public trust, unlike new gTLDs which were created, bought and paid for by private interests. Registrants of legacy TLDs are entitled to price stability and predictability, and should not be subject to price increases with no maximums. Unlike new gTLDs, registrants of legacy TLDs registered their names and made their online presence on legacy TLDs on the basis that price caps would continue to exist. Unrestrained price increases on the millions of .org registrants who are not-for-profits or non-profits would be unfair to them. Unchecked price increases have the potential to result in hundreds of millions of dollars being transferred from these organizations to one non-profit, the Internet Society, with .org registrants receiving no benefit in return. ICANN should not allow one non-profit nearly unlimited access to the funds of other non-profits. ICANN appears to be entirely catering to registries by removing price caps. ICANN should stand up for the public interest and registrants! Sincerely, Daniel Schwabe

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] (no subject)
by Jenny Taylor April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

Domain registrations should remain affordable for those of us without commercial revenue. Your charge is to protect the not-for-profits and individuals, not to increase revenue for the middlemen who sell our domains.

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Potential Price Increases on ORG Domains
by Tom Hay Bauer April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

I sit on the boards of several non-profit organizations that have ORG websites, and I can tell you that conventional webpages are becoming less important with increasing use of social media such as Facebook and Instagram. It there is an unjustified increase in ORG domain registration fees I would recommend that we terminate our websites and rely on other social media options. Tom Bauer San Diego, CA

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Proposed Renewal of .org Registry Agreement
by lance＠oleniks.net April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

In Section 1a, regarding this statement: "In alignment with the base registry agreement, the price cap provisions in the current .org agreement, which limited the price of registrations and allowable price increases for registrations, are removed from the .org renewal agreement.” Removing the price cap is a horrible idea. You’ll potentially be driving up the cost of these domain names, so they are no longer affordable. Please don’t. Lance Olenik https://lokowebdesign.com

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Price Cap Comment - Chris Bigalke
by Chris Bigalke April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

I write to oppose the removal of price caps on any of the “legacy” TLDs as doing so will only create a free-for-all on limitless price increases across the well-established board. The new GTLDs are already accepted as alternative options with price expectations that vary greatly based on the registry; however, current registrants of older well established extensions are expected to maintain some level of stability. These legacy domain names, some of which have been registered for many years, are unlike the new mess being created and owners of these legacy names have a reasonable expectation of affordability and stability. The old manta goes ‘if it is not broken, you do not try and fix it.’ The vast majority of domain owners will remain unaffected so long as the fluctuating and exorbitant prices remain in the newer name space; there will be plenty of years ahead for ICANN to benefit from those while allowing stability within the legacy name space. Leave well enough alone and move forward without affecting millions and millions of current and well established registrants who expect their domain expenses to remain reasonable, affordable and stable. Thank you -- Chris Bigalke Artist info(a)chrisbigalke.com www.chrisbigalke.com www.showdeer.com

1 0