I am not sure to what end? Why would we discuss this? Haven’t we already got a full agenda? Why is this particular letter so important. I am not convinced the GNSO Council is in a position to respond nor assist here... Adrian Kinderis From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu Sent: Friday, 17 June 2011 5:45 PM To: GNSO Council List Subject: Re: [council] NTIA letter to ICANN Despite the unfortunate timing (16 June) I think this is an important development and support discussing it on Saturday. We may need to have a follow up discussion, but it would be good to have at least an initial conversation as soon as possible. Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA Email: mary.wong@law.unh.edu<mailto:mary.wong@law.unh.edu> Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
From:
Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com> To: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 6/17/2011 5:40 AM Subject: [council] NTIA letter to ICANN Councillors, For those of you that haven't seen this, here is a link to the letter NTIA has sent to ICANN re the new gTLD program. http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/strickling-to-dengate-thrush-16jun11-... This is one of the topics that we could discuss during our Saturday morning session, if there is interest in doing so. Stéphane