I haven't submitted it yet. I have a TON of citations. I've litterally just started. Jonathan Zuck Executive Director Innovators Network Foundation www.InnovatorsNetwork.org<http://www.InnovatorsNetwork.org> ________________________________ From: John McCormac <jmcc@hosterstats.com> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2020 1:24:04 PM To: Jonathan Zuck <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org>; cpwg@icann.org <cpwg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CPWG] DNS Abuse Education On 14/03/2020 19:37, Jonathan Zuck wrote:
Oh, I KNOW it needs much more. Like I said, I just started. As for coining a phrase, there are plenty of references to it in the literature
Yep but if you want it to be accepted by Wikipedia then you have to add the citations (Reliable Sources rather than just internal Wikipedia links) to the draft. Otherwise, it is likely to be rejected. The Dutch study is a good citation and should be included in the draft. Also any direct mentions of the phrase "DNS abuse" in print/online publications would also be good to include. However, steer clear of using blogs for citations even if they are written by experts. The more citations from Reliable Sources a draft has, the less likely it is to be rejected or deleted. If you think that things can get a bit argumentative on ICANN lists, there's nothing quite like a Wikipedia Holy War. :) Regards...jmcc -- ********************************************************** John McCormac * e-mail: jmcc@hosterstats.com MC2 * web: http://www.hosterstats.com/ 22 Viewmount * Domain Registrations Statistics Waterford * Domnomics - the business of domain names Ireland * https://amzn.to/2OPtEIO IE * Skype: hosterstats.com **********************************************************