Dear all, I have followed up in answering Annebeth's questions in the comments and have no fundamental objections. On one point I believe we have duplicate text in two places so we need to decide where to put it. I've noted that in a reply comment. New version attached. I do not agree with Timo's proposal at the end of the document to remove the reference in the recommendations section to the charter of the Subsequent Procedures PDP. This should not be a controversial statement, as the Charter is available and a public document. Kind regards, Heather Forrest ________________________________ From: ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org <ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Annebeth Lange <annebeth.lange@uninett.no> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 7:53:10 PM To: Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G.; Alexander Schubert Cc: ctn-crosscom@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ctn-crosscom] invitation to submit comments or questions related to the post-Helsinki progress report Good point, Alexander. I have added a few more things in the paper to meet your comment here. Med vennlig hilsen Annebeth From: <ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg@isoc-cr.org<mailto:crg@isoc-cr.org>> Date: Tuesday 30 August 2016 17:14 To: Alexander Schubert <alexander@schubert.berlin<mailto:alexander@schubert.berlin>> Cc: "ctn-crosscom@icann.org<mailto:ctn-crosscom@icann.org>" <ctn-crosscom@icann.org<mailto:ctn-crosscom@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Ctn-crosscom] invitation to submit comments or questions related to the post-Helsinki progress report Thanks Alex will go over it Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 30 Aug 2016, at 16:50, Alexander Schubert wrote: Hi, Yes: it must be obviously "three-letter" in the mid of page 1 ("The CWG has interpreted this as comprising:........ "). I do miss the "short forms" of country and territory names - as the 2012 AGB 2.2.1.4.1 is mentioning them. I like the final recommendation - but urge to make sure that nobody could misinterpret it in a way that "no policy can ever be created allowing country names & ISO 3166 II codes to be delegated". THIS WG was unable to find a solution - other policy making groups have to take over (gNSO). Thanks, Alexander From: ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Joke Braeken Sent: Dienstag, 30. August 2016 16:48 To: ctn-crosscom@icann.org<mailto:ctn-crosscom@icann.org> Subject: [Ctn-crosscom] invitation to submit comments or questions related to the post-Helsinki progress report Dear all, As discussed during the latest call on 29 August @21UTC, you are kindly invited to submit comments or questions related to the post-Helsinki progress report. Please find the latest version in attachment. Discussion on the list is more than welcome, but please make changes related to the progress report in the report itself. Deadline: Monday 13 September, end of day. Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor <mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> joke.braeken@icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: <https://twitter.com/ccNSO> https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: <https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/> https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ <http://ccnso.icann.org> http://ccnso.icann.org _______________________________________________ Ctn-crosscom mailing list Ctn-crosscom@icann.org<mailto:Ctn-crosscom@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ctn-crosscom _______________________________________________ Ctn-crosscom mailing list Ctn-crosscom@icann.org<mailto:Ctn-crosscom@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ctn-crosscom