On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
Again, I object strongly to this decision. It is not a productive way.
Negative!!! rfp3 is for discussing response to section 3 of the ICG request simple! I don't see where its indicated that this list is for contract co discussion. I don't think its right to associate being productive to this particular issue because what is to be discussed is within scope! Again it would not have mattered much to me if a new list was created but trying to imply some form of seclusion or interference is what i am strongly opposed to! Regards
-----Original Message-----
Jaap - I believe that we have decided that RFP3b will have the same email list as RFP3, that is, the full CWG list.
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>* The key to understanding is humility - my view !