The implication of this letter from the ccNSO is that it will only proceed to approval with final proposals available for prior community review. And so as a result, the combined timetable we have been working to is not achievable: that chartering organisation will only be able to approve at/after an ICANN meeting, not before hand. It would be either Buenos Aires, or Dublin. Am I reading this right? best Jordan On 26 March 2015 at 17:13, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:
*From:* Byron Holland [mailto:byron.holland@cira.ca] *Sent:* 26 March 2015 17:04 *To:* rickert@anwaelte.de; leonfelipe@sanchez.mx; lise.fuhr@difo.dk; Mathieu Weill; jrobinson@afilias.info *Cc:* ccnso-council@icann.org *Subject:* Letter ccNSO Decision-Making Process
Dear Lise, Jonathan, Leon, Mathieu, and Thomas,
Please find attached a letter on behalf of the ccNSO Council.
Kind regards,
Byron
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-- Jordan Carter Chief Executive *InternetNZ* 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob) jordan@internetnz.net.nz Skype: jordancarter *A better world through a better Internet *