October 2016 - Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds

Re: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] FW: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG
by Olga Cavalli Oct. 20, 2016

Oct. 20, 2016

Dear colleagues, The GAC will allocate time during the Hyderabad meeting to discuss about its participation in the CCWG as chartering organization. The draft charter has been distributed to all members of the GAC for their revision and comments. I will keep you updated about any news. Best Olga 2016-10-10 19:30 GMT-04:00 Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli(a)gmail.com>: > Hi, > I agree with Sylvia´s comments. > > And I still have no feedback from the GAC. > > Best > Olga > > 2016-10-10 20:08 GMT-03:00 Sylvia Cadena <sylvia(a)apnic.net>: > >> Thanks for sharing this. >> >> >> >> I would really appreciate if you can provide clarification about who will >> be delivering the webinar, and if there is anything that the DT might need >> to do/review before then, as the webinar is planned in just a couple of >> dates. >> >> >> >> If the charter is not adopted with enough time to have the call for the >> CCWG participation defined before Hyderabad, we might need to organize a >> session to present the charter (hopefully adopted by then) to promote >> participation at the CCWG. Don’t you think? >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Sylvia >> >> >> >> ————————————————————————— >> >> >> >> *Sylvia Cadena | APNIC Community Partnerships Specialist >> | sylvia(a)apnic.net <sylvia(a)apnic.net>* >> >> VoIP: sylvia(a)voip.apnic.net | skypeID: sylviacadena >> >> FB ISIF.asia | G+ ISIFAsia | @ISIF_Asia >> >> >> >> 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101 Australia | PO Box 3646 >> >> Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 | Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 >> >> http://www.apnic.net | http://www.isif.asia | https://blog.apnic.net/ >> >> * Love trees. Print only if necessary. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *<dt-cwg-auctionproceeds-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Marika >> Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> >> *Date: *Tuesday, 11 October 2016 at 2:33 AM >> *To: *Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv> >> *Cc: *"dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org" <dt-cwg-auctionproceeds@icann. >> org>, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> >> *Subject: *Re: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] FW: For your review - proposed >> charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG >> >> >> >> Thank you for your quick response, Katrina. Much appreciated. >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> >> Marika >> >> >> >> *Marika Konings* >> >> Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation >> for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >> >> Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org >> >> >> >> *Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO* >> >> *Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses >> <http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages >> <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.* >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv> >> *Date: *Monday 10 October 2016 at 10:26 >> *To: *Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> >> *Cc: *"dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org" <dt-cwg-auctionproceeds@icann. >> org>, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> >> *Subject: *RE: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] FW: For your review - proposed >> charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG >> >> >> >> Dear Marika, >> >> >> >> Thank you for your email! >> >> It was our understanding that there is still an ongoing work to fine-tune >> the charter. Therefore we postponed the adoption until the final version of >> the charter is released. >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> >> ]{atrina >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] >> *Sent:* Monday, October 10, 2016 7:21 PM >> *To:* Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv> >> *Cc:* dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org; Bart Boswinkel < >> bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> >> *Subject:* Re: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] FW: For your review - proposed >> charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG >> >> >> >> Dear Katrina, >> >> >> >> Thank you very much for the ccNSO’s response to the DT’s request for >> input. In addition to your input, we’ve received a request from the GNSO >> leadership team to have a webinar to allow for a walk through of the >> charter followed by Q & A to address any questions there might be. As such, >> a webinar will be organized on *Thursday 13 October at 16.00 UTC*. This >> webinar will also be open to other SO/ACs as others may have been similarly >> challenged to give the proposed charter due consideration (note, to date >> only formal input has been received from the ccNSO (see >> https://community.icann.org/x/7Bq4Aw[community.icann.org] >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…>). >> As such, we would like to request that the ccNSO holds off on adopting the >> charter pending the webinar and input from other SO/ACs as we want to make >> sure that there are no pertinent issues identified that might require >> updates to the proposed charter. We do anticipate that shortly after the >> webinar the DT will be in a position to confirm the final version of the >> charter for consideration to all ICANN SO/ACs. >> >> >> >> We appreciate your patience. >> >> >> >> On behalf of Jonathan Robinson, Chair of the DT >> >> >> >> *From: *Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv> >> *Date: *Friday 30 September 2016 at 09:10 >> *To: *Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org>, " >> thomas.schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch" <thomas.schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch>, " >> paf(a)netnod.se" <paf(a)netnod.se>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel(a)godaddy.com>, >> "louie(a)louie.net" <louie(a)louie.net>, "tsinha(a)umd.edu" <tsinha(a)umd.edu>, " >> bverd(a)verisign.com" <bverd(a)verisign.com>, Alan Greenberg < >> alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca>, 'Oscar Robles' <oscar(a)lacnic.net> >> *Cc: *Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org>, Olof Nordling < >> olof.nordling(a)icann.org>, Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich(a)icann.org>, >> Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes(a)icann.org>, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng(a)icann.org>, >> "dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org" <dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org>, " >> ccnso-council(a)icann.org" <ccnso-council(a)icann.org> >> *Subject: *RE: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction >> Proceeds CCWG >> >> >> >> Dear Marika, Jonathan, Alan, >> >> >> >> Thank you for your message and invitation to review the proposed charter. >> As you pointed out in your email, in March 2015 the ccNSO Council decided >> not to participate in the cross-community working group on the new gTLD >> Auction Proceeds. After reviewing the proposed charter, the ccNSO Council >> respectfully acknowledged the excellent job done by the drafting committee. >> Further, the ccNSO Council revisited its decision of March 2015. After >> careful consideration of all arguments, taking into account the importance >> of the use of the auction funds and contribution that ccTLDs with >> experience in comparable projects could bring to the cross-community >> working group, I am pleased to inform you that the ccNSO now anticipates to >> participate in the cross-community working group as a chartering >> organization and will consider the charter for adoption at its upcoming >> meeting on 13 October 2016. >> >> >> >> On behalf of the ccNSO Council, >> >> >> >> Katrina Sataki >> >> Chair of the ccNSO >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org >> <marika.konings(a)icann.org>] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 13, 2016 7:41 PM >> *To:* Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv>; thomas.schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch; >> paf(a)netnod.se; James M. Bladel <jbladel(a)godaddy.com>; louie(a)louie.net; >> tsinha(a)umd.edu; bverd(a)verisign.com; alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca; Oscar >> Robles <oscar(a)lacnic.net> >> *Cc:* Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org>; Olof Nordling < >> olof.nordling(a)icann.org>; Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich(a)icann.org>; >> Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes(a)icann.org>; Steve Sheng <steve.sheng(a)icann.org>; >> dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org >> *Subject:* For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds >> CCWG >> >> >> >> Sending on behalf of Jonathan Robinson, new gTLD Auction Proceeds >> Drafting Team Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair: >> >> >> >> Dear SO/AC Chairs, >> >> >> >> On behalf of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team (DT), we are >> delighted to submit to you and your respective SO/ACs, the proposed charter >> for a Cross-Community Working Group on new gTLD Auction Proceeds. As you >> may recall, representatives of all ICANN SO/ACs, apart from the ccNSO >> (which decided not to take part in the DT effort), participated in the DT >> deliberations (see https://community.icann.org/x/AR_AAw >> [community.icann.org] >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> >> for DT members). >> >> >> >> This proposed charter is the result of extensive input and deliberations, >> including careful review of input that was received as part of the >> cross-community session at ICANN 56 in Helsinki (see >> https://community.icann.org/x/fgmbAw)[community.icann.org] >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> >> and we believe it now represents a careful balance between the different >> viewpoints and perspectives, including from both the DT Members and the >> ICANN Board liaisons to the DT. As such, the DT would like to request you >> review the proposed charter with this careful balance in mind and only flag >> to the DT any pertinent issues that would prevent your respective SO/AC >> from adopting this charter. We would like to request you highlight such >> pertinent issues *by 30 September 2016 at the latest*, including an >> indication of when you anticipate your respective SO/AC to be in a position >> to consider the charter for adoption following 30 September, provided that >> no pertinent issues have been identified by any of the ICANN SO/ACs. >> >> >> >> Of course, should you have any clarifying questions, please do not >> hesitate to respond to this message. The DT looks forward to receiving your >> feedback. >> >> >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> Jonathan Robinson, DT Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds mailing list >> Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt-cwg-auctionproceeds >> > >

1 0

For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG
by Marika Konings Oct. 17, 2016

Oct. 17, 2016

Sending on behalf of Jonathan Robinson, new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair: Dear SO/AC Chairs, On behalf of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team (DT), we are delighted to submit to you and your respective SO/ACs, the proposed charter for a Cross-Community Working Group on new gTLD Auction Proceeds. As you may recall, representatives of all ICANN SO/ACs, apart from the ccNSO (which decided not to take part in the DT effort), participated in the DT deliberations (see https://community.icann.org/x/AR_AAw for DT members). This proposed charter is the result of extensive input and deliberations, including careful review of input that was received as part of the cross-community session at ICANN 56 in Helsinki (see https://community.icann.org/x/fgmbAw) and we believe it now represents a careful balance between the different viewpoints and perspectives, including from both the DT Members and the ICANN Board liaisons to the DT. As such, the DT would like to request you review the proposed charter with this careful balance in mind and only flag to the DT any pertinent issues that would prevent your respective SO/AC from adopting this charter. We would like to request you highlight such pertinent issues by 30 September 2016 at the latest, including an indication of when you anticipate your respective SO/AC to be in a position to consider the charter for adoption following 30 September, provided that no pertinent issues have been identified by any of the ICANN SO/ACs. Of course, should you have any clarifying questions, please do not hesitate to respond to this message. The DT looks forward to receiving your feedback. Best wishes, Jonathan Robinson, DT Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair

3 3

For your review - message to SO/AC Chairs re. new gTLD Auction Proceeds Charter
by Marika Konings Oct. 14, 2016

Oct. 14, 2016

Dear All, Please find below the message that the DT Chairs propose sending to the SO/AC Chairs following the webinar earlier this week. The idea is to send this out by Monday at the latest so if you have any feedback or comments, please share those with the list before that time. Best regards, Marika -- Dear SO/AC Chairs, We are following up on our message below from 13 September (see below) concerning the proposed new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Charter. To date, we’ve received confirmation from the ccNSO that it is ready to go ahead and consider the charter for adoption. In addition, the GNSO leadership team requested a webinar to allow for a walk-through of the charter and address any questions there might be. This webinar, which was communicated to you and open to anyone interested, was held on Thursday 13 October. For those interested to listen to a recording of the webinar, or to eview the slides, please see here: https://community.icann.org/x/gh_4Aw[community.icann.org]. Although a number of interesting points were discussed in relation to the prospective work of the CWG, no pertinent issues were identified which would require modification of the charter. Therefore, the Drafting Team considers its work done and would hereby like to formally submit the proposed charter for a CCWG on new gTLD Auction Proceeds (see https://community.icann.org/x/mRuOAw[community.icann.org]) for your group’s consideration as soon as reasonably possible. Thank-you for your attention to this matter. Best regards, Jonathan Robinson, DT Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair From: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Date: Tuesday 13 September 2016 at 10:41 Subject: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Sending on behalf of Jonathan Robinson, new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair: Dear SO/AC Chairs, On behalf of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team (DT), we are delighted to submit to you and your respective SO/ACs, the proposed charter for a Cross-Community Working Group on new gTLD Auction Proceeds. As you may recall, representatives of all ICANN SO/ACs, apart from the ccNSO (which decided not to take part in the DT effort), participated in the DT deliberations (see https://community.icann.org/x/AR_AAw[community.icann.org] for DT members). This proposed charter is the result of extensive input and deliberations, including careful review of input that was received as part of the cross-community session at ICANN 56 in Helsinki (see https://community.icann.org/x/fgmbAw)[community.icann.org] and we believe it now represents a careful balance between the different viewpoints and perspectives, including from both the DT Members and the ICANN Board liaisons to the DT. As such, the DT would like to request you review the proposed charter with this careful balance in mind and only flag to the DT any pertinent issues that would prevent your respective SO/AC from adopting this charter. We would like to request you highlight such pertinent issues by 30 September 2016 at the latest, including an indication of when you anticipate your respective SO/AC to be in a position to consider the charter for adoption following 30 September, provided that no pertinent issues have been identified by any of the ICANN SO/ACs. Of course, should you have any clarifying questions, please do not hesitate to respond to this message. The DT looks forward to receiving your feedback. Best wishes, Jonathan Robinson, DT Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair

1 0

Re: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] FW: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG
by Marika Konings Oct. 14, 2016

Oct. 14, 2016

Thank you for your quick response, Katrina. Much appreciated. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. From: Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv> Date: Monday 10 October 2016 at 10:26 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Cc: "dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org" <dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org>, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> Subject: RE: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] FW: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Dear Marika, Thank you for your email! It was our understanding that there is still an ongoing work to fine-tune the charter. Therefore we postponed the adoption until the final version of the charter is released. Kind regards, ]{atrina From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 7:21 PM To: Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv> Cc: dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org; Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] FW: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Dear Katrina, Thank you very much for the ccNSO’s response to the DT’s request for input. In addition to your input, we’ve received a request from the GNSO leadership team to have a webinar to allow for a walk through of the charter followed by Q & A to address any questions there might be. As such, a webinar will be organized on Thursday 13 October at 16.00 UTC. This webinar will also be open to other SO/ACs as others may have been similarly challenged to give the proposed charter due consideration (note, to date only formal input has been received from the ccNSO (see https://community.icann.org/x/7Bq4Aw[community.icann.org]) As such, we would like to request that the ccNSO holds off on adopting the charter pending the webinar and input from other SO/ACs as we want to make sure that there are no pertinent issues identified that might require updates to the proposed charter. We do anticipate that shortly after the webinar the DT will be in a position to confirm the final version of the charter for consideration to all ICANN SO/ACs. We appreciate your patience. On behalf of Jonathan Robinson, Chair of the DT From: Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv> Date: Friday 30 September 2016 at 09:10 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org>, "thomas.schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch" <thomas.schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch>, "paf(a)netnod.se" <paf(a)netnod.se>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel(a)godaddy.com>, "louie(a)louie.net" <louie(a)louie.net>, "tsinha(a)umd.edu" <tsinha(a)umd.edu>, "bverd(a)verisign.com" <bverd(a)verisign.com>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca>, 'Oscar Robles' <oscar(a)lacnic.net> Cc: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org>, Olof Nordling <olof.nordling(a)icann.org>, Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich(a)icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes(a)icann.org>, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng(a)icann.org>, "dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org" <dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org>, "ccnso-council(a)icann.org" <ccnso-council(a)icann.org> Subject: RE: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Dear Marika, Jonathan, Alan, Thank you for your message and invitation to review the proposed charter. As you pointed out in your email, in March 2015 the ccNSO Council decided not to participate in the cross-community working group on the new gTLD Auction Proceeds. After reviewing the proposed charter, the ccNSO Council respectfully acknowledged the excellent job done by the drafting committee. Further, the ccNSO Council revisited its decision of March 2015. After careful consideration of all arguments, taking into account the importance of the use of the auction funds and contribution that ccTLDs with experience in comparable projects could bring to the cross-community working group, I am pleased to inform you that the ccNSO now anticipates to participate in the cross-community working group as a chartering organization and will consider the charter for adoption at its upcoming meeting on 13 October 2016. On behalf of the ccNSO Council, Katrina Sataki Chair of the ccNSO From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 7:41 PM To: Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv>; thomas.schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch; paf(a)netnod.se; James M. Bladel <jbladel(a)godaddy.com>; louie(a)louie.net; tsinha(a)umd.edu; bverd(a)verisign.com; alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca; Oscar Robles <oscar(a)lacnic.net> Cc: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org>; Olof Nordling <olof.nordling(a)icann.org>; Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich(a)icann.org>; Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes(a)icann.org>; Steve Sheng <steve.sheng(a)icann.org>; dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org Subject: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Sending on behalf of Jonathan Robinson, new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair: Dear SO/AC Chairs, On behalf of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team (DT), we are delighted to submit to you and your respective SO/ACs, the proposed charter for a Cross-Community Working Group on new gTLD Auction Proceeds. As you may recall, representatives of all ICANN SO/ACs, apart from the ccNSO (which decided not to take part in the DT effort), participated in the DT deliberations (see https://community.icann.org/x/AR_AAw[community.icann.org] for DT members). This proposed charter is the result of extensive input and deliberations, including careful review of input that was received as part of the cross-community session at ICANN 56 in Helsinki (see https://community.icann.org/x/fgmbAw)[community.icann.org] and we believe it now represents a careful balance between the different viewpoints and perspectives, including from both the DT Members and the ICANN Board liaisons to the DT. As such, the DT would like to request you review the proposed charter with this careful balance in mind and only flag to the DT any pertinent issues that would prevent your respective SO/AC from adopting this charter. We would like to request you highlight such pertinent issues by 30 September 2016 at the latest, including an indication of when you anticipate your respective SO/AC to be in a position to consider the charter for adoption following 30 September, provided that no pertinent issues have been identified by any of the ICANN SO/ACs. Of course, should you have any clarifying questions, please do not hesitate to respond to this message. The DT looks forward to receiving your feedback. Best wishes, Jonathan Robinson, DT Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair

4 6

Recording and attendance new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Charter Webinar 30 October 2016
by Nathalie Peregrine Oct. 13, 2016

Oct. 13, 2016

Dear All, Please find the presentation slide deck and the attendance as attachments, the MP3 and AC recordings below for the new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Charter Webinar held on 30 October 2016: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailer.samanage.com_wf_…> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-auction-proceeds-13oct16-en.mp3 The AC recording: https://participate.icann.org/p2iqstk3mai/<https://participate.icann.org/p2iqstk3mai/?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=06fa1be590a85b5f…> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt-cwg-auctionproceeds/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/px6AAw Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie Peregrine ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for 13 October 2016 Nathalie Peregrine: (10/13/2016 17:47) Dear all, welcome to the Webinar on new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Charter on the 13 October 2016 Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (18:08) Can you provide links to these documents? Marika Konings: (18:10) @Eduardo - I will post the slide deck now on the DT wiki space and get the link to you in a minute. Marika Konings: (18:12) You can download the slides here: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_do… Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (18:16) CAn you give an example of what will be considered a conflict of interest in the CCWG? Marika Konings: (18:17) @Eduardo - further information in relation to conflict of interest declarations will follow later in the presentation so that may address your question. Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (18:17) @MArika: Ok. Thnaks. Kurt Pritz: (18:22) Q for end: Can the principles / constriants include measurement? I.e., can there be an a priori and after the fact measurement of return, NPV or payback? This need not always be quantitative but there should be a promised and measured return. The actual return should be taken into account in future requests. Finally (sorry for this long comment), and consistent with measurement, we could use the term "use" of funds, rather than "disubursement," which, to me connotes more of an unconditional grant or gift. Marika Konings: (18:24) @Kurt - that is probably something for the CCWG to determine? ken stubbs: (18:25) very concerned about overhead & feel that independent evaluators s/b hired by independent committee to evaluate proposals & measure admin costs. Becky Burr: (18:25) @Kurt and Marika - any good program would build in measurement as Kurt suggests. Don't see how we could proceed without the ability to understand what has been accomplished Asha Hemrajani: (18:25) @Kurt, excellent points and something we have considered in the drafting team. However, the exact details of how NPV/return should be measured (and your points are valid) here would be what the CCWG would convene to determine Marika Konings: (18:25) @Becky - exactly, and that is why it has been called out as a specific question for the CCWG to address. Asha Hemrajani: (18:26) What the charter drafting team needs to do and has done is specify that the CCWG should address this. Marika Konings: (18:26) @Ken - and the issue of overhead is also specifically called out. What is an appropriate level of overhead? ken stubbs: (18:26) we have for the last 5-7 years had public committments that $$ would not be appropriated to ICANN. this was essential purpose for co-mingling Kurt Pritz: (18:27) I am not advocating this group determine the measurement but rather that it is a principle for how the ICANN community invests this money. Olof Nordling: (18:27) How many Chartering Organzations would need to sign up for a launch of the CCWG? Asha Hemrajani: (18:27) Agree Kurt Alan Greenberg: (18:27) @Kurt, it would be insane to give out this amount of money with no attempt to identify if the money is being used effectively. The difficulty is not spending too much of the money on that evluation. Asha Hemrajani: (18:28) ROI is an art and a science :-) Marika Konings: (18:28) @Olof - I believe according to the new CWG Principles, it just requires two, but from indications so far, it seems here is broad interest across SO/ACs to join this effort as a chartering organization. Kurt Pritz: (18:28) To Ken's point, another prinicple could be benchmarking against other similarly situated organzations that create a foundation of this type. What is typical or hoped-for overhead rates. Alan Greenberg: (18:28) I'm not sure "ROI" is the real measure we are after though. Olof Nordling: (18:28) Thanks Marika! Marika Konings: (18:29) @Kurt - that is also something that is recommended in the charter. Of course, what you see in the screen is a summarized version, so for the full details, please review the complete charter. Becky Burr: (18:29) there are people who know precisely how to do the required measurement. we should not reinvent that wheel. agree re benchmarking Asha Hemrajani: (18:29) @Alan in my opinion yes ROI would be one of the measures - one can look at ROI of both tangible and intangible benefits Marika Konings: (18:29) You can find the proposed charter here: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… Asha Hemrajani: (18:29) exactly Becky ken stubbs: (18:32) including providing consulting services to potential applicants Asha Hemrajani: (18:33) @ken could you elaborate? ken stubbs: (18:34) no person could be a member of the cwg if they are providing consulting services for a potential applicant . thoughts ? Asha Hemrajani: (18:34) @ken yes - that is covered in the enhanced CoI Marika Konings: (18:34) @Ken - the way it is currently framed members/participants just need to declare that conflict, but they are not prevented from participating. Alan Greenberg: (18:35) Ken, there was a lot of concern about this sort of thing, but in the end we are recommending that there be no limit on who can participate, but they must make full declarations. Pretty much like participation in an SO. Eduardo Diaz - NARALO: (18:35) Is there a definitive tiemline for the expected next steps? ken stubbs: (18:35) i would be quite concerned about this item (only speaking personally) Alan Greenberg: (18:36) @Ken, as were the DT members. But departing from the ICANN model of restricting WG participation seemed to go to a place we also didn't want to go to. ken stubbs: (18:38) does the icann board allow voting or advocacy where a clear conflict exists ? Asha Hemrajani: (18:38) @Ken agree with Alan in that we had quite a few strong debates on this but we had the concern that we could not openly restrict participation. Would like your views on this Becky Burr: (18:38) @Ken, no Becky Burr: (18:39) but the WG won't be deciding on applications Asha Hemrajani: (18:41) @Ken, the CCWG will decide on the process/framework and another group actually disburses the funds.. Marika Konings: (18:43) @Ken - any recommendations would go out for public comment and will need to be approved by Chartering Organizations, so there are a number of checks and balances in place that would hopefully prevent such 'gaming'. Asha Hemrajani: (18:43) @Ken, The Board would not do anything about the membership of the group. HOWEVER, the Board has an obligation to make sure that the decisions that it makes are free from conflict of interest Marika Konings: (18:43) and of course, the Board will need to sign off at the end of the day. James Bladel: (18:43) To Ken's point - I'm hopeful that the CCWG looks at ways to spin this out of ICANN etnirely (e.g. independent foundation/development fund/etc.) Asha Hemrajani: (18:43) @jonathan, I cannot speak now, please could you read out my comment Marika Konings: (18:43) also, a consensus call is never done solely on numbers, it would factor in affiliation / representation. ken stubbs: (18:43) +1 james Jonathan Robinson: (18:45) @Asha. Please repste comment so I know which one to read out / communicate Jonathan Robinson: (18:45) repost Asha Hemrajani: (18:46) Asha Hemrajani: @Ken, The Board would not do anything about the membership of the group. HOWEVER, the Board has an obligation to make sure that the decisions that it makes are free from conflict of interest Samantha Eisner: (18:47) @James, as the entity that the funds come from, there will always be some level of responsibility for ICANN to make sure that the funds are going to intended purposes. Of course, the disbursement mechanism could be independent from ICANN, but there would have to be some governance/reporting structure in place to report back to ICANN Asha Hemrajani: (18:48) Exactly Samantha, the eventual organization cannot be completely spun out of ICANN Asha Hemrajani: (18:48) comment above with reference to James and Ken's comments Samantha Eisner: (18:50) +1 Jonathan Asha Hemrajani: (18:50) Yes Jonathan James Bladel: (18:51) Thanks, Sam. Implementation detials aside, the general idea is that there is arm's length between ICANN and the evaluation proposals / distribution of funds. Erika Mann: (18:52) True independence, I doubt that even the board should adminster this Becky Burr: (18:53) +1 Erika James Bladel: (18:53) Agree with Erika. Erika Mann: (18:54) Hi Jonathan, I had difficulties in joining but heard part of the discussion and are fully online now ken stubbs: (18:54) agree with erika.. icann board doesn't administrate. principal function ther s/b evaluative ken stubbs: (18:56) my comments related to board evaluating adherence to established guidelines . they have competence to deal with this Asha Hemrajani: (18:57) @Ken yes that was my point - the board has the responsibility to oversee that guidelines are adhered to, that we are upholding our fiduciary responsibilites and that the conflict of interest principles are not violated. Olga Cavalli - GAC: (18:58) Thanks Jonathan! ken stubbs: (18:58) thx jonathan James Bladel: (18:58) Thanks Jonathan & ALan. Markus Kummer: (18:58) Thanks, Jonathan -- good briefing. Bye all Olga Cavalli - GAC: (18:58) bye Becky Burr: (18:58) thanks all Asha Hemrajani: (18:58) Thanks and bye! Erika Mann: (18:58) Thanks Jonathan, team

1 0

FW: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG
by Marika Konings Oct. 10, 2016

Oct. 10, 2016

FYI Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. From: Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv> Date: Friday 30 September 2016 at 09:10 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org>, "thomas.schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch" <thomas.schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch>, "paf(a)netnod.se" <paf(a)netnod.se>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel(a)godaddy.com>, "louie(a)louie.net" <louie(a)louie.net>, "tsinha(a)umd.edu" <tsinha(a)umd.edu>, "bverd(a)verisign.com" <bverd(a)verisign.com>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca>, 'Oscar Robles' <oscar(a)lacnic.net> Cc: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org>, Olof Nordling <olof.nordling(a)icann.org>, Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich(a)icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes(a)icann.org>, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng(a)icann.org>, "dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org" <dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org>, "ccnso-council(a)icann.org" <ccnso-council(a)icann.org> Subject: RE: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Dear Marika, Jonathan, Alan, Thank you for your message and invitation to review the proposed charter. As you pointed out in your email, in March 2015 the ccNSO Council decided not to participate in the cross-community working group on the new gTLD Auction Proceeds. After reviewing the proposed charter, the ccNSO Council respectfully acknowledged the excellent job done by the drafting committee. Further, the ccNSO Council revisited its decision of March 2015. After careful consideration of all arguments, taking into account the importance of the use of the auction funds and contribution that ccTLDs with experience in comparable projects could bring to the cross-community working group, I am pleased to inform you that the ccNSO now anticipates to participate in the cross-community working group as a chartering organization and will consider the charter for adoption at its upcoming meeting on 13 October 2016. On behalf of the ccNSO Council, Katrina Sataki Chair of the ccNSO From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 7:41 PM To: Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv>; thomas.schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch; paf(a)netnod.se; James M. Bladel <jbladel(a)godaddy.com>; louie(a)louie.net; tsinha(a)umd.edu; bverd(a)verisign.com; alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca; Oscar Robles <oscar(a)lacnic.net> Cc: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org>; Olof Nordling <olof.nordling(a)icann.org>; Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich(a)icann.org>; Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes(a)icann.org>; Steve Sheng <steve.sheng(a)icann.org>; dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org Subject: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Sending on behalf of Jonathan Robinson, new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair: Dear SO/AC Chairs, On behalf of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team (DT), we are delighted to submit to you and your respective SO/ACs, the proposed charter for a Cross-Community Working Group on new gTLD Auction Proceeds. As you may recall, representatives of all ICANN SO/ACs, apart from the ccNSO (which decided not to take part in the DT effort), participated in the DT deliberations (see https://community.icann.org/x/AR_AAw[community.icann.org] for DT members). This proposed charter is the result of extensive input and deliberations, including careful review of input that was received as part of the cross-community session at ICANN 56 in Helsinki (see https://community.icann.org/x/fgmbAw)[community.icann.org] and we believe it now represents a careful balance between the different viewpoints and perspectives, including from both the DT Members and the ICANN Board liaisons to the DT. As such, the DT would like to request you review the proposed charter with this careful balance in mind and only flag to the DT any pertinent issues that would prevent your respective SO/AC from adopting this charter. We would like to request you highlight such pertinent issues by 30 September 2016 at the latest, including an indication of when you anticipate your respective SO/AC to be in a position to consider the charter for adoption following 30 September, provided that no pertinent issues have been identified by any of the ICANN SO/ACs. Of course, should you have any clarifying questions, please do not hesitate to respond to this message. The DT looks forward to receiving your feedback. Best wishes, Jonathan Robinson, DT Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair

1 1

Webinar on new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Charter - Thursday 13 October at 16.00 UTC
by Marika Konings Oct. 10, 2016

Oct. 10, 2016

Dear All, Following the DT’s request for input concerning pertinent issues that would prevent adoption of the proposed charter for the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross-Community Working Group from all ICANN SO/ACs (see https://community.icann.org/x/7Bq4Aw[community.icann.org]) the DT has received a request from the GNSO leadership team to have a webinar to allow for a walk through of the charter followed by Q & A to address any questions there might be. As such, a webinar will be organized on Thursday 13 October at 16.00 UTC. This webinar will also be open to other SO/ACs as others may have been similarly challenged to give the proposed charter due consideration (note, to date only formal input has been received from the ccNSO (see https://community.icann.org/x/7Bq4Aw[community.icann.org]) If you are interested in participating, please confirm your attendance at gnso-secs(a)icann.org. Note that the webinar will be recorded and transcribed. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. From: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Date: Tuesday 13 September 2016 at 10:41 To: Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv>, "thomas.schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch" <thomas.schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch>, "paf(a)netnod.se" <paf(a)netnod.se>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel(a)godaddy.com>, "louie(a)louie.net" <louie(a)louie.net>, "tsinha(a)umd.edu" <tsinha(a)umd.edu>, "bverd(a)verisign.com" <bverd(a)verisign.com>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca>, Oscar Robles <oscar(a)lacnic.net> Cc: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org>, Olof Nordling <olof.nordling(a)icann.org>, Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich(a)icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes(a)icann.org>, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng(a)icann.org>, "dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org" <dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org> Subject: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Sending on behalf of Jonathan Robinson, new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair: Dear SO/AC Chairs, On behalf of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team (DT), we are delighted to submit to you and your respective SO/ACs, the proposed charter for a Cross-Community Working Group on new gTLD Auction Proceeds. As you may recall, representatives of all ICANN SO/ACs, apart from the ccNSO (which decided not to take part in the DT effort), participated in the DT deliberations (see https://community.icann.org/x/AR_AAw for DT members). This proposed charter is the result of extensive input and deliberations, including careful review of input that was received as part of the cross-community session at ICANN 56 in Helsinki (see https://community.icann.org/x/fgmbAw) and we believe it now represents a careful balance between the different viewpoints and perspectives, including from both the DT Members and the ICANN Board liaisons to the DT. As such, the DT would like to request you review the proposed charter with this careful balance in mind and only flag to the DT any pertinent issues that would prevent your respective SO/AC from adopting this charter. We would like to request you highlight such pertinent issues by 30 September 2016 at the latest, including an indication of when you anticipate your respective SO/AC to be in a position to consider the charter for adoption following 30 September, provided that no pertinent issues have been identified by any of the ICANN SO/ACs. Of course, should you have any clarifying questions, please do not hesitate to respond to this message. The DT looks forward to receiving your feedback. Best wishes, Jonathan Robinson, DT Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair

1 0

Update on CWG Auction Proceeds
by Jonathan Robinson Oct. 10, 2016

Oct. 10, 2016

Dear All, I wanted to provide you with an update on where things stand with regard to the SO/AC review of the proposed new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Charter. To date, we have only received confirmation from the ccNSO that no pertinent issues have been identified and that they are ready to consider the charter for adoption at their upcoming meeting. We have also received a request from the GNSO Council leadership team to host a webinar on the proposed charter since, due to other priorities, many have not had the time to focus on the proposed charter and a webinar will facilitate this process. As such, and also assuming that other SO/ACs may find themselves in a similar situation, I propose that the DT hosts a webinar on Thursday this week (16h00 UTC) for the GNSO and any others interested in the topic. Hopefully this will allow for focused attention on the proposed charter and facilitate feedback from all groups as to whether or not approval of the Charter can move forward to the next phase. In the meantime, I will ask the ccNSO to hold off on approval of the charter until it is clear that there are no pertinent issues and the charter will remain as is. Of course, if you have any further feedback as to where your respective group stands with regard to the review of the charter, that would be much appreciated. Best wishes, Jonathan

1 0

FW: [council] FW: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG
by Marika Konings Oct. 2, 2016

Oct. 2, 2016

Please find below input from one GNSO Council member – the charter was discussed during the GNSO Council meeting on 29 September and no pertinent issues have been raised to date. Do DT members from the other ICANN SO/ACs have any feedback on whether any input is forthcoming from their respective groups? Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. From: Paul McGrady <policy(a)paulmcgrady.com> Date: Saturday 1 October 2016 at 04:06 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel(a)godaddy.com>, 'GNSO Council List' <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Cc: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson(a)afilias.info> Subject: RE: [council] FW: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Thanks Marika. I suppose I should have said “the correct framework to develop the process.” I stick by “windfall”, as ICANN didn’t earn these funds. In any event, I am thankful that you are taking the suggestion back to the DT. Regards, Paul Paul D. McGrady, Jr. policy(a)paulmcgrady.com From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 6:43 PM To: Paul McGrady <policy(a)paulmcgrady.com>; 'James M. Bladel' <jbladel(a)godaddy.com>; 'GNSO Council List' <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Cc: jrobinson(a)afilias.info Subject: Re: [council] FW: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Paul, just to clarify, the charter does not set out the ‘process to spend these windfalls’, it outlines the scope for the CCWG that is expected to develop the framework for disbursements of funds. Also, to provide a bit more background on the process and community deliberations that have lead up to this proposed charter: March 2015: GNSO Chair Jonathan Robinson wrote to SO/AC Chairs to take temperature on the desire for a drafting team to discuss the development of a CCWG June 2015: ICANN53, in Buenos Aires: SO/AC Panel High Interest Session and Community Workshop Session July - August 2015: Development of Discussion Paper Drafted to take into consideration pertinent issues discussed at ICANN53 September 2015: Discussion Paper is published for public comment December 2015: Discussion Paper Comments Report published along with updated Discussion Paper January - February 2016: Requests for nominations to Drafting Team for CCWG, Board Chair nominates Board Liaisons, First Call of Drafting Team/Feb March – September 2016: Drafting Team work, including review of all the materials and input leading up to the DT, distribution of draft charter for review and discussion prior to ICANN56, community session during ICANN56, review of all comments received during ICANN56 as well as those submitted subsequently by email (see comment review tool at https://community.icann.org/x/fgmbAw)[community.icann.org], 13 September 2016: Submission of proposed charter to ICANN SO/ACs with the request to identify any pertinent issues that would prevent SO/AC adoption Of course, I will take your suggestion for a public comment period back to the DT, but I also wanted to remind the Council that the DT has specifically requested input on whether there are any pertinent issues that would avoid adoption of the charter by SO/ACs to be able to address these prior to formally submitting the proposed charter to the ICANN SO/ACs for their consideration. The idea of the DT was to obtain this input by the end of September so it would be in a position to make any updates to the proposed charter, if needed, which would allow for formal submission of the proposed charter in time for consideration by the different SO/ACs at ICANN57. For your convenience, I’ve attached the proposed charter here again. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses[learn.icann.org] and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages[gnso.icann.org]. From: <owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Paul McGrady <policy(a)paulmcgrady.com> Date: Friday 30 September 2016 at 14:47 To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel(a)godaddy.com>, 'GNSO Council List' <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Cc: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson(a)afilias.info> Subject: RE: [council] FW: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG All, Just to follow on from my comments yesterday, it is my personal belief (and not necessarily the view of the IPC, but not necessarily not the view either) that this Charter should be open to a real and robust public comment – not just to those with the time and resources to have traveled to Helsinki. There is no rush to disburse these funds (correct?), so sending the message to the public that ICANN doesn’t want their opinion on the correct process to spend these windfalls, I believe, is an avoidable mistake. Regards, Paul Paul D. McGrady, Jr. policy(a)paulmcgrady.com From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 3:37 PM To: GNSO Council List <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] FW: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Councilors - See message below, sent on behalf of the gTLD Auction Proceeds Charter Drafting Team. Their Draft Charter for a proposed CCWG is attached, and they are requesting feedback by 30 September. If time allows, lets plan to add this as a discussion point for our next call (29 SEP). Thank you, J. From: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Date: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 12:41 Subject: For your review - proposed charter new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Sending on behalf of Jonathan Robinson, new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair: Dear SO/AC Chairs, On behalf of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team (DT), we are delighted to submit to you and your respective SO/ACs, the proposed charter for a Cross-Community Working Group on new gTLD Auction Proceeds. As you may recall, representatives of all ICANN SO/ACs, apart from the ccNSO (which decided not to take part in the DT effort), participated in the DT deliberations (see https://community.icann.org/x/AR_AAw[community.icann.org] for DT members). This proposed charter is the result of extensive input and deliberations, including careful review of input that was received as part of the cross-community session at ICANN 56 in Helsinki (see https://community.icann.org/x/fgmbAw)[community.icann.org] and we believe it now represents a careful balance between the different viewpoints and perspectives, including from both the DT Members and the ICANN Board liaisons to the DT. As such, the DT would like to request you review the proposed charter with this careful balance in mind and only flag to the DT any pertinent issues that would prevent your respective SO/AC from adopting this charter. We would like to request you highlight such pertinent issues by 30 September 2016 at the latest, including an indication of when you anticipate your respective SO/AC to be in a position to consider the charter for adoption following 30 September, provided that no pertinent issues have been identified by any of the ICANN SO/ACs. Of course, should you have any clarifying questions, please do not hesitate to respond to this message. The DT looks forward to receiving your feedback. Best wishes, Jonathan Robinson, DT Chair & Alan Greenberg, DT Vice-Chair

1 0