- Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds - lists.icann.org

mp3 and attendance new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team 14 July 2016
by Terri Agnew July 14, 2016

July 14, 2016

Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording for the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team held on 14 July 2016 at 13:00 UTC: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-auction-proceeds-14jul16-en.mp3<http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=NrFWbrBstcrPWP369qgbqlXiSKeL20xnUXz…> On page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt-cwg-auctionproceeds/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/px6AAw Attendees: ALAC Alan Greenberg ASO None ccNSO Will not be participating in the drafting team GAC Olga Cavalli GNSO Tony Harris Jonathan Robinson RSSAC Brad Verd Kaveh Ranjbar SSAC None Board Board Liaisons Asha Hemrajani Board appointed staff advisors Samantha Eisner Apologies: Russ Mundy Erika Mann Lyman Chapin ICANN staff: Marika Konings Vinciane Koenigsfeld Lauren Allison David Tait Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for Thursday, 14 July 2016 Terri Agnew:Welcome to the New gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG Charter Drafting Team held on Thursday, 14 July 2016 at 13:00 UTC Jonathan Robinson:Hello all Asha Hemrajani:Could I have a dial out please Alan Greenberg:Will be on briedge in a moment Asha Hemrajani:Terri cannot hear you anymore Marika Konings:@Asha - no,we cannot hear you Jonathan Robinson:Has anyone heard from Erica. I emailed her yesterday but did not get a response Asha Hemrajani:@Marika, I was referring to not being able to hear Terri. I wasn't speaking Jonathan Robinson:Thanks Terri Marika Konings:Ah, sorry Asha, I misunderstood Asha Hemrajani:@Jonathan Erika will be able to join us for part of today's call Asha Hemrajani:only Asha Hemrajani:in between her 2 flights Jonathan Robinson:Thaks Asha Asha Hemrajani:Is anyone speaking? I cannot hear anything Jonathan Robinson:Yes Asha, there is audio. Alan was speaking Asha Hemrajani:ok I cannot hear anything - the audio suddenly stopped working for me Asha Hemrajani:so I will exit the adobe room and reconnect again Terri Agnew:@Ahsa, the op is dialing out now Asha Hemrajani:@jonathan, regarding your email to Erika, let's discuss during this call Asha Hemrajani:@jonathan I share your concern Asha Hemrajani:@jonathan Olga is in South America, not Asia Marika Konings:Olga confirmed her availability in the doodle poll Asha Hemrajani:Sylvia is in Australia Marika Konings:Sylvia did not respond to the doodle poll Terri Agnew:Welcome Kaveh Ranjbar Terri Agnew:Welcome Tony Harris Tony Harris:Apology for joining late Samantha Eisner:I'm here Samantha Eisner:There is a document AND a draft charter Samantha Eisner:the document references proposed language that is suggested for integration Marika Konings:It has not been shared with the mailing list yet Alan Greenberg:If there are merged comments, just identify as such (without further names). Olga Cavalli:Hi, apologies for being late. Terri Agnew:Welcome Olga Marika Konings:I didn't capture the names for the Helsinki sessions - just took down the general gist of the contribution Marika Konings:we can go back to the transcript, but that will definitely create additional work Marika Konings:we can note Helsinki session and people can add names if they recall who made the specific point? Marika Konings:The only pre-Helsinki comments are those from Sylvia which we can also easily identify Marika Konings:and email comments that came in after Helsinki meeting Asha Hemrajani:ok I am back Asha Hemrajani:apologies Olga Cavalli:yes good idea Asha Hemrajani:yes Olga Cavalli:+1 to Alan´s comment Olga Cavalli:agree with Alan Olga Cavalli:lobbying differs as a concept from country to country Samantha Eisner:@Asha, instances like that would be addressed when uniform principles that can be established and applied across organization Samantha Eisner:It's the former Samantha Eisner:Or more likely the former Samantha Eisner:I recommend that the CCWG has the ability to address this more head on Asha Hemrajani:@sam ok thanks Asha Hemrajani:@jonathan that works for me, makes sense Tony Harris:Me too Alan Greenberg:It's not likely to be lost, but we may wish to highlight that this is a subsantive area that the CCWG needs to address. Alan Greenberg:At least some of us will be on the CCWG! bverd (RSSAC):Apologies, but I have to sign off for a prior committment. Kaveh Ranjbar:I am already here to repreent RSSAC Tony Harris:Sorry, must also sign off to run to a meeting Asha Hemrajani:agreed Olga Cavalli:agree Asha Hemrajani:can we see the agenda again Asha Hemrajani:thanks found it Olga Cavalli:looks good tome Olga Cavalli:option 2 is more realistic Asha Hemrajani:Marika, can you explain option 2 again Olga Cavalli:remember that northerm hemisphere is summer, not in the south :) Marika Konings:Option 2 would foresee additional time being needed based on feedback from the ICANN SO/ACs in relation to the proposed charter Marika Konings:this is already public as it is on a publicly archived mailing list :-) Asha Hemrajani:would suggest more time buffer and regularly updating the schedule Marika Konings:phew, I already started doubting my math skills! Asha Hemrajani:Jonathan wants to stretch the summer :-) Olga Cavalli:no problem for me Wed or Thursday Asha Hemrajani:I am ok with Wednesdays Olga Cavalli:winter here! Olga Cavalli::) Asha Hemrajani:90min Olga Cavalli:2h is fine Olga Cavalli:90 ok as well Olga Cavalli:thanks to you Asha Hemrajani:Thanks all David Tait:thank you!

1 0

Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Auction Proceeds DT Meeting
by Marika Konings July 14, 2016

July 14, 2016

Dear All, Please find below the proposed agenda for the next new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team meeting which has been scheduled for Thursday 14 July at 13.00 UTC. For your convenience, we’ve created the attached comment review tool to facilitate your review and discussion of the input received to date. Please note that this comment review tool includes the comments raised during the session in Helsinki, those received subsequently by email as well the comments that Sylvia submitted to the mailing list prior to the Helsinki meeting. Best regards, Marika Proposed Agenda – new gTLD Auction Proceeds Drafting Team – Thursday 14 July at 13.00 UTC 1. Roll call & Welcome 2. Review feedback received during Helsinki session & discuss how to address feedback in draft charter 3. Identify outstanding items that need further DT consideration (e.g. statement of interest, conflict of interest) 4. Discuss timeline for finalizing charter 5. Confirm next meeting & next steps Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

2 2

FW: Comments period ?
by Marika Konings July 13, 2016

July 13, 2016

For your information, please see below. We’ll add this input to the comment review tool. Best regards, Marika On 13/07/16 12:31, "Daniel Dardailler" <danield(a)w3.org> wrote: Thanks Marika Our main input is that the current scope is too widely defined. The use of "not inconsistent" with ICANN's mission is a clear departure from the original intent to do something "good for the Internet" aligned with ICANN's principles ("support directly" was the original terms used). Anything that doesn't hurt the Internet would be OK by this weak requirement, such as growing corn with no water or developing clean energy sources. Although there are good projects, they won't help the Internet or the Web reach their full potential. The drafting team has done a good job at describing what would not be OK to fund from a procedural point of view (such as funding individuals, lobbying groups, inconsistent with ICANN's tax rules, etc), but so far has not clearly establish what should be the criteria the CCWG should use to further develop the grant instrument itself. We think that it should be made clear in the charter that - the funding will only go to Internet related projects, which are by nature technical, and not to anything marginally related to the Internet (everything is nowadays) and that doesn't hurt the Internet: it has to do good for the Internet, its shared infrastructure, it's users (as Internet users, not just as regular citizen) - use of funding should be in support of the main goals of ICANN: to improve the stability, security, and global interoperability of the Internet. - it should consider criteria of global benefits vs. local benefits (e.g. is this funding going to help all Internet users or just a limited population ?) - it should consider criteria of long terms benefits vs. short terms results (hence the importance of funding infrastructure oriented things) - it should consider criteria of scaling effects: will a relatively small funding (e.g. 1M USD over the 100 available) have rippling benefits saving Internet users and the community much more than that in the end ? - it should consider additional criteria such as difficulty to be funded by usual granters (such as gov, large foundations). Also, the Internet being implemented as a stack of layers of technologies: - physical layer (e.g. optic cable, wifi, dsl), - logical/software (ip, dns, http, etc), - application (search, social platform, content), it would be useful for someone, the drafting team, or the CCWG, to explore the funding priorities along those lines. We think the focus should be on the middleware layers: from managing IP network, DNS, to improving the http/Web layers since these are the closest technologies in support of the Internet as seen by ICANN. Funding physicial layers work for instance might very well be used by a competitor network to IP, and funding pure content runs the same risks (of attracting users to another network than IP). Take care. Daniel Dardailler Director of International Relations W3C On 2016-07-11 15:01, Marika Konings wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > There is no official comment period, but the DT invited those that > were in attendance either in person or remotely during the session in > Helsinki to provide their contributions via email if they did not have > an opportunity to speak up during the session. The next meeting of the > DT is scheduled for coming Thursday during which they will start > reviewing the input received as part of the Helsinki session so > ideally any comments you have are received prior to Thursday (you can > send your comments to me and I will forward them to the drafting > team). The latest version of the charter can be found here: > https://community.icann.org/x/mRuOAw. > > Best regards, > > Marika > > On 11/07/16 14:32, "Daniel Dardailler" <danield(a)w3.org> wrote: > > Hello Marika > > I'd like to know where I can find the latest charter for the CCWG on > Auctions, and what is your deadline for acccepting comments. > > > Thanks.

1 0

Overview of comments made during Cross-Community Session
by Marika Konings July 1, 2016

July 1, 2016

Dear All, Please find attached a high level overview of the comments received during the cross-community session. Note that I’ve attempted to organize these in line with a number of different themes that seemed to emerge during the meeting. In some cases these comments already include the response provided by the chairs and/or DT members during the discussion. You may want to consider having these included in a public comment review tool to allow for the systematic review of this input, as well as any other input DT members may have on the latest version of the charter (for example, Sylvia already submitted a number of comments)? I will work with the DT leadership team to identify a date/time for our next meeting, so please stay tuned. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

1 0

Re: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] FW: New gTLD Auction Proceeds
by Sylvia Cadena June 29, 2016

June 29, 2016

Thanks Marika. It will be great to have a bit of information about the session, in a condensed form to be able to work through it. My connection here is not that good to be able to follow the webcast or stream video -sorry–. Glad to know people agree that the CCWG should not be part of the disbursement process. It seems that it was not that clear for those that make the remarks though. I also agree with the need to define a finite time for the CCWG to work, and I hope we can add that to our future discussions. Warm regards, Sylvia From: <dt-cwg-auctionproceeds-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:dt-cwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Date: Wednesday, 29 June 2016 at 5:26 PM To: "dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org<mailto:dt-cwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>" <dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org<mailto:dt-cwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>> Subject: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] FW: New gTLD Auction Proceeds For your information, please find another comment below following yesterday’s session. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>. From: Greg Kapfer <kapfer(a)isoc.org<mailto:kapfer@isoc.org>> Date: Wednesday 29 June 2016 at 07:16 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Cc: Greg Kapfer <kapfer(a)isoc.org<mailto:kapfer@isoc.org>> Subject: Re: New gTLD Auction Proceeds Marika, Thanks for hosting the community discussion yesterday. I understand that follow-on comments should be directed to you, and thereby to the Charter Drafting Committee. In the discussion, one participant recommended that the CCWG have a finite life, and that distribution decisions not be made in such a way that the distributions be strung out over time. A second speaker suggested that principle should not preclude distribution to recipients/programs that seek long-term goals and funding mechanisms that foster lasting impact for the Internet community. This speaker also noted that these principles need not be mutually exclusive. The Internet Society agrees with both recommendations to the Charter Drafting Committee. It would be a monumental task to marshal the tens of millions of dollars in the New gTLD Auction Proceeds over any short-term period. Examples of such funding and program vehicles are: · Capacity Building within developing countries, in which funds could stimulate partnerships with governments, equipment donors, and civil society. · Contribution to existing endowments legally designed to maintain the contributed corpus to ensure a long-term stable funding tool. These are areas of interest that the Internet Society has, and will continue to, pursue. The former could be attained through designated funds for this purpose. The latter is represented by the existing Endowment for the Sustainability of the IETF<http://sustainietf.org/> dedicated to ensuring the long-term funding for the IETF in its standard setting work. Thank you again for this opportunity to provide input into this important process. Greg Kapfer Chief Financial Officer Internet Society ————————————————————————— Looking for something interesting to read? Get to know our Development Program at https://www.apnic.net/publications/media-library/brochures/files/APNIC-Deve… ————————————————————————— Sylvia Cadena | Community Partnerships Specialist | sylvia(a)apnic.net<mailto:sylvia@apnic.net> ISIF Asia Information Society Innovation Fund sip: sylvia(a)voip.apnic.net<mailto:sylvia@voip.apnic.net> skype: sylviacadena https://www.facebook.com/ISIF.asia http://gplusme.at/ISIFAsia Twitter @ISIF_Asia ISIF blog http://discover.isif.asia<http://discover.isif.asia/> Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC) 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101 Australia | PO Box 3646 Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 | Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 http://www.apnic.net<http://www.apnic.net/> | http://www.isif.asia<http://www.isif.asia/> | https://blog.apnic.net/ * Sent by email to save paper. Print only if necessary.

2 2

FW: New gTLD Auction Proceeds
by Marika Konings June 29, 2016

June 29, 2016

For your information, please find another comment below following yesterday’s session. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>. From: Greg Kapfer <kapfer(a)isoc.org> Date: Wednesday 29 June 2016 at 07:16 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Cc: Greg Kapfer <kapfer(a)isoc.org> Subject: Re: New gTLD Auction Proceeds Marika, Thanks for hosting the community discussion yesterday. I understand that follow-on comments should be directed to you, and thereby to the Charter Drafting Committee. In the discussion, one participant recommended that the CCWG have a finite life, and that distribution decisions not be made in such a way that the distributions be strung out over time. A second speaker suggested that principle should not preclude distribution to recipients/programs that seek long-term goals and funding mechanisms that foster lasting impact for the Internet community. This speaker also noted that these principles need not be mutually exclusive. The Internet Society agrees with both recommendations to the Charter Drafting Committee. It would be a monumental task to marshal the tens of millions of dollars in the New gTLD Auction Proceeds over any short-term period. Examples of such funding and program vehicles are: · Capacity Building within developing countries, in which funds could stimulate partnerships with governments, equipment donors, and civil society. · Contribution to existing endowments legally designed to maintain the contributed corpus to ensure a long-term stable funding tool. These are areas of interest that the Internet Society has, and will continue to, pursue. The former could be attained through designated funds for this purpose. The latter is represented by the existing Endowment for the Sustainability of the IETF<http://sustainietf.org/> dedicated to ensuring the long-term funding for the IETF in its standard setting work. Thank you again for this opportunity to provide input into this important process. Greg Kapfer Chief Financial Officer Internet Society

1 0

FW: Auctions proceeds comment
by Marika Konings June 28, 2016

June 28, 2016

Dear All, As further comments come in, I will forward them to the mailing list, but I will also capture them in the notes I took during the session so that you have a complete record of the input provided so that it can be reviewed at one of next meetings of the drafting team. Best regards, Marika On 28/06/16 16:35, "Matthew Shears" <mshears(a)cdt.org> wrote: Hi Marika Could you be sure to note my comment in the chat from the meting today: matthew shears: I don't think that te CCWG should be involved at all in anything related to funds disbursement - the CCWG should propose mechanisms and/or structures that would be independent of the CCWG (in other words once establihsed the CCWG should be dissolved so as to avoid anyu conflict of interest) Thanks. Matthew -- Matthew Shears | Director, Global Internet Policy & Human Rights Project Center for Democracy & Technology | cdt.org E: mshears(a)cdt.org | T: +44.771.247.2987

1 0

Slide deck for cross-community session
by Marika Konings June 28, 2016

June 28, 2016

Dear All, Please find attached the final slide deck for tomorrow’s cross-community session on new gTLD Auction Proceeds. The session is scheduled on Tuesday 27 June from 15.15 – 16.45 Helsinki time. For further details, please see http://sched.co/7NE0. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.

2 1

Re: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated slide deck
by Sylvia Cadena June 27, 2016

June 27, 2016

Thanks Marika for sharing the slides and the latest draft of the charter. Best of luck to Jonathan and all present there to share the work so far at the cross-community session. I am looking forward to know how the meeting went, and what contributions/questions from the floor can be incorporated to the process so that the charter can be finalized soon. I like very much the progress done on the text regarding expert advice. Fully support that. Only small detail there is that it will be important to mention there that expert advisors should also disclose any conflict of interest. I am very sorry about my lack of participation to the last 2 meetings or to share comments before, but I really have to express my concern about 2 important issues that were changed during your discussions over the last 2 meetings that I do not agree with, which were already discussed in previous meetings. I have argued to support both issues below in all the previous meetings I was able to attend, as well as documents shared with the mailing list. * I do not agree with the use of the words “non inconsistent” when referring to ICANN’s mission. Fund allocations must be in line with ICANN’s mission as that is key not only to preserve the tax status, but also to support communities that can hardly access other sources of funding (like traditional donors) as they do not understand the nature of the technical challenges those projects or organizations are trying to solve/address. For example, it is very hard for organization maintaining root-servers, IXPs, developing standards (just as an example) to apply for traditional funding. The auction proceeds provide a unique opportunity to support the stability of the Internet not only at the infrastructure level. Projects/organizations applying for funds should be able to articulate how their proposal is actually in line with ICANN’s mission. The previous word in use was “furtherance”, which was already wide enough. By changing it to “non consistent” the text has an even weaker approach to support ICANN’s mission. * The text about diversity was modified, and the mention to the 3 communities that ICANN serves was removed. I do not support that change. It is very important that the diversity focus also applies to the communities ICANN serves. Also, just wanted to point out, that as we are pushing so hard for disclosure of conflict of interest, it will be important to have all our SOI updated on the DT wiki, just to be consistent with what we are talking about. There are a few there hat are missing. Warm regards, Sylvia From: <dt-cwg-auctionproceeds-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:dt-cwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Date: Friday, 24 June 2016 at 11:23 PM To: "dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org<mailto:dt-cwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>" <dt-cwg-auctionproceeds(a)icann.org<mailto:dt-cwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org>> Subject: [Dt-cwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated slide deck Dear All, Please find attached for your review an updated version of the slide deck. Note that we are still working on the process & objectives for this session slide but we already wanted to give you an opportunity to review this version and encourage you to share any additional questions you think need to be called out as part of the cross-community session. You will see that there are still slides with the verbatim text of the charter in the deck, but those are merely there for background and/or when needed during the discussion. Looking forward to receiving your input. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>. ————————————————————————— Looking for something interesting to read? Get to know our Development Program at https://www.apnic.net/publications/media-library/brochures/files/APNIC-Deve… ————————————————————————— Sylvia Cadena | Community Partnerships Specialist | sylvia(a)apnic.net<mailto:sylvia@apnic.net> ISIF Asia Information Society Innovation Fund sip: sylvia(a)voip.apnic.net<mailto:sylvia@voip.apnic.net> skype: sylviacadena https://www.facebook.com/ISIF.asia http://gplusme.at/ISIFAsia Twitter @ISIF_Asia ISIF blog http://discover.isif.asia<http://discover.isif.asia/> Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC) 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101 Australia | PO Box 3646 Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 | Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 http://www.apnic.net<http://www.apnic.net/> | http://www.isif.asia<http://www.isif.asia/> | https://blog.apnic.net/ * Sent by email to save paper. Print only if necessary.

2 1

For your review - updated slide deck
by Marika Konings June 24, 2016

June 24, 2016

Dear All, Please find attached for your review an updated version of the slide deck. Note that we are still working on the process & objectives for this session slide but we already wanted to give you an opportunity to review this version and encourage you to share any additional questions you think need to be called out as part of the cross-community session. You will see that there are still slides with the verbatim text of the charter in the deck, but those are merely there for background and/or when needed during the discussion. Looking forward to receiving your input. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.

1 0