Board readiness - Revised interviewee packet
Hi All: You might remember that, after a trial interview with Susan, we thought that the questions should be amended in some way. The amendments I am suggesting here, apply to the first question about “surprise.” Under the initial brand question, I ask the interviewee to consider if s/he was surprised about pended or rejected recommendations for different “categories” of rejection: cost, Bylaw violation, need to consult with the GAC, wording clarification. I also slightly recorded some of the other questions to make them more germane to SubPro. Please read the page of questions and see if this makes sense to you. Staff comments very welcome. Thanks very much. Kurt
Hi Kurt, Just checking in. Would you happened to have a different list or version of questions for the SubPro Board liaison? Or is this the only version of the info packet and that has been shared with Becky Burr? Kind regards, Justine On Sat, 31 May 2025 at 16:26, kurt kjpritz.com via Gnso-board-readiness-smallteam <gnso-board-readiness-smallteam@icann.org> wrote:
Hi All:
You might remember that, after a trial interview with Susan, we thought that the questions should be amended in some way.
The amendments I am suggesting here, apply to the first question about “surprise.” Under the initial brand question, I ask the interviewee to consider if s/he was surprised about pended or rejected recommendations for different “categories” of rejection: cost, Bylaw violation, need to consult with the GAC, wording clarification.
I also slightly recorded some of the other questions to make them more germane to SubPro.
Please read the page of questions and see if this makes sense to you.
Staff comments very welcome.
Thanks very much.
Kurt
_______________________________________________ Gnso-board-readiness-smallteam mailing list -- gnso-board-readiness-smallteam@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-board-readiness-smallteam-leave@icann.org
participants (2)
-
Justine Chew -
kurt kjpritz.com