January 2019 - Gnso-epdp-team

Recommendation 1 (new purposes)
by Mueller, Milton L Jan. 18, 2019

Jan. 18, 2019

During our meeting Friday I was asked to analyze public comments on Recommendation 1 to see whether there was anything other than Purpose O (research by ICANN) that needed to be considered. As you can see from the attached spreadsheet, the answer is a simple No. There is only one new purpose proposed, namely George Kirikos's proposal for collecting data to establish the ownership history of domain names. But this did not obtain support from any other commenter or from people within the EPDP. All other requests for "additional" Purposes were either covered by existing purposes and recommendations (usually Purpose 2 but also Purpose 5 and Recommendation 7) or were variations on the "research" purpose which we considered. Several other comments did not propose new purposes at all but rather made comments about Purposes already proposed in the initial report; e.g., the request by RySG to clarify to which party (ICANN, Registries, Registrars) purposes were attributed. Regarding the "Research" purpose, as we discussed Friday it is not clear whether it is needed until ICANN's role is specified. As Ruth stated, if ICANN is the controller for registration data it can use the data for research anyway. I would conclude that in responding to public comment we can use this analysis as the basis for our response. Dr. Milton L. Mueller Professor, School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology

1 0

EPDP Team meeting during ICANN 64 Kobe
by Kavouss Arasteh Jan. 18, 2019

Jan. 18, 2019

Derar Kurt, Pls by the end of this meeting kindly clarify whether there would be travel support for the above-mentioned meeting The sooner the better to enable finding cheaper ticket " Marche grise" Regards Kavouss

2 1

Fwd: [council] GDPR EPDP
by Stephanie Perrin Jan. 18, 2019

Jan. 18, 2019

this is a very useful recent opinion; I find the highlighted article summarized the guidance in a helpful way. Stephanie Perrin -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [council] GDPR EPDP Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:55:22 +0100 From: Erika Mann <erika(a)erikamann.com><mailto:erika@erikamann.com> To: council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> All - Maybe helpful for your EPDP discussion’s. Keep in mind this document is released by the Belgian national DPA and not the European cross national board of DPAs. Nonetheless I assume that they will have discussed this with their colleagues but I had no chance (yet) to check this. Regards, Erika Belgium's privacy watchdog publishes guidance on the notions of controller and processor<https://www.lexology.com/r.ashx?i=6685664&l=88SJB9G> CMS Belgium[CMS Belgium logo]<http://www.cms-db.com/> Belgium<https://www.lexology.com/hub/belgium> January 17 2019 Recently, the Belgian Data Protection Authority (“DPA<https://www.dataprotectionauthority.be/>”) published guidance on controller and processor concepts (see original documents in French<https://www.autoriteprotectiondonnees.be/sites/privacycommission/files/docu…> and in Dutch<https://www.gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit.be/sites/privacycommission/files…>), refreshing the distinction between these two concepts and their implications. In view of recent questions about the qualification and concrete application of the concepts of controller and processor, the DPA has decided to recap the principles and definitions applicable to these concepts. Sent from my iPhone

1 0

MEETING STARTS IN 15 MIN--REMINDER: Meeting Invitation / Alternates & Observers / GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP call / 16-18 January 2019 F2F meetings
by Andrea Glandon Jan. 18, 2019

Jan. 18, 2019

Dear all, Non-members can follow the EPDP F2F meeting taking place on 16-18 January 2019 in Toronto, Canada via the audio cast or view only Adobe Connect room. Agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/sAn_BQ As requested and discussed on Tuesday's (14 August 2018) meeting, please note that an additional Adobe Connect room has been created for use by interested alternates and observers to be able to view-only the main EPDP Team Adobe Connect room. The view-only room will also broadcast the audio of the EPDP Team AC room, however, those in the view-only room will not be heard. Note that the audio cast stream will also remain available for now for those that prefer to use that option to listen live to the EPDP Team meeting. View-Only Adobe Connect room for alternates and observers: https://participate.icann.org/gnso-epdp-observers Meeting Audio Cast (for alternates and observers) To join the event, click on the link: Listen in browser: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01 [stream.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__stream.icann.org-3A8000…> Listen in application such as iTunes: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01.m3u [stream.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__stream.icann.org-3A8000…> Kind Regards, Terri

1 2

Notes, action items and outcomes of day 2
by Caitlin Tubergen Jan. 18, 2019

Jan. 18, 2019

Dear EPDP Team, Please find attached the notes, action items and outcomes of Day 2 of the EPDP Team F2F meeting in Toronto. Best regards, Marika, Berry, and Caitlin

1 0

Meeting Invitation: Alternates & Observers / GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP call / Tuesday, 22 January 2019 for 3 hours
by Terri Agnew Jan. 17, 2019

Jan. 17, 2019

Dear all, Non-members can follow the EPDP call taking place on Tuesdays and Thursdays via the audio cast or view only Adobe Connect room. As requested and discussed on Tuesday's (14 August 2018) meeting, please note that an additional Adobe Connect room has been created for use by interested alternates and observers to be able to view-only the main EPDP Team Adobe Connect room. The view-only room will also broadcast the audio of the EPDP Team AC room, however, those in the view-only room will not be heard. Note that the audio cast stream will also remain available for now for those that prefer to use that option to listen live to the EPDP Team meeting. View-Only Adobe Connect room for alternates and observers: https://participate.icann.org/gnso-epdp-observers Meeting Audio Cast (for alternates and observers) To join the event, click on the link: Listen in browser: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01 Listen in application such as iTunes: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01.m3u Agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/8pUWBg Thank you. Kind Regards, Terri

1 0

why purpose 2 is relevant to ICANN's mission
by Chris Disspain Jan. 17, 2019

Jan. 17, 2019

Attached is the explanation I am just giving to the EPDP team regarding purpose 2 and ICANN’s mission. Cheers, CD

3 2

Notes, action items and outcomes of day 1
by Marika Konings Jan. 17, 2019

Jan. 17, 2019

Dear EPDP Team, Please find attached the notes, action items and outcomes of day 1 of the EPDP Team F2F meeting in Toronto. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses…> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gn…>.

2 1

REMINDER: Meeting Invitation / Alternates & Observers / GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP call / 16-18 January 2019 F2F meetings
by Terri Agnew Jan. 15, 2019

Jan. 15, 2019

Dear all, Non-members can follow the EPDP F2F meeting taking place on 16-18 January 2019 in Toronto, Canada via the audio cast or view only Adobe Connect room. Agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/sAn_BQ As requested and discussed on Tuesday's (14 August 2018) meeting, please note that an additional Adobe Connect room has been created for use by interested alternates and observers to be able to view-only the main EPDP Team Adobe Connect room. The view-only room will also broadcast the audio of the EPDP Team AC room, however, those in the view-only room will not be heard. Note that the audio cast stream will also remain available for now for those that prefer to use that option to listen live to the EPDP Team meeting. View-Only Adobe Connect room for alternates and observers: https://participate.icann.org/gnso-epdp-observers Meeting Audio Cast (for alternates and observers) To join the event, click on the link: Listen in browser: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01 [stream.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__stream.icann.org-3A8000…> Listen in application such as iTunes: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01.m3u [stream.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__stream.icann.org-3A8000…> Kind Regards, Terri

1 0

CPH Proposed Alternative to Small Team Approach
by Rosette, Kristina Jan. 15, 2019

Jan. 15, 2019

All, On behalf of the CPH members and alternates, attached and copied below is a CPH-proposed alternative to the small team approach. The CPH does not support the small team approach, and discussed it at a meeting earlier today. -*- Whilst we appreciate the challenge of finding an approach that is both effective and works for all members, the CPH does not support the 3 small team proposal as the best way to review public comments.[1] [FN1: Although CPH representatives discussed at their meeting this morning the 3-team proposal that had been put forward over the weekend, the rationale applies also to the more recent 2-team proposal. ] Dividing the EPDP Team into 3 Small teams creates huge coordination challenges for each group and puts a significant burden on the individuals who have to represent their group. EPDP topics are so interrelated that it's difficult to discuss in the vacuum of small teams and given the necessary need to ensure all differing interests are represented in each team, there is likely to be same lack of consensus that exists in the team as a whole. Furthermore, dividing up group members will necessitate an increase in the amount of time that will have to be spent discussing progress and concerns within each group. Being on the EPDP Team is already a huge time commitment for its members, and presumably few can afford to commit even more time to be able to keep up to date on 3 teams, instead of 1. Therefore the CPH would like to propose the following alternate approach: 1) Staff confirm the order in which each purpose/recommendation is going to be reviewed 2) Instead of meeting as a team (or small teams) allow this Tuesday's (8 January 2019) call time to be used by each group to go through the public comments themselves. We appreciate that members have already been asked to review all public comments, but in practise, it is unlikely that most have had the time to do so. 3) Each group should review the public comments for each purpose and recommendation (in the order specified by staff as per 1) and agree on their position. If, after reviewing the public comments, a group would like to change their position, they need to provide a rationale as to why. If the group's position is unchanged, they should identify why they haven't changed their position. 4) Each group should provide their position and rationale for each purpose/recommendation in writing, in advance of the meeting where it is going to be discussed, so that Staff can present it to the whole group in a review-friendly format 5) The EPDP Team continues to meet as a whole team on Tuesdays and Thursdays, but instead of discussing the individual public comments, it discusses the position of each group on the public comments of each recommendation/purpose, where there is no consensus. 6) In between meetings, the list should be utilised to continue discussion, one topic at a time. List discussion should be highly focused and structured, for example providing a response to specific questions. -*- Kristina Kristina Rosette Senior Corporate Counsel, IP - Domains rosettek(a)amazon.com<mailto:rosettek@amazon.com> | 703.407.1354 ________________________________ [1] Although CPH representatives discussed at their meeting this morning the 3-team proposal that had been put forward over the weekend, the rationale applies also to the more recent 2-team proposal.

8 10