September 2019 - Gnso-epdp-team

Decision to disclose input document
by Caitlin Tubergen 18 Sep '19

18 Sep '19

Dear EPDP Team, Further to the following action item from the F2F, “Support staff to create a Google Doc in which EPDP Team Members are to review and consider the types of disclosure decision models (in other words, who is making the ultimate determination to disclose non-public registration data - contracted party or ICANN) and what would make these options acceptable to the different groups by Thursday, September 19,” please find the a Google Doc for your input: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10VRZRziGDXvckC_y3ob_SGB-1NN9WrL6Y6A3XQu…. Thank you, and have a nice weekend. Best regards, Marika, Berry, and Caitlin

2 1

Proposed Agenda - EPDP Team meeting #19 on Thursday 19 September at 14.00 UTC
by Marika Konings 18 Sep '19

18 Sep '19

Dear EPDP Team, Please find below the proposed agenda for the next EPDP Team meeting which is scheduled for Thursday 19 September at 14.00 UTC. As a reminder, here are the action items coming out of the F2F meeting: 1. Alex Deacon, Milton Mueller and other willing volunteers to draft a write up of a potential accreditation model, taking into account the Team’s F2F discussions, in advance of the Thursday, 19 September meeting. 2. IPC, BC, SSAC, and GAC reps to separately draft a vision for their “ideal accreditation model” in order to assist the group with what the baseline accreditation requirements could be as well as the attendant benefits of accreditation within the architecture of an SSAD by Wednesday, September 18. 3. Support Staff to create a table (in the form of a Google Doc) which includes a column for each lawful basis and a column for what a requesting party would be required to provide in its request, what is the expected response time, is automation likely, what are the standardized categories that may fall within that lawful basis, etc. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U9jt9nOHs9QMjWTDl7UPaT--9aD2lHZI/edit. Following receipt of the table, the EPDP Team members to populate the contents of the table by Wednesday 25 September. If there are commonalities, policy recommendations can be drafted accordingly. 4. Support staff to create a Google Doc (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/10VRZRziGDXvckC_y3ob_SGB-1NN9WrL6Y6A3XQu…) in which EPDP Team Members are to review and consider the types of disclosure decision models (in other words, who is making the ultimate determination to disclose non-public registration data - contracted party or ICANN) and what would make these options acceptable to the different groups by Thursday, September 19. 5. EPDP Team to review the legal memos and come back with the most relevant points that need to be factored in as the Staff Support Team produces the 1.0 draft by Thursday, September 19. 6. James and Mark Sv. to work together on a revised proposal for Building Block L (SSAD query policy) by Thursday, September 19. When discussing updates to Building Block L, Team members to consider if it is within the Team’s charter to continue discussing this issue. 7. Matt C. to review the legal advice on how to perform the balancing test and update Alan Woods’ initial balancing test document into a simple guide to conduct the balancing test to be included in the next iteration of the zero draft by Thursday, September 19. 8. Contracted party Team members to draft letter to ICANN Board, outlining scenarios discussed, including where the disclosure decision lies within the SSAD, and inquire whether there are any options the Board would not be amenable to. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika ============ EPDP Phase 2 - Meeting #19 Proposed Agenda Thursday, 19 September 2019 at 14.00 UTC 1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes) 2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair) 3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes) a) Legal committee update 4. Accreditation (30 minutes) a) Overview of updates made in response to input received during F2F meeting (Alex Deacon, Milton Mueller) b) Feedback from EPDP Team c) Confirm next steps 5. Query Policy – second/final reading (15 minutes) a) Overview of updates made in response to input received during F2F meeting (James Bladel, Mark Svancarek) b) Feedback from EPDP Team c) Confirm next steps 6. Who should be responsible for disclosure decision (30 minutes) a) Review team input (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/10VRZRziGDXvckC_y3ob_SGB- 1NN9WrL6Y6A3XQuniv8/edit<https://docs.google.com/document/d/10VRZRziGDXvckC_y3ob_SGB-%091NN9WrL6Y6A3…>) b) Consider team input and approach forward c) Confirm next steps 7. Proposed schedule of meetings and topics to be covered until ICANN66 (15 minutes) a) Review proposed schedule b) Feedback from EPDP Team c) Confirm next steps 8. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting (5 minutes): a) Thursday 26 September 2019 at 14.00 UTC b) Confirm action items c) Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses…> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gn…>.

3 2

Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] [Ext] Re: Proposed Agenda - EPDP Team meeting #19 on Thursday 19 September at 14.00 UTC
by Marika Konings 18 Sep '19

18 Sep '19

Hi Alan, The link is the same as the one referenced under action item 4 (https://docs.google.com/document/d/10VRZRziGDXvckC_y3ob_SGB-1NN9WrL6Y6A3XQu…). Something must have gone wrong when pasting the link into the agenda item. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 08:30 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org>, "gnso-epdp-team(a)icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Proposed Agenda - EPDP Team meeting #19 on Thursday 19 September at 14.00 UTC I get doc not found for the link under agenda item 6. Alan At 16/09/2019 11:01 AM, Marika Konings wrote: Dear EPDP Team, Please find below the proposed agenda for the next EPDP Team meeting which is scheduled for Thursday 19 September at 14.00 UTC. As a reminder, here are the action items coming out of the F2F meeting: 1. Alex Deacon, Milton Mueller and other willing volunteers to draft a write up of a potential accreditation model, taking into account the Teamâ€™s F2F discussions, in advance of the Thursday, 19 September meeting. 2. IPC, BC, SSAC, and GAC reps to separately draft a vision for their â€œideal accreditation modelâ€ in order to assist the group with what the baseline accreditation requirements could be as well as the attendant benefits of accreditation within the architecture of an SSAD by Wednesday, September 18. 3. Support Staff to create a table (in the form of a Google Doc) which includes a column for each lawful basis and a column for what a requesting party would be required to provide in its request, what is the expected response time, is automation likely, what are the standardized categories that may fall within that lawful basis, etc. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U9jt9nOHs9QMjWTDl7UPaT--9aD2lHZI/edit [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> . Following receipt of the table, the EPDP Team members to populate the contents of the table by Wednesday 25 September. If there are commonalities, policy recommendations can be drafted accordingly. 4. Support staff to create a Google Doc (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/10VRZRziGDXvckC_y3ob_SGB-1NN9WrL6Y6A3XQu… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> ) in which EPDP Team Members are to review and consider the types of disclosure decision models (in other words, who is making the ultimate determination to disclose non-public registration data - contracted party or ICANN) and what would make these options acceptable to the different groups by Thursday, September 19. 5. EPDP Team to review the legal memos and come back with the most relevant points that need to be factored in as the Staff Support Team produces the 1.0 draft by Thursday, September 19. 6. James and Mark Sv. to work together on a revised proposal for Building Block L (SSAD query policy) by Thursday, September 19. When discussing updates to Building Block L, Team members to consider if it is within the Teamâ€™s charter to continue discussing this issue. 7. Matt C. to review the legal advice on how to perform the balancing test and update Alan Woodsâ€™ initial balancing test document into a simple guide to conduct the balancing test to be included in the next iteration of the zero draft by Thursday, September 19. 8. Contracted party Team members to draft letter to ICANN Board, outlining scenarios discussed, including where the disclosure decision lies within the SSAD, and inquire whether there are any options the Board would not be amenable to. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika ============ EPDP Phase 2 - Meeting #19 Proposed Agenda Thursday, 19 September 2019 at 14.00 UTC 1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes) 2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair) 3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes) a) Legal committee update 4. Accreditation (30 minutes) a) Overview of updates made in response to input received during F2F meeting (Alex Deacon, Milton Mueller) b) Feedback from EPDP Team c) Confirm next steps 5. Query Policy – second/final readinng (15 minutes) a) Overview of updates made in response to input received during F2F meeting (James Bladel, Mark Svancarek) b) Feedback from EPDP Team c) Confirm next steps 6. Who should be responsible for disclosure decision (30 minutes) a) Review team input (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/10VRZRziGDXvckC_y3ob_SGB- 1NN9WrL6Y6A3XQuniv8/edit [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…>) b) Consider team input and approach forward c) Confirm next steps 7. Proposed schedule of meetings and topics to be covered until ICANN66 (15 minutes) a) Review proposed schedule b) Feedback from EPDP Team c) Confirm next steps 8. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting (5 minutes): a) Thursday 26 September 2019 at 14.00 UTC b) Confirm action items c) Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, IInternet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses…> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gn…>. _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_…>) and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_…>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

1 0

**Reminder** Meeting Invitation / Observers / GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP-P2 call / 19 September 2019
by Julie Bisland 18 Sep '19

18 Sep '19

**Please note, if needed, the telephone join information has been updated (see below) As a result of various requests to facilitate observers to follow the EPDP Phase 2 deliberations in real time, audio cast will be made available for the EPDP plenary meetings. Staff will be monitoring audio cast attendance numbers so that the EPDP leadership can assess its usage. As a reminder, the zoom recording, mp3 recording, chat transcript and transcript of the EPDP plenary meetings will be publicly posted as soon as available on the EPDP wiki page and GNSO master calendar. Dear all, The next meeting of the GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP – Phase 2 is scheduled on Thursday, 19 September 2019 at 14:00 UTC for 120 minutes. (calls will be scheduled for 120 minutes but aim to keep to 90 minutes) 07:00 PDT, 10:00 EDT, 16:00 Paris CEST, 19:00 Karachi PKT, 23:00 Tokyo JST, (Friday) 00:00 Melbourne AEST For other times: https://tinyurl.com/y6tba8hk [tinyurl.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tinyurl.com_y6tba8hk&d…> Agenda Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/9YUCBw The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_grou…> Meeting Audio Cast (for observers) To join the event, click on the link: Listen in browser: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01 [stream.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__stream.icann.org-3A8000…> Listen in application such as iTunes: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01.m3u [stream.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__stream.icann.org-3A8000…> Kind Regards, Terri If needed, an option to join via telephone has been added for this meeting. **New join information - Conference Bridge: Toll-free access number (US and Canada): 800 550 6865 and Toll 213 233 3193 Other telephone numbers found here: http://www.adigo.com/icann [adigo.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adigo.com_icann&d=D…> Enter passcode on telephone: 7349

1 0

**Updated telephone join information / Meeting Invitation / Observers / GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP-P2 call / 19 September 2019
by Terri Agnew 16 Sep '19

16 Sep '19

**Please note, if needed, the telephone join information has been updated (see below) As a result of various requests to facilitate observers to follow the EPDP Phase 2 deliberations in real time, audio cast will be made available for the EPDP plenary meetings. Staff will be monitoring audio cast attendance numbers so that the EPDP leadership can assess its usage. As a reminder, the zoom recording, mp3 recording, chat transcript and transcript of the EPDP plenary meetings will be publicly posted as soon as available on the EPDP wiki page and GNSO master calendar. Dear all, The next meeting of the GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP – Phase 2 is scheduled on Thursday, 19 September 2019 at 14:00 UTC for 120 minutes. (calls will be scheduled for 120 minutes but aim to keep to 90 minutes) 07:00 PDT, 10:00 EDT, 16:00 Paris CEST, 19:00 Karachi PKT, 23:00 Tokyo JST, (Friday) 00:00 Melbourne AEST For other times: https://tinyurl.com/y6tba8hk Agenda Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/9YUCBw The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_grou…> Meeting Audio Cast (for observers) To join the event, click on the link: Listen in browser: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01 Listen in application such as iTunes: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01.m3u Kind Regards, Terri If needed, an option to join via telephone has been added for this meeting. **New join information - Conference Bridge: Toll-free access number (US and Canada): 800 550 6865 and Toll 213 233 3193 Other telephone numbers found here: http://www.adigo.com/icann Enter passcode on telephone: 7349

1 0

Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] High-level notes and action items - EPDP Team F2F - 9-11 September
by Alan Greenberg 15 Sep '19

15 Sep '19

My understanding was different. It was not that she was uncomfortable with the questions (or whatever is in the overall document) but that she wanted to first pass it by the EU people who were acting as advisors (ie partners in formulating the doc). There is not point in sharing what is there now if it may be completely changed - that would be a waste of our time. Alan At 14/09/2019 05:42 PM, Ayden Férdeline wrote: >Thanks Alan, I think your recollection is >correct, but I personally found that response >from ICANN Org to be unsatisfactory. > >Before these questions are being shared with any >third party, I think we as a chartered working >group should be able to review them so that we >have a fuller understanding of what discussions >are taking place that could potentially impact our work. > >I think this is particularly important given >Elena herself expressed discomfort with the way >in which the questions were worded. If ICANN >staff are not fully comfortable with the >questions, I think we should be able to read >through them ASAP and to offer speedy input on >suggested improvements or revisions. > >I appreciate the questions are still a working >document, and it's with that understanding that >we would be offering suggested improvements - >with a vision only to making sure we get >information back that is actionable and useful for us as a working group. > >Best wishes, Ayden > >‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >On Saturday, 14 September 2019 22:14, Alan >Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> wrote: > > > My recollection is that Elena said that she did > > not feel comfortable sharing the memo now, prior > > to consulting with the EU folks who are helping > > them, but would share it with us once that is > > done and prior to submitting to the EDPB. > > > > Alan > > > > At 12/09/2019 09:07 PM, Ayden FÃ©rdeline wrote: > > > > > Also, I appreciate that it was not agreed as an > > > action item, but is there any way in which we > > > might be able to keep an open dialogue with the > > > Strawberry Team and - importantly - to see their > > > questions they plan to submit to the European > > > Data Protection Board before they are submitted > > > to any external party? I think we can all > > > appreciate they would be in draft form - that's > > > why we would like to help get the wording (and > > > sentiment) correct, and to avoid reputational > > > damage to ICANN if the wrong questions are > > > asked. I realise this was requested already, and > > > there was pushback from the Strawberry Team, but > > > I think it's important and inconsistent with > > > ICANN's stated commitments to transparency that > > > we are all ignorant as to what is being asked > > > that has a high potential to impact our work.

2 3

Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] High-level notes and action items - EPDP Team F2F - 9-11 September
by Alan Greenberg 14 Sep '19

14 Sep '19

My recollection is that Elena said that she did not feel comfortable sharing the memo now, prior to consulting with the EU folks who are helping them, but would share it with us once that is done and prior to submitting to the EDPB. Alan At 12/09/2019 09:07 PM, Ayden FÃ©rdeline wrote: >Also, I appreciate that it was not agreed as an >action item, but is there any way in which we >might be able to keep an open dialogue with the >Strawberry Team and - importantly - to see their >questions they plan to submit to the European >Data Protection Board before they are submitted >to any external party? I think we can all >appreciate they would be in draft form - that's >why we would like to help get the wording (and >sentiment) correct, and to avoid reputational >damage to ICANN if the wrong questions are >asked. I realise this was requested already, and >there was pushback from the Strawberry Team, but >I think it's important and inconsistent with >ICANN's stated commitments to transparency that >we are all ignorant as to what is being asked >that has a high potential to impact our work.

2 1

High-level notes and action items - EPDP Team F2F - 9-11 September
by Caitlin Tubergen 14 Sep '19

14 Sep '19

Dear EPDP Team: Below, please find high-level notes and action items from the face-to-face meeting. As a reminder, the next EPDP Phase 2 meeting will be Thursday, 19 September at 14:00 UTC. The Legal Committee will meet on Tuesday, 17 September at 14:00 UTC. Wishing everyone safe travels home. Best regards, Marika, Berry, and Caitlin -- Action Items Alex Deacon, Milton Mueller and other willing volunteers to draft a write up of a potential accreditation model, taking into account the Team’s F2F discussions, in advance of the Thursday, 19 September meeting. IPC, BC, SSAC, and GAC reps to separately draft a vision for their “ideal accreditation model” in order to assist the group with what the baseline accreditation requirements could be as well as the attendant benefits of accreditation within the architecture of an SSAD by Wednesday, September 18. Support Staff to create a table (in the form of a Google Doc) which includes a column for each lawful basis and a column for what a requesting party would be required to provide in its request, what is the expected response time, is automation likely, what are the standardized categories that may fall within that lawful basis, etc. Following receipt of the table, the EPDP Team members to populate the contents of the table. If there are commonalities, policy recommendations can be drafted accordingly. Support staff to create a Google Doc in which EPDP Team Members are to review and consider the types of disclosure decision models (in other words, who is making the ultimate determination to disclose non-public registration data - contracted party or ICANN) and what would make these options acceptable to the different groups by Thursday, September 19. EPDP Team to review the legal memos and come back with the most relevant points that need to be factored in as the Staff Support Team produces the 1.0 draft by Thursday, September 19. James and Mark Sv. to work together on a revised proposal for Building Block L (SSAD query policy) by Thursday, September 19. When discussing updates to Building Block L, Team members to consider if it is within the Team’s charter to continue discussing this issue. Matt C. to review the legal advice on how to perform the balancing test and update Alan Woods’ initial balancing test document into a simple guide to conduct the balancing test to be included in the next iteration of the zero draft by Thursday, September 19. Contracted party Team members to draft letter to ICANN Board, outlining scenarios discussed, including where the disclosure decision lies within the SSAD, and inquire whether there are any options the Board would not be amenable to. High-level Notes ACCREDITATION–Building Block F Straw Proposals Presented prior to Discussion: Milton Mueller and Alex Deacon Outcome / Agreements EPDP Team did not agree on accreditation process or assignments; however, it agreed that a small group would consider the Team’s discussion during the F2F and develop a proposal for a subsequent discussion. The EPDP Team agreed to separate authentication from authorization. The team did not agree that the accreditor would perform the authorization function. Discussion Notes Purpose· Remove burden from entity providing disclosure · Provide code of contract or series of contracts· Spread liability (without diminishing protections for data subjects)· Provide process pathway to track data / monitoring Who serves as accreditor· Entity develops request or proposal· Competent authority with legal basis; demonstrates consistency with Article 42 and 43· EPDP sets outline and principles and assessment activities AccreditorTasksAuthentication – confirm identityEstablish preliminary determination on lawful basisConsider how to manage volume requests NOTE: Authorization process is not necessarily with the accreditor. Sub-team will consider whether Authorization should rest with another entity or with the accreditor or unique criteria Role: Certifying Accreditor No Agreement, options discussed:· ICANN – difficult because they process of data · Independent Data Trust· DPA Role: Accreditation Body(ies)· WIPO· Law enforcement–each country would have one entry point. i.e. in U.S. it might be FBI or in other countries, it would be the national country.· Europol and Interpol–agree this is not possible for law enforcement agencies, at least not for certain countries· Limit # of accrediting bodies to be able to manage system· Create track for entities that are not accredited Role: AuditorAgree that auditing is needed; unclear who should conduct audits Role & Process: De-AccreditationEPDP agrees that de-accreditation should be a componentAccreditor must be compliant with DPAsNeed to establish how to do this, such as:· Safeguards, prevent entity from setting up shop next door· Remedial action, i.e. may not shut down immediately, some corrective action is possible Decision to DiscloseJoint ControllerWho Balances?Entity with Legal Basis Options: Who Decides?{Note: EPDP did not decide on preferred option in LA. Group will consider options and potentially write a letter to Board to frame questions}JC Agreement § Responsibilities identified in agreement; CPs cannot increase their risk§ Must be correct to manage liability / risk§ Liability is clearly defined (ICANN or CPs)§ Establish Joint and Severable Liability Contracted PartiesICANNIndependent Data Trust PROS/CONS+ Most accountable to data subject+ Has physical access to data- Lack of consistency with hundreds of CPs applying policy to make decision to disclose- ICANN unable to indemnify CPs (maybe, shared risk possible)+ Bird & Bird Memo states that CPs are controllers and retain liabilitiesPROS/CONS+ Reduce risk of liability to CPs+ Provides consistency+ One party that performs decision and auditing role might be preferable+ Build body of work / decisions consistently Considerations for all OptionsStandardized clearing houseTimely ResponseInsurance to alleviate risk or establishing risk fund may be possible ICANN sets rules so it has to be a joint controller SSAD Not required by lawGoal = predictableEasier Building Block N, Financial Sustainability Outcome: Staff to develop Draft 1.0 with implementation guidelines consistent with the F2F discussion. Note: The EPDP noted the need to make SSAD Determination and consider cost-benefit analysis before finalizing approach to financial sustainability. Set Up Cost of Providing and Making Available an Investigative Tool Cost SharingShare cost across the systemDirect and indirect beneficiariesShare costs across the systemCPs contribute intangible resources via in-house staff, etc. UseLook at other Models ANTICIPATED BENEFITS: Certainty to Process Cost Savings FLIP CHARTS Each stakeholder group contributed principles / ideas to ignite the conversation. SSACAll participants have costs: Central system = ICANN CPs: receive, review, reply Requestors: accreditation, query-making Issue subsidies? Letting market workRDS as basic service / core servicePassing costs to requestors: May burden victims.GAC Any financing model should not be profit/revenue generating System should not provide financial disincentives to requestors acting on behalf of public authorities CPH Any financial model should not be profit/revenue generating Cost Neutral and borne by beneficiaries Not a hidden tax / pass through charge to registrants / data subject Integration costs represent CPH contributions ALACConsider:· Costs· Cost Savings· Accreditation costs borne by users· Charge / Requestor: consideration of public interest exception· Chares passed through to registrants seems inevitable (it’s part of the infrastructure) NCSGCosts [potential funder] Capital / set up costs [Large Users] Accreditation costs [Flat fee per time period] Usage costs (per request) [per request fee, cost-based. Higher for non-accredited] Insurance costs [unsure] Audit / enforcements [unsure, ICANN / DPAs?] CSGOK for cost-sharing to vary by volume, requestor type, legal obligation, etc. Fees on per-request basis are problematic Must not create disincentives to costs reductions

3 2

For your input - lawful basis considerations
by Marika Konings 12 Sep '19

12 Sep '19

Dear EPDP Team, In relation to the following action item: * Support Staff to create a table (in the form of a Google Doc) which includes a column for each lawful basis and a column for what a requesting party would be required to provide in its request, what is the expected response time, is automation likely, what are the standardized categories that may fall within that lawful basis, etc. Following receipt of the table, the EPDP Team members to populate the contents of the table. If there are commonalities, policy recommendations can be drafted accordingly. You can find the google doc here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U9jt9nOHs9QMjWTDl7UPaT--9aD2lHZI/edit. Please provide your input by Wednesday 25 September at the latest. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses…> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gn…>.

1 0

Post Call | GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP – Phase 2 | 09-11 September 2019 F2F
by Terri Agnew 11 Sep '19

11 Sep '19

Dear all, All recordings for the GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP – Phase 2 held on 09-11 September 2019 F2F meetings can be found on the agenda wiki page <https://community.icann.org/x/6oECBw> (attendance included) and the GNSO Master calendar <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group…> . (please give it some time for Wednesday’s recordings to be posted) These include: * Attendance (please let me know if your name has been left off the attendance list) * Audio recording * Zoom chat archive * Zoom recording (including audio, visual, rough transcript) * Transcript As a reminder only members and alternates can join the call, observers can join via audio cast, listen to the recordings and read the transcript afterwards. For additional information, you may consult the mailing list archives <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/> and the main wiki page<https://community.icann.org/x/IYEpBQ>. Thank you. With kind regards, Terri

1 0