December 2016 - Gnso-igo-ingo-crp

PLEASE IGNORE (Re: FOR REVIEW/DISCUSSION: NEW Co-Chairs Statement and UPDATED TMCH Charter questions document)
by Mary Wong Dec. 5, 2016

Dec. 5, 2016

My apologies; I mistakenly sent the note below to the wrong PDP Working Group! On 12/5/16, 16:23, "Mary Wong" <mary.wong(a)icann.org> wrote: Dear all, In advance of the Working Group call this week, and pending circulation of the finalized agenda, please find attached the following documents for your review and further discussions: (1) A draft statement from our Working Group co-chairs regarding the provision of additional rights protection mechanisms by the TMCH and registry operators (i.e. in addition to the minimum mandatory RPMs prescribed by ICANN and which form the basis of our current Policy Development Process); and (2) A table of all the TMCH-related Charter questions, as refined and suggested by the Sub Team and including notes and questions from several Working Group members as of 4 December. This document essentially replicates the Proposed Edited Questions that were circulated in the form of the more comprehensive table that was discussed by the Sub Team, but hopefully aids your deliberations as it sets out all the proposed questions in one spot. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org Telephone: +1-603-5744889 On 12/2/16, 00:53, "George Kirikos" <icann(a)leap.com> wrote: I was reading the documents this morning, and the first one (which starts with "4. Deliberations of the PDP Working Group") has some very strange formatting when printed out, at least for me (e.g. many of the last sentences in paragraphs are mangled, with strange spacing or missing letters; perhaps the bolded text??). Could we have future versions of these documents in PDF, please? Sincerely, George Kirikos 4116-588-0269 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.leap.com_&d=DgIFaQ&… On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org> wrote: > Dear all, > > > > The proposed agenda for our Working Group meeting this Thursday is as > follows: > > > > 1. Roll call and updates to Statements of Interest > > 2. Review of discussions at ICANN57 – GAC Communique and WG open > session > > 3. Confirm WG comments in draft Initial Report concerning its review > of the IGO Small Group Proposal > > 4. Confirm intended date of publication of Initial Report and other > milestones leading to the Final Report > > 5. Any other business > > > > For #2, here is the link to the GAC Communique: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gacweb.icann.org_downl… , > and to the transcript of the Working Group session at ICANN57: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__schd.ws_hosted-5Ffiles_… . > We note that a link to the slides that were used at that WG session had been > circulated previously (see below). > > > > In addition, for #2, WG members may wish to consider the question that was > raised by the representative of the United States Patent and Trademark > Office (USPTO) who attended the WG open session: “whether [standing kicks in > at the time that a notification is submitted to WIPO or whether it kicks in > once it's disseminated to all of the Paris Convention member countries and > whether they decide whether or not to reject or not reject that > notification.” > > > > For #3, please find attached an initial draft of what will be Section 4 > (Deliberations of the PDP Working Group) of our Initial Report (where > Section 6 – which we have been discussing – contains our Preliminary > Recommendations). As noted previously, Section 4 complements Section 6 by > providing both the process background and related narrative to the actual > text of the preliminary recommendations. > > > > For purposes of the call this week, staff suggests a focus on Section 4.4 > (where the process background and the WG’s conclusions on the Small Group > Proposal are described and tabulated). > > > > We are also attaching a clean copy of the latest version of Section 6, > updated following the last WG call before ICANN57. Please note that in the > interests of getting the draft Deliberations document out to everyone as > soon as we could, staff has not yet done a full sweep through the Section 6 > document to spot overlaps and gaps. > > > > Thanks and cheers > > Mary > > > > From: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org> > Date: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 12:23 > To: "gnso-igo-ingo-crp(a)icann.org" <gnso-igo-ingo-crp(a)icann.org> > Subject: Slides from the Working Group's open community discussion at > ICANN57 > > > > Dear all, > > > > The slides from our Working Group’s open session yesterday at ICANN57, where > our likely initial recommendations were presented to the community, are > available here: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__schd.ws_hosted-5Ffiles_… . > > > > Once the transcript and recording are published on the ICANN57 meeting > website, we will provide a link to them and the slides from our Working > Group wiki page. > > > > Thanks and cheers > > Mary > > > > > > Mary Wong > > Senior Policy Director > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org > > Telephone: +1-603-5744889 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list > Gnso-igo-ingo-crp(a)icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp

1 0

FOR REVIEW/DISCUSSION: NEW Co-Chairs Statement and UPDATED TMCH Charter questions document
by Mary Wong Dec. 5, 2016

Dec. 5, 2016

Dear all, In advance of the Working Group call this week, and pending circulation of the finalized agenda, please find attached the following documents for your review and further discussions: (1) A draft statement from our Working Group co-chairs regarding the provision of additional rights protection mechanisms by the TMCH and registry operators (i.e. in addition to the minimum mandatory RPMs prescribed by ICANN and which form the basis of our current Policy Development Process); and (2) A table of all the TMCH-related Charter questions, as refined and suggested by the Sub Team and including notes and questions from several Working Group members as of 4 December. This document essentially replicates the Proposed Edited Questions that were circulated in the form of the more comprehensive table that was discussed by the Sub Team, but hopefully aids your deliberations as it sets out all the proposed questions in one spot. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org Telephone: +1-603-5744889 On 12/2/16, 00:53, "George Kirikos" <icann(a)leap.com> wrote: I was reading the documents this morning, and the first one (which starts with "4. Deliberations of the PDP Working Group") has some very strange formatting when printed out, at least for me (e.g. many of the last sentences in paragraphs are mangled, with strange spacing or missing letters; perhaps the bolded text??). Could we have future versions of these documents in PDF, please? Sincerely, George Kirikos 4116-588-0269 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.leap.com_&d=DgIFaQ&… On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org> wrote: > Dear all, > > > > The proposed agenda for our Working Group meeting this Thursday is as > follows: > > > > 1. Roll call and updates to Statements of Interest > > 2. Review of discussions at ICANN57 – GAC Communique and WG open > session > > 3. Confirm WG comments in draft Initial Report concerning its review > of the IGO Small Group Proposal > > 4. Confirm intended date of publication of Initial Report and other > milestones leading to the Final Report > > 5. Any other business > > > > For #2, here is the link to the GAC Communique: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gacweb.icann.org_downl… , > and to the transcript of the Working Group session at ICANN57: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__schd.ws_hosted-5Ffiles_… . > We note that a link to the slides that were used at that WG session had been > circulated previously (see below). > > > > In addition, for #2, WG members may wish to consider the question that was > raised by the representative of the United States Patent and Trademark > Office (USPTO) who attended the WG open session: “whether [standing kicks in > at the time that a notification is submitted to WIPO or whether it kicks in > once it's disseminated to all of the Paris Convention member countries and > whether they decide whether or not to reject or not reject that > notification.” > > > > For #3, please find attached an initial draft of what will be Section 4 > (Deliberations of the PDP Working Group) of our Initial Report (where > Section 6 – which we have been discussing – contains our Preliminary > Recommendations). As noted previously, Section 4 complements Section 6 by > providing both the process background and related narrative to the actual > text of the preliminary recommendations. > > > > For purposes of the call this week, staff suggests a focus on Section 4.4 > (where the process background and the WG’s conclusions on the Small Group > Proposal are described and tabulated). > > > > We are also attaching a clean copy of the latest version of Section 6, > updated following the last WG call before ICANN57. Please note that in the > interests of getting the draft Deliberations document out to everyone as > soon as we could, staff has not yet done a full sweep through the Section 6 > document to spot overlaps and gaps. > > > > Thanks and cheers > > Mary > > > > From: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org> > Date: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 12:23 > To: "gnso-igo-ingo-crp(a)icann.org" <gnso-igo-ingo-crp(a)icann.org> > Subject: Slides from the Working Group's open community discussion at > ICANN57 > > > > Dear all, > > > > The slides from our Working Group’s open session yesterday at ICANN57, where > our likely initial recommendations were presented to the community, are > available here: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__schd.ws_hosted-5Ffiles_… . > > > > Once the transcript and recording are published on the ICANN57 meeting > website, we will provide a link to them and the slides from our Working > Group wiki page. > > > > Thanks and cheers > > Mary > > > > > > Mary Wong > > Senior Policy Director > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org > > Telephone: +1-603-5744889 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list > Gnso-igo-ingo-crp(a)icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp

1 0

Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat from IGO-INGO CRP PDP call on Thursday, 01 December 2016 17:00 UTC
by Michelle DeSmyter Dec. 1, 2016

Dec. 1, 2016

Dear All, Please find the attendance and MP3 recording for the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection PDP WG Meeting held on Thursday, 01 December 2016 at 17:00 UTC at: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__audio.icann.org_gnso_gn…> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-igo-ingo-crp-access-01dec16-en.mp3 <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-igo-ingo-crp-access-01dec16-en.mp3> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__audio.icann.org_gnso_gn…> On page: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#dec The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group…> Attendees: David Maher – RySG Gary Campbell – GAC George Kirikos – Individual Jay Chapman – Individual Mason Cole – RySG Nat Cohen - BC Paul Tattersfield – Individual Phil Corwin – BC Apologies: Petter Rindforth - IPC ICANN staff: Mary Wong Berry Cobb Michelle DeSmyter ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mm.icann.org_pipermail_…> Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/15LDAw Thank you. Kind regards, Michelle DeSmyter ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for Thursday, 01 December 2016 Michelle DeSmyter:Dear all, welcome to the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms Working Group on Thursday, 01 December 2016 at 17:00 UTC. Michelle DeSmyter:Agenda meeting page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… George Kirikos:Hi folks. Gary Campbell:Hi guys George Kirikos:Hi Gary. George Kirikos:Welcome Phil & David. Philip Corwin:Good day all. Let's give this a few minutes before starting. Also, Petter is unlikely to be joining today due to a work conflict. Paul Tattersfield:Hi all George Kirikos:Hi Paul. Paul Tattersfield:Are you snowed in up there George yet? George Kirikos:Not yet, Paul! :-) Last year was very mild....global warming's helping us. How are things in the UK? Gary Campbell:I don't envy you guys Paul Tattersfield:Things are still quite mild here George Kirikos:We envy your location, Gary. :-) Gary Campbell:I know you do Berry Cobb:Let me check George Kirikos:Here's the letter from Phil & Petter: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_corr… George Kirikos:(on screen now) Mary Wong:Hello everyone, really sorry I'm late (had connectivity problems here in Kuala Lumpur) Berry Cobb:GNSO Council Agenda: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_di… Jay Chapman:sorry too to be late Mary Wong:THanks, Phil, and apologies again George Kirikos:I had my hand up. George Kirikos:I think for this document, most of it looked good -- we'll likely need to focus on the table starting on page 9 (comparison with the IGO small group proposal). Mary Wong:SORRY Mary Wong:@George, yes, thanks Mary Wong:We thought a table would be most illustrative George Kirikos:I was having trouble printing out the document (some of the bold text came out strangely). If the next one can be a PDF, that'd be ideal. Mary Wong:OK, gotcha, George - wll do George Kirikos:Sounds good, Phil. No point finishing at end of December --- lots of ICANN criticism for starting comment periods during holidays. Mary Wong:@Phil, yes George Kirikos:Question: In the report, will this be the order? i.e. our section 6 might be best before the current section 4? (especially 4.4) George Kirikos:i.e. someone reading 4.4 won't understand it, until they get to section 6. Mary Wong:The table is basically what we presented in HYD, only in tabular form and with Notes Mary Wong:@George, we hope to get everyone a full draft Initial Report with all the other Sections "filled in" by next week's meeting Mary Wong::) George Kirikos:lol Mary Wong:It was QUITE the experience! George Kirikos:I had one small concern about section 6. Mary Wong:We will look at that sentence, George - thank you Mary Wong:@Phil, yes we are George Kirikos:We should let those who couldn't make it to today's call that they should also review the documents and submit comments by Monday of next week. George Kirikos:(i.e. via the mailing list) Mary Wong:Just in time for ICANN58 :) George Kirikos:As members of this working group, are we still allowed to submit our personal comments to the comment period?? Mary Wong:@George, yes, of course! George Kirikos:Great, just wanted to be sure. :-) Mary Wong:@Phil, yes I think so too - and next Council call is 15 Dec George Kirikos:ICANN58 is March 10-15 2018, so we'll be done for sure before then. George Kirikos:Oops, ICANN58 is March 11-16, 2018. George Kirikos:2017, rather. George Kirikos:Bye folks. Jay Chapman:Thanks, all! Mary Wong:Thank you Phil and everybody! We look forward to your comments and will circulate the full draft Initial Report as soon as we can. Paul Tattersfield:thanks everyone bye Gary Campbell:Thanks all

1 0