October 2015 - Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

Domain Phishing
by Graeme Bunton Oct. 27, 2015

Oct. 27, 2015

One of the refrains I think we've all heard from registrars is that the reasons for using a P/P service are many, but very frequently as simple as 'less spam'. We've also maintained that there is nothing inherently dubious or suspicious about a P/P registration. The current massive phishing campaign being waged against registrants I think highlights these things very clearly, and the below articles from DNW are worth a read: http://domainnamewire.com/2015/10/27/domain-phishing/ and http://domainnamewire.com/2015/10/26/warning-domain-name-phishing-email-bla… Graeme -- _________________________ Graeme Bunton Manager, Analytics and Insights Manager, Public Policy Tucows Inc. PH: 416 535 0123 ext 1634

2 1

Escrowing of Data by NON accredited P/P Providers and accredited Providers that are not already ICANN accredited registrars.
by Chris Pelling Oct. 26, 2015

Oct. 26, 2015

Afternoon all, Further to the F2F, I would further like to remind us all and put on record the escrowing of the underlying data of the registrant. Registrars whom are signed up to the 2009/2013 RAA have to escrow the underlying data of the registrant to an ICANN escrow provider, for example Iron Mountain, weekly, or in some cases depending on size of registrar - daily. Now with regards a lawyer whom will not be accredited if I am understanding the conversations correctly, how is the registrar to know that a registration from a lawyer is the registrant rather than the lawyer himself? Registrars now within ICANN audits have to stipulate the domains that the registrar owns, maybe lawyers and P/P providers should have the same caveat. I can see at some point these providers will fall within an audit that ICANN cooks up. Maybe it should be the case, that lawyers would have to enter into the same type of agreement with escrowing underlying data, and then, more importantly take an accredited P/P provider whom is NOT a registrar should also enter this same agreement with ICANN. The background and reasoning behind this was because of a registrar going "pop" leaves a total mess of registrants data and/or any data at all, the same can be said for lawyers who are disbarred, similar to the conversation in the F2F where we were told that lawyers who do not play by the rules would risk this, and there is a path to facilitate this if repeated incidents happen. I would, and probably like many registrars expect, no less than the same escrowing of underlying registrant data by any lawyer / accredited P/P provider that's not an ICANN accredited registrar. Lastly, to be frank if a lawyer does not wish to adhere to the P/P provisions that we have spent near 2 years debating and crafting, then what was the point of spending all this time in this PDP just to create tiers where some have to work within the rules and some don't. Kind Regards, Chris

1 0

Action items from Dublin F2F meeting & list of staff operational feedback
by Mary Wong Oct. 24, 2015

Oct. 24, 2015

Dear WG members, We hope that those members that were in Dublin had a productive meeting, and wish you safe travels home. Attached are two documents for further WG discussion: (1) a list of action items arising from the face-to-face meeting on 16 October; and (2) a summary of possible operational issues for WG consideration (to the extent that any are identified as requiring further policy guidance and/or rewording of existing WG recommendations). Please note that document (1) does not include a number of editing changes and additional language agreed on by the WG in Dublin, which the co-chairs and staff will work on and include in the next iteration of the draft Final Report. Finally, please note that, as is customary following an ICANN Public Meeting, there will be no WG meeting on Tuesday 27 October. WG meetings will resume on Tuesday 3 November. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org

1 0

Proposed language concerning lawyers and P/P services
by Mary Wong Oct. 22, 2015

Oct. 22, 2015

Dear WG members, As you¹ll recall, at our face to face meeting on Friday, the WG discussed whether there is a need to clarify whether the WG²s proposed definition of P/P services includes, or should expressly exclude, lawyers and attorneys who, as service providers, do proxy service registrations for clients in light of concerns over the impact on the right to counsel. The co-chairs would like to offer the following language for your further discussion: "The issue of whether or not accreditation standards would apply to attorneys was raised in public comments. However, we believe it is outside of ICANN¹s remit to regulate attorney/client relationships and we believe that ICANN should avoid attempting to do so in any implementation of our proposed policy.² Please feel free to continue the discussion via email to this list. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org

13 14

Please read if you are attending the WG Dublin session in person
by Mary Wong Oct. 20, 2015

Oct. 20, 2015

We just wanted to let you know that there won¹t be any coffee, tea or refreshments at the WG open session tomorrow (Wednesday 20 October) - so please get ³fueled up² before arriving at the Convention Center. Cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org

1 0

FW: Co-Chairs Draft Language for Updating Section 1 3 3 - 30 Sept
by Mary Wong Oct. 18, 2015

Oct. 18, 2015

Dear all, As there seems to be intermittent problems with WG members receiving (or rather, not receiving) emails from other WG members, Vicky has asked me to forward her message and suggested amendments to the Section 1.3.3. language, in case some of you did not receive her first note. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org From: Victoria Sheckler <vsheckler(a)riaa.com> Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 09:17 To: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org>, "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg(a)icann.org>, "Steven J. Metalitz (met(a)msk.com)" <met(a)msk.com> Subject: Co-Chairs Draft Language for Updating Section 1 3 3 - 30 Sept > Please see attached some suggested clarifications to the last paragraph of > this document (on top of the redlines in the draft Mary sent around). For > your reference, I¹ve copied the updated paragraph below. MARY I¹m not sure > if this will make it to the entire working group can you please forward it > on just in case? Thanks. -Vicky > > The Working Group notes that at least some significant current providers of > these services have adopted and do enforce similar restrictions on who may use > their particular services. The Working Group¹s conclusion that such a > prohibition should not be incorporated into accreditation standards at this > time is not meant to discourage accredited providers from adopting and > implementing such policies if they so choose (provided that other relevant > criteria, such as publication of terms of service and grounds for termination > of the service, are fulfilled). The Working Group also notes that at least > some registrants engaged in commercial transactions using domain names > registered through P/P services are doing so to carry out illegal activities > or other abuses that may provide a basis for disclosure or publication under > another part of these accreditation standard, or under terms of service > adopted and published by accredited providers. In other words, the Working > Group¹s conclusion that registrants engaged in commercial or transactional > activities should not be considered per se ineligible to use P/P services > should have no impact on a particular registrant¹s eligibility (or not) to do > so on other grounds. >

2 1

Date & time of open community session at ICANN54
by Mary Wong Oct. 18, 2015

Oct. 18, 2015

Dear WG members, Please note that due to overall schedule changes and some session clashes affecting a number of GNSO constituencies/groups, the WG¹s open community session at ICANN54 in Dublin will be this Wednesday, 21 October, at 0800-0900 Dublin time. Remote participation details and location can be found here: https://meetings.icann.org/en/dublin54/schedule/wed-ppsai. Thank you. Cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org

1 0

Additional Documents for Dublin F2F meeting
by Mary Wong Oct. 14, 2015

Oct. 14, 2015

Dear WG members, Please find attached the following documents: (1) The list of issues identified in Parts 1 through 3 of the WG¹s Public Comment Review Tool for further WG discussion, with the co-chairs¹ proposed response to each issue; (2) A summary of the recommendations from Sub Team 4; and (3) An updated Sub Team 4 report including the recommendations summarized in (2), in ³redlined² format to show the changes from the version last circulated to the WG. Please note that the Sub Team 4 documents have not yet been discussed or reviewed by all the Sub Team members, and as such are subject to further discussion and change. In relation to the various categories of comments it reviewed, the Sub Team has not yet finalized its full recommendations for Categories F and G, although certain recommendations from those two categories that seem to have Sub Team support have been included in the summary document. With the addition of these three documents to the latest version of the Illustrative Disclosure Framework (last circulated for the WG meeting on 6 October) and the draft Final Report (circulated on 8 October), the full set of documents for discussion at the WG face to face meeting this Friday has now been distributed. For your convenience, we have created a wiki page for the upcoming face-to-face meeting that sets out the draft schedule and attaches all these documents keyed to their respective sessions: https://community.icann.org/x/uaxYAw. Thanks, everyone; see you in Dublin, either in person or virtually! Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org From: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 23:12 To: "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: For your review and further WG discussion - Draft Final Report > Dear WG members, > > Please find attached a marked-up (or ³redlined²) version of the first draft of > our proposed Final Report as well as a clean version of the same (for easier > reading). The mark-up shows the proposed changes from the published version of > our Initial Report. Please note that this draft has not yet been seen or > reviewed by the WG chairs; however, as discussed on the WG call this past > Tuesday, the plan is to set aside some time during the face-to-face meeting > next Friday in Dublin to start discussing the report. To that end staff has > been authorized to update the Initial Report and circulate this draft Final > Report. > > Here are some additional notes for your convenient reference: > > (1) The majority of the textual changes, not surprisingly, are in the > Executive Summary and to some extent Section 6 (to which a brief description > of how the WG has handled the public comments has been added) and Section 7 > (in relation to Category C, as regards commercial activity and online > financial transactions). Other changes have generally been more minor, and > focus largely on updating the Initial Report in terms e.g. of removing > references to preliminary recommendations and open issues. > > (2) We have NOT added in a revised Illustrative Disclosure Framework or any > new general recommendations, pending the outcome of the WG¹s discussions of > the work from Sub Teams 3 and 4. > > (3) Throughout the document but most especially in the Executive Summary > we have inserted comments and questions that remain to be addressed by the WG, > whether at the upcoming face-to-face meeting in Dublin, to take into account > staff operational feedback, or on a post-Dublin call. As you review the > revisions, please be sure to pay attention to these comments and questions. > > (4) The outcome of the required formal Consensus Call may well change some of > the assumed conclusions, and therefore this is only a draft of a Final Report > that we anticipate will likely see some revisions as the WG proceeds with its > deliberations. As such, please forgive any gaps and other typographical or > formatting errors. These will of course all be corrected in the final version. > > We hope that providing you with even a fairly rough draft of the proposed > Final Report at this time will enable you to review the document as well as > the remaining issues and questions for WG discussion before we meet again next > Friday in Dublin. Remote participation details for the Dublin face-to-face > meeting will be sent around to everyone shortly. > > Thanks and cheers > Mary > > Mary Wong > Senior Policy Director > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) > Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 > Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org > >

1 0

Tentative draft schedule for PPSAI WG face-to-face meeting on 16 October
by Mary Wong Oct. 13, 2015

Oct. 13, 2015

Dear WG members, As you prepare for our Dublin meeting, the co-chairs thought it might be helpful to circulate a draft agenda for the upcoming face-to-face meeting on Friday 16 October. Please note that the schedule is subject to further changes, pending ongoing discussions among the co-chairs and staff, and within the respective Sub Teams. We hope to circulate the documents highlighted in the attached schedule shortly. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org

7 8

For your review and further WG discussion - Draft Final Report
by Mary Wong Oct. 9, 2015

Oct. 9, 2015

Dear WG members, Please find attached a marked-up (or ³redlined²) version of the first draft of our proposed Final Report as well as a clean version of the same (for easier reading). The mark-up shows the proposed changes from the published version of our Initial Report. Please note that this draft has not yet been seen or reviewed by the WG chairs; however, as discussed on the WG call this past Tuesday, the plan is to set aside some time during the face-to-face meeting next Friday in Dublin to start discussing the report. To that end staff has been authorized to update the Initial Report and circulate this draft Final Report. Here are some additional notes for your convenient reference: (1) The majority of the textual changes, not surprisingly, are in the Executive Summary and to some extent Section 6 (to which a brief description of how the WG has handled the public comments has been added) and Section 7 (in relation to Category C, as regards commercial activity and online financial transactions). Other changes have generally been more minor, and focus largely on updating the Initial Report in terms e.g. of removing references to preliminary recommendations and open issues. (2) We have NOT added in a revised Illustrative Disclosure Framework or any new general recommendations, pending the outcome of the WG¹s discussions of the work from Sub Teams 3 and 4. (3) Throughout the document but most especially in the Executive Summary we have inserted comments and questions that remain to be addressed by the WG, whether at the upcoming face-to-face meeting in Dublin, to take into account staff operational feedback, or on a post-Dublin call. As you review the revisions, please be sure to pay attention to these comments and questions. (4) The outcome of the required formal Consensus Call may well change some of the assumed conclusions, and therefore this is only a draft of a Final Report that we anticipate will likely see some revisions as the WG proceeds with its deliberations. As such, please forgive any gaps and other typographical or formatting errors. These will of course all be corrected in the final version. We hope that providing you with even a fairly rough draft of the proposed Final Report at this time will enable you to review the document as well as the remaining issues and questions for WG discussion before we meet again next Friday in Dublin. Remote participation details for the Dublin face-to-face meeting will be sent around to everyone shortly. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org

1 0