August 2015 - Gnso-ppsai1 - lists.icann.org

question 1 recommendations.
by Deacon, Alex Sept. 1, 2015

Sept. 1, 2015

Hi all, Apologies for the delay. Here is the update to the doc on question one including draft recommendations for review. Have a great weekend. Alex

4 4

Moving forward?
by Mary Wong Aug. 25, 2015

Aug. 25, 2015

Hello Sub Team 1 members, I thought I¹d follow up on my email below, to enquire how you especially Lindsay and Alex as the co-convenors would like to move this Sub Team¹s discussions forward. At this point, we basically have a summary/analysis of both questions that this Sub Team was asked to review. In addition, based on moving some comments over from the general WG Review Tool following the WG call on 4 August, there is a few additional comments that may merit a brief review in the updated Sub Team Review Tool, to see whether they go toward the analysis for Question 1 or Question 2, and in either case whether they change the numbers and analysis. Lindsay and Alex would you like to schedule a call for the Sub Team next week to discuss these points, or do you prefer to try to do the discussions by email? FYI the Sub Team wiki (updated accordingly) is here: https://community.icann.org/x/zoZCAw Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org From: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org> Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 18:20 To: "gnso-ppsai1(a)icann.org" <gnso-ppsai1(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai1] Updated Public Comment Review Tool > Hello again all, > > As noted in my last message and per the WG call earlier today, I¹ve now > updated this Sub Team¹s Public Comment Review Tool with relevant comments that > were otherwise posted or included elsewhere less appropriate (e.g. in the > overall WG Review Tool where a commenter placed his/her comment under a > different recommendation heading). > > I attach the updated Sub Team Tool for your review to make things easier > I¹ve highlighted all the additions in yellow (easily removable if you wish). > I¹ve also uploaded it to the Sub Team wiki. > > Since this may trigger the need to update the existing Summary documents, > please let me know if you would like me to assist with that task. > > Thanks and cheers > Mary > > Mary Wong > Senior Policy Director > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) > Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 > Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org > > > From: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org> > Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 12:58 > To: "gnso-ppsai1(a)icann.org" <gnso-ppsai1(a)icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai1] Update to 1.3.2 question 2 > >> Hello everyone, >> >> I¹ve uploaded David¹s edited document to the Sub Team wiki page: >> https://community.icann.org/x/zoZCAw (BTW, Val, I think Alex sent the same >> Google Docs link for both documents so if someone can send me the correct >> link for Question 1 I¹ll correct the links :) >> >> FYI and as a follow up from the WG call earlier today I¹m going back >> through the WG¹s overall Public Comment Review Tool Part 1 (recommendations >> #1 through #9) to pick out those comments that, while ³attached² to other >> recommendations/questions, are directly relevant to the work of this Sub >> Team. I¹ll send around an updated Sub Team Review Tool as soon as I can and >> please note also that this may need further updating once I get through Part >> 2 of the WG Review Tool (which will, as noted on the WG call, cover >> recommendations #10 through #20 minus any that are being covered by existing >> Sub Teams). >> >> This DOES mean that the numbers and certain statements in the current summary >> documents will likely need to be updated; please let me know if you prefer >> that I do that for the group as well though if folks are still working on >> either summary document it may be best if you tell me which version to use if >> so. >> >> Thanks and cheers >> Mary >> >> Mary Wong >> Senior Policy Director >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) >> Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 >> Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org >> >> >> From: <gnso-ppsai1-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Lindsay Hamilton-Reid >> <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid(a)fasthosts.com> >> Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 12:26 >> To: David Cake <dave(a)difference.com.au>, "gnso-ppsai1(a)icann.org" >> <gnso-ppsai1(a)icann.org> >> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai1] Update to 1.3.2 question 2 >> >>> >>> >>> Hi David >>> >>> Thanks for that I haven¹t had the chance to read it yet but I will J. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Lindsay >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: gnso-ppsai1-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai1-bounces@icann.org] >>> On Behalf Of David Cake >>> Sent: 04 August 2015 12:44 >>> To: gnso-ppsai1(a)icann.org >>> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai1] Update to 1.3.2 question 2 >>> >>> I¹ve made a few changes to 1.3.2 question 2 to incorporate >>> my separate analysis. I think the changes will be fairly uncontroversial >>> (and one was just a proofreading comment where a sentence had become >>> ungrammatical in editing). >>> But feel free to discuss any issues if you feel my changes have changed the >>> sense of the summary. My apologies for getting this done about 48 hours >>> later than I had intended, I had some unexpected technical issues (had to >>> spend a few hours making my laptop remember it had my email). >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> David >>>

5 15

PPSAI Subteam 1 transcription 19 August 2015
by Nathalie Peregrine Aug. 20, 2015

Aug. 20, 2015

Dear all, Please find attached the transcription of the PPSAI Subteam 1 call on the 19 August 2015 Kind regards, Nathalie

1 0

MP3 PPSAI WG SubTeam1 - Wednesday 19 August 2015 at 1400 UTC
by Nathalie Peregrine Aug. 19, 2015

Aug. 19, 2015

Dear All, Please find below the attendance and MP3 recording for the Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP SubTeam 1 call held on Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 14:00 UTC. Transcript will follow upon receipt. MP3: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/2cs4insre5rqdm0zu19of6qa5u5m4hle.mp3<http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=zZ8xDDIU4PY795Cika7Nmy-2FNugFnAwo9a…> Attendees: Val Sherman Sara Bockey Alex Deacon Lindsay Hamilton-Reid ICANN staff: Mary Wong Marika Konings Nathalie Peregrine Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie -------------------------------

1 0

Re: [Gnso-ppsai1] Updated Public Comment Review Tool
by Mary Wong Aug. 4, 2015

Aug. 4, 2015

Hello again all, As noted in my last message and per the WG call earlier today, I¹ve now updated this Sub Team¹s Public Comment Review Tool with relevant comments that were otherwise posted or included elsewhere less appropriate (e.g. in the overall WG Review Tool where a commenter placed his/her comment under a different recommendation heading). I attach the updated Sub Team Tool for your review to make things easier I¹ve highlighted all the additions in yellow (easily removable if you wish). I¹ve also uploaded it to the Sub Team wiki. Since this may trigger the need to update the existing Summary documents, please let me know if you would like me to assist with that task. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org From: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org> Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 12:58 To: "gnso-ppsai1(a)icann.org" <gnso-ppsai1(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai1] Update to 1.3.2 question 2 > Hello everyone, > > I¹ve uploaded David¹s edited document to the Sub Team wiki page: > https://community.icann.org/x/zoZCAw (BTW, Val, I think Alex sent the same > Google Docs link for both documents so if someone can send me the correct link > for Question 1 I¹ll correct the links :) > > FYI and as a follow up from the WG call earlier today I¹m going back > through the WG¹s overall Public Comment Review Tool Part 1 (recommendations #1 > through #9) to pick out those comments that, while ³attached² to other > recommendations/questions, are directly relevant to the work of this Sub Team. > I¹ll send around an updated Sub Team Review Tool as soon as I can and please > note also that this may need further updating once I get through Part 2 of the > WG Review Tool (which will, as noted on the WG call, cover recommendations #10 > through #20 minus any that are being covered by existing Sub Teams). > > This DOES mean that the numbers and certain statements in the current summary > documents will likely need to be updated; please let me know if you prefer > that I do that for the group as well though if folks are still working on > either summary document it may be best if you tell me which version to use if > so. > > Thanks and cheers > Mary > > Mary Wong > Senior Policy Director > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) > Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 > Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org > > > From: <gnso-ppsai1-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Lindsay Hamilton-Reid > <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid(a)fasthosts.com> > Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 12:26 > To: David Cake <dave(a)difference.com.au>, "gnso-ppsai1(a)icann.org" > <gnso-ppsai1(a)icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai1] Update to 1.3.2 question 2 > >> >> >> Hi David >> >> Thanks for that I haven¹t had the chance to read it yet but I will J. >> >> Regards >> >> Lindsay >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: gnso-ppsai1-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai1-bounces@icann.org] On >> Behalf Of David Cake >> Sent: 04 August 2015 12:44 >> To: gnso-ppsai1(a)icann.org >> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai1] Update to 1.3.2 question 2 >> >> I¹ve made a few changes to 1.3.2 question 2 to incorporate my >> separate analysis. I think the changes will be fairly uncontroversial (and >> one was just a proofreading comment where a sentence had become ungrammatical >> in editing). >> But feel free to discuss any issues if you feel my changes have changed the >> sense of the summary. My apologies for getting this done about 48 hours later >> than I had intended, I had some unexpected technical issues (had to spend a >> few hours making my laptop remember it had my email). >> >> Regards >> >> David >>

1 0

Update to 1.3.2 question 2
by David Cake Aug. 4, 2015

Aug. 4, 2015

I’ve made a few changes to 1.3.2 question 2 to incorporate my separate analysis. I think the changes will be fairly uncontroversial (and one was just a proofreading comment where a sentence had become ungrammatical in editing). But feel free to discuss any issues if you feel my changes have changed the sense of the summary. My apologies for getting this done about 48 hours later than I had intended, I had some unexpected technical issues (had to spend a few hours making my laptop remember it had my email). Regards David

3 2