For your review: draft scoping paper
Dear Scoping Team Members: Further to Support Staff’s action to circulate a clean version of the Scoping Paper to the Team by COB today, please find the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit#. As a reminder, please provide additional and final edits by COB Thursday, 2 April. Support Staff will then incorporate the proposed edits and send the paper to the GNSO Council by Monday, 6 April. In addition, please remember to keep the your RrSG GNSO Councilors colleagues apprised of the Scoping Team's progress. Thank you. Best regards, Berry and Caitlin
Thanks Berry and Caitlin for your work on this. I have added a few more tracked changes, sorry. Most of the changes are for clarity, things that were hard to see when we had the commented version in progress. I do note Tom's comment on the AuthInfo management <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit?di...> section and I think we would benefit from discussing that a bit. My assumption was that each row on the issues chart indicated a different topic and thus the bigger ones would be approached in individual PDPs, and it sounds like that's how Tom was reading it also, but Berry has explained that each row is a different policy topic but not necessarily a different PDP. I would propose that we do two things: 1, combine the FOA and AuthInfo rows into one topic (I think they're too intertwined to be separated) and 2, add a sentence to the paragraph immediately preceding the chart to explain that the rows may be combined depending on what the GNSO Council thinks makes sense. I think we could propose that some be approached together (maybe TEAC and TDRP?) also. What do you think? Thanks! -- Sarah Wyld Domains Product Team Tucows +1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392 On 3/30/2020 10:49 PM, Caitlin Tubergen wrote:
Dear Scoping Team Members:
Further to Support Staff’s action to circulate a clean version of the Scoping Paper to the Team by COB today, please find the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit#.
As a reminder, please provide additional and final edits by *COB Thursday, 2 April*. Support Staff will then incorporate the proposed edits and send the paper to the GNSO Council by *Monday, 6 April*.
In addition, please remember to keep the your RrSG GNSO Councilors colleagues apprised of the Scoping Team's progress.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Berry and Caitlin
_______________________________________________ GNSO-TPRST mailing list GNSO-TPRST@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tprst
Hi, I agree with Sarah. Another approach would be to number the topics and suggest a potential grouping in a table at the end of the doc. I believe Berry talked about 3 potential groups on our last call. Best tom Von: GNSO-TPRST <gnso-tprst-bounces@icann.org> im Auftrag von Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com> Organisation: Tucows Datum: Dienstag, 31. März 2020 um 15:45 An: "gnso-tprst@icann.org" <gnso-tprst@icann.org> Betreff: Re: [GNSO-TPRST] For your review: draft scoping paper Thanks Berry and Caitlin for your work on this. I have added a few more tracked changes, sorry. Most of the changes are for clarity, things that were hard to see when we had the commented version in progress. I do note Tom's comment on the AuthInfo management<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit?di...> section and I think we would benefit from discussing that a bit. My assumption was that each row on the issues chart indicated a different topic and thus the bigger ones would be approached in individual PDPs, and it sounds like that's how Tom was reading it also, but Berry has explained that each row is a different policy topic but not necessarily a different PDP. I would propose that we do two things: 1, combine the FOA and AuthInfo rows into one topic (I think they're too intertwined to be separated) and 2, add a sentence to the paragraph immediately preceding the chart to explain that the rows may be combined depending on what the GNSO Council thinks makes sense. I think we could propose that some be approached together (maybe TEAC and TDRP?) also. What do you think? Thanks! -- Sarah Wyld Domains Product Team Tucows +1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392 On 3/30/2020 10:49 PM, Caitlin Tubergen wrote: Dear Scoping Team Members: Further to Support Staff’s action to circulate a clean version of the Scoping Paper to the Team by COB today, please find the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit#<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit>. As a reminder, please provide additional and final edits by COB Thursday, 2 April. Support Staff will then incorporate the proposed edits and send the paper to the GNSO Council by Monday, 6 April. In addition, please remember to keep the your RrSG GNSO Councilors colleagues apprised of the Scoping Team's progress. Thank you. Best regards, Berry and Caitlin _______________________________________________ GNSO-TPRST mailing list GNSO-TPRST@icann.org<mailto:GNSO-TPRST@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tprst
Good Afternoon, I think we now have the near final draft. Sarah/Tom, we added some language above the chart that ties these two (FOA/AuthCode) items together. If anyone has any additional edits/comments/suggestions, please get them in the Scoping Letter<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit> by Thursday. As a reminder, we will not be having a meeting this week so if needed please reach out to the list so that we can get everything wrapped up this week. I also want to thank everyone that helped us reach closure on this issue. I believe it was an efficient and productive team effort, even with some changing of the circumstances during the process. Thanks Roger From: GNSO-TPRST <gnso-tprst-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Sarah Wyld Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 8:46 AM To: gnso-tprst@icann.org Subject: Re: [GNSO-TPRST] For your review: draft scoping paper Notice: This email is from an external sender. Thanks Berry and Caitlin for your work on this. I have added a few more tracked changes, sorry. Most of the changes are for clarity, things that were hard to see when we had the commented version in progress. I do note Tom's comment on the AuthInfo management<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit?di...> section and I think we would benefit from discussing that a bit. My assumption was that each row on the issues chart indicated a different topic and thus the bigger ones would be approached in individual PDPs, and it sounds like that's how Tom was reading it also, but Berry has explained that each row is a different policy topic but not necessarily a different PDP. I would propose that we do two things: 1, combine the FOA and AuthInfo rows into one topic (I think they're too intertwined to be separated) and 2, add a sentence to the paragraph immediately preceding the chart to explain that the rows may be combined depending on what the GNSO Council thinks makes sense. I think we could propose that some be approached together (maybe TEAC and TDRP?) also. What do you think? Thanks! -- Sarah Wyld Domains Product Team Tucows +1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392 On 3/30/2020 10:49 PM, Caitlin Tubergen wrote: Dear Scoping Team Members: Further to Support Staff’s action to circulate a clean version of the Scoping Paper to the Team by COB today, please find the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit#<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit>. As a reminder, please provide additional and final edits by COB Thursday, 2 April. Support Staff will then incorporate the proposed edits and send the paper to the GNSO Council by Monday, 6 April. In addition, please remember to keep the your RrSG GNSO Councilors colleagues apprised of the Scoping Team's progress. Thank you. Best regards, Berry and Caitlin _______________________________________________ GNSO-TPRST mailing list GNSO-TPRST@icann.org<mailto:GNSO-TPRST@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tprst
Thanks, looks good to me. -- Sarah Wyld Domains Product Team Tucows +1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392 On 3/31/2020 2:23 PM, Roger D Carney wrote:
Good Afternoon,
I think we now have the near final draft. Sarah/Tom, we added some language above the chart that ties these two (FOA/AuthCode) items together.
If anyone has any additional edits/comments/suggestions, please get them in the Scoping Letter <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit> by Thursday.
As a reminder, we will not be having a meeting this week so if needed please reach out to the list so that we can get everything wrapped up this week.
I also want to thank everyone that helped us reach closure on this issue. I believe it was an efficient and productive team effort, even with some changing of the circumstances during the process.
Thanks
Roger
*From:*GNSO-TPRST <gnso-tprst-bounces@icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Sarah Wyld *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2020 8:46 AM *To:* gnso-tprst@icann.org *Subject:* Re: [GNSO-TPRST] For your review: draft scoping paper
Notice: This email is from an external sender.
Thanks Berry and Caitlin for your work on this.
I have added a few more tracked changes, sorry. Most of the changes are for clarity, things that were hard to see when we had the commented version in progress.
I do note Tom's comment on the AuthInfo management <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit?di...> section and I think we would benefit from discussing that a bit. My assumption was that each row on the issues chart indicated a different topic and thus the bigger ones would be approached in individual PDPs, and it sounds like that's how Tom was reading it also, but Berry has explained that each row is a different policy topic but not necessarily a different PDP.
I would propose that we do two things: 1, combine the FOA and AuthInfo rows into one topic (I think they're too intertwined to be separated) and 2, add a sentence to the paragraph immediately preceding the chart to explain that the rows may be combined depending on what the GNSO Council thinks makes sense. I think we could propose that some be approached together (maybe TEAC and TDRP?) also.
What do you think? Thanks!
-- Sarah Wyld Domains Product Team Tucows +1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392
On 3/30/2020 10:49 PM, Caitlin Tubergen wrote:
Dear Scoping Team Members:
Further to Support Staff’s action to circulate a clean version of the Scoping Paper to the Team by COB today, please find the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit# <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit>.
As a reminder, please provide additional and final edits by *COB Thursday, 2 April*. Support Staff will then incorporate the proposed edits and send the paper to the GNSO Council by *Monday, 6 April*.
In addition, please remember to keep the your RrSG GNSO Councilors colleagues apprised of the Scoping Team's progress.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Berry and Caitlin
_______________________________________________
GNSO-TPRST mailing list
GNSO-TPRST@icann.org <mailto:GNSO-TPRST@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tprst
_______________________________________________ GNSO-TPRST mailing list GNSO-TPRST@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tprst
Same here, I’m fine with the new language. tom Von: GNSO-TPRST <gnso-tprst-bounces@icann.org> im Auftrag von Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com> Organisation: Tucows Datum: Dienstag, 31. März 2020 um 20:29 An: "gnso-tprst@icann.org" <gnso-tprst@icann.org> Betreff: Re: [GNSO-TPRST] For your review: draft scoping paper Thanks, looks good to me. -- Sarah Wyld Domains Product Team Tucows +1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392 On 3/31/2020 2:23 PM, Roger D Carney wrote: Good Afternoon, I think we now have the near final draft. Sarah/Tom, we added some language above the chart that ties these two (FOA/AuthCode) items together. If anyone has any additional edits/comments/suggestions, please get them in the Scoping Letter<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit> by Thursday. As a reminder, we will not be having a meeting this week so if needed please reach out to the list so that we can get everything wrapped up this week. I also want to thank everyone that helped us reach closure on this issue. I believe it was an efficient and productive team effort, even with some changing of the circumstances during the process. Thanks Roger From: GNSO-TPRST <gnso-tprst-bounces@icann.org><mailto:gnso-tprst-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Sarah Wyld Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 8:46 AM To: gnso-tprst@icann.org<mailto:gnso-tprst@icann.org> Subject: Re: [GNSO-TPRST] For your review: draft scoping paper Notice: This email is from an external sender. Thanks Berry and Caitlin for your work on this. I have added a few more tracked changes, sorry. Most of the changes are for clarity, things that were hard to see when we had the commented version in progress. I do note Tom's comment on the AuthInfo management<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit?di...> section and I think we would benefit from discussing that a bit. My assumption was that each row on the issues chart indicated a different topic and thus the bigger ones would be approached in individual PDPs, and it sounds like that's how Tom was reading it also, but Berry has explained that each row is a different policy topic but not necessarily a different PDP. I would propose that we do two things: 1, combine the FOA and AuthInfo rows into one topic (I think they're too intertwined to be separated) and 2, add a sentence to the paragraph immediately preceding the chart to explain that the rows may be combined depending on what the GNSO Council thinks makes sense. I think we could propose that some be approached together (maybe TEAC and TDRP?) also. What do you think? Thanks! -- Sarah Wyld Domains Product Team Tucows +1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392 On 3/30/2020 10:49 PM, Caitlin Tubergen wrote: Dear Scoping Team Members: Further to Support Staff’s action to circulate a clean version of the Scoping Paper to the Team by COB today, please find the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit#<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit>. As a reminder, please provide additional and final edits by COB Thursday, 2 April. Support Staff will then incorporate the proposed edits and send the paper to the GNSO Council by Monday, 6 April. In addition, please remember to keep the your RrSG GNSO Councilors colleagues apprised of the Scoping Team's progress. Thank you. Best regards, Berry and Caitlin _______________________________________________ GNSO-TPRST mailing list GNSO-TPRST@icann.org<mailto:GNSO-TPRST@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tprst _______________________________________________ GNSO-TPRST mailing list GNSO-TPRST@icann.org<mailto:GNSO-TPRST@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tprst
This looks good to me. Thanks to all! Jim On 31 Mar 2020, at 14:23, Roger D Carney wrote:
Good Afternoon,
I think we now have the near final draft. Sarah/Tom, we added some language above the chart that ties these two (FOA/AuthCode) items together.
If anyone has any additional edits/comments/suggestions, please get them in the Scoping Letter<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit> by Thursday.
As a reminder, we will not be having a meeting this week so if needed please reach out to the list so that we can get everything wrapped up this week.
I also want to thank everyone that helped us reach closure on this issue. I believe it was an efficient and productive team effort, even with some changing of the circumstances during the process.
Thanks Roger
From: GNSO-TPRST <gnso-tprst-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Sarah Wyld Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 8:46 AM To: gnso-tprst@icann.org Subject: Re: [GNSO-TPRST] For your review: draft scoping paper
Notice: This email is from an external sender.
Thanks Berry and Caitlin for your work on this.
I have added a few more tracked changes, sorry. Most of the changes are for clarity, things that were hard to see when we had the commented version in progress.
I do note Tom's comment on the AuthInfo management<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit?di...> section and I think we would benefit from discussing that a bit. My assumption was that each row on the issues chart indicated a different topic and thus the bigger ones would be approached in individual PDPs, and it sounds like that's how Tom was reading it also, but Berry has explained that each row is a different policy topic but not necessarily a different PDP.
I would propose that we do two things: 1, combine the FOA and AuthInfo rows into one topic (I think they're too intertwined to be separated) and 2, add a sentence to the paragraph immediately preceding the chart to explain that the rows may be combined depending on what the GNSO Council thinks makes sense. I think we could propose that some be approached together (maybe TEAC and TDRP?) also.
What do you think? Thanks!
--
Sarah Wyld
Domains Product Team
Tucows
+1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392
On 3/30/2020 10:49 PM, Caitlin Tubergen wrote: Dear Scoping Team Members:
Further to Support Staff’s action to circulate a clean version of the Scoping Paper to the Team by COB today, please find the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit#<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit>.
As a reminder, please provide additional and final edits by COB Thursday, 2 April. Support Staff will then incorporate the proposed edits and send the paper to the GNSO Council by Monday, 6 April.
In addition, please remember to keep the your RrSG GNSO Councilors colleagues apprised of the Scoping Team's progress.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Berry and Caitlin
_______________________________________________
GNSO-TPRST mailing list
GNSO-TPRST@icann.org<mailto:GNSO-TPRST@icann.org>
_______________________________________________ GNSO-TPRST mailing list GNSO-TPRST@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tprst
Looks good to me. Thanks everyone! Barbara Knight, CCEP, CCME Sr. Director - Registry Compliance bknight@Verisign.com<mailto:bknight@Verisign.com> t: 703-948-3343 c: 703-622-1071 12061 Bluemont Way, Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com<http://www.verisigninc.com/> From: GNSO-TPRST <gnso-tprst-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Roger D Carney Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 2:24 PM To: gnso-tprst@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [GNSO-TPRST] For your review: draft scoping paper Good Afternoon, I think we now have the near final draft. Sarah/Tom, we added some language above the chart that ties these two (FOA/AuthCode) items together. If anyone has any additional edits/comments/suggestions, please get them in the Scoping Letter<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit> by Thursday. As a reminder, we will not be having a meeting this week so if needed please reach out to the list so that we can get everything wrapped up this week. I also want to thank everyone that helped us reach closure on this issue. I believe it was an efficient and productive team effort, even with some changing of the circumstances during the process. Thanks Roger From: GNSO-TPRST <gnso-tprst-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-tprst-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Sarah Wyld Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 8:46 AM To: gnso-tprst@icann.org<mailto:gnso-tprst@icann.org> Subject: Re: [GNSO-TPRST] For your review: draft scoping paper Notice: This email is from an external sender. Thanks Berry and Caitlin for your work on this. I have added a few more tracked changes, sorry. Most of the changes are for clarity, things that were hard to see when we had the commented version in progress. I do note Tom's comment on the AuthInfo management<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit?di...> section and I think we would benefit from discussing that a bit. My assumption was that each row on the issues chart indicated a different topic and thus the bigger ones would be approached in individual PDPs, and it sounds like that's how Tom was reading it also, but Berry has explained that each row is a different policy topic but not necessarily a different PDP. I would propose that we do two things: 1, combine the FOA and AuthInfo rows into one topic (I think they're too intertwined to be separated) and 2, add a sentence to the paragraph immediately preceding the chart to explain that the rows may be combined depending on what the GNSO Council thinks makes sense. I think we could propose that some be approached together (maybe TEAC and TDRP?) also. What do you think? Thanks! -- Sarah Wyld Domains Product Team Tucows +1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392 On 3/30/2020 10:49 PM, Caitlin Tubergen wrote: Dear Scoping Team Members: Further to Support Staff’s action to circulate a clean version of the Scoping Paper to the Team by COB today, please find the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit#<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit>. As a reminder, please provide additional and final edits by COB Thursday, 2 April. Support Staff will then incorporate the proposed edits and send the paper to the GNSO Council by Monday, 6 April. In addition, please remember to keep the your RrSG GNSO Councilors colleagues apprised of the Scoping Team's progress. Thank you. Best regards, Berry and Caitlin _______________________________________________ GNSO-TPRST mailing list GNSO-TPRST@icann.org<mailto:GNSO-TPRST@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tprst
I made a slight edit to the reference to domains using privacy/proxy in the COR section. Need to highlight the concern of changes to P/P customer info, and to distinguish that proxy providers are indeed the registrant.
On Apr 1, 2020, at 4:26 AM, Knight, Barbara via GNSO-TPRST <gnso-tprst@icann.org> wrote:
Looks good to me. Thanks everyone!
<image004.jpg>
Barbara Knight, CCEP, CCME Sr. Director - Registry Compliance bknight@Verisign.com <mailto:bknight@Verisign.com>
t: 703-948-3343 c: 703-622-1071 12061 Bluemont Way, Reston, VA 20190
Verisign.com <http://www.verisigninc.com/> <image003.png>
From: GNSO-TPRST <gnso-tprst-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Roger D Carney Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 2:24 PM To: gnso-tprst@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [GNSO-TPRST] For your review: draft scoping paper
Good Afternoon,
I think we now have the near final draft. Sarah/Tom, we added some language above the chart that ties these two (FOA/AuthCode) items together.
If anyone has any additional edits/comments/suggestions, please get them in the Scoping Letter <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit> by Thursday.
As a reminder, we will not be having a meeting this week so if needed please reach out to the list so that we can get everything wrapped up this week.
I also want to thank everyone that helped us reach closure on this issue. I believe it was an efficient and productive team effort, even with some changing of the circumstances during the process.
Thanks Roger
From: GNSO-TPRST <gnso-tprst-bounces@icann.org <mailto:gnso-tprst-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Sarah Wyld Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 8:46 AM To: gnso-tprst@icann.org <mailto:gnso-tprst@icann.org> Subject: Re: [GNSO-TPRST] For your review: draft scoping paper
Notice: This email is from an external sender.
Thanks Berry and Caitlin for your work on this.
I have added a few more tracked changes, sorry. Most of the changes are for clarity, things that were hard to see when we had the commented version in progress.
I do note Tom's comment on the AuthInfo management <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit?di...> section and I think we would benefit from discussing that a bit. My assumption was that each row on the issues chart indicated a different topic and thus the bigger ones would be approached in individual PDPs, and it sounds like that's how Tom was reading it also, but Berry has explained that each row is a different policy topic but not necessarily a different PDP.
I would propose that we do two things: 1, combine the FOA and AuthInfo rows into one topic (I think they're too intertwined to be separated) and 2, add a sentence to the paragraph immediately preceding the chart to explain that the rows may be combined depending on what the GNSO Council thinks makes sense. I think we could propose that some be approached together (maybe TEAC and TDRP?) also.
What do you think? Thanks!
-- Sarah Wyld Domains Product Team Tucows +1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392
On 3/30/2020 10:49 PM, Caitlin Tubergen wrote: Dear Scoping Team Members:
Further to Support Staff’s action to circulate a clean version of the Scoping Paper to the Team by COB today, please find the link:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit# <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXxp5TsUskcrW444D6lYCLy6YX99Wyus/edit>.
As a reminder, please provide additional and final edits by COB Thursday, 2 April. Support Staff will then incorporate the proposed edits and send the paper to the GNSO Council by Monday, 6 April.
In addition, please remember to keep the your RrSG GNSO Councilors colleagues apprised of the Scoping Team's progress.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Berry and Caitlin
_______________________________________________ GNSO-TPRST mailing list GNSO-TPRST@icann.org <mailto:GNSO-TPRST@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tprst <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tprst>_______________________________________________ GNSO-TPRST mailing list GNSO-TPRST@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tprst
participants (7)
-
Caitlin Tubergen -
James Galvin -
Knight, Barbara -
Owen Smigelski -
Roger D Carney -
Sarah Wyld -
Thomas Keller