- Internal-cg - lists.icann.org

Draft minutes of 1 October teleconference
by Samantha Dickinson Oct. 17, 2014

Oct. 17, 2014

Hello all The draft minutes of the last teleconference are now available on Dropbox in the Minutes folder. The direct link is: < https://www.dropbox.com/s/okd0ocrlwagn72b/minutes-teleconference-1-october-… > Regards Sam

9 12

Reminder - ICG social event
by Alice Jansen Oct. 17, 2014

Oct. 17, 2014

Dear ICG Members, This is to kindly remind you that your social event is this evening at 20:00. Location: Glass Lounge - Intercontinental Hotel Best regards Alice --- [cid:793F1344-1F83-49DB-93C6-A0BC280BE1C9]

8 8

Re: [Internal-cg] Reminder - ICG social event
by mnuduma Oct. 17, 2014

Oct. 17, 2014

Thanks Sent from Samsung Mobile -------- Original message -------- From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen(a)icann.org> Date: 16/10/2014 16:46 (GMT-08:00) To: internal-cg(a)icann.org Subject: [Internal-cg] Reminder - ICG social event Dear ICG Members, This is to kindly remind you that your social event is this evening at 20:00. Location: Glass Lounge – Intercontinental Hotel Best regards Alice ---

1 0

GAC nominee to ICG
by Heather.Dryden＠ic.gc.ca Oct. 16, 2014

Oct. 16, 2014

Dear Alissa, ICG colleagues, This is to advise you that, following the GAC elections, the incoming GAC Chair, Mr Thomas Schneider, will replace me as a GAC nominee to the ICG with effect from Friday 17 October 2014. Best of luck to you all with the challenge ahead! Heather Dryden

2 1

Thursday session on accountability
by Alissa Cooper Oct. 16, 2014

Oct. 16, 2014

I have been invited to participate in the Thursday community session about enhancing ICANN accountability <http://la51.icann.org/en/schedule/thu-enhancing-accountability>. There is a large panel of speakers and I will have a 5-minute slot. I have been asked to talk about how the ICG plans to link to the parallel accountability process and what discussions have taken place about this so far. Obviously we have been discussing this a bit amongst ourselves in the context of the proposal finalization process and the FAQ, both of which are on our agenda for further discussion on Friday. We also have a slot on Friday to discuss how we will liaise with the accountability CCWG. While the results of these discussions are TBD, I think there are a few points I can make, slightly expanding on what is in the FAQ: 1. Our charter recognizes that maintaining the accountability of Internet identifier governance is central to the transition process. 2. The ICG has asked the operational communities to consider oversight and accountability — writ large, i.e., "all the ways in which oversight is conducted over the IANA functions operator’s provision of the services and activities” — in their proposals. 3. After receiving consensus proposals from the operational communities regarding IANA, the ICG will conduct an analysis and assessment of their implications for ICANN accountability. We are still discussing what this analysis and assessment will entail, and this will depend somewhat on the extent to which ICANN accountability is the focus of one or more community proposals. 4. We will be having further discussion on Friday to determine how we will procedurally liaise with the accountability CCWG, including how and when we might communicate the analysis/assessment described in (3). Thoughts? Alissa

15 30

NTIA Clarity was RE: Minor issue with timeline language
by Narelle Clark Oct. 16, 2014

Oct. 16, 2014

One even greater source of clarity would be the NTIA. I asked the same question of Larry Strickling personally this week and rather than claim to be a perfect relay agent, I think we should invite him to meet with the ICG. I would hope his diary would have the capacity to accommodate such a meeting. In case you were wondering, he reassured me that he was expecting an identical document to come from ICANN as went to ICANN from the ICG. Like I said, however, I expect we would prefer he said that to us himself. Best regards Narelle > -----Original Message----- > From: internal-cg-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] > On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper > Sent: Friday, 17 October 2014 2:02 AM > To: Subrenat, Jean-Jacques > Cc: internal-cg(a)icann.org > Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Minor issue with timeline language > > In addition to the various statements that have been made about this issue this > week, I've also reached out to a few ICANN board and staff folks about the > possibility of us issuing a joint statement outlining the proposal transmission > steps. So that is an option for us as well if we want to go down that path. > > Alissa > > > > > On Oct 12, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques <jjs(a)dyalog.net> wrote: > > > > Hartmut, > > good catch! Yes, I should have written ICG instead of IGC. > > Jean-Jacques. > > > > ----- Mail original ----- > > De: "Hartmut Richard Glaser" <glaser(a)cgi.br> > > À: "Jean-Jacques Subrenat" <jjs(a)dyalog.net>, "Russ Mundy" > > <mundy(a)tislabs.com> > > Cc: internal-cg(a)icann.org > > Envoyé: Dimanche 12 Octobre 2014 14:11:14 > > Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Minor issue with timeline language > > > > > > IGC = ICG ??? > > > > ==================================== > > > > On 12/10/14 16:46, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote: > > > > > > This (Sunday) morning the ALAC received the visit of the CEO/President of > ICANN. > > Fadi started his presentation by underlining the importance of the transition > plan, before any other topic. > > During Q&A, and speaking as a representative of the ALAC, I mentioned that > the IGC would be sending its transition plan formally through ICANN, and > highlighted the fact that ICANN (Board and/or Staff) should abstain from any > modification of the plan itself. > > I asked him to bring this to the attention of his colleagues on the ICANN > Board: he said he would do that. > > > > Jean-Jacques. > > > > ----- Mail original ----- > > De: "Russ Mundy" <mundy(a)tislabs.com> À: "Jean-Jacques Subrenat" > > <jjs(a)dyalog.net> Cc: "Russ Mundy" <mundy(a)tislabs.com> , "WUKnoben" > > <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de> , internal-cg(a)icann.org Envoyé: > > Dimanche 12 Octobre 2014 12:36:15 > > Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Minor issue with timeline language > > > > > > In the 14 March announcement, NTIA tasked ICANN with "to convene global > stakeholders to develop a proposal to transition the current role played by NTIA" > and the IANA Functions contract is between NTIA & ICANN so it is entirely > reasonable for NTIA to want the response to their announcement to come from > ICANN. I support the solution suggested by Daniel for the ICG to simultaneously > deliver the final proposal to both NTIA and ICANN. > > > > I would also like to suggest that we consider some technical means of > "signing" the final proposal using something like a gpg/pgp signature and > publishing the public key on the ICG web site - in that way, anyone on the > Internet can tell if any changes have been made to the ICG proposal. > > > > I would not object to the exact wording suggested by JJ but I do think that the > last sentence is unnecessary - I think that it would be much better to use a > technical means to get assurance that ICANN would not make any changes to > the report. > > > > Russ > > > > On Oct 11, 2014, at 1:38 AM, "Subrenat, Jean-Jacques" <jjs(a)dyalog.net> > wrote: > > > > As stated in a previous email, I suggest once again that we add that the > content will not be modified by ICANN or any other entity. Also, the addition > proposed by Daniel (ICG sending the plan to NTIA both directly and through > ICANN) should be retained. > > > > Thus, > > "Following on NTIA's request, and consistent with procurement rules within > ICANN, the ICG shall submit its Transition Plan to the NTIA directly, as well as > formally through ICANN. The content of the plan shall in no way be altered, > redacted or modified by ICANN as the designated channel of transmission." > > > > Thanks, > > Jean-Jacques. > > > > > > > > > > ----- Mail original ----- > > De: "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de> À: "Kavouss Arasteh" > > <kavouss.arasteh(a)gmail.com> , "Daniel Karrenberg" > > <daniel.karrenberg(a)ripe.net> Cc: internal-cg(a)icann.org Envoyé: Samedi > > 11 Octobre 2014 09:18:59 > > Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Minor issue with timeline language > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree here. > > > > Perhaps a reference in our submission/transmission whatsoever to NTIA’s > request maybe helpful: > > > > “Following the NTIA request in consistence with procurement rules as well as > practical matter, the ICG submits - formally through ICANN - the transition > proposal to NTIA.” > > > > > > Best regards > > > > Wolf-Ulrich > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Kavouss Arasteh > > Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 6:09 PM > > To: Daniel Karrenberg > > Cc: internal-cg(a)icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Minor issue with > > timeline language > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > For me does not matter whether ICG transmit to NTIA,or ICANN transmit > > , without any edit ,whatsoever, to NTIA,.or ICG transmit to NTIA with > > a copy to ICANN,or ICG transmit to NTIA and ICANN simultaneously ( not > > coped to ICANN but transmittal to ICANN) The important issue is ICANN > > should not touch, edit, comment on the final Report Kavouss > > > > > > > > 2014-10-10 14:57 GMT+02:00 Daniel Karrenberg < daniel.karrenberg(a)ripe.net > > : > > > > > > publish & transmit to ntia & transmit to icann. these days one cannot > > any longer distinguish between orignial and copy. ;-) > > > > ---------- > > Sent from a hand held device. > > > > On 10.10.2014, at 13:13, joseph alhadeff < joseph.alhadeff(a)oracle.com > > wrote: > > > > It would seem that if we publish the proposal just after transmission to ICANN > and copy NTIA on that missive that we have insured that no one can > misunderstand what we proposed. > > > > On 10/10/2014 6:44 AM, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > > Jean-Jacques, > > > > Je suggère que nous allons faire notre travail, sans préjudice de ce que autres > vont faire avec le résultat. Nous le faisons d'une manière transparente et à ce > que tout le monde peut prendre acte du résultat. Une fois que nous avons fait > notre travail nous avons terminé et il sera pour les autres à faire leur choix. Il > serait vain pour nous de prévoir des règles sur la façon dont ce qui se passera > lorsque nous aurons terminé. > > > > Amicalement > > > > Daniel > > > > --------- > > > > rough translation: > > > > > > I suggest we do our job without prejudice about what others will do with it. > We do it in a transparent manner and such that everyone can take note of the > result. Once we have done our job we are finished and it will be for others to > make their choices. It would be futile and therfore unwise for us to stipulate > rules on how what will happen after we are finished. > > > > Read: ICANN will be judged by and suffer the consequences of what they do > with the final proposal. > > > > Read also: we will be judged by our (futile) debates and actions, > > > > Daniel > > > > ---------- > > Sent from a hand held device. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg(a)icann.org > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg > > _______________________________________________ > > Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg(a)icann.org > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg > > _______________________________________________ > > Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg(a)icann.org > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg > > _______________________________________________ > > Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg(a)icann.org > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg > > _______________________________________________ > > Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg(a)icann.org > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg > > _______________________________________________ > > Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg(a)icann.org > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg > > _______________________________________________ > > Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg(a)icann.org > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg > > _______________________________________________ > > Internal-cg mailing list > > Internal-cg(a)icann.org > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg > _______________________________________________ > Internal-cg mailing list > Internal-cg(a)icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

1 0

Minor issue with timeline language
by Alissa Cooper Oct. 16, 2014

Oct. 16, 2014

Hi all, The folks at NTIA have pointed out to me that as a practical matter and to remain consistent with their procurement rules, ICANN is the entity that needs to submit the final transition proposal to NTIA. If you look at our published timeline, it says the following in step 7: "If no concerns are found, the ICG formally submits the final proposal to NTIA." I suggest that we should update this to say: "If no concerns are found, the ICG formally submits the final proposal to ICANN for delivery to NTIA.” Let me know what you think. Thanks, Alissa

17 27

Slides for meeting Thursday
by Patrik Fältström Oct. 16, 2014

Oct. 16, 2014

As of today, I find the following will present: - Alissa - Milton - Martin - Jari - Adiel If I do not hear from you, I expect you will use same slides as you use at the meeting with GAC (if you did use slides). If you want to use other slides, please let me (and/or Alice and Ergys) know ASAP! Patrik

4 3

Logistics for meetings Thursday and Friday
by Patrik Fältström Oct. 15, 2014

Oct. 15, 2014

All, Here is an outline of the logistics for the meetings Thursday and Friday. Look at the three issues below please! Thursday 10:00-12:00, Los Angeles Room - Two lines of mikes, one for old questions, one for new - Two rows of chairs, one behind the other, for ICG members - Me and Mohamed will not be on the chairs, but instead moderating with mikes - Alissa on stage, opening, closing, running meeting etc - Timers 2 min for everyone speaking after Alissa and operational communities introductions - Remote participants might chat (text) and Alice will read the text - Remote Hubs will be able to speak themselves, with fallback Alice read - Alice will be at a table by the side of the stage - Alice + Ergys + Patrik (at least) is in a Skype chat within which Alice let Patrik know whether remote participation is requested Friday 0900-1730, Westside Room: - First 45 min closed - Microphones, translation during the first 45 min - Alice and Ergys will be outside the doors stopping people from going in - Remote participation for ICG members is possible (via bridge) first 45 min - Approximately 5 min will be needed to change from closed to open meeting - Scribe will be on one screen - Other screen available for presentation - First 45 min will be minuted but not scribed

4 5

GAC-ICG Mtg - SANTA MONICA room
by Alice Jansen Oct. 15, 2014

Oct. 15, 2014

Dear ICG Members, Please note that the GAC meetings are now being held in the Santa Monica meeting room. Your meeting with the GAC is today at 10:30-11:30. The room change has been reflected in your meeting schedule: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/icg-losangeles51-schedule-01oct… Remote participation details are available at: http://la51.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-gac-icg Best regards Alice

1 0