Sure Mirjana, We can develop a draft for Latin GP to review. Comparing document versions may not work as some sections were re-structured. However, we will try to document all the changes from the previous version submitted to the IP. Regards, Sarmad From: Mirjana Tasić <Mirjana.Tasic@rnids.rs> Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 9:39 PM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org>, Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Latingp] Early feedback from IP Dear Sarmad, Is it possible that Pitinan provide such document. One possibility is to compare two documents and find differences. After that we can add rationale. I shall not be available next Thursday for a meeting, I’ll be travelling. Regards Mirjana From: Latin GP <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Reply to: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 11 May 2021 at 18:34 To: Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Subject: [Latingp] Early feedback from IP Dear Latin GP members, Here is a request for IP. Before doing a more detailed review, the Integration Panel would like to receive a list of changes and their rationale from the previous version of the Latin LGR. As the Latin LGR proposal does not have redline changes, developing a short document for identifying recent changes will help IP review the Latin GP proposal more effectively. Regards, Sarmad