Can we justify the inclusion of Esperanto based on the principles or should we included because IP thinks it should be included? Mats --- Mats Dufberg DNS Specialist, IIS Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://www.iis.se/en/ From: Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com> Reply-To: Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com> Date: Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 01:05 To: ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Subject: [Latingp] Codepoints from Esperanto The following code points occur in Esperanto, but are not previously included in our Repertoire: Unicode Glyph Unicode Name 0109 ĉ Latin Small Letter C with Circumflex 011D ĝ Latin Small Letter G with Circumflex 0125 ĥ Latin Small Letter H with Circumflex 0135 ĵ Latin Small Letter J with Circumflex 016D ŭ Latin Small Letter U with Breve In addition, we had included 015D ŝ Latin Small Letter S with Circumflex This in our repertoire, but the only example was from Tswa, which is EGIDS 5 -- which the IP apparently doesn't consider sufficient for inclusion. So we may want to modify the entry to reflect Esperanto there. Bill Jouris Inside Products bill.jouris@insidethestack.com 831-659-8360 925-855-9512 (direct)