Dear Dennis, I remember you had created diagrams showing the different options (using Powerpoint?). I would like them included in the appendix to demonstrate the complexities of the issue. Could you share again the link for the file please? Thanks, Meikal Am 5. Okt. 2019, 10:22 +0200 schrieb Meikal Mumin <meikal@mumin.de>:

Hi Dennis,

Thanks for sharing the file. I’ll think about a different wording but anyone is welcome to suggest something.

Best,

Meikal Am 4. Okt. 2019, 18:53 +0200 schrieb Tan Tanaka, Dennis <dtantanaka@verisign.com>:

...

Meikal,

Here is the revised version of the document https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Asf9ecnyX4rkK3pyQMzDuH8YY5-eXw8quZ6guDiU...

Could you (and others too) review the highlighted section? I think it could be re-worded better (or remove altogether because it doesn’t make sense to me).

Thanks, Dennis

Dear all, Thanks for re-sharing the link. I embedded slides one and three in the proposal. Thanks, Meikal Am 9. Okt. 2019, 17:54 +0200 schrieb Pitinan Kooarmornpatana :

Hi Meikal, Dennis,

For the interest of time, kindly allow me to share the link. I believe that this is what you are referring to: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Pey1tE1q3KnvbKtiSjaUNsaVC_AXhwmaLgPi...,

Regards, Pitinan

From: Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Meikal Mumin <meikal@mumin.de> Date: Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 21:14 To: "Tan Tanaka, Dennis" <dtantanaka@verisign.com> Cc: "Tan Tanaka, Dennis via Latingp" <latingp@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Latingp] Revised Appendix IDNA2003

Dear Dennis,

I remember you had created diagrams showing the different options (using Powerpoint?). I would like them included in the appendix to demonstrate the complexities of the issue.

Could you share again the link for the file please?

Thanks,

Meikal Am 5. Okt. 2019, 10:22 +0200 schrieb Meikal Mumin <meikal@mumin.de>:

...

Hi Dennis,

Thanks for sharing the file. I’ll think about a different wording but anyone is welcome to suggest something.

Best,

Meikal Am 4. Okt. 2019, 18:53 +0200 schrieb Tan Tanaka, Dennis <dtantanaka@verisign.com>:

...

Meikal,

Here is the revised version of the document https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Asf9ecnyX4rkK3pyQMzDuH8YY5-eXw8quZ6guDiU... [docs.google.com]

Could you (and others too) review the highlighted section? I think it could be re-worded better (or remove altogether because it doesn’t make sense to me).

Thanks, Dennis