I am stating a view, not engaging in debate. I dont see a reason to state the matter as you have. The percentage of Latino's in Chicago (for example) dwarfs any other non-English linguistic-ethnic group. Would we send them to LAC-RALO? I also dont think there needs to be further barrier to their participation. On 6/5/07, Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> wrote:
Michael Maranda wrote:
This would also be appealing for inclusion of a significant proportion of US population. If we used that criteria we should then also include Mandarin, Greek, Hindi, Italian, and probably a few others.
How often must this subject be re-debated?
- Evan
_______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica... --- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
Draft Code of Conduct: http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- Executive Director, CTCNet Chicago Chapter Co-Founder, Chicago Digital Access Alliance Co-Chair, Illinois Community Technology Coalition President, Association For Community Networking Support the efforts of the Chicago Digital Access Alliance: http://www.digitalaccessalliance.org