Dear All,
Please find attached the summary of the discussion during the meeting on 10
September 2018.
The action items are given below:
S. No.
Action Items
Owner
1
Fill in background details in Executive Summary section of the Draft
Recommendations document
SH
2
Review the language of the recommendations and suggest any edits inline
ALL
3
Based on the discussion, suggest language for how to handle TLD applications
for those scripts not integrated in RZ-LGR, for further review
DT
These meeting notes and the recording of the session have been posted at the
wiki page of the study group at:
https://community.icann.org/display/croscomlgrprocedure/Study+Group+on+Techn
ical+Use+of+RZ-LGR.
Regards,
Sarmad
Dear RZ-LGR SG members,
The public comment period for the scope document for RZ-LGR Study has now
closed. We have received one substantive comment from NCSG - see
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/technical-rz-lgr-2018-08-02-en. We
would request you to please review the comment and let us know how to
respond to the various points raised in this comment. We would aim to post
the report on the public comments by 25 September, as indicated.
Regards,
Sarmad
Dear All,
Please find attached the summary of the discussion during the meeting on 27
August 2018.
The action items are given below:
S. No.
Action Items
Owner
1
Start a Google Document for recommendations
DT
2
Review Recommendation 1 item 6 on pg. 9 of
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-052-en.pdf> SSAC 052 report
for further discussion on scope item 2.a.
ALL
3
Develop a recommendation on how to deal with self-identified variant labels
for ccTLDs and gTLDs
ALL
4
Review the existing recommendations and analysis
ALL
The following possible recommendations were identified:
* Existing gTLDs and ccTLDs should be valid through RZ-LGR.
* Variant labels of existing gTLDs and ccTLDs must be identified using
RZ-LGR. Such variant labels should not be allocated to a different
applicant, following the IDN variant TLD management process
* RZ-LGR calculations should be applied equally for validation and
variant labels of gTLDs and ccTLDs.
* Based on the calculations of RZ-LGR, the follow-up additional
constraints can be different between gTLD and ccTLD, as per the policies and
processes for gTLDs and ccTLDs respectively.
* RZ-LGR will be used for determining variant labels for reserved
labels, which should also be incorporated in the list of reserved labels.
These meeting notes and the recording of the session have been posted at the
wiki page of the study group at:
https://community.icann.org/display/croscomlgrprocedure/Study+Group+on+Techn
ical+Use+of+RZ-LGR.
Regards,
Sarmad
