"strongly disincentivize private resolution of contention sets" Elisa, I believe there is no support in SubPro policy for disincentivizing private resolutions, only to disincentive applying just for profiting from private auctions. On the contrary, contention set resolution solutions such as Joint Ventures were explicitly added as allowed. I wonder if the actual request for the vendor was more nuanced than that ? Rubens
Em 2 de mar. de 2024, à(s) 15:21, Next Round Policy Implementation <NextRound_PolicyImplementation@icann.org> escreveu:
Dear IRT members,
The updated version of the Next Round Policy Implementation Plan is published on the wiki workspace <https://community.icann.org/x/tQM5Dg>. We will go through it during meeting #31 <https://community.icann.org/x/boAvEQ>, on 4 March 2024 at 20:15-21:30 UTC / 16:15-17:30 AST.
Best, Elisa
_______________________________________________ SubPro-IRT mailing list SubPro-IRT@icann.org <mailto:SubPro-IRT@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/subpro-irt
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.