October 2015 - Wp4 - lists.icann.org

Draft analysis of the public comments: invitation to contribute
by Niels ten Oever Oct. 8, 2015

Oct. 8, 2015

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Dear all, With the deadline drawing near Tatiana and I have made new additions to the document in which the comments are summarized. This time we have provided a draft analysis of the comments in line with the 'DelBianco Postulate' as proposed by Greg (thanks for that!). We have two concrete question for additions to the document to Bernard and/or Leon: (1.) to summarize the outcomes of the poll on rights language, and (2.) to provide a language proposal for the metrics. We would like to reiterate this is a draft text, simply to help us have a constructive and productive discussions and hopefully come to good decisions on our submission to the CCWG in the call later today. Additions, contributions and corrections before the call are of course very much welcomed. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qGYKB3d2pjx0iFGj8a8lywgM7WgYqTpis_4- ldkbtg8/edit?usp=sharing or in short form: http://is.gd/wp4delbianco Best, Niels - -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWFlJQAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjp2IQH/AoUl37hIrfuZUIMDAjl40h+ CrDD15+nzVhiJnN8BgJu/UQ2HWmYQWcG9pzPnXCsADp7lIbgbZgeQCi5zaBsnLjK XicUFqFzHEozwuaMjXkK4Vr/KtvNzSMYbE+JOdDdbPrd6eEtnTHUiblsf3iEn9VQ hNESEtts3w/V4QqvmE8Xcsaf9KJNH3gthjKp7Tit9FCAsESeD5zQMZZUOCE5LBP2 roiBGaaOBDqZ0rX5bJr/XOKrvFcEZTpR0TLCqGMrwlC0sogPa1UeeTynCyRp8muz Ms+UNE8rgR3CEOA9NTWEjioXvzch0EjGz/MjODgyqYUF3m7OVP+c9rgV4cFeenQ= =RAok -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

CCWG - WP4 Poll on referencing existing documents
by Bernard Turcotte Oct. 8, 2015

Oct. 8, 2015

All, Following today's WP4 it was decided to poll the WP4 participants on the subject of referring to existing human rights instruments or not. Please complete the following by 23:59 UTC Wednesday October 7th 2015 by replying to the WP4 list: - Question 1 - Should there be a reference to a specific document in the Bylaws text regarding human rights proposed by the CCWG (Yes or No)? - Question 2 - If a document reference is included should it be the UDHR (yes or no)? - Question 3 - If not UDHR what other document or documents should be referred to (list)? Thank you. Staff for Leon Sanchez.

26 31

Re: [Wp4] CCWG - WP4 Poll on referencing existing documents
by ram.mohan Oct. 7, 2015

Oct. 7, 2015

1. No 2. N/A 3. N/A Adding something like this has potent impact on IANA, not simply ICANN in a naming and policy function. Also see Sam Eisner's rationale. Any such suggestion should be run past the IETF and RIRs. Ram -------- Original message -------- From: Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard(a)gmail.com> Date:10/06/2015 8:10 PM (GMT-05:00) To: wp4(a)icann.org Subject: [Wp4] CCWG - WP4 Poll on referencing existing documents All, Following today's WP4 it was decided to poll the WP4 participants on the subject of referring to existing human rights instruments or not. Please complete the following by 23:59 UTC Wednesday October 7th 2015 by replying to the WP4 list: Question 1 - Should there be a reference to a specific document in the Bylaws text regarding human rights proposed by the CCWG (Yes or No)? Question 2 - If a document reference is included should it be the UDHR (yes or no)? Question 3 - If not UDHR what other document or documents should be referred to (list)? Thank you. Staff for Leon Sanchez.

6 8

Fwd: [WP1] Updated analysis of public comments on bringing AoC into the bylaws
by Greg Shatan Oct. 6, 2015

Oct. 6, 2015

Here is an example of the "DelBianco Postulate." Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org> Date: Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:54 AM Subject: [WP1] Updated analysis of public comments on bringing AoC into the bylaws To: "wp1(a)icann.org" <wp1(a)icann.org>, Jordan Carter <jordan(a)internetnz.net.nz > Cc: Becky Burr <becky.burr(a)neustar.biz>, Thomas Rickert <thomas(a)rickert.net>, ACCT-Staff <acct-staff(a)icann.org>, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez < carlosraulg(a)gmail.com> Members of WP1: Attached is an update (v3) of the analysis of public comments on bringing the Affirmation of Commitments into the ICANN bylaws. The update reflects discussion on our Monday call, plus edits from Rinalia, plus my expansion of an issue that was also discussed on Monday’s WP2 call — requiring implementation of review recommendations before opening next round of gTLDs. We are hoping to discuss on second half of today’s WP1 call at 19 UTC > > From: <wp1-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Jordan Carter > Date: Monday, October 5, 2015 at 7:03 AM > To: "wp1(a)icann.org", ACCT-Staff > Subject: [WP1] WP1 Agenda Items and Volunteer Groups - Updated > > Hi all > > Here is an update to volunteers on analysing the public comments, followed > by outline agendas for our next two calls. > > I noted just now in closing we may need another call to close out this > work. Let me give notice now that if we do, the only window that can work > is *Friday 09 October 2015 at 1730-1930 UTC.* Staff, please send out a > tentative invite to that call window, in case we need it. > > > Our immediate task is to analyse public comments and recommend amended > proposals and/or choices for the CCWG to consider, by 12-Oct. These will be > considered at the CCWG meeting in Dublin on Friday 16 October. > > Within WP1 we have 8 distinct groups working on this public comment > analyses. > > Here are the currently known volunteers. Please advise if you wish to join > in any of the groups. > > *Budget, strat plan, op plan* --> Jonathan Zuck, Cherine Chalaby, Carlos >> Raul Gutierrez, Mary Uduma, Asha Hemrajani >> >> *Standard Bylaws* --> Keith Drazek, James Gannon, Chris Disspain >> >> *Fundamental Bylaws* --> Keith Drazek, James Gannon, Chris Disspain >> >> *Individual Director removal* --> Mike Chartier, Robin Gross, Alan >> Greenberg, Erika Mann, Cherine Chalaby >> >> *Board removal* --> Greg Shatan, Alan Greenberg, George Sadowsky >> >> *AoC* --> Steve DelBianco, Carlos Raul Gutierrez, Alan Greenberg, Rinalia >> Abdul Rahim >> >> *Community forum* --> Jordan Carter, Matthew Shears, Jorge >> Cancio, Gonzalo Navarro >> >> *CMSM* --> Avri Doria, Robin Gross, Steve DelBianco, Jorge Cancio, >> Samantha Eisner, Alan Greenberg, Ram Mohan, Kavouss Arasteh >> > > > > *Here are the tentative agenda items for the coming calls:* > > *WP1 — Tues 6 Oct - 19h-21h UTC* > > * New Public Comment analyses:* > > - Fundamental Bylaws and Regular Bylaws (Keith) > - Individual Director Removal (Mike and Robin) > > *Review of previous discussions where required:* > > - AoC > - Board Removal > > > *WP1 — Thur 8 Oct - 05h-07h UTC* > > > * New Public Comment analyses: * > > - Community Forum (Matthew) > - CMSM (Avri and Robin) > > *Review of previous discussions where required:* > > - Fundamental and Regular Bylaws > - Individual Director removal > - Budget > > > best, > Jordan > > Jordan Carter > Rapporteur, Work Party 1 (Community Empowerment) > Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN's Accountability (CCWG) > > _______________________________________________ WP1 mailing list WP1(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1

1 0

Zuck Model for Human Rights comments on 2nd CCWG draft report
by Niels ten Oever Oct. 6, 2015

Oct. 6, 2015

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Dear all, I hope this email finds you well. In order to fulfill our tasks as volunteers Tatiana and I have tried to categorize the comments on the second draft CCWG draft report concerning human rights in the Zuck-model . https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qGYKB3d2pjx0iFGj8a8lywgM7WgYqTpis_4- ldkbtg8/edit?usp=sharing We hope this can be the basis or at least a contribution to a constructive discussion in our call in about 1.5 hour. Best, Niels - -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWFC6/AAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpj5UIAJ56c2Tg9HF6c5arcj1NM6hL 8EKWUR0g0GM0rYoaMYMUoiw3HbzxCVW6iAkGqH0NRRZs5UEPn84SqCSdeinCvRMp ldho7tCmUpbv5CZBP4Z/dvsuurvG6IJgvZwXPaT6KhaT8ybSuWtNEHxZACgZGRNP KAMmP8OWVSvLE+Thdrm+UnxNEydaCpc3O9RQnmsvLbxnf7zo0om/hPSOTxrW4Ynu OYRRwbM9dXprKDrSCL7qTNFG0aYerjjbsFT7veU+FXf4KfMqqIbET0Xla8cuRC17 5+C8uAodIhEodCGdxt7AU/Pjtq+E2rMFC8AUH1ur2wNAlS8tD1v0U45GlqQmoOA= =3vCm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 3

Doodle poll for WP4 Meeting on 6 October
by Brenda Brewer Oct. 2, 2015

Oct. 2, 2015

Please respond to the Doodle poll for the another WP4 Meeting on 6 October. Please respond in a timely manner so the meeting details can be sent out ASAP. Doodle Link: http://doodle.com/poll/9rvezn37nffp47xh Thank you all kindly! Brenda

1 0