- atrt2 - lists.icann.org

Volunteer engagement
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 2, 2013

Oct. 2, 2013

I just realized (yes, I should have noticed earlier) that 37 - Volunteer engagement fell through the cracks, although bits of it are in other recommendations. Clearly too late to do anything about it now, but I think that as we review the draft document and community input, we should think about putting it back, or fleshing out other areas to ensure that it is covered adequately. Alan

1 0

Updated PDP template uploaded
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 2, 2013

Oct. 2, 2013

I have uploaded a revised PDP template replacing the community input section, fixed a few typos and replaced some place-holder text. I believe that this now completes the commitments I had out of Tuesday's review. If I missed anything, please let me know. Alan

1 0

Update to Template 12-17, 35&
by Avri Doria Oct. 2, 2013

Oct. 2, 2013

Hi, Carlos and I have continued working on the drive draft. I remains available for online comment. <https://docs.google.com/document/d/12tg-LleCMmc4ekWTKMgB074miEFgc2RSOlZKqM5…> I have, however, downloaded a new snapshot that reflects work done on the issues discussed during Tuesday's meeting. Covering any changes based on comments and continued work, there will be another snapshot taken just before the deadline on Friday. Draft-131003: <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/41899319/Template-12-16353…> avri

1 0

Additions to the Treatment of Review Teams recommendations
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 2, 2013

Oct. 2, 2013

Fiona, the Rec that I worded as suggested in Washington was: >The Board must address all AoC RT recommendations in a clear and >unambiguous manner, indicating to what extent they are accepting >each recommendation. During our conference call on Tuesday, I suggested and Steve said that he could support a recommendation on having the Board apply a time line to all accepted recommendations. Here is a wording that I hope is acceptable. >In responding to Review Team recommendations, the Board must provide >an expected time frame for implementation, and if that time frame is >different from one given by the RT, the rationale should address the >difference. If you would like me to add them to the document on the Wiki myself, please let me know. Alan

1 0

Whois templates
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 2, 2013

Oct. 2, 2013

I have uploaded the revised Whois templates. Changes: 1. A new template has been added prior to Recommendation 1 on the Board adoption of the RT report. 2. Substantial changes to the Community input column including references to the Puclic Comments and other input. 3. The only other change is in the ATRT analysis of the Rec 5 implementation where I replaced the paragraph of the forthcoming portal (which by the way is quite impressive). Alan

1 0

Updated Draft for ATRT! Recommendations 9-14
by Larry Strickling Oct. 2, 2013

Oct. 2, 2013

Attached. This version reflects yesterday's discussion as well as edits from Jorgen and Heather.

1 0

Finance template
by Lise Fuhr Oct. 2, 2013

Oct. 2, 2013

Dear ATRT2, Jørgen and I hereby send a revised version of the Finance template with the remarks from our meeting in Washington incorporated. I have more templates to come during the weekend. Enjoy your Friday Best, Lise

5 7

Edits to GAC-related report following Oct. 1 call
by Heather.Dryden＠ic.gc.ca Oct. 2, 2013

Oct. 2, 2013

Dear ATRT 2 colleagues, As discussed on the call yesterday, I am circulating edits to the ATRT 2 list so that they can be reflected in the GAC-related report and recommendations. The page numbers referenced below are based on the draft GAC-related report dated September 29. Best regards, Heather > > 1. Regarding Jorgen's proposed new sentence for the "Findings section 2" on P. 10, I am proposing modest revisions to allow the sentence to read as being more factual, as follows: > > "...challenges continue with barriers for participation both within the GAC and to ICANN in general. More effective procedures in the GAC and easier access to information by ICANN as well as better explanation of the ICANN model will uphold a continuous and effective level of participation in the GAC. > > 2. Correction to middle of first full para on P. 9: > > In response to early ATRT2 analysis, staff further elaborated that the Global Stakeholder Engagement (GSE) team produces a monthly report for the Chair of the GAC. This document includes a "look back" reporting on the previous months activity and projection looking forward at the next months planned activity involving GSE staff and government interactions. NEW TEXT TO REPLACE EXISTING: "This report was proposed by staff for circulation to the GAC chair." END NEW TEXT AND PARA THEN CONTINUES WITH EXISTING: GSE staff have also developed a global government engagement strategy document that will be presented to the Board Global Relations Committee (BGRC) for informational purposes at the committee meeting in Los Angeles this month (26 Sept 2013.) As a best practice the RVPs seek to inform the GAC members in their regions of the community regional engagement strategy working groups activities and outcomes. > > 3. > NEW SECOND PARA ADDED TO P. 5 UNDER "Background Research Undertaken" > > "Notable progress has nevertheless been achieved by the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) in terms of defining and providing greater visibility into the GAC consensus process, resulting in an amendment to Principle 47 of the GAC’s Operating Principles in October 2011 at the Dakar meetings. The Operating Principles are publicly posted on the GAC website." > Insert footnote to contain the following text or link to GAC website at <https://gacweb.icann.org/> : > GAC Operating Principles > As amended, GAC Dakar meeting in October, 2011 > > Principle 47 > The GAC works on the basis of seeking consensus among its membership. Consistent with United Nations practice[1], consensus is understood to mean the practice of adopting decisions by general agreement in the absence of any formal objection. Where consensus is not possible, the Chair shall convey the full range of views expressed by members to the ICANN Board. > > [1] In United Nations practice, the concept of "consensus" is understood to mean the practice of adoption of resolutions or decisions by general agreement without resort to voting in the absence of any formal objection that would stand in the way of a decision being declared adopted in that manner. Thus, in the event that consensus or general agreement is achieved, the resolutions and decisions of the United Nations meetings and conferences have been adopted without a vote. In this connection, it should be noted that the expressions "without a vote", "by consensus" and "by general agreement" are, in the practice of the United Nations, synonymous and therefore interchangeable. > > 4. 　 NEW TEXT TO ADD TO THE LIST ON P.9 > "Relevant Governmental Advisory Committee Operating Principles: Principle 47, footnote 1, Dakar amended version October 2011" > > 　

1 0

ATRT2 question: When were directors paid?
by Steve Crocker Oct. 1, 2013

Oct. 1, 2013

Folks, I probed this point more fully. The resolution was passed December 8, 2011. It took a while to complete election forms, i.e. whether a director wished to forgo or accept payment, and also to evaluate the tax implications. Payments started at different times for different directors based on the time it took to complete the administrative paperwork, but payments were calculated from the time of the Board's resolution. Thus, even if the first payment was delayed, it included payment for the full period. In two cases, it took a bit longer than it did for the others, but the extra delay was at the request of the specific director and was related to their personal situation. In terms of satisfying the ATRT1 recommendation, I believe Dec 8, 2011 is the correct date to use. The delays after that were administrative issues. I can easily understand complaints about the administrative delays, but they are similar in nature to delays related to reimbursement of travel expenses, etc. In the case of payments to directors, the delays surrounding the first payments were a one-time issues and I don't believe they have been or are likely to be a problem with subsequent directors. The system is set up and working. Steve

1 0

WS4 Revised recommendations schedule
by Fiona Asonga Oct. 1, 2013

Oct. 1, 2013

Hallo Larisa Kindly update the WS4 proposed recommendations sheet with the new one after Washington Kind regards Fiona

1 0