Dear team,
Hope you are all well.
This is in reference to previous conversations on the topic.
Franc (copied here in this email) has been helpful in looking through
the documents.
Please find attached the analysis here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1R0j8RwbUrxbPxVIe_5Hgc4CRNUaXkSoyZ-x…
The document contains two sheets;
First, EPDP HRIA- analyses the EPDP Phase 2 Recommendations which inform
the ODA Report.
Second, ODA HRIA- analyses the ODA Recommendations which aims to
implement the EPDP Report.
FYI- The ODA Report is informed by the EPDP Report though in some
instances ICANN might have misunderstood the EPDP Report and ICANN Board
wrote to the GNSO Council raising this questions:
1.
Whether the ODA has correctly interpreted the intent of the SSAD
recommendations in the proposed implementation;
2.
Whether the ODA has overlooked any key aspects of the SSAD
recommendations that should be factored in by the ICANN Board when
it considers the recommendations;
3.
Its view on the concerns identified by the ICANN Board and potential
options that could be considered, either in the form of changes to
the proposed implementation or the policy recommendations
themselves, to address these concerns (note, these are expected to
be high level suggestions at this stage);
4.
Any other aspects that help inform the Council’s deliberations and
consultation with the ICANN Board.
For background here are the original documents that were being analysed:
1.
EPDP Phase 2 Final Report:
https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/epdp-phas…
2.
ODA Final Report:
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ssad-oda-25jan22-en.pdf
I look forward to your feedback as I begin working on the prose report
which I hope to complete the first version by June 7^th and will be
scheduled to be maximum 10 pages for transmission to the board via NCSG
(which CCWP-HR is seated).
Please feel free to let me know in case of any questions.
---
Best Regards,
*EPK*
