FW: [CORRESPONDENCE] Cherine Chalaby to Katrina Sataki re: IFRT Bylaws Amendment
FYI From: Wendy Profit [mailto:wendy.profit@icann.org] Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2019 2:50 AM To: katrina@nic.lv Cc: Cherine Chalaby <cherine.chalaby@board.icann.org>; David Conrad <david.conrad@icann.org>; Kim Davies <kim.davies@iana.org>; David Olive <david.olive@icann.org>; Secretary <secretary@icann.org>; Correspondence <Correspondence@icann.org> Subject: [CORRESPONDENCE] Cherine Chalaby to Katrina Sataki re: IFRT Bylaws Amendment Dear Katrina Sataki, Please find the attached letter from Cherine Chalaby regarding the composition of the IANA Functions Review Team and proposed ICANN Bylaws change. Thank you and best regards, Wendy Profit Senior Manager, Board Operations ICANN
Dear Katrina, The last sentence of Cherine's letter goes as "The Board encourages the ccNSO to contribute to this public comment proceeding." I personally wonder what kind of contribution is encouraged here? Is each of the ccNSO member encouraged to post a comment expressing "Support for ccNSO letter" or "No-support for ccNSO letter" ? Or, does it mean just a general thing such as cooperation with the Board in concluding? Hiro On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:04:00 +0300 "Katrina Sataki" <katrina@nic.lv> wrote:
FYI
From: Wendy Profit [mailto:wendy.profit@icann.org] Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2019 2:50 AM To: katrina@nic.lv Cc: Cherine Chalaby <cherine.chalaby@board.icann.org>; David Conrad <david.conrad@icann.org>; Kim Davies <kim.davies@iana.org>; David Olive <david.olive@icann.org>; Secretary <secretary@icann.org>; Correspondence <Correspondence@icann.org> Subject: [CORRESPONDENCE] Cherine Chalaby to Katrina Sataki re: IFRT Bylaws Amendment
Dear Katrina Sataki,
Please find the attached letter from Cherine Chalaby regarding the composition of the IANA Functions Review Team and proposed ICANN Bylaws change.
Thank you and best regards,
Wendy Profit
Senior Manager, Board Operations
ICANN
I was curious about that too. My interpretation was to respond in support, and so I did just that this afternoon. Sent from my iPhone
On 17 Jun 2019, at 18:22, HiroHOTTA <hotta@jprs.co.jp> wrote:
Dear Katrina,
The last sentence of Cherine's letter goes as "The Board encourages the ccNSO to contribute to this public comment proceeding."
I personally wonder what kind of contribution is encouraged here? Is each of the ccNSO member encouraged to post a comment expressing "Support for ccNSO letter" or "No-support for ccNSO letter" ? Or, does it mean just a general thing such as cooperation with the Board in concluding?
Hiro
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:04:00 +0300 "Katrina Sataki" <katrina@nic.lv> wrote:
FYI
From: Wendy Profit [mailto:wendy.profit@icann.org] Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2019 2:50 AM To: katrina@nic.lv Cc: Cherine Chalaby <cherine.chalaby@board.icann.org>; David Conrad <david.conrad@icann.org>; Kim Davies <kim.davies@iana.org>; David Olive <david.olive@icann.org>; Secretary <secretary@icann.org>; Correspondence <Correspondence@icann.org> Subject: [CORRESPONDENCE] Cherine Chalaby to Katrina Sataki re: IFRT Bylaws Amendment
Dear Katrina Sataki,
Please find the attached letter from Cherine Chalaby regarding the composition of the IANA Functions Review Team and proposed ICANN Bylaws change.
Thank you and best regards,
Wendy Profit
Senior Manager, Board Operations
ICANN
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Dear Hiro, I "think" what Cherene is asking for here is for some public comments from the overall ccNSO (and ccTLD) Community in support of the proposed Bylaw language. A public comment or two from a non-ccNSO member ccTLD would, I think, assuage any lingering concerns that the Board might have with respect to adopting the new Bylaw language as proposed in the public comment. Of course, I cannot read his mind... __ FYI (and a "head's up" to the Council), I expect that the ECA will hold an Approval Action Community Forum on this in Montreal, assuming the Board does indeed vote in favour of this Bylaw change. Best Regards, /Stephen On 6/17/19, 13:22, "Ccnso-council on behalf of HiroHOTTA" <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org on behalf of hotta@jprs.co.jp> wrote: Dear Katrina, The last sentence of Cherine's letter goes as "The Board encourages the ccNSO to contribute to this public comment proceeding." I personally wonder what kind of contribution is encouraged here? Is each of the ccNSO member encouraged to post a comment expressing "Support for ccNSO letter" or "No-support for ccNSO letter" ? Or, does it mean just a general thing such as cooperation with the Board in concluding? Hiro On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:04:00 +0300 "Katrina Sataki" <katrina@nic.lv> wrote: > FYI > > > > From: Wendy Profit [mailto:wendy.profit@icann.org] > Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2019 2:50 AM > To: katrina@nic.lv > Cc: Cherine Chalaby <cherine.chalaby@board.icann.org>; David Conrad <david.conrad@icann.org>; Kim Davies <kim.davies@iana.org>; David Olive <david.olive@icann.org>; Secretary <secretary@icann.org>; Correspondence <Correspondence@icann.org> > Subject: [CORRESPONDENCE] Cherine Chalaby to Katrina Sataki re: IFRT Bylaws Amendment > > > > Dear Katrina Sataki, > > > > Please find the attached letter from Cherine Chalaby regarding the composition of the IANA Functions Review Team and proposed ICANN Bylaws change. > > > > Thank you and best regards, > > > > Wendy Profit > > Senior Manager, Board Operations > > ICANN > > > > > _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Dear Stephen, Thanks for helping my understanding. Hiro On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 22:19:29 +0000 "Stephen Deerhake @ ASNIC" <sdeerhake@nic.as> wrote:
Dear Hiro,
I "think" what Cherene is asking for here is for some public comments from the overall ccNSO (and ccTLD) Community in support of the proposed Bylaw language. A public comment or two from a non-ccNSO member ccTLD would, I think, assuage any lingering concerns that the Board might have with respect to adopting the new Bylaw language as proposed in the public comment.
Of course, I cannot read his mind... __
FYI (and a "head's up" to the Council), I expect that the ECA will hold an Approval Action Community Forum on this in Montreal, assuming the Board does indeed vote in favour of this Bylaw change.
Best Regards,
/Stephen
?On 6/17/19, 13:22, "Ccnso-council on behalf of HiroHOTTA" <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org on behalf of hotta@jprs.co.jp> wrote:
Dear Katrina,
The last sentence of Cherine's letter goes as "The Board encourages the ccNSO to contribute to this public comment proceeding."
I personally wonder what kind of contribution is encouraged here? Is each of the ccNSO member encouraged to post a comment expressing "Support for ccNSO letter" or "No-support for ccNSO letter" ? Or, does it mean just a general thing such as cooperation with the Board in concluding?
Hiro
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:04:00 +0300 "Katrina Sataki" <katrina@nic.lv> wrote: > FYI > > > > From: Wendy Profit [mailto:wendy.profit@icann.org] > Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2019 2:50 AM > To: katrina@nic.lv > Cc: Cherine Chalaby <cherine.chalaby@board.icann.org>; David Conrad <david.conrad@icann.org>; Kim Davies <kim.davies@iana.org>; David Olive <david.olive@icann.org>; Secretary <secretary@icann.org>; Correspondence <Correspondence@icann.org> > Subject: [CORRESPONDENCE] Cherine Chalaby to Katrina Sataki re: IFRT Bylaws Amendment > > > > Dear Katrina Sataki, > > > > Please find the attached letter from Cherine Chalaby regarding the composition of the IANA Functions Review Team and proposed ICANN Bylaws change. > > > > Thank you and best regards, > > > > Wendy Profit > > Senior Manager, Board Operations > > ICANN > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Dear Hiro, You are most welcome. Mind you, it's speculation on my part. I've not talked any Board members regarding this topic. Best Regards, Stephen On 6/17/19, 23:08, "hotta@jprs.co.jp on behalf of HiroHOTTA" <hotta@jprs.co.jp> wrote: Dear Stephen, Thanks for helping my understanding. Hiro On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 22:19:29 +0000 "Stephen Deerhake @ ASNIC" <sdeerhake@nic.as> wrote: > Dear Hiro, > > I "think" what Cherene is asking for here is for some public comments from the overall ccNSO (and ccTLD) Community in support of the proposed Bylaw language. A public comment or two from a non-ccNSO member ccTLD would, I think, assuage any lingering concerns that the Board might have with respect to adopting the new Bylaw language as proposed in the public comment. > > Of course, I cannot read his mind... __ > > > FYI (and a "head's up" to the Council), I expect that the ECA will hold an Approval Action Community Forum on this in Montreal, assuming the Board does indeed vote in favour of this Bylaw change. > > > Best Regards, > > /Stephen > > > ?On 6/17/19, 13:22, "Ccnso-council on behalf of HiroHOTTA" <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org on behalf of hotta@jprs.co.jp> wrote: > > Dear Katrina, > > The last sentence of Cherine's letter goes as "The Board encourages > the ccNSO to contribute to this public comment proceeding." > > I personally wonder what kind of contribution is encouraged here? > Is each of the ccNSO member encouraged to post a comment expressing > "Support for ccNSO letter" or "No-support for ccNSO letter" ? > Or, does it mean just a general thing such as cooperation with the > Board in concluding? > > Hiro > > > On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:04:00 +0300 > "Katrina Sataki" <katrina@nic.lv> wrote: > > FYI > > > > > > > > From: Wendy Profit [mailto:wendy.profit@icann.org] > > Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2019 2:50 AM > > To: katrina@nic.lv > > Cc: Cherine Chalaby <cherine.chalaby@board.icann.org>; David Conrad <david.conrad@icann.org>; Kim Davies <kim.davies@iana.org>; David Olive <david.olive@icann.org>; Secretary <secretary@icann.org>; Correspondence <Correspondence@icann.org> > > Subject: [CORRESPONDENCE] Cherine Chalaby to Katrina Sataki re: IFRT Bylaws Amendment > > > > > > > > Dear Katrina Sataki, > > > > > > > > Please find the attached letter from Cherine Chalaby regarding the composition of the IANA Functions Review Team and proposed ICANN Bylaws change. > > > > > > > > Thank you and best regards, > > > > > > > > Wendy Profit > > > > Senior Manager, Board Operations > > > > ICANN > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ccnso-council mailing list > Ccnso-council@icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council > _______________________________________________ > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. > > >
Dear Stephen, Your speculation sounds reasonable, in that case, perhaps, we can help. LACTLD and nic.pr are involved in an initiative to reaching out to non-ccNSO/LACTLD ccTLD operators in the Caribbean. It is very probable that some of them would be willing to support the proposed Bylaw language. Regards, Pablo On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 6:28 AM Stephen Deerhake @ ASNIC <sdeerhake@nic.as> wrote:
Dear Hiro,
You are most welcome. Mind you, it's speculation on my part. I've not talked any Board members regarding this topic.
Best Regards,
Stephen
On 6/17/19, 23:08, "hotta@jprs.co.jp on behalf of HiroHOTTA" < hotta@jprs.co.jp> wrote:
Dear Stephen,
Thanks for helping my understanding.
Hiro
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 22:19:29 +0000 "Stephen Deerhake @ ASNIC" <sdeerhake@nic.as> wrote: > Dear Hiro, > > I "think" what Cherene is asking for here is for some public comments from the overall ccNSO (and ccTLD) Community in support of the proposed Bylaw language. A public comment or two from a non-ccNSO member ccTLD would, I think, assuage any lingering concerns that the Board might have with respect to adopting the new Bylaw language as proposed in the public comment. > > Of course, I cannot read his mind... __ > > > FYI (and a "head's up" to the Council), I expect that the ECA will hold an Approval Action Community Forum on this in Montreal, assuming the Board does indeed vote in favour of this Bylaw change. > > > Best Regards, > > /Stephen > > > ?On 6/17/19, 13:22, "Ccnso-council on behalf of HiroHOTTA" < ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org on behalf of hotta@jprs.co.jp> wrote: > > Dear Katrina, > > The last sentence of Cherine's letter goes as "The Board encourages > the ccNSO to contribute to this public comment proceeding." > > I personally wonder what kind of contribution is encouraged here? > Is each of the ccNSO member encouraged to post a comment expressing > "Support for ccNSO letter" or "No-support for ccNSO letter" ? > Or, does it mean just a general thing such as cooperation with the > Board in concluding? > > Hiro > > > On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:04:00 +0300 > "Katrina Sataki" <katrina@nic.lv> wrote: > > FYI > > > > > > > > From: Wendy Profit [mailto:wendy.profit@icann.org] > > Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2019 2:50 AM > > To: katrina@nic.lv > > Cc: Cherine Chalaby <cherine.chalaby@board.icann.org>; David Conrad <david.conrad@icann.org>; Kim Davies <kim.davies@iana.org>; David Olive <david.olive@icann.org>; Secretary <secretary@icann.org>; Correspondence <Correspondence@icann.org> > > Subject: [CORRESPONDENCE] Cherine Chalaby to Katrina Sataki re: IFRT Bylaws Amendment > > > > > > > > Dear Katrina Sataki, > > > > > > > > Please find the attached letter from Cherine Chalaby regarding the composition of the IANA Functions Review Team and proposed ICANN Bylaws change. > > > > > > > > Thank you and best regards, > > > > > > > > Wendy Profit > > > > Senior Manager, Board Operations > > > > ICANN > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ccnso-council mailing list > Ccnso-council@icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council > _______________________________________________ > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. > > >
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
participants (5)
-
HiroHOTTA -
Katrina Sataki -
Nick Wenban-Smith -
Pablo Rodriguez -
Stephen Deerhake @ ASNIC