April 2025 - Ccnso-pgawg - lists.icann.org

Re: [Ext] Re: [EXTERNAL] - Friendly reminder Re: Draft final report PGA WG
by Bart Boswinkel April 29, 2025

April 29, 2025

Hi Jordan Correct, tomorrow (this week) is first reading full report. Kind regards, Bart From: Jordan Carter <jordan.carter(a)auda.org.au> Date: Monday, 28 April 2025 at 10:45 To: Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-pgawg <ccnso-pgawg(a)icann.org> Cc: Joke Braeken <joke.braeken(a)icann.org>, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [EXTERNAL] - [Ccnso-pgawg] Friendly reminder Re: Draft final report PGA WG Hi all I’m back from my holiday, speak with you tomorrow! Report looks good broadly speaking. Only wonder if we should do any more specification of the proposed terms for the study groups? I have some non substantive editorial changes to suggest that I hope to tack into the Google doc this afternoon European time. I presume that our meeting this week will be a first reading? Cheers Jordan Jordan Carter — .au Domain Administration +61-417-243-647 on Signal or iMessage ________________________________ From: Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-pgawg <ccnso-pgawg(a)icann.org> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2025 6:26:42 PM To: ccnso-pgawg(a)icann.org <ccnso-pgawg(a)icann.org> Cc: Joke Braeken <joke.braeken(a)icann.org>; Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] - [Ccnso-pgawg] Friendly reminder Re: Draft final report PGA WG Dear all As a friendly reminder Please review the draft report: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ouZnDqzikDxnuhlz5VPw0uWvqdCxX2Giy5mEGN4… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1ouZnDqzikDxn…> Any comments or suggested edits, please include in suggestion mode in the doc or in response the this email. The next Policy Gap Analysis Working Group teleconference is scheduled for 29 April 2025 at 17:00 UTC. Main topic is review of the report Kind regards, Bart From: Joke Braeken via Ccnso-pgawg <ccnso-pgawg(a)icann.org> Date: Wednesday, 16 April 2025 at 06:08 To: "ccnso-pgawg(a)icann.org" <ccnso-pgawg(a)icann.org> Cc: Joke Braeken <joke.braeken(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ccnso-pgawg] Draft final report PGA WG Dear All, Please find here the draft final report by the PGA working group, as introduced yesterday by Bart to the group. Please review the document, and suggest any edits or comments you may have either directly in the document, or on the PGA mailing list. Thank you. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ouZnDqzikDxnuhlz5VPw0uWvqdCxX2Giy5mEGN4… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1ouZnDqzikDxn…> Best regards, Joke Braeken joke.braeken(a)icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org>

5 5

NOTES | PGA | 29 April 2025 (17 UTC)
by Joke Braeken April 29, 2025

April 29, 2025

NOTES | PGA | 29 April 2025 (17 UTC) 1. Welcome Welcome by Jordan Thank you to Bart for writing the draft final report and to those who read it 2. First reading We can accept the editorial edits, but let’s clean up offline Summary of our work and recommendations. We do not repeat annex A, B, C Focus is on the first part of this report. Bart: Kim suggested friendly amendments to Annex A. If I have questions, I will get back to Kim. During the final call, the group needs to accept the full doc. Jordan: any questions regarding the process? None Bart: 2 weeks ago Bart introduced the broad structure of the doc, and afterwards he started adding some text. Included are the recommendations. In the text, per section Start with the introduction, and then the rest of the document. >> Section 1 No substantial changes, only editorial ones Questions or comments about this section? None Jordan: I broke the labeling of the objectives/tasks. Should be the same word. 3 objectives >> Section 2 Overview of policies. Any questions/comments? Bart: overview itself is included in Annex A Up to council how they want to maintain the overview. Are you in favour of recommendation 1? Green ticks, no red ones. >> Section 3 Bart: core of the doc. Questions regarding text up to item 6, request confidentiality None Regarding deciding priorities Questions or comments? None Recommendation 1 Questions or comments? None Green marks, no red ones Section 3.2 Recommendations on how to structure WG. up to council? Comment by Peter. Not be too prescriptive. Jordan: i am comfortable with the amount of detail there Chris: it is study group. Important to make that distinction between study group and working group. The group is meant to study stuff. That’s all. Any questions or comments? None Do you agree? Green marks Section 3.3 Any questions or comments? None Group agrees with section 3.3. Recommendation 3 Irina: good to have the advice in the text of the report. However, should this be in the recommendation? The process is there. How to do that is up to Council. Bart: ccnso does not have it. Whether it is a real committee, or just chairs and vice chairs, is another thing. You do not want to have a standing committee that is dormant for a while. If nothing is happening in 2 to 3 years, why establish a committee Jordan: suggestions for what the ccnso could do, included twice. As the first study group comes to an end, look to the process. No strong view. Council will look carefully at the whole report. It does not matter too much in the text of the recommendation. Irina: first paragraph in rec3 would probably be enough. Do you agree with rec3? Section 3.4. Irina: just a list of issue types and methods. Bart: listing various gaps and methods. Nothing else. No order in the listing. Details included in Annex C Irina: make sure it is clear for any potential reader. Final sentence. For future reference and use, you are referred to annex C Green marks in zoom Kim: comment regarding adoption Bart: adoption the doc as it stands. Alternative word, before we circulate this again Jordan: the word is ok. But the process? No-one knows what the word “adopt” means? Kim: exactly. What are the consequences? Jordan: formally receives…. Or agrees to publish. Bart: will check with recommendation in the text Jordan: a bit more context. What is this about. Why does it matter? Do not go straight into the recommendation. Or call it “summary of the recommendations” Page 10 Kim: ensure consistency Bart: second reading as online silence procedure Jordan: 7 day comment period. If needed, we have a meetimng Bart: we might not need to meet Jordan: let’s meet in 2 weeks. Might be a short meeting Joke Braeken joke.braeken(a)icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org>

1 0

Policy Gap Analysis Working Group (PGA WG) | 29 April 2025 at 17:00 UTC
by ccNSO Calendar April 29, 2025

April 29, 2025

***REMINDER*** Dear all, The next Policy Gap Analysis Working Group teleconference is scheduled for 29 April 2025 at 17:00 UTC. Please find the call details below: Join Zoom Meeting https://icann.zoom.us/j/99469798225?pwd=oeaBwjejJQOFVQorMZmP6gwbUXDFXT.1 Meeting ID: 994 6979 8225 Passcode: PGAWG#0123 Wiki: https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/w4H0Cg?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiZTY1Z… Thank you!

1 0

Friendly reminder Re: Draft final report PGA WG
by Bart Boswinkel April 28, 2025

April 28, 2025

Dear all As a friendly reminder Please review the draft report: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ouZnDqzikDxnuhlz5VPw0uWvqdCxX2Giy5mEGN4… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1ouZnDqzikDxn…> Any comments or suggested edits, please include in suggestion mode in the doc or in response the this email. The next Policy Gap Analysis Working Group teleconference is scheduled for 29 April 2025 at 17:00 UTC. Main topic is review of the report Kind regards, Bart From: Joke Braeken via Ccnso-pgawg <ccnso-pgawg(a)icann.org> Date: Wednesday, 16 April 2025 at 06:08 To: "ccnso-pgawg(a)icann.org" <ccnso-pgawg(a)icann.org> Cc: Joke Braeken <joke.braeken(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ccnso-pgawg] Draft final report PGA WG Dear All, Please find here the draft final report by the PGA working group, as introduced yesterday by Bart to the group. Please review the document, and suggest any edits or comments you may have either directly in the document, or on the PGA mailing list. Thank you. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ouZnDqzikDxnuhlz5VPw0uWvqdCxX2Giy5mEGN4… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1ouZnDqzikDxn…> Best regards, Joke Braeken joke.braeken(a)icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org>

5 4

Draft final report PGA WG
by Joke Braeken April 16, 2025

April 16, 2025

Dear All, Please find here the draft final report by the PGA working group, as introduced yesterday by Bart to the group. Please review the document, and suggest any edits or comments you may have either directly in the document, or on the PGA mailing list. Thank you. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ouZnDqzikDxnuhlz5VPw0uWvqdCxX2Giy5mEGN4… Best regards, Joke Braeken joke.braeken(a)icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org>

1 0

NOTES | PGA WG | 15 April 2025 (15 UTC)
by Joke Braeken April 15, 2025

April 15, 2025

NOTES | PGA WG | 15 April 2025 (15 UTC) 1. Welcome Welcome by Maria, Bart 2. Draft final report PGA WG Bart speaks to the proposed draft of the final report by the PGA WG. Overview: suggestion to include it as annex B. as annex A to the full report. Document will be shared with the PGA WG the day after the meeting. Do you agree that I include the reference to the latest letter on the retirement policy, and the outcome of the conversation on icann org and the board caucus and the drafting committee? Green marks in zoom. This is merely a resource. Any comments regarding the draft recommendation to Council? Noting that this is the first time you see this. No comments Also to still include: recommendations regarding the study groups. To be included in the next version. Will alert you once done. Advise to council on how to organise the working groups. Peter: being a member of the group, and a member of council, how detailed should the suggestions be? Mission statement is ultimately the mandate of council. Do not go into any more detail. Bart: make sure people know. Not too many details. Recommend what the study group should do. Reference to your experience and timely delivery. Use the experience of the .lb case for future reference. Something for the next call. Will try to include both scenarios. 3. AOB Maria: don’t forget to update your SOI 4. Next meeting 29 April at 17:00 UTC Joke Braeken joke.braeken(a)icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org>

1 0

Policy Gap Analysis Working Group (PGA WG) | 15 April 2025 at 15:00 UTC
by ccNSO Calendar April 15, 2025

April 15, 2025

***REMINDER*** Dear all, The next Policy Gap Analysis Working Group teleconference is scheduled for 15 April 2025 at 15:00 UTC. Please find the call details below: Join Zoom Meeting https://icann.zoom.us/j/99469798225?pwd=oeaBwjejJQOFVQorMZmP6gwbUXDFXT.1 Meeting ID: 994 6979 8225 Passcode: PGAWG#0123 Wiki: https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/B4H7Cg?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiZjQ2Y… Thank you!

1 0