August 2019 - CPWG - lists.icann.org

Re: [CPWG] [GTLD-WG] Geo Names Scenarios
by mail＠christopherwilkinson.eu CW 10 Aug '19

10 Aug '19

Good afternoon: Noted. Having looked at the 'final' version, I noticed some concessions to my comments, some of which have been recalled by John McCormac. Thankyou. However, I think we should have gone further. It still sounds rather corny to be referring hypothetically to existing gTLDs. Also, regarding .bluenile, ALAC must be consistent with existing TM law. If we accept that one local TM can block - or obtain - a global monopoly TM, then geo-names could become lost on a large scale. This whole issue merits a thorough discussion which has never taken place in At Large. Regards CW > El 5 de agosto de 2019 a las 22:15 Jonathan Zuck <JZuck(a)innovatorsnetwork.org> escribió: > > > Thanks John. I guess the point is that the applicant guidebook is being rewritten and the rules regarding permission, etc. are being revisited and we're just trying to build a consensus position her in the At-large, to the extent possible, so that we might comment. Our attempt to just "share views" in Morocco was a bit of a mess so we came up with the ideas of scenarios. I'll look at your specific comments and try to incorporate the ones that make sense. Thanks again! > Jonathan > > > On 8/5/19, 1:12 PM, "GTLD-WG on behalf of John McCormac" <gtld-wg-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of jmcc(a)hosterstats.com> wrote: > > On 05/08/2019 20:07, Jonathan Zuck wrote: > > *Folks,* > > > > On Wednesday’s call, I hope to circulate the link to a survey, for > > everyone to spread to the community, regarding Geo Names scenarios. In > > an effort to get past the rhetoric and down to brass tacks, as we say, > > we’re looking at “outcomes” that we may or may not like. If we we are > > able to identify the outcomes we won’t and don’t want, we can set about > > crafting policy recommendations, if not for subproc than at least the > > board, that would most likely lead to those outcomes. Hope that makes > > sense. Remember the questions we will aks about each scenario are: > > > > 1. Do you believe this scenario to be likely, given the status quo? > > 2. How satisfied would you be with this scenario? > > > > It looks very much like an angels and pinheads situation with a lot of > hypotheticals. Some of the existing Geo NGTs are not doing well and it > might be better to examine the reasons for this before going off on a > tangent about hypothetical situations that may or may not affect a > second round of NGTs. > > On item 1: people in many areas outside the US consider their local > ccTLD to be the first choice TLD. Having millions of domains in a geo > database might be impressive but the Internet, and most people in those > regions will just ignore it and continue using their local ccTLD. (By > the way, .NAME is a real gTLD so it might better to use .EXAMPLE for > examples.) > > On item 2: Duplication. Capital city names are not necessarily unique. I > think that the guys from .BERLIN explained the process of having to get > permission from the city council/authorities before applying for the NGT. > > On item 3: Doesn't the Catholic Church have .CATHOLIC? > > On item 4: More rules and regulations for non-existent NGTs? Go look at > the structure of the .US ccTLD. It was intended to have a kind of > geographical and regulatory subdomains structure. The problem is that > TLDs tend towards simplicity. Brand names and business names matter in > most TLDs and trying to impose subdomains is not a good approach because > people generally ignore them. Worst of all, it creates confusion for the > NGT and opens the possibility of multiple pricing tiers. > > The assumptions in this hypothetical seem to be based on the > non-existence of ccTLDs as a direct competitor to Geo NGTs. > > Regards...jmcc > -- > ********************************************************** > John McCormac * e-mail: jmcc(a)hosterstats.com > MC2 * web: http://www.hosterstats.com/ > 22 Viewmount * Domain Registrations Statistics > Waterford * And Historical DNS Database. > Ireland * Over 516 Million Domains Tracked. > IE * Skype: hosterstats.com > ********************************************************** > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > > _______________________________________________ > GTLD-WG mailing list > GTLD-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg > > Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs > _______________________________________________ > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. > > _______________________________________________ > GTLD-WG mailing list > GTLD-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg > > Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs > _______________________________________________ > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

1 0

New gTLD Applicant Support - improve it, or scrap it?
by Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond 10 Aug '19

10 Aug '19

Dear colleagues, on last week's CPWG call, a particularly vigorous discussion started regarding gTLD subsequent procedures, with a particular focus on applicant support. The ALAC has been on record in the past round as fully supporting the concept and implementation of an Applicant Support program for applicants that might not otherwise have the funding capability to pay the hefty application fee required when filing an application for a new gTLD. For your information, please be so kind to find a few Statements from the ALAC about Applicant Support: Publish Date 1. Title 2. 31 Jul 2014 Report: Supporting the Domain Name Industry in Underserved Regions <https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/6711> Topic(s): *Contracted Party Agreements <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/contracted-party-agreements>, Engagement <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/engagement>, New gTLDs <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/new-gtlds>, Reviews/Improvements <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/reviews-improvements>* 3. 10 Jan 2012 New gTLD Applicant Support Program: Financial Assistance <https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/8041> Topic(s): *Engagement <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/engagement>, New gTLDs <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/new-gtlds>, Operations/Finances <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/operations-finances>* 4. 20 Dec 2011 ALAC Statement on the Preliminary Support Implementation Program <https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/8071> Topic(s): *Engagement <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/engagement>, New gTLDs <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/new-gtlds>, Operations/Finances <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/operations-finances>* 5. 4 Aug 2011 GAC/ALAC Statement on Applicant Support <https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/8261> Topic(s): *Engagement <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/engagement>, New gTLDs <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/new-gtlds>, Operations/Finances <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/operations-finances>* 6. 7 Dec 2010 Cartagena Statement of the African ICANN community about the Support for new gTLD applicants <https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/8581> Topic(s): *Engagement <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/engagement>, New gTLDs <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/new-gtlds>* 7. 24 Jun 2010 African ICANN Community Publishes Statement on Support for New gTLD Applicants <https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/8711> Topic(s): *Engagement <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/engagement>, New gTLDs <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/new-gtlds>, Operations/Finances <https://atlarge.icann.org/topics/operations-finances>* **On last week's call -- see https://community.icann.org/x/a7KjBg we heard several calls for changing this long standing ALAC line and whilst some opposed changing the At-Large position, there was also significant support for changing it. In short, the argument that was developed against Applicant Support was that the financial support proposed to applicants only covered the application fee that was only a small subset of the costs of running a gTLD - so one could argue that applicants risk being set-up to fail. Second, there was concern that there were so few applications for applicant support in the previous ground and thirdly, the guidelines for accepting support applications were so tight to reduce the possibility of gaming, that they were unachievable. I recommend that you read the appropriate transcript that is linked from the agenda on https://community.icann.org/x/a7KjBg -- but I would urge those who developed their points, in favour of continuing the ALAC view to improve applicant support and those in favour of scrapping Applicant Support, to make their points known here. My paraphrased summary definitely doesn't do justice to all of the points that were put across during the call so I apologise if I have not gotten its interpretation all correct. The conversation was just too large and too fundamental for the small amount of time we had available on the call. Kindest regards, Olivier

13 41

Redrafted statement on Root Server System Comment
by Alan Greenberg 08 Aug '19

08 Aug '19

As discussed and decided on the CPWG call yesterday, we need to have a final version of the comment to submit. Bastiaan was given an opportunity to redraft te statement but presumably he is on vacation and did not reply. According, as requested at the end of the meeting, I did a redraft and posted it on the Wiki - https://community.icann.org/x/2IajBg. For your convenience, both redline and clean copies are attached here. Alan

2 1

ACTION/CPWG by 11 August - Proposed Definition of Name Collisions and Scope of Inquiry for the Name Collisions Analysis Project
by Evin Erdogdu 08 Aug '19

08 Aug '19

Dear All, As per the AI from yesterday's CPWG, please view the draft ALAC statement on Proposed Definition of Name Collisions and Scope of Inquiry for the Name Collisions Analysis Project<https://community.icann.org/x/7KSjBg> at its workspace for comment: https://community.icann.org/x/7KSjBg. Please comment on the workspace as necessary by Sunday, 11 August at 23:59 UTC. Thank you, Evin

1 0

IMPORTANT WEBINAR / At-Large Briefing Webinar on GDD Operational Preparation on Thursday, 08 August 2019 at 19:00 UTC
by ICANN At-Large Staff 07 Aug '19

07 Aug '19

********************* Español después de la version en inglés Version francaise en bas du mail ********************* Dear All, The ALAC will hold an At-Large Briefing Webinar on the topic of GDD Operational Preparation for the Next Round of New gTLDS on Thursday, 8 August at 19:00 UTC. This will be an opportunity to learn more on the initial planning that ICANN is carrying out for the next round of New gTLDs as well as hear the latest At-Large perspective. Presenters include Trang Nguyen<https://www.icann.org/profiles/281>, VP, Strategic Programs and Jonathan Zuck<https://community.icann.org/x/Dg0FBQ>, Co-Chair of the At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group<https://community.icann.org/x/jYDpB>. This webinar will include French and Spanish interpretation. For other times: https://tinyurl.com/y5v3run2 The agenda (to be updated) and call details can be found at: https://community.icann.org/x/q4PkBg Zoom URL: https://icann.zoom.us/j/480354165 ADIGO Conference Bridge: EN: 1638 ES: 1738 FR: 1838 Toll-free access number (US and Canada): 800 550 6865 Other toll-free numbers: https://www.adigo.com/icann If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Thank you. Kind regards, At-Large Staff ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> ************************************ Estimados todos, El ALAC llevará a cabo un seminario web de información general sobre el tema de la Preparación Operativa de GDD para la próxima Ronda de Nuevos gTLDS el jueves 8 de agosto a las 19:00 UTC. Esta será una oportunidad para aprender más sobre la planificación inicial que ICANN está llevando a cabo para la próxima ronda de Nuevos gTLD, así como escuchar la última perspectiva de At-Large. Los presentadores incluyen a Trang Nguyen<https://www.icann.org/profiles/281>, Vicepresidente de programas estratégicos y Jonathan Zuck<https://community.icann.org/x/Dg0FBQ>, copresidente del grupo de trabajo de Políticas Consolidadas de At-Large<https://community.icann.org/x/jYDpB>. Este seminario web incluirá interpretación en Francés y Español. Para zonas horarias: https://tinyurl.com/y5v3run2 La Agenda (sera actualizada) y detalles de la llamada se encuentran en: https://community.icann.org/x/q4PkBg Zoom URL: https://icann.zoom.us/j/480354165 ID de conferencia para ADIGO Audio EN: 1638 ES: 1738 FR: 1838 Numero Toll-free (US and Canada): 800 550 6865 Otros numeros toll-free: https://www.adigo.com/icann Si requiere un dial- out por favor contactar At-Large staff at: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Gracias. Saludos cordiales, At-Large Staff ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> ****************************** Chers tous, L’ALAC organise un webinaire de Briefing At-Large sur la préparation opérationnelle de GDD pour la prochaine série de nouveaux gTLD, le jeudi 8 août 2019 à 19:00 UTC. Ce sera l’occasion d’en savoir plus sur la planification initiale que l’ICANN est en train de réaliser pour la prochaine série de nouveaux gTLD, ainsi que d’entendre la dernière perspective d’At-Large. Les présentateurs seront Trang Nguyen, Vice-Président, Programmes Stratégiques<https://www.icann.org/profiles/281>, et Jonathan Zuck<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Jonathan+Zuck+SOI>, coprésident du groupe de travail sur la politique consolidée At-Large<https://community.icann.org/x/jYDpB> (CPWG). Ce webinaire sera interprété en français et espagnol. Pour d’autres horaires : https://tinyurl.com/y5v3run2 L’ordre du jour (en ours de mise à jour) et les détails de l’appel peuvent être consultés ici: https://community.icann.org/x/q4PkBg Zoom URL: https://icann.zoom.us/j/480354165 ID de conference pour l’Audio ADIGO EN: 1638 ES: 1738 FR: 1838 Numéros d’accès ADIGO: https://www.adigo.com/icann Si vous avez besoin d’être connecté à l’appel, veuillez contacter le personnel At-Large: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Merci. Cordialement, At-Large Staff ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

2 2

**REMINDER** Meeting Invitation: At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Call on Wednesday, 07 August 2019 at 19:00 UTC
by ICANN At-Large Staff 07 Aug '19

07 Aug '19

Dear All, The next At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Call is scheduled for Wednesday, 07 August 2019 at 19:00 UTC for 90 mins. For other times: https://tinyurl.com/yyq9x3zw The agenda (to be updated) and call details can be found at: https://community.icann.org/x/EIHkBg Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/j/870980586 <javascript:;> / Meeting ID: 870-980-586 ADIGO Conference Bridge: EN: 1638 ES: 1738 Toll-free access number (US and Canada): 800 550 6865 Other toll-free numbers: https://www.adigo.com/icann At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Wiki Space: https://community.icann.org/x/jYDpB If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Thank you. Kind regards, At-Large Staff ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 0

Re: [CPWG] [ccwg-internet-governance] WIPO: STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS (SCT/42); GENEVA 4-7/11
by cw＠christopherwilkinson.eu 07 Aug '19

07 Aug '19

Good afternoon: May I suggest that CPWG on Geo-names later today also take note of this development. We have known for some time that this was ‘in the works’, and it has now finally come to light. Regards CW > On 7 Aug 2019, at 09:27, Nigel Hickson <nigel.hickson(a)icann.org> wrote: > > Colleagues > > Good morning; as noted on the CCWG IG Call yesterday, WIPO is discussing, inter-alia, a proposal cconcerning the Protection of Country Names and > Geographical Names of National Significance in the DNS. > > The link for the meeting is at https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/details.jsp?meeting_id=50450 <https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/details.jsp?meeting_id=50450> > while the agenda for the meeting is at https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_42/sct_42_1_prov.pdf <https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_42/sct_42_1_prov.pdf>. > > The relevant document to be discussed (SCT/41/6) is at https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_41/sct_41_6.pdf <https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_41/sct_41_6.pdf> though it is likely an updated draft will be discussed in November. > > Best > > Nigel > > > _______________________________________________ > ccwg-internet-governance mailing list > ccwg-internet-governance(a)icann.org <mailto:ccwg-internet-governance@icann.org> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance> > > _______________________________________________ > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy <https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos <https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

1 0

Subsequent Procedures Update: Reserved Names, Closed Generics & Registrant Protections, snapshot as at 7 Aug 2019
by Justine Chew 06 Aug '19

06 Aug '19

Dear all, Reference is made to the *CPWG SubPro Updates workspace <https://community.icann.org/x/6a_jBg>*. At this point, the Subsequent Procedures PDP WG is expected to start deliberating on the public comments received to its Initial Report on these 3 topics on 8 Aug 20:00 UTC Here is a *snapshot on the topics of Reserved Names, Closed Generics & Registrant Protections as at 7 Aug* <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/111390697/01.%20SubPro%20R…> . No CCT recommendations were picked up by SubPro WG for these 3 topics. But comments/queries are welcomed. Thanks, Justine Chew -----

1 0

Subsequent Procedures Update: Application Change Requests, snapshot as at 6 Aug 2019
by Justine Chew 06 Aug '19

06 Aug '19

Dear all, Reference is made to the *CPWG SubPro Updates workspace* <https://community.icann.org/x/6a_jBg> Here is a *snapshot of where the Subsequent Procedures PDP WG is at in its deliberations on the topic of Application Change Requests as at 6 Aug 2019* <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/111390697/01A.%20SubPro%20…> . SubPro WG will started deliberating on the public comments received to its Supplemental Initial Report on 8 Aug at 20:00 UTC. There were no CCT recommendations picked up by SubPro WG for this topic and I personally don't think there is anything controversial that we need to be concerned about. But comments/questions are welcomed nonetheless. Thanks, Justine Chew -----

1 0

Subsequent Procedures WT5 on Geonames: A proposal from geoTLD group to change the existing AGB string contention resolution for geonames
by Justine Chew 06 Aug '19

06 Aug '19

Dear all, I have been asked to bring this proposal from the geoTLD group for At-Large/ALAC's consideration. In short, the proposal seeks to change the existing AGB string contention resolution procedure to recognise rights to non-capital city name strings under applicable national law. While I expect the details, intricacies (read: varying circumstances) and text changes (I suspect there will be) will be discussed at the next WT5 call (on 7 Aug 2019, 20:00 UTC), I understand it to propose in principle that: - Where there is a contention set for a non-capital city name string, priority would be given to the applicant that intends to use the non-capital city name string for geographic purposes provided the applicant is based in a country where national laws exist to protect such names like in Switzerland and Germany. Recall that any applicant that wishes to apply for/use a non-capital city name for geographic purposes is subject to the preventative protection mechanism (i.e. must obtain a letter of support or non-objection from the relevant government or local authority) - Where there is more than one applicant that intends to use the same non-capital city name string for geographic purposes and they all have obtained the requisite letter of support or non-objection from their respective government or local authority, priority would be given to the applicant whose application is intended to serve the non-capital city with the larger or largest population size. I shall attempt to include this on the agenda of today's CPWG Call (on 7 Aug 2019 at 19:00 UTC). Justine ----- ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Katrin Ohlmer | DOTZON GmbH <ohlmer(a)dotzon.com> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 01:28 Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 7 August 2019 at 20:00 UTC To: gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5(a)icann.org <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5(a)icann.org> Dear All, as announced, I would like to provide the proposal of the geoTLD group on the topic 4 „Changes to string contention resolution“: *Update Applicant Guidebook, Chapter 2.2.1.4.4 with:* If an application for a string representing a geographic name is in a contention set with applications for identical strings that have not been identified as geographical names, the string contention will be resolved using the string contention procedures described in Module 4. *Update Applicant Guidebook, Module 4. with:* A// In case there is contention for a string where one application intends to use the string as a non-capital city name or designated the TLD to targeting it to a geographic meaning, preference should be given to the applicant who will use the TLD for geographic purposes if the applicant for the geoTLD is based in a country where national law gives precedent to city and/or regional names. *RATIONALE: This would reflect national law e.g. in countries like Switzerland and Germany, where e.g. city names have more rights that holders of the same name.* B// If there is more than one applicant for an identical string representing a geographic name, and the applications have requisite government approvals, the applicant with the larger no of inhabitants will prevail over the smaller one. As the criteria „size“ has been used in the CPE criteria, it is apparently a well-accepted criteria. *RATIONALE: This would reflect the current rule of the Applicant Guidebook „capital city has priority over smaller city.* I’m happy to explain our thoughts until our call, individually or on the list. Kind regards Katrin DOTZON GmbH - digital identities for tomorrow Akazienstrasse 28 10823 Berlin Deutschland - Germany Tel: +49 30 49802722 Fax: +49 30 49802727 Mobile: +49 173 2019240 ohlmer(a)dotzon.consulting www.dotzon.consulting Besuchen Sie uns auf LinkedIn <https://de.linkedin.com/company/dotzon-gmbh>. DOTZON GmbH Registergericht: Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 118598 Geschäftsführer: Katrin Ohlmer Sitz der Gesellschaft: Akazienstrasse 28, 10823 Berlin *Von:* Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces(a)icann.org> *Im Auftrag von *Emily Barabas *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 6. August 2019 12:14 *An:* gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5(a)icann.org *Betreff:* [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 7 August 2019 at 20:00 UTC Dear all, Please find below the proposed agenda for the Work Track 5 call tomorrow, 7 August 2019 at 20:00 UTC for 90 minutes: 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates 2. Closure of Discussion on Languages/Translations (see attached document summarizing proposals that have been discussed on recent calls) 3. Closure of Discussion on Non-AGB Terms 4. Closure of Discussion on Changes to String Contention Resolution 5. Final review of public comments - Proposals 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 37 - Please see the public comment summary document beginning on page 32: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rsyxCEBd6ax3Rb_w1kms_E9n29XL1_lw3Yp9XQ4… [docs.google.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> . - For reference, full text of comments is available at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WKSC_pPBviCnbHxW171ZIp4CzuhQXRCV1NR… [docs.google.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…> 1. AOB Kind regards, Emily *Emily Barabas *| Policy Manager *ICANN* | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 _______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

1 0