January 2021 - Gnso-epdp-team

Meeting Invitation | Observers | GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP-P2A call | Thursday, 28 January 2021 at 14:00 UTC
by Terri Agnew 21 Jan '21

21 Jan '21

As a result of various requests to facilitate observers to follow the EPDP Phase 2 deliberations in real time, zoom webinar room will be made available for the EPDP plenary meetings. As a reminder, the zoom recording, audio recording, chat transcript and transcript of the EPDP plenary meetings will be publicly posted as soon as available on the EPDP wiki page and GNSO master calendar. Dear all, The next meeting of the GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP – Phase 2A is scheduled on Thursday, 28 January 2021 at 14:00 UTC for 90 minutes. Zoom room information: Main Zoom Webinar link: https://icann.zoom.us/j/92181477886?pwd=TlJHTU5EY1d3bUxLV2s3UStPS2MxZz09 [icann.zoom.us]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann.zoom.us/j/92181477886?pwd=TlJHTU5E…> Passcode: Z@S07?t=v5 Going forward, observers will now join via zoom webinar. Observers will have ability to view member chat and information shared in the zoom webinar room. Observers will not be able to use chat or raise hands. Before joining the call: Please send dial out requests to gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> only Please be sure you have read the Expected Standards of Behavior [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resource…> Visit the Wiki agenda page: https://community.icann.org/x/iogmCQ Check your time zone: https://tinyurl.com/yd9myw47 The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar/2021 [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calen…> If you are joining via audio only: One tap mobile US: +13126266799,,92181477886#,,,,,,0#,,3121016458# or +13462487799,,92181477886#,,,,,,0#,,3121016458# Webinar ID: 921 8147 7886 Passcode: 3121016458 International numbers available: https://icann.zoom.us/u/acVxz9PmJI [icann.zoom.us]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann.zoom.us/u/acVxz9PmJI__;!!PtGJab4!p…> Thank you. Kind regards, Terri

1 0

FW: Someone would like to contact you about your domain.
by James M. Bladel 21 Jan '21

21 Jan '21

Team – Please see below for an ad hoc test/audit from Brian to one of my personal domains, where I replied within 2 hours. Clearly, the GoDaddy Web Form is functioning as intended. If there are other registrars who have not deployed a functioning web form, then I recommend raising that issue with ICANN Compliance. Thank you, J. Begin forwarded message: From: James Bladel Subject: Fwd: Someone would like to contact you about your domain. Date: January 7, 2021 at 10:15:23 MST To: Brian King Is this some kind of test? Did I pass? Happy New Year! J. Begin forwarded message: From: GoDaddy <donotreply(a)godaddy.com<mailto:donotreply@godaddy.com>> Subject: Someone would like to contact you about your domain. Date: January 7, 2021 at 08:39:07 MST To: Someone is trying to contact you regarding jamesbladel.com.<https://click-email.godaddy.com/3Vd9a3KLwjoQ8oSRH5IdRk/?currencyId=USD&eid=…> We received a request from someone who'd like to contact you regarding jamesbladel.com<http://jamesbladel.com/>, which you registered through GoDaddy. This contact method is designed to provide a way for people who are interested in your domain to reach you, while still keeping your contact information private. We're required by ICANN regulations<https://click-email.godaddy.com/6VCIICAcUl27qMrf9c7m36/?currencyId=USD&eid=…> to forward these types of requests to you, and you're not under any obligation to respond. Remember, we have no information on the legitimacy of these contacts, and scammers have been known to try to pose as GoDaddy or other companies. Use caution when viewing or replying to unsolicited messages from third parties. If you determine you would like to respond to this message, please be aware that you are electing to respond directly to a third party that has no affiliation with GoDaddy. Here is the message from brian.king(a)markmonitor.com<mailto:brian.king@markmonitor.com>. Once again, this is NOT from a GoDaddy representative. GoDaddy does not authorize or verify any offers to sell or purchase domains via email. I would like to contact you regarding your domain and/or content on your website. If you would like to respond to the requester, please email them at brian.king(a)markmonitor.com<mailto:brian.king@markmonitor.com>. If you are interested in selling your domain, the safest course of action would be to list the domain for sale, then email the inquirer that you have listed it for sale. To list your domain for sale, please visit this Help article<https://click-email.godaddy.com/2w5aGUlLBoSykuc9RHzw0A/?currencyId=USD&eid=…> for step-by-step instructions. Copyright © 1999-2021 GoDaddy Operating Company, LLC. 14455 N. Hayden Rd, Ste. 219, Scottsdale, AZ 85260 USA. All rights reserved. 4397180013

1 0

**Reminder** Meeting Invitation | Observers | GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP-P2A call | Thursday, 21 January 2021 at 14:00 UTC
by Julie Bisland 20 Jan '21

20 Jan '21

As a result of various requests to facilitate observers to follow the EPDP Phase 2 deliberations in real time, zoom webinar room will be made available for the EPDP plenary meetings. As a reminder, the zoom recording, audio recording, chat transcript and transcript of the EPDP plenary meetings will be publicly posted as soon as available on the EPDP wiki page and GNSO master calendar. Dear all, The next meeting of the GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP – Phase 2A is scheduled on Thursday, 21 January 2021 at 14:00 UTC for 90 minutes. Zoom room information: Main Zoom Webinar link: https://icann.zoom.us/j/92181477886?pwd=TlJHTU5EY1d3bUxLV2s3UStPS2MxZz09 [icann.zoom.us]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann.zoom.us/j/92181477886?pwd=TlJHTU5E…> Passcode: Z@S07?t=v5 Going forward, observers will now join via zoom webinar. Observers will have ability to view member chat and information shared in the zoom webinar room. Observers will not be able to use chat or raise hands. Before joining the call: Please send dial out requests to gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> only Please be sure you have read the Expected Standards of Behavior [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resource…> Visit the Wiki agenda page: https://community.icann.org/x/h4gmCQ Check your time zone: https://tinyurl.com/ycdekt2u [tinyurl.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tinyurl.com/ycdekt2u__;!!PtGJab4!tsjyT3R…> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar/2021 [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calen…> If you are joining via audio only: One tap mobile US: +13126266799,,92181477886#,,,,,,0#,,3121016458# or +13462487799,,92181477886#,,,,,,0#,,3121016458# Webinar ID: 921 8147 7886 Passcode: 3121016458 International numbers available: https://icann.zoom.us/u/acVxz9PmJI [icann.zoom.us]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann.zoom.us/u/acVxz9PmJI__;!!PtGJab4!p…> Thank you. Kind regards, Terri

1 0

Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Meeting with ICANN staff on legal v. natural study
by Marika Konings 20 Jan '21

20 Jan '21

Marc, all, The questions are those that were identified and assigned by the EPDP Team during the last meeting (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QlM4O_vwx7cQ11DJ_Lx2kqhyyRgDkMXG/edit - under the heading ICANN org study). Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of "Anderson, Marc via Gnso-epdp-team" <gnso-epdp-team(a)icann.org> Reply to: "Anderson, Marc" <mcanderson(a)verisign.com> Date: Tuesday, 19 January 2021 at 16:03 To: "gnso-epdp-team(a)icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] Meeting with ICANN staff on legal v. natural study Caitlin, Berry and Marika, I see from the workplan & action items document that support staff has sent a list of initial questions on the legal/natural study to ICANN org. “Support Staff to notify internal colleagues of submitted questions relating the ICANN org legal/natural study, and coordinate a time for a presentation on the study, during which submitted questions will be addressed.” Could you share that list of questions with the working group so we are all on the same page heading into our call? Best, Marc

2 1

Proposed Agenda - EPDP Team meeting #3 - Thursday 21 January at 14.00 UTC
by Marika Konings 19 Jan '21

19 Jan '21

Dear EPDP Team, Please find below the proposed agenda for Thursday’s EPDP Team meeting. Also, a reminder of the action items due by the end of COB today: Feasibility of unique contacts: * Review terminology, problem statements and provide examples: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1weQemSQ0-884ILbhmR3OLzUWouyGXMKH/edit. * Review assignments of clarifying questions and proposals: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e2-rVF2wh-821tct76O50QdWwn4ZcIqS/edit Legal / natural: * Review assignments of clarifying questions and proposals: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QlM4O_vwx7cQ11DJ_Lx2kqhyyRgDkMXG/edit#<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QlM4O_vwx7cQ11DJ_Lx2kqhyyRgDkMXG/edit> Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika ======================= EPDP Phase 2A - Meeting #03 Proposed Agenda Thursday 21 January 2021 at 14.00 UTC 1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes) 2. Welcome & Chair updates (Chair) (5 minutes) 1. Reminder to select your represented member on the Legal Committee 3. Review of Homework Assignments (75 minutes) Feasibility of unique contacts (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1weQemSQ0-884ILbhmR3OLzUWouyGXMKH/edit and https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e2-rVF2wh-821tct76O50QdWwn4ZcIqS/edit) a. Review of proposed definitions and terminology: · Review EPDP Team input · Confirm common understanding of definitions / terminology b. Review of problem statement: * Review EPDP Team input * Confirm common understanding of problem statement / problems that are expected to be resolved c. Practical application of pseudonymisation · CPH Teams to share examples, if available, of how pseudonymisation is used in practice providing input on questions such as do the different registrars communicate at the time of registration and exchange this unique string along with other personal data of the registrant? Or is there a common database where all strings corresponding to each registration are listed? · Q & A by EPDP Team d. Confirm assignments for clarifying questions · Review input received · Confirm assignments e. Introduction of proposals for options to require unique contacts to have a uniform anonymized email address across domain name registrations that would not result in being treated as publication of personal data · Proponents to introduce proposal · Q & A by EPDP Team · Confirm next steps Legal vs. natural (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QlM4O_vwx7cQ11DJ_Lx2kqhyyRgDkMXG/edit#<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QlM4O_vwx7cQ11DJ_Lx2kqhyyRgDkMXG/edit>) 1. Confirm assignments for clarifying questions · Review input received · Confirm assignments 1. Introduction of proposals for guidance that can be provided to Registrars and Registries who differentiate or want to differentiate between registrations of legal and natural persons (if time allows) · Proponents to introduce proposal · Q & A by EPDP Team · Confirm next steps 1. Confirm next steps * ICANN org webinar to address clarifying questions assigned to ICANN org scheduled for Tuesday 26 January at 14.00 UTC 4. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting (5 minutes): 1. Meeting #04 Thursday 28 January at 14.00 UTC. 2. Confirm action items 1. Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any

2 1

REMINDER: Call for Legal Committee Volunteers - EPDP Phase 2A
by Caitlin Tubergen 19 Jan '21

19 Jan '21

Dear EPDP Team, This is a friendly reminder for groups to reconfirm or appoint one member to the Phase 2A Legal Committee by COB tomorrow, Wednesday, 20 January. Thank you. Best regards, Marika, Berry, and Caitlin From: Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, January 14, 2021 at 12:39 PM To: "gnso-epdp-team(a)icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team(a)icann.org> Subject: Call for Legal Committee Volunteers - EPDP Phase 2A Dear EPDP Team, As Keith noted during today’s meeting, the EPDP Phase 2A Team will have a Legal Committee, similar to Phase 1 and Phase 2. EPDP Team groups may reconfirm/appoint one member to the Legal Committee by Wednesday, 20 January. Those of you who participated in Phase 1 and 2 will remember we established a Legal Committee to review and revise proposed legal questions to ensure: (1) the questions are truly legal in nature, as opposed to policy or policy implementation questions; (2) the questions are phrased in a neutral manner, avoiding both presumed outcomes as well as constituency positioning; (3) the questions are both apposite and timely to the EPDP Team’s work; and (4) the budget for external legal counsel is being used responsibly. Based on feedback from the team, the membership is representative, i.e., each group may, but is not required to, appoint up to one representative. The appointed representative, where possible, should have legal expertise. Members of the Legal Committee are asked to provide advice based on their legal experience, factoring in all aspects of the conversation, not only that of their respective constituency. The Legal Committee will meet on an as-needed basis. The meetings will be open to anyone from the EPDP Team who would like to attend; however, only the appointed representatives will be invited to speak. Questions agreed to by the entire Legal Committee will be sent to outside counsel for review and forwarded to the EPDP Team as an FYI; please note this means if you have an interest in the Legal Committee’s work and/or have concerns with certain questions, please filter that feedback through your appointed representative. Thank you. Best regards, Marika, Berry, and Caitlin

1 0

Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] [Ext] RE: For your review - feasibility of requiring unique contacts terminology, problem statement and examples
by Marika Konings 19 Jan '21

19 Jan '21

Thanks, Melina. Copying in the correct email address for the GNSO EPDP Team (please see message below). We’ll get your access to the google drive sorted shortly. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika From: STROUNGI Melina <Melina.STROUNGI(a)ec.europa.eu> Date: Tuesday, 19 January 2021 at 12:45 To: "gnso-epdp-team-bounces(a)icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team-bounces(a)icann.org>, Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Cc: NEMIGUENTCHEVA - GRAU Velimira <Velimira.GRAU(a)ec.europa.eu>, "LEWIS-EVANS, Christopher" <Christopher.Lewis-Evans(a)nca.gov.uk>, "Kapin, Laureen" <LKAPIN(a)ftc.gov> Subject: [Ext] RE: For your review - feasibility of requiring unique contacts terminology, problem statement and examples Dear Caitlin, Berry and Marika, Just to let you know that I do not appear to have access to the google docs below. I had requested access since yesterday but it doesn’t seem to have been authorized. In order to meet today’s deadline, please find some initial questions/comments from my side (copying also my GAC colleagues). If someone could insert them in the doc, where appropriate, it would be great. 1. On the B&B definition of pseudonymisation, currently defined as: “The same unique string is used for multiple registrations by a unique data subject.”--> By ‘multiple registrations’ we mean various registrations within the same registrar or within multiple registrars/registries? (Melina/GAC) Why do we need a different definition of pseudonymisation as compared to the one in GDPR? What is the added value of such definition? (Velimira/GAC) 1. According to the description of the specific exercise of Phase 2a, our goal/task is : “Addressing the feasibility of requiring unique contacts to have a uniform anonymized email address across domain name registrations at a given Registrar” Moreover, according to EPDP Team Recommendation #13: “The EPDP Team recommends that the Registrar MUST provide an email address or a web form to facilitate email communication with the relevant contact, but MUST NOT identify the contact email address or the contact itself”. -->Doesn’t this mean that the purpose of Phase 2a has been already defined and is limited to contactibility of the registrant? Or can we still consider including feasibility of correlation or registrations across multiple registrars? (Melina/GAC) 1. ENISA’s report on pseudonymisation techniques states that: ‘however, it is often not the choice of pseudonymisation technique utilised for one or two specific identifiers that causes the most problems; it is the implicit linkability among a set of pseudonyms and other data values that are joined into a more complex data structure’. The issue of linkability is precisely the point that we need to understand and this is precisely why an example of how pseudonymisation would work in the context of registries/registrars would be useful. We need to understand how this ‘unique string’ would be shared (if shared) across registries/registrars, if and to what extent they already exchange internally personal data and if such linkability would be possible from the side of third parties (if yes, how? By hacking/leaking the mapping table for example or also in any other way?). It is crucial for the purpose and success of the whole Phase 2a exercise to have a solid understanding on specific technical implementation details. To that end, specific case examples provided by the contracted parties would be very useful. Best, Melina From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 8:56 PM To: gnso-epdp-team(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - feasibility of requiring unique contacts terminology, problem statement and examples Dear EPDP Team, Per the action items from Thursday’s meeting, the staff support team has tried to pull together terminology, problem statements and examples for your review and input here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1weQemSQ0-884ILbhmR3OLzUWouyGXMKH/edit<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1weQemSQ0-884…>. Please provide your group’s input by Tuesday 19 January COB. Also take note of the other documents that have been posted for review as part of the action items coming out of Thursday’s meeting (see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17qLMYb3HC7qGYPQveXbUq5ZSzvedrQ3t8Ad…<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17qLMYb3H…>). Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika

2 1

Meeting with ICANN staff on legal v. natural study
by Anderson, Marc 19 Jan '21

19 Jan '21

Caitlin, Berry and Marika, I see from the workplan & action items document that support staff has sent a list of initial questions on the legal/natural study to ICANN org. "Support Staff to notify internal colleagues of submitted questions relating the ICANN org legal/natural study, and coordinate a time for a presentation on the study, during which submitted questions will be addressed." Could you share that list of questions with the working group so we are all on the same page heading into our call? Best, Marc

1 0

Contact Relays
by James M. Bladel 18 Jan '21

18 Jan '21

Hi folks – On last Thursday’s call, we spent a chunk of time discussing the merits/efficacy of various Registrar implementations of the Contact Relay requirement. In my view, this is one of htose topics that our group can’t resist debating, and yet it is not within scope for our work in Phase 2A. Our calendar is extremely tight, and I would ask everyone (myself included) to try and avoid these “catnip” topics that burn a lot of call time, but ultimately don’t end up anywhere. Thanks— J.

4 4

For your review - feasibility of requiring unique contacts terminology, problem statement and examples
by Marika Konings 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

Dear EPDP Team, Per the action items from Thursday’s meeting, the staff support team has tried to pull together terminology, problem statements and examples for your review and input here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1weQemSQ0-884ILbhmR3OLzUWouyGXMKH/edit. Please provide your group’s input by Tuesday 19 January COB. Also take note of the other documents that have been posted for review as part of the action items coming out of Thursday’s meeting (see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17qLMYb3HC7qGYPQveXbUq5ZSzvedrQ3t8Ad…). Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika

1 0