- Gnso-newgtld-wg - lists.icann.org

Update on Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice Review - ICANN
by Jorge.Cancio＠bakom.admin.ch Sept. 12, 2016

Sept. 12, 2016

Just in case you hadn't seen this: https://www.icann.org/news/blog/update-on-competition-consumer-trust-and-co… There are some interesting infos, e.g. on the value of categories etc. Best regards Jorge

2 2

Actions/Discussion Notes: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG 08 September 2016
by Julie Hedlund Sept. 8, 2016

Sept. 8, 2016

Dear WG Members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes captured by staff from the meeting on 08 September. These high-level notes are designed to help PDP WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/1.+WG+Meetings. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Actions/Discussion Notes: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Meeting, 08 September 2016 1. Leadership and updates of the Sub Teams Discussion Notes: · Work Track 1: Sara Bockey: Beginning work on work track topics. · Work Track 2: Michael Flemming: Looking at Work Track 1 approach. Need SOIs updated. Looking at the Work Plan and prioritization. Looking at topics. Lively topics. · Work Track 3: Jian Zhang: TBD. · Work Track 4: Cheryl Langdon Orr -- Similar track -- looking at timeline, universal acceptance issues, etc. Reordering of prioritization. 2. Call times/rotation Discussion Notes: · Can't accommodate everyone. · Can't find times that are perfect for everyone. · Recordings/readings -- do recordings and at least two readings. Action Item: Look again at attendance for times and consider whether to move the times. 3. Document Views Action Item: Make documents more readable (font size) and suitable for printing. 4. Continued Discussion on Community Comment 1 Discussion Notes: 1.c: Are ongoing mechanisms for the introduction of additional new gTLDs necessary to achieving sufficient diversity (e.g., choice and trust) in terms of domain extensions? Please explain. 1c.R1: · Donna Austin: Note an unreasonable question. Should try to do that. · Alan Greenberg: Hard to do this without seeing the conclusion of the PDP. · Avri Doria: We need further clarification and where should it be done. Should we talk about it in this group? Does this fit into the Work Track? Is it intertwined? Draft what we want in terms of diversity. GAC has made some suggestions. Helpful if anyone from the GAC or ALAC would like propose some thoughts or take this on. · Tom Dale, GAC Secretariat: Happy to help. · Donna Austin: Shouldn't read the GAC response in isolation. Might be different interpretations of this question. · Avri Doria: Look at them as a group and answer them all. Ic.R2: · Avri Doria: This becomes an input into why we need a continuing mechanism. · Donna Austin: One of the potential mechanism for having more diversity is the subsequent round. An ongoing mechanism is important. There are some benefits (from the RySG position). · Jeff Neuman: Interlinked with Work Track 1 particularly communication. Also applicant outreach. Should help with diversity. Announcing a date certain would help. · Avri Doria: As we build a work plan we might be able to provide an approximate date. · Alan Greenberg: There is no question about demand, it is not a diversity issue, but maybe a trust issue. · Paul McGrady: Notion of second registration - make sure at the end of the day that we have an adequate program to allow diversity to happen and not to be wrapped up in the second level marketplace. · Paul McGrady: Diversity needs to be defined in a way that includes new uses other than just more sales of second levels. Referring to the fact that in 2012 round there wasn't a differentiation between .brand model and others. Could develop a more streamlined model in the subsequent procedures. · Kristina Rosette: Disagreed with Alan's contention. Geographic diversity in primary location does allow for broader diversity. · Avri Doria: Diversity --- how it relates to other kinds of diversity. Can be more geographical. Need to explore this in Work Track 1. · Jian Zhang: Add language on diversity. If there are more internationalized TLDs people might think more -- language and culture could be taken together. · Avri Doria: Diversity in script and language will not be dealt with in one track -- for example Track 4. Diversity needs to be defined in a way that includes new uses other than just more sales of second levels.. 1d.R1: · Is it too early in the review cycle of the previous round to determine the full range of benefits of the 2012 round of the new gTLDs? Should that impact the decision to introduce additional new gTLDs and/or the timing of ongoing mechanisms for new gTLDs? · None of the groups that commented said that the policy shouldn't be changed, the policy of an ongoing mechanism to accept new gTLDs -- we shouldn't stop anything because we can realize all the benefits. · Diversity needs to be defined in a way that includes new uses other than just more sales of second levels. 1d.R2: Avri Doria: Summary -- Shouldn't unnecessarily delay. Id.R3: · Avri Doria: Summary -- Need more information. Still in the round. · Kavouss Arasteh: What time frame is too early? · Greg Shatan: We are still in mid-stream. We are trying to redesign an airplane in mid-air. Many have not fully opened for business. We do need need to consider the fact that we are looking at a moving target. · Jeff Neuman: After .biz was launched it took 4-5 years to see usage. We can't say in 2 years we will know better. It may take a number of years, but hard to define. · Michael Flemming: Need to look at delegation and process, while there are still a few left. So we have to highly consider "benefits" in the relative aspect of how categorized TLDs use them. Looking at the application process and where we are at in that to start measuring benefit cannot be done equally across the spectrum. 1.e: What additional considerations should be taken into account before deciding on ongoing mechanisms for new gTLDs (e.g., to cancel onoing mechansims for new gTLDs via policy changes? 1e.R1, 2, 3: · Get on with it. Make sure we have covered existing problems and emerging problems. · Jeff Neuman: Caution against spending too much time on the hypothetical. We have experience to see what could happen with different mechanisms. Needs to be a balance. · Jian Zhang: Chinese market: hard to reach universal acceptance on fast or slow. In China many companies don't think it is too early; the feel they didn't act quickly enough in the first round. Whether we should have fast track for no controversial debate. · Jeff Neuman: Highlight all cases we did not anticipate (and Greg Shatan). · Kavouss Arasteh: Be careful about fastrack, may not be fast. 1.f: Any other issues related to this overarching subject? 1f.R1, 2, 3: No comments on the responses.

1 0

Mp3, AC Chat & Attendance for New gTLD Subsequent Procedures call on Thursday, 08 September 2016
by Michelle DeSmyter Sept. 8, 2016

Sept. 8, 2016

Dear All, Please find the attendance of the call attached to this email and the MP3 recording below for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group call held on Thursday, 08 September 2016 at 3:00 UTC. Attendance of the calls is also posted on the agenda wiki page: MP3: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-08sep16-en.mp3 <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-08sep16-en.mp3> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/ohWsAw Thank you. Kind regards, Michelle ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for Thursday, 08 September 2016 Michelle DeSmyter:Dear All, Welcome to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group, Thursday, 08 September 2016 at 3:00 UTC Michelle DeSmyter:Wiki Member page: https://community.icann.org/x/Ogp1Aw Michelle DeSmyter:Agenda page: https://community.icann.org/x/ohWsAw Kavouss Arasteh:Hi every body Jeff Neuman:hello Kavouss. Thanks for being on so early in your day Kavouss Arasteh:PLS KINDLY ADVISE TO DIAL ME UP Kavouss Arasteh:Hello jeff Kavouss Arasteh:Pls advise for dial up Michelle DeSmyter:Hi there Kavouss - the operator should be dialing you in the next minute or so Jeff Neuman:Can we put a link up to the cc1 document on the right side of the screen Emily Barabas:Yes, one moment. Emily Barabas:we will also bring it up the AC room. Jeff Neuman:2 minute warning :) Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Jeff I am still waiting for my dial out so only in the AC Room ATM but I will be audio enabled at some stage I assume ;-) Philip Corwin:Greetings colleagues Kavouss Arasteh:Dear Chair Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Hi Philip Kavouss Arasteh:pls put the document disussing on the screen Philip Corwin:Hello Cheryl. Hope all is smashing ;-) Jeff Neuman:All - Just waitng for operator to start the recording :) Kavouss Arasteh:It is a very inconvenient widdow Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):All just fine here in AU thanks Phil Philip Corwin:There's no way I can read anything in that window...larger font please Kavouss Arasteh:can you make tjhe doc. more bigger Avri Doria:you shaould have also received the PDF in the email on the list. Steve Chan:It's also available as a link on the right-hand side: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=59645660&preview=/… Emily Barabas:Everyone should be able to zoom on this document using the plus and minus signs at the bottom of window Emily Barabas:And scroll up and down, left and right as needed Kavouss Arasteh:TOO FAST SPEAKING Sara Bockey:Sorry Kavouss! I was trying to speak slowly. I'll do better next time. Michael Flemming:I need to call in Alan Greenberg:That link seems to open with the wiki viewer. One that goes directly to the PDF is https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/59645660/CC1%20Review%20To… Emily Barabas:Thanks Alan, I will correct in the agenda, as well Michael Flemming:Hi Julie, its two "m"s in the last name, thanks Michael Flemming:For the sake of the Notes Michael Flemming:I am called in Kavouss Arasteh:Why the provided document is so much congested in font Julie Hedlund:@Micheal -- Got it! Julie Hedlund:Sorry Michael! Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):It is of course an *excellent* time slot for Asia Pac Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):we normally get to attend ICANN Calls between 0100 and 0500 local times Justine Chew:This time slot is under exceptional circumstances, no? Justine Chew:Yes, CLO, this is an EXCELLENT time slot for Asia Pac. :-) Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):we can of course find other times suitable for APAC and less pauinful for other Rwgions *but* I do need to note APAC usually gets to have the 'bad end ofd the stick Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):bad end of the stick it should read Kavouss Arasteh:you are very very kind and your actions are highly appreciated Kiran Malancharuvil:Taking a middle of the night call every once in a while is a necessary evil with ICANN. Tom Dale (ACIG GAC Secretariat):@CLO There is an Australian expression "Rough end of the pineapple" Kavouss Arasteh:Pls kindly do not chategorize European attendees UNFLEXIBLE Michael Flemming:I did not use such words, but thank you. Emily Barabas:The original versions of all comments are available on the wiki: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=59645660 Donna Austin, Neustar:Of course this only becomes more difficult in a few weeks time with daylight saving changes. Jian Zhang_KNET:@Emily the two 800 tele numbers do NOT work Jeff Neuman:Thanks for the reminder Donna :) Jian Zhang_KNET:only the 400 numbers work... I mean China numbers Kavouss Arasteh:Let us review the matter to make it more convinent ,if possible Kavouss Arasteh:Be positive Emily Barabas:We will work on making the document more readable for those who would like to print Kurt Pritz:@ Tom Dale: which end is the rough end? they both seem unpleasant Tom Dale (ACIG GAC Secretariat):@kurt Pritz, I just report the idiom, I cannot speak from experience. Emily Barabas:Jian -- were you able to dial in or are you still having trouble? Jeff Neuman:Welcome Back Steve! Emily Barabas:Welcome back Steve! Emily Barabas:We missed you! Donna Austin, Neustar:Welcome back Steve Steve Chan:THANK YOU EMILY AND JULIE!! Jeff Neuman:+1 Avri - Emily and Julie did great to help us over the weeks Julie Hedlund:@Avri -- Special thanks to Emily! Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Well said Avri ++++ Sara Bockey:Yes, thank you Emily and Julie! Wecome back Steve Kavouss Arasteh:Avri, Kavouss Arasteh:Pls advise whether the doc, you are referring is on the screen Steve Chan:@Kavouss, yes, we are on line 1c.R1 Kavouss Arasteh:is that O.R1? Steve Chan:1c, top of page 3 Emily Barabas:For those who prefer to view this document in excel, it is now on the wiki here: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=59645660 Donna Austin, Neustar:I think the GAC has made some suggestions, we could potentially build on that. Julie Hedlund:@Avri -- Tom Dale has his hand up Tom Dale (ACIG GAC Secretariat):Diversity is also an issue for CCWG-ACC WS2 Donna Austin, Neustar:I think the IPC comments were addressing consumer trust Jeff Neuman:Diversity in registrants is but one form of diversity. But diversity in usage by consumers is another. Michael Flemming:Dotbrand even in itself is not just a one way usage, the use of the TLD itself has a very diverse ecosystem. Paul McGrady:Diversity needs to be defined in a way that includes new uses other than just more sales of second levels. Jeff Neuman:@Paul - Agree. Emily, can we reflect that in the notes Michael Flemming:+1 Emily Barabas:Yes, we will make sure it is captured Julie Hedlund:@Jeff: I am taking the notes and will include it. Greg Shatan:I support Paul's comment. Paul McGrady:+1 Kristina. Kavouss Arasteh:It would good if we have a non exhaustive list of diversity Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):+1 to Avri (streamlining application process could increase diversity) Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Indeed Jian Jeff Neuman:Good point Jian.... Michael Flemming:Should we look at diversity froma Community standpoint, as well? Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):Definitely, Jian. Lottery (priority number) preference to IDN applications demonstrated that, I think. Jeff Neuman:I think we should collectively offer a definition of diversity in the full group and then farm out certain portions that relate to the Work Tracks Kavouss Arasteh:Did you decide to have list of diversity so far discussed Michael Flemming:Agreed, diversity will extend across all of the individual Work Tracks. Jeff Neuman:@Kavuouss - I believe that we should offer our own list of diversity factors (and should make that an action item) Jian Zhang_KNET:@Jeff agree! Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Yup Jeff Neuman:Kavuouss said it better than I did :) Donna Austin, Neustar:I think I'd just say that I think it largely supports what Kavouss said. Jeff Neuman:I agrree that the comments that were submitted were pretty clear. Greg Shatan:you read it well, Avri. Paul McGrady:Well writtem + late at night for many = a quiet crowd. Michael Flemming:Yes Jeff Neuman:yes Donna Austin, Neustar:Kavouss asks a good question. 1229 registry agreements have been executed to date. Kavouss Arasteh:wE BADLY HERAING YOU AS THERE IS A SUBSTANTIAL LEVEL OF hum Julie Hedlund:@Kavouss: Staff are trying to capture the summary in the chat. Kavouss Arasteh:Thank for clarication Grec and Jeff Paul McGrady:@Donna, perhaps but contracts aren't the same thing as use. Perhaps .brands would be further along if we didn't have to spend months and months just getting recognized as distinct category via Spec. 13. Donna Austin, Neustar:@Paul, agreed but it is one measure of where we are in the process. Michael Flemming:So we have to highly consider "benefits" in the relative aspect of how categorized TLDs use them. Looking at the application process and where we are at in that to start measuring benefit cannot be done equally across the spectrum. Paul McGrady:@Jeff, how about concrete issues such as if we end up with the scale of applications some have mentioned (10,000?), which will create new pressures on Staff. Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):Not to put words in the IPC's mouth, but were they referring to reasonably foreseeable? Jeff Neuman:@kristina - Probably....but just trying to make sure Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):Would be helpful to get that clarification. Paul? Greg? Greg Shatan:We should also identify corner cases that weren't anticipated but did occur. Jeff Neuman:We should highlight all cases we did not anticipate that actually happened...agree Paul McGrady:e.g. "Surpise! No closed generics after all." Jeff Neuman:Paul - IMO that was reasonably forseeable :) Paul McGrady:surprise Paul McGrady:Exactly. Jeff Neuman:But spending 1.5 years debating what we would do if someone applied for .murder, .terrorism or .nazi was a little overkill :) Kavouss Arasteh:if the session is continued , I am disconnected Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):I have a vague recollection of the Fast Track ccTLD IDN process not being so fast. Am I remembering correctly? Jeff Neuman:Pun definately NOT intended Greg Shatan:Oy. Paul McGrady:It wasn't foreseeable that ICANN would do a 180 on it, but all of the chaos caused by gaps/late opportunities to adjust the Guidebook after application window closed should have foreseable and locked down before publication. Let's not make the same mistake. Jian Zhang_KNET:The fast track cctld IDN was supposed to move faster... Donna Austin, Neustar:@Kristina, the non-policy process was fast, but perhaps the take-up was not so fast. Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):Apologies if I've missed it, but will we circle back once we get ALAC and NCSG input? Jian Zhang_KNET:That's a lesson we should learn Emily Barabas:Monday 19 September 19 at 15:00 UTC Avri Doria:we will circle back in any case and will fold in any new comments at that time. at least that is the way i see it. Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):Thanks, Avri. Sara Bockey:Thank you all! Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Good Call thanks everyone Talk again soon (probabkly in a WT session ... Bye for now then... Paul McGrady:Thanks Avri Great call! Tom Dale (ACIG GAC Secretariat):Thanks. Michael Flemming:thx Greg Shatan:tx & bye!

1 0

Proposed Agenda: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group, 08 September 2016 at 3:00 UTC
by Emily Barabas Sept. 7, 2016

Sept. 7, 2016

Dear All, Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Thursday, 08 September 2016 at 3:00 UTC for 90 minutes. 1. Welcome/Review Agenda 2. SOIs 3. Work Track (Sub Team) Status Updates 4. CC1 Review Tool 5. AOB If you need a dial-out or want to send an apology please email gnso-secs(a)icann.org. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

8 7

Provision of back-end registry services
by Austin, Donna Sept. 1, 2016

Sept. 1, 2016

Hi All A working group of the RySG has been formed to consider a number of topics being discussed as part of this PDP. On Friday I posted the following email to the list, which resulted in quite a bit of discussion. I'm working through the ensuing discussion and will attempt to provide a summary for this group. Sara, I think RSP Accreditation will be discussed as part of WG 1 and request that this input be taken into account. I repost my email to this list for information and also to encourage more discussion on the topic. ___ As RSP Accreditation was identified as a high priority, and as Neustar is one of the leading RSP as a result of the new gTLD program, I'd like to start a discussion on the path forward. I've just finished listening to the recording from the GDD summit on the topic of certification of back-end registry providers. As some of you may recall, during that session Sean Kaine from Neustar requested that we step back from the solution, ie. RSP Accreditation and try to identify the problems we're trying to solve in order to be sure that we have the correct solution. Sean also acknowledged as part of his intervention that accreditation may well be the answer, but let's be sure we understand what problems we're trying to solve first. I acknowledge that many may consider this to be a dissenting point of view, but I would ask this group if we could at least have the discussion. I understand that many believe these discussions have been had before, but I would argue that those were largely absent the experience we have had since as a result of the implementation of the new gTLD program and 1000+ registry operators going live. I think it would also be helpful to define what we mean when we say 'accreditation'. It is possible that it means different things to different people and in this regard it would be helpful to have a common understanding. It may be that we come up with a few different versions of what 'accreditation' means and find that some of these are more palatable than others. I admit that I don't have a fully developed idea of what 'accreditation' actually means in this context, but I do expect that there are a number of ways that 'accreditation' could be achieved. Some of the concerns that Neustar has with accreditation are as follows: * The potential to create unnecessary layers of bureaucracy in order to achieve accreditation * ICANN being responsible for the development and implementation of any accreditation program-I think we'd all agree that ICANN does not have a good track record in this regard. * Ability to maintain product differentiation * Creating another contracted party within ICANN-if a contract is required and fees are to be paid to ICANN in order to be accredited then RSPs could potentially create their own stakeholder group within the GNSO, ie a third party in the CPH * What are the implications, if any, on the Registry Agreement? To help us move forward in the manner I'm suggesting, I've identified some of the problems I believe we're trying to solve acknowledging that this list is not exhaustive: * The RSP needs the ability to interact directly with ICANN with regard to technical issues. * Streamline the 2012 new gTLD processes for any future round: o Remove the need for the same RSP to undergo the same PDT for every registry operator o Streamline the application process as it relates to the technical requirements o Make provision for applicants to select RSPs after securing the TLD o Find a more efficient way to swap out RSPs Following the discussion at the GDD Summit, ICANN staff committed to synthesize the discussion, and come back to us with next steps. I don't believe this has happened, but based on some of the chat on our call earlier this week it does seem that some work that is going on in this regard. I think it would be helpful to our discussion to understand what the status of what that work is and where it's headed. Looking forward to everyone's thoughts. Donna Donna Austin: Neustar, Inc. Policy and Industry Affairs Manager Cell: +1.310.890.9655 Email: donna.austin(a)neustar.biz<mailto:donna.austin@neustar.biz> ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately and delete the original message. Follow Neustar: [cid:image001.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0] Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/neustarinc> [cid:image002.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0] LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349> [cid:image003.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0] Twitter<http://www.twitter.com/neustar> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

8 11

Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat for New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG 22 August 2016
by Terri Agnew Aug. 22, 2016

Aug. 22, 2016

Dear All, Please find the attendance of the call attached to this email and the MP3 recording below for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group call held on Monday, 22 August 2016 at 13:00 UTC. Attendance of the calls is also posted on the agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/2g_sAw MP3: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-22aug16-en.mp3<http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=NrFWbrBstcrPWP369qgbqlXiSKeL20xnUXz…> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/_ACsAw Thank you. Kind regards, Terri ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for Monday, 22 August 2016 Terri Agnew:Dear All, Welcome to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group, Monday, 22 August 2016 at 13:00 UTC Terri Agnew:wiki agenda page: https://community.icann.org/x/2g_sAw Terri Agnew:WG Members wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/Ogp1Aw Kavouss Arasteh:Dear Terri, Kavouss Arasteh:Hi, may you pls advise to dial me up Kavouss Arasteh:Regards kavouss Terri Agnew:@Kavouss, I sent you a private AC message and an email Kavouss Arasteh 2:Tks Kavouss Arasteh 2:I replied Vanda Scartezini:hi all ! Vanda Scartezini:`we are running in South America a survey about the reasons the newgTLd around here was so few and expectation for the next round Vanda Scartezini:when finished I beleive will be interesting for this group to know the reasons Vanda Scartezini:i am in a noise area- airport , reason why I will not open the microphone. Vanda Scartezini:welcome Avri. Vanda Scartezini:is ok for me Alan Greenberg:I have a conflit and will only be able to stay for about a 1/2 hour. Alan Greenberg:..conflict.. Terri Agnew:thank you for this information Alan Kavouss Arasteh 2:Terri Kavouss Arasteh 2:Has the meeting started Kavouss Arasteh 2:I have not yet been dialed Terri Agnew:@Kavouss, the op has tried dialing several times. She will keep trying Martin SUTTON BRG:hi apologies for late arrival Kavouss Arasteh 2:That was a neumber which has been dialed since July 2014 for hundreds of call Terri Agnew:Op was able to reach you and you have joined on the telephone Emily Barabas:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QLmUjQZB7x2ez74td4m5GC1q1pH… Jon Nevett:please send calendar invites for all meetings once these are finalized. Thanks! Kavouss Arasteh 2:Yes tks Katrin Ohlmer | DOTZON GmbH:looks good Kavouss Arasteh 2:If possible I prepare to have a weekly or forthnughtly schedule Michael Flemming:Jeff, my apologies but you are somewhat soft. Can you speak up more? Jeff Neuman:i will try...thanks Sara Bockey:@avri that was perfect Michael Flemming:Thanks, Jeff. Couldn't have said it better myself. Terri Agnew:New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team - Track 4 - IDNs/Technical & Operations will take place on Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 20:00 UTC. Terri Agnew:New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team - Track 3 - String Contention, Objections & Disputes will take place on Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 15:00 UTC. Emily Barabas:The full CC1 Review tool is available at: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/59645660/CC1%20Review%20To… Alan Greenberg:I have to leave now.. Rubens Kuhl:From a formal perspective, do we really need to answer for "no comments" comments ? Rubens Kuhl:(Like 1.f R1, XLS line 34) Emily Barabas:@jeff, I will do that. thanks. Michael Flemming:To echo Phil Corwin, GAC points out that the results of all reviews should be considered. Heather Forrest:Just to note Jeff's helpful suggestion to the Council that the WG be involved in future Council responses to the next GAC Communique. This is something I'll ensure is raised in the Council. Heather Forrest:No problem! Tracey Hind (ACIG GAC Secretariat):there is a hand up in the chat Tracey Hind (ACIG GAC Secretariat):on the GAC page... Kurt Pritz:Re: GAC - The Policy, at the time of approval of the first round, was to have a subsequent round within a year of the the last round. This was to allow those who weren't reached by ICANN's communication strategy to "catch up." SInce then, there have been reviews inserted in the critical path (e.g., the RPM review) but the sort of comprehensive review contemplated by the GAC in this letter is not part of the current policy. There is no need for an "agreed policy and administrative framework supported by all stakeholders" (whatever that is. jorge cancio (GAC Switzerland):Hi there. As GAC member I may clarify that the GAC input and advice refer mainly to already envisaged and ongoing reviews, which are not still finalised Rubens Kuhl:On the RySG comment on implementation, one decision the full WG needs to make is to make one IRT for the WG or one IRT per Work Track. I personally favor the later, to have 4 IRTs at this point that would be merged in the future, but either option works. jorge cancio (GAC Switzerland):We have to be mindful that announcements made when the 2012 round started were well-meant intentions, I guess. At that moment of time many of the issues encountered later on had not been possible to be anticipated... Heather Forrest:Jeff - We'll take your question back. Martin Sutton:nope VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:Hey Guys Got Late Martin Sutton:I think the IPC response is clear - no reason to change thepolicy but they query that it has npt followed through with amechanism put in place Michael Flemming:It seems like I am unheard Terri Agnew:@Michael, I see your mic is active on AC ,please check your mic Michael Flemming:It seems my microphone is not connected properly Terri Agnew:@Michael, let us know if a dial out on the telephone is needed Michael Flemming:That would be well Avri Doria:10 minutes left in meeting Terri Agnew:Michael is on audio Laura Watkins (Nominet):I believe it is from the IPC statement Emily Barabas:IPC Response to CC1: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=59645660&preview=/… jorge cancio (GAC Switzerland):Perhaps there was no contradiction - simply at that time, people thought that all reviews would have been done within that one year Avri Doria:yes, we were optimistc back then. Terri Agnew:@Michael, you audio is cutting in and out Michael Flemming:Apologies for the bad audio. Michael Flemming:Hi Avri, thank you for the clarification. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Thx Avri, Jeff and Everyone, good to get started on all this sorry to be so mute Midnight here and sleeping child in m room ( I am still kinds on bed rest) Bye for now ... Talk again soon... jorge cancio (GAC Switzerland):on 1c) the GAC answer seems to be cut off? Rubens Kuhl:Avri, I'll just post the issue to the mailing list as it requires more time to discuss. Michael Flemming:I echo Cheryl. I need to catch a train home so am cutting out early. jorge cancio (GAC Switzerland):thanks! Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):bye Sara Bockey:Thank you all. Rubens Kuhl:Thanks all! Katrin Ohlmer | DOTZON GmbH:Thanks all! Christa Taylor:Thanks everyone! Iliya Bazlyankov:Thanks all, bye! Harold Arcos:thanks all take care jorge cancio (GAC Switzerland):thanks and bye all! VAIBHAV AGGARWAL:Thanks Team Vanda Scartezini:tks

1 0

Actions/Discussion Notes: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG 22 August 2016
by Julie Hedlund Aug. 22, 2016

Aug. 22, 2016

Dear WG Members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes captured by staff from the meeting on 22 August. These high-level notes are designed to help PDP WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/1.+WG+Meetings. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Actions/Discussion Notes: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Meeting, 22 August 2016 1. Working Group Meeting Schedule Discussion Notes: · Avoid 1900 UTC (not currently a scheduled time). · 3 time slots are: 0300, 1500, and 2000 UTC. See the Google Doc at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QLmUjQZB7x2ez74td4m5GC1q1pHeO5ke2eP…. · Put out a fortnightly or longer term schedule. 2. Board Letter to GNSO Council on New gTLDs Discussion Notes: · Sent a letter to the PDP WG Liaison, Paul McGrady, to request that the GNSO Council should consult with this PDP WG before responding. · Wait for the GNSO Council discussion on 01 September and deal with questions that they pass on to the PDP WG. 3. Work Track Sub Team Status Updates Discussion Notes: · Work Track Sub Teams 1 and 2 held initial meetings and selected Co-Leaders: o Work Track 1 Sub Team: Sara Bockey and Christa Taylor o Work Track 2 Sub Team: Phil Buckingham and Michael Flemming · PDP WG Co-Chairs and Sub Team Co-Leaders will meet to discuss the Work Plans. · Sub Team 4 meets at 2000 UTC on 25 August and Sub Team 3 meets at 1500 UTC on 30 August. · Need Co-Leader volunteers/nominations for Sub Teams 3 and 4 · Sub Teams Co-Leaders will provide status updates at the PDP WG meetings 4. CC1 Review Tools (General Comments, Questions 1a and 1b) Action Item: Ask for clarification from the IPC representatives re: meaning of their response to Question 1a -- IPC response, "No. However, we note that there has, in fact, been no ongoing mechanism for which the policy called." Discussion Notes: · The GNSO Council responded to the GAC advice -- update the tool. · PDP WG should be involved in future Council responses to the next GAC Communique. · Need to write comments on the initials responses. Need PDP WG comments in order to respond. The foundation of what will be written is in the tool. Need to look at what has already been suggested. · Produce a response to the GAC and other commenters, per the PDP. Response should be broken down by question.

1 0

Proposed Agenda: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group 22 August 2016 13:00 UTC
by Emily Barabas Aug. 22, 2016

Aug. 22, 2016

Dear All, Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday, 22 August at 13:00 UTC: 1. Welcome/Review Agenda 2. SOIs 3. Working Group Meeting Schedule 4. Board Letter to GNSO Council on New gTLDs 4. Work Track (Sub Team) Status Updates 5. CC1 Review Tool 6. AOB Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 From: <ntfy-gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine(a)icann.org> Date: Friday 19 August 2016 at 10:33 To: "ntfy-gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org" <ntfy-gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org> Cc: "gnso-secs(a)icann.org" <gnso-secs(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ntfy-gnso-newgtld-wg] Meeting Invitation: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group 22 August 2016 13:00 UTC Dear all, The next call for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group is scheduled to take place on Monday, 22 August 2016 at 13:00 UTC for 90 minutes. 06:00 PDT, 09:00 EDT, 14:00 London, 15:00 CEST for other places see: http://tinyurl.com/zo2z9hj ADOBE CONNECT Room :https://icann.adobeconnect.com/newgtldswg/ If you require a dial-out, please email me with your preferred contact number at gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie ____________________________________________________________________________ Participant passcode: NEW GTLD Dial in numbers: Country Toll Numbers Freephone/ Toll Free Number ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 BRAZIL SAO PAULO: 55-11-3958-0779 0800-7610651 CHILE 1230-020-2863 CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 CROATIA 080-08-06-309 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 EGYPT 0800000-9029 ESTONIA 800-011-1093 FINLAND 358-9-5424-7162 0-800-9-14610 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 HUNGARY 36-1-700-8856 06-800-12755 INDIA BANGALORE: 91-80-48030674 INDIA MUMBAI: 91-22-49412807 INDIA INDIA A: 000-800-852-1268 INDIA INDIA B: 000-800-001-6305 INDIA INDIA C: 1800-300-00491 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 ITALY MILAN: 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 ITALY ROME: 39-06-8751-6018 800-986-383 ITALY TORINO: 39-011-510-0118 800-986-383 JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7878-2631 0066-33-132439 JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-6868-2631 0066-33-132439 LATVIA 8000-3185 LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 8002-9246 MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 MEXICO GUADALAJARA (JAL): 52-33-3208-7310 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MEXICO CITY: 52-55-5062-9110 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MONTERREY: 52-81-2482-0610 001-866-376-9696 NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 PERU 0800-53713 PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 1800-111-42453 POLAND 00-800-1212572 PORTUGAL 351-2-10054705 8008-14052 ROMANIA 40-31-630-01-79 RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 SAUDI ARABIA 800-8-110087 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 0800-002066 SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 TURKEY 00-800-151-0516 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 8000-35702370 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 VIETNAM 120-11751

2 1

CCT-RT meeting in Vienna on 29-30 August
by Emily Barabas Aug. 22, 2016

Aug. 22, 2016

Dear All, FYI for those of you in the Vienna area -- The Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Team will be holding a face-to-face meeting in Vienna on 29-30 August. Observers are welcome to attend. There will also be a cocktail hour for all stakeholders on 28 August. Additional information is available at https://www.icann.org/news/blog/join-the-competition-consumer-trust-and-con…. Kind regards, Emily Emily Barabas | Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

1 0

IPC Response to Community Comment 1
by Greg Shatan Aug. 20, 2016

Aug. 20, 2016

Dear Co-Chairs, I am pleased to submit the Intellectual Property Constituency's response to this Working Group's first request for Community Comments. Best regards, Gregory S. Shatan President, IPC

1 0