- Gnso-review-wg - lists.icann.org

Actions/Discussion Notes for GNSO Review WG Meeting on 12 July 2018
by Julie Hedlund July 12, 2018

July 12, 2018

Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes captured by staff from the meeting on 12 July 2018. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/GRWG/2018. The next meeting is on Thursday, 26 July at 1300 UTC. A notice has been sent separately. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Action Items and Notes GNSO Review Working Group Meeting on Thursday, 12 July 2018 at 13:00 UTC Action Items: Final Report: Action Item 1: Staff will include in the draft Final Report a graphic depicting the steps in the process to complete the WG's work. Action Item 2: Staff will distribute draft Final Report early the week of 16 July with a draft motion for GNSO Council consideration and approval. WG members will circulate the report to their communities and share comments from their communities on the call on 26 July. Notes: 1. Review agenda/SOIs: No SOI Updates 2. Status of Consensus Call for implementation charters for recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36 closed on 21 June -- The charter went for consensus call. No comments or objections were received. -- Implementation is considered to be agreed as of 21 June. -- The charter was posted on the summary page of the wiki. -- This was the last of the recommendations to be implemented. -- Question: Did we recommended that the Council take care of any specific items that we need to include in our report to Council? Staff response: The recommendations were formulated to say that the recommendations have been implemented and did not include any calls to action for Council. -- Regarding Diversity requirements, the charter recognizes that additional work may come out of the recommendations of the CCWG-Accountability WS2 sub-group on Diversity, noting where these recommendations may be relevant. -- Where there are possible budget impact (such as recommendations related to translation/interpretation), this has been noted. -- Question: Does the WG agree that all recommendations have been implemented or are there any further comments or open questions? No additional comments or questions raised, therefore the group agrees that all recommendations have been implemented. 3. Update to OEC and GNSO Council at ICANN62 -- Report was sent to OEC and Council prior to ICANN62. -- The Council had a full agenda and did not designate time to discuss the report, but the WG did not have any specific questions or requests for the Council, and the Council did not have any questions about the report. -- Policy staff is coordinating with MSSI staff to see if the OEC has any questions about the report. These will be shared with the WG and taken into account in the drafting of the Final Report. 4. Status and Next Steps: Final Report -- Policy Staff is prepared to produce the Final Report, which will likely be in the same format as the Initial Report and updated to reflect that all recommendations have been implemented. MSSI staff will confirm formatting requirements. -- Staff will prepare a motion to go before the Council in its August meeting to accept the report and indicate that this completes the work of the GNSO Working Group and that the report will be submitted to the OEC. -- The OEC will need to confirm that it approves the work, as well. Staff will send the report to the OEC on behalf of Council once Council has passed the motion. -- It is anticipated that all work will completed by the September 28 deadline. -- Staff will deliver the draft Final Report to the WG early in the week of 16 July. -- Once approved by the WG, staff will submit the motion and report prior to the 6 August document deadline for the August Council meeting. -- Question: would it be possible to include a graphic depicting progression of steps in the process. Staff response: Yes, this is possible. Something similar was included in the implementation plan. -- Because consensus calls have been taken throughout the process and members have had an opportunity to share their groups, the process has followed WG guidelines. -- Question to discuss: Do we need a combined consensus call for all of the recommendations combined together with the report? Do members need to send out to communities feedback before reaching consensus? -- There is not anticipated to be any concerns about the charters. It is possible that there could be questions about the introductory or conclusion text. -- Suggestion: Allow members to conduct a final review of the report and absent any questions or concerns, the WG will submit the report to Council (via Rafik). -- Staff noted that if we do a consensus call, we could open it next Wednesday, have a two week consensus call wrap up on 1 August and have a meeting of 2 August (rather than 26 July) to wrap up the work prior to the document deadline. -- Agreement that an additional consensus call is not needed given that the group has reached consensus on all recommendations. >From the chat: Kris Seeburn: i think we have consensus calls on the different ones....so i would be tempted not to push for another group consensus again... but i understand...wolf ulrich concern Kris Seeburn: perhaps the way out... is just highlight consensus carried out Rafik Dammak: for the motion to council when time comes, I guess I can submit that on behalf of the WG Kris Seeburn: +1 rafik Sara Bockey: I'm reluctant to do another group call... everyone has a lot on their plates these days and folks may not be able to review the whole document. I understanding the desire, just not sure how feasible or successful it would be Lori Schulman: I would like to have the consensus call delayed past August. Lori Schulman: Most are on vacation in August. 5. Next Meeting: 26 July 1300 UTC 6. AOB: None.

1 0

Recordings, Attendance & AC Chat | GNSO Review WG Call | Thursday, 12 July 2018 at 13:00 UTC
by Terri Agnew July 12, 2018

July 12, 2018

Dear All, Please find the MP3, AC Recording and attendance below and AC chat attached for the GNSO Review Working Group held on Thursday, 12 July 2018 at 13:00 UTC. MP3: https://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-12jul18-en.mp3 AC Recording: <https://participate.icann.org/p948niod91z/?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=a2dc48ddcd103aed…> https://participate.icann.org/p948niod91z/ The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group…> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar Mailing list archives: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/ Wiki agenda page: <https://community.icann.org/x/fgE5BQ> https://community.icann.org/x/fgE5BQ Attendance Members: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben (ISPCP Primary) Rafik Dammak (NCSG Primary) Lawrence Olawale-Roberts (BC Primary) Sara Bockey (RrSG Primary) Lori Schulman (IPC Primary) Participants: Kris Seeburn (NCUC) On Audio Only: None Apologies: Jennifer Wolfe (RySG Primary) ICANN Staff: Emily Barabas Berry Cobb Marika Konings Julie Hedlund Terri Agnew **Please let me know if your name has been left off of the list** Thank you. Kind Regards, Terri

1 0

Agenda for GNSO Review WG Meeting on 12 July 2018
by Julie Hedlund July 10, 2018

July 10, 2018

Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, Please see below the draft agenda for the meeting on Thursday, 12 July at 13:00 UTC. Please also see the attached materials and the action items below with updates from the previous meeting. Draft agenda: Review agenda/SOIs Status of Consensus Call for implementation charters for recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36 closed on 21 June Update to OEC and GNSO Council at ICANN62 Status and Next Steps: Final Report Next Meeting: 26 July 1300 UTC AOB Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Action Items from GNSO Review Working Group Meeting on Thursday, 07 June 2018 at 13:00 UTC Status of two-week review of implementation charter for recommendations 6, 33, 35 and 36 on Diversity and subsequent discussion: Action Item 1: Staff will accept current changes and add text to clarify the relationship between the implementation of the GNSO Review recommendations and CCWG-Accountability Recommendations. (DONE) Action Item 2: Staff will open a two week consensus call today on the revised implementation Charter. (DONE) Preparation for Update to OEC and GNSO Council at ICANN62 – Draft Report and Slides: Action Item 3: Staff will include language about the relationship between implementation of GNSO Review recommendations and CCWG-Accountability recommendations in the report to the OEC. Where there is discussion of these recommendations, the text should also reflect this issue (page 12 of the report). Indicate that the recommendations are considered implemented and will be augmented with the implementation of the CCWG-Accountability recommendations. (DONE) Action Item 4: Update slide 4 of the presentation removing text anticipating consensus approval of implementation charters for recommendations 6, 33, 35 and 36. Adjust text to reflect discussion on the relationship between implementation of GNSO Review Recommendation and CCWG-Accountability recommendations. (DONE)

1 0

CLOSED-CONSENSUS CALL: Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36 Implementation Charter
by Julie Hedlund June 22, 2018

June 22, 2018

Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, The Consensus Call below closed on 21 June 2018 and no objections were received. As there were no objections the implementation of Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36 is considered agreed by full consensus. See the latest status at: https://community.icann.org/display/GRWG/Status+of+Draft+Documents+and+Cons…. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: Gnso-review-wg <gnso-review-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 11:14 AM To: "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] REMINDER-CONSENSUS CALL: Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36 Implementation Charter Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, Per the email below, this is a reminder of the Consensus Call for the GNSO Review Implementation Charter for Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36, per the action items from the meeting on 07 June. Staff is circulating the revised version of the charter for a two-week Consensus Call to end on Thursday, 21 June 2018. If there are no objections the recommendation will be deemed to have been implemented by Full Consensus. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: Gnso-review-wg <gnso-review-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 5:44 PM To: "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] CONSENSUS CALL: Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36 Implementation Charter Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, This is a Consensus Call for the GNSO Review Implementation Charter for Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36, per the action items from the meeting on 07 June (see below). The redlines in the document reflect the agreed-upon changes during the meeting. As noted in the attached charter, these are the recommendations for implementation: Recommendation 6: That the GNSO record and regularly publish statistics on Working Group participation (including diversity statistics). Recommendation 33: That Stakeholder Groups, Constituencies, and the Nominating Committee, in selecting their candidates for appointment to the GNSO Council, should aim to increase the geographic, gender and cultural diversity of its participants, as defined in ICANN Core Value 4 [now Core Value 2]. Recommendation 35: That the GNSO Council establish a Working Group, whose membership specifically reflects the demographic, cultural, gender and age diversity of the Internet as a whole, to recommend to Council ways to reduce barriers to participation in the GNSO by non- English speakers and those with limited command of English. Recommendation 36: That, when approving the formation of a PDP Working Group, the GNSO Council requires that its membership represent as far as reasonably practicable the geographic, cultural and gender diversity of the Internet as a whole. Additionally, that when approving GNSO Policy, the ICANN Board explicitly satisfy itself that the GNSO Council undertook these actions when approving the formation of a PDP Working Group. Staff is circulating the revised version of the charter for a two-week Consensus Call to end on Thursday, 21 June 2018. If there are no objections the recommendation will be deemed to have been implemented by Full Consensus. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Action Items GNSO Review Working Group Meeting on Thursday, 07 June 2018 at 13:00 UTC Status of two-week review of implementation charter for recommendations 6, 33, 35 and 36 on Diversity and subsequent discussion: Action Item 1: Staff will accept current changes and add text to clarify the relationship between the implementation of the GNSO Review recommendations and CCWG-Accountability Recommendations. Action Item 2: Staff will open a two week consensus call today on the revised implementation Charter. Preparation for Update to OEC and GNSO Council at ICANN62 – Draft Report and Slides: Action Item 3: Staff will include language about the relationship between implementation of GNSO Review recommendations and CCWG-Accountability recommendations in the report to the OEC. Where there is discussion of these recommendations, the text should also reflect this issue (page 12 of the report). Indicate that the recommendations are considered implemented and will be augmented with the implementation of the CCWG-Accountability recommendations. Action Item 4: Update slide 4 of the presentation removing text anticipating consensus approval of implementation charters for recommendations 6, 33, 35 and 36. Adjust text to reflect discussion on the relationship between implementation of GNSO Review Recommendation and CCWG-Accountability recommendations.

1 0

Cancelled: Meeting on 21 June
by Julie Hedlund June 19, 2018

June 19, 2018

Dear all, Since there have been no objections, the call on 21 June will be cancelled. To avoid scheduling meetings during ICANN62 or the week after (24 June through 07 July) we will resume meetings the week of 08 July, beginning on Thursday, 12 July, at 1300 UTC. Best regards, Julie From: Gnso-review-wg <gnso-review-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 11:26 AM To: Kris Seeburn <seeburn.k(a)gmail.com>, Sara Bockey <sbockey(a)godaddy.com> Cc: "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-review-wg] [Ext] Re: Cancel Meeting on 21 June Thanks Kris! Best, Julie From: Kris Seeburn <seeburn.k(a)gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 11:24 AM To: Sara Bockey <sbockey(a)godaddy.com> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-review-wg] Cancel Meeting on 21 June No objection for me as well. Sorry i have not been able to attend lately. I’ve been on travel and then i had death in the family all coincided. I should be able to pickup after soonest. Thanks Kris On Jun 19, 2018, at 19:21, Sara Bockey <sbockey(a)godaddy.com> wrote: No objection Sara Sent from my iPhone. Apologies for typos and/or brevity. On Jun 19, 2018, at 8:04 AM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> wrote: Dear all, We have no comments from the submission of the progress status report to the GNSO Council and the OEC, and no action items for the call this Thursday, 21 June, so staff suggests cancelling the meeting. If there are no objections, we’ll send a notice of cancellation later today. Best, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director _______________________________________________ Gnso-review-wg mailing list Gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-review-wg _______________________________________________ Gnso-review-wg mailing list Gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-review-wg Kris Seeburn seeburn.k(a)gmail.com www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/ [linkedin.com] "Life is a Beach, it all depends at how you look at it"

1 0

Cancel Meeting on 21 June
by Julie Hedlund June 19, 2018

June 19, 2018

Dear all, We have no comments from the submission of the progress status report to the GNSO Council and the OEC, and no action items for the call this Thursday, 21 June, so staff suggests cancelling the meeting. If there are no objections, we’ll send a notice of cancellation later today. Best, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

3 3

Re: [Gnso-review-wg] [Ext] Re: Cancel Meeting on 21 June
by Julie Hedlund June 19, 2018

June 19, 2018

Thanks Sara! Best, Julie From: Sara Bockey <sbockey(a)godaddy.com> Date: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 11:21 AM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Cc: "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-review-wg] Cancel Meeting on 21 June No objection Sara Sent from my iPhone. Apologies for typos and/or brevity. On Jun 19, 2018, at 8:04 AM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> wrote: Dear all, We have no comments from the submission of the progress status report to the GNSO Council and the OEC, and no action items for the call this Thursday, 21 June, so staff suggests cancelling the meeting. If there are no objections, we’ll send a notice of cancellation later today. Best, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director _______________________________________________ Gnso-review-wg mailing list Gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-review-wg

1 0

REMINDER-CONSENSUS CALL: Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36 Implementation Charter
by Julie Hedlund June 14, 2018

June 14, 2018

Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, Per the email below, this is a reminder of the Consensus Call for the GNSO Review Implementation Charter for Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36, per the action items from the meeting on 07 June. Staff is circulating the revised version of the charter for a two-week Consensus Call to end on Thursday, 21 June 2018. If there are no objections the recommendation will be deemed to have been implemented by Full Consensus. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: Gnso-review-wg <gnso-review-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 5:44 PM To: "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] CONSENSUS CALL: Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36 Implementation Charter Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, This is a Consensus Call for the GNSO Review Implementation Charter for Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36, per the action items from the meeting on 07 June (see below). The redlines in the document reflect the agreed-upon changes during the meeting. As noted in the attached charter, these are the recommendations for implementation: Recommendation 6: That the GNSO record and regularly publish statistics on Working Group participation (including diversity statistics). Recommendation 33: That Stakeholder Groups, Constituencies, and the Nominating Committee, in selecting their candidates for appointment to the GNSO Council, should aim to increase the geographic, gender and cultural diversity of its participants, as defined in ICANN Core Value 4 [now Core Value 2]. Recommendation 35: That the GNSO Council establish a Working Group, whose membership specifically reflects the demographic, cultural, gender and age diversity of the Internet as a whole, to recommend to Council ways to reduce barriers to participation in the GNSO by non- English speakers and those with limited command of English. Recommendation 36: That, when approving the formation of a PDP Working Group, the GNSO Council requires that its membership represent as far as reasonably practicable the geographic, cultural and gender diversity of the Internet as a whole. Additionally, that when approving GNSO Policy, the ICANN Board explicitly satisfy itself that the GNSO Council undertook these actions when approving the formation of a PDP Working Group. Staff is circulating the revised version of the charter for a two-week Consensus Call to end on Thursday, 21 June 2018. If there are no objections the recommendation will be deemed to have been implemented by Full Consensus. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Action Items GNSO Review Working Group Meeting on Thursday, 07 June 2018 at 13:00 UTC Status of two-week review of implementation charter for recommendations 6, 33, 35 and 36 on Diversity and subsequent discussion: Action Item 1: Staff will accept current changes and add text to clarify the relationship between the implementation of the GNSO Review recommendations and CCWG-Accountability Recommendations. Action Item 2: Staff will open a two week consensus call today on the revised implementation Charter. Preparation for Update to OEC and GNSO Council at ICANN62 – Draft Report and Slides: Action Item 3: Staff will include language about the relationship between implementation of GNSO Review recommendations and CCWG-Accountability recommendations in the report to the OEC. Where there is discussion of these recommendations, the text should also reflect this issue (page 12 of the report). Indicate that the recommendations are considered implemented and will be augmented with the implementation of the CCWG-Accountability recommendations. Action Item 4: Update slide 4 of the presentation removing text anticipating consensus approval of implementation charters for recommendations 6, 33, 35 and 36. Adjust text to reflect discussion on the relationship between implementation of GNSO Review Recommendation and CCWG-Accountability recommendations.

1 0

CLOSED-CONSENSUS CALL: Recommendations 26, 27, 28, & 29 Implementation Charter
by Julie Hedlund June 8, 2018

June 8, 2018

Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, The Consensus Call below closed on 07 June 2018 and no objections were received. As there were no objections the implementation of Recommendations 26, 27, 28 & 29 is considered agreed by full consensus. See the latest status at: https://community.icann.org/display/GRWG/Status+of+Draft+Documents+and+Cons…. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: Gnso-review-wg <gnso-review-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 3:12 PM To: "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] REMINDER-CONSENSUS CALL: Recommendations 26, 27, 28, & 29 Implementation Charter Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, Per the message below, this is a reminder of the Consensus Call for the implementation charter for recommendations 26, 27, 28, & 29. Staff is circulating the final version of the charter for a two-week Consensus Call to end on Thursday, 07 June 2018. If there are no objections the recommendations will be deemed to have been implemented by Full Consensus. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: Gnso-review-wg <gnso-review-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 1:44 PM To: "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] CONSENSUS CALL: Recommendations 26, 27, 28, & 29 Implementation Charter Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, This is a Consensus Call for the GNSO Review Implementation Charter for Recommendations 26, 27, 28, & 29, per the action items below from the meeting on 24 May. It was noted during the meeting that the only changes were to reflect the actions taken by ICANN relating to GDPR compliance. The text of the charter including the Working Group Determination section with implementation guidance remains unchanged from the text agreed to by the Working Group last November 2017. As noted in the attached charter, these are the recommendations for implementation: Recommendation 26: That GNSO Council members, Executive Committee members of Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies and members of Working Groups complete and maintain a current, comprehensive Statement of Interest on the GNSO website. Where individuals represent bodies or clients, this information is to be posted. If not posted because of client confidentiality, the participant’s interest or position must be disclosed. Failing either of these, the individual not be permitted to participate. Recommendation 27: That the GNSO establish and maintain a centralized publicly available list of members and individual participants of every Constituency and Stakeholder Group (with a link to the individual’s Statement of Interest where one is required and posted). Recommendation 28: That section 6.1.2 Membership of Chapter 6.0 Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies: Operating Principles and Participation Guidelines of the GNSO Operating Procedures be revised to clarify that key clauses are mandatory rather than advisory, and to institute meaningful sanctions for non-compliance where appropriate. Recommendation 29: That Statements of Interest of GNSO Council Members and Executive Committee members of all Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies include the total number of years that person has held leadership positions in ICANN. Staff is circulating the final version of the charter for a two-week Consensus Call to end on Thursday, 07 June 2018. If there are no objections the recommendations will be deemed to have been implemented by Full Consensus. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

1 0

Final GNSO2 Review Progress and Implementation Status Report and Slides
by Julie Hedlund June 7, 2018

June 7, 2018

Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, Per the action items 3 and 4 below from today’s meeting, please see the attached redlined, clean, and PDF versions of the GNSO2 Review Progress and Implementation Status Report that will be submitted to the Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) of the Board of Directors, and the GNSO Council on behalf of the GNSO Review Working Group. The redlines reflect the changes resulting from the discussion during today’s meeting. Please also see the attached revised slides for the presentation to the OEC and the GNSO Council, per today’s discussion. The deadline for documents to be submitted for consideration at the ICANN62 meeting is tomorrow, so staff will submit the Report and slides accordingly. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Action Items and Notes GNSO Review Working Group Meeting on Thursday, 07 June 2018 at 13:00 UTC Action Items: Status of two-week review of implementation charter for recommendations 6, 33, 35 and 36 on Diversity and subsequent discussion: Action Item 1: Staff will accept current changes and add text to clarify the relationship between the implementation of the GNSO Review recommendations and CCWG-Accountability Recommendations. Action Item 2: Staff will open a two week consensus call today on the revised implementation Charter. Preparation for Update to OEC and GNSO Council at ICANN62 – Draft Report and Slides: Action Item 3: Staff will include language about the relationship between implementation of GNSO Review recommendations and CCWG-Accountability recommendations in the report to the OEC. Where there is discussion of these recommendations, the text should also reflect this issue (page 12 of the report). Indicate that the recommendations are considered implemented and will be augmented with the implementation of the CCWG-Accountability recommendations. Action Item 4: Update slide 4 of the presentation removing text anticipating consensus approval of implementation charters for recommendations 6, 33, 35 and 36. Adjust text to reflect discussion on the relationship between implementation of GNSO Review Recommendation and CCWG-Accountability recommendations.

1 0