December 2018 - Gnso-rpm-sunrise

[Worksheet] Sunrise Charter Question 5(a) - Due 2 January
by Ariel Liang Dec. 21, 2018

Dec. 21, 2018

Dear Sunrise Sub Team members, Per staff action item, we created worksheets via Google Docs to assist the Sub Team review in its analysis as whether, and how, the Analysis Group survey results answer each of the final agreed Charter questions. You can find the worksheets on the wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/_oIWBg Instructions: * Each Charter Question has its own worksheet, which includes a table for Sub Team members to complete in the “suggesting” mode. * Sunrise Charter questions 2, 4, 5, 8, 11, and 12 were directly included in Analysis Group’s development of the surveys. On their worksheets, staff included the tab/cell reference to the Survey Analysis Tool<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs…> that contains some of the survey data relevant to answering those questions. * The agreed Sunrise Preamble Charter Question and Sunrise Charter questions 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, and 10 were not directly included in developing the surveys. They are nevertheless included in the Sub Team review as the survey results may be relevant to answering those agreed Charter questions. * When providing input, please note your name and tab title/cell number (if applicable) as reflected in the Survey Analysis Tool. Sub Team Homework: By Wednesday 02 January 2019 at 13:00 UTC, Sub Team is tasked to provide input in the worksheet set up for Sunrise Charter Question 5(a): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cHtWXXy9jh5JsoieFE7VinddaWvGTlaAE58E4uj…. * Staff have included notes captured during the call on Wednesday, 19 December in the worksheet as an example. * By the deadline, the worksheet will be locked to prevent further editing and a PDF version will be circulated to the Sub Team. Thank you for your time and contribution. Happy Holidays and Happy New Year! Talk to you soon in 2019. Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel

1 0

Recordings, attendance & AC chat / RPMs Sub Team for Sunrise Registrations call / Wednesday, 19 December 2018 at 18:00 UTC
by Nathalie Peregrine Dec. 20, 2018

Dec. 20, 2018

Dear all, Please find the attendance and AC Chat attached to this email, and the MP3 & AC recording below for the Review of all Review of all Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) Sub Team for Sunrise Registrations call held Wednesday, 19 December 2018 at 18:00 UTC. Attendance and recording of the call is also posted on agenda wiki page: MP3: https://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-rpm-review-sunrise-registrations-19dec18-… AC Recording: https://participate.icann.org/p7q9dam610p/ The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_grou…> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-sunrise/ Main wiki page for the working group: https://community.icann.org/x/KhGsAw Thank you. Kind Regards, Andrea

1 0

Action Item/Links & Agenda: RPM Sunrise Sub Team Meeting 02 Jan 1800 UTC
by Julie Hedlund Dec. 19, 2018

Dec. 19, 2018

Dear RPM Sunrise Sub Team members, Please see below the draft agenda for the meeting on Wednesday, 02 January at 1800 UTC for 60 minutes. Please also see the following action item, references, and links from the meeting notes below. Best, Mary, Ariel, Berry, and Julie ACTION ITEM: : By 1300 UTC, Wednesday, 02 January 2018, analyze whether / how the data in "Actual & Potential Registrants", “Registry & Registrars”, and “Trademark Owners” tabs answer the agreed question 5, sub question 5(a), and all the sub questions of 5(a), in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs… and add your comments/suggestions in the summary table (to be provided, see action item 2) [BY 02 Jan] See: Question 5 (Final Charter Questions for Sunrise & Trademark Claims RPMs for Which Data is Being Sought) (a) Does the current 30-day minimum for a Sunrise Period serve its intended purpose, particularly in view of the fact that many registry operators actually ran a 60-day Sunrise Period? • Are there any unintended results? • Does the ability of Registry Operators to expand their Sunrise Periods create uniformity concerns that should be addressed by this WG? • Are there any benefits observed when the Sunrise Period is extended beyond 30 days? • Are there any disadvantages? Draft Agenda: 1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest 2. Select Sub Team Leader 3. Begin survey analysis 4. AOB NOTES & ACTION ITEMS Actions: Staff will extend the nominations for Sub Team leaders/co-leaders to COB 21 December and also send to the Working Group for reference. [DONE] Staff will create Google documents for each question to which Sub Team members can add comments/suggestions. [ONGOING] Sub Team members: By 1300 UTC, Wednesday, 02 January 2018, analyze whether / how the data in "Actual & Potential Registrants", “Registry & Registrars”, and “Trademark Owners” tabs answer the agreed question 5, sub question 5(a), and all the sub questions of 5(a), in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs… and add your comments/suggestions in the summary table (to be provided, see action item 2) [BY 02 Jan] See: Question 5 (Final Charter Questions for Sunrise & Trademark Claims RPMs for Which Data is Being Sought) (a) Does the current 30-day minimum for a Sunrise Period serve its intended purpose, particularly in view of the fact that many registry operators actually ran a 60-day Sunrise Period? • Are there any unintended results? • Does the ability of Registry Operators to expand their Sunrise Periods create uniformity concerns that should be addressed by this WG? • Are there any benefits observed when the Sunrise Period is extended beyond 30 days? • Are there any disadvantages? Notes: 1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest: Susan Payne has taken the position of Secretary of the Intellectual Property Constituency. 2. Select Sub Team Leader: -- ACTION ITEM: Resend the nomination announcement until COB 21 December, also send to the full WG. -- Consider whether WG Co-Chairs could rotate. 3. Begin survey analysis -- ACTION ITEM -- Tool: Look at the refined charter questions and the Data Sub Team questions -- structured on the original data request table. Applies some structure. -- Ask Sub Team members to point out where other data applies. -- Cells F28 and G28 answer that, namely that only 4 TM owners missed the 30 day deadline. -- Cell F31 argues for 'more time', but with no tradeoff/cost attached to it, it's somewhat a weak question -- Registries and Registrars data also apply. -- Question 5 is not the place to start. -- See F28 and G28 responses. -- Don't look at the Sunrise period on its own, look at the time before it sharts (G35 on registries and registrars tab). -- F31 indicates that people believe that a 60-day period would be preferable. -- Can look at brand owner, but also at registries and registrars. Line: 33 onward. -- Haven't decided the overarching question -- is Sunrise a good thing? Is it a good thing? Propose that we go to the summary table: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20181203/0f4ad243/Ta…., -- Need to start filling in the table. -- From registrars find it too late -- don't participate. Misunderstanding of 30 days versus 60 days (30 days sunrise and 60 days are both 60 days, for the first one is a 30 day notice period). dding +30 (multiplied by something) days means registry can not start business , but paying bills. There is no way registries could do 60 days because of the first come, first-served scenario. The questions didn't provide clarity or there was no knowledge about this. -- Could run it longer than 60 days -- the durations are a minimum. -- Filter for the question was those registrars who participated in sunrise. -- Registry/Registrar -- Q15 and Q4 tabs -- costs implementing sunrise periods. Also, registry E29.

1 0

Actions & Notes: RPM Sunrise Sub Team Meeting 19 December 1800 UTC
by Julie Hedlund Dec. 19, 2018

Dec. 19, 2018

Dear All, Please see below the action items and notes captured by staff from the RPM Sunrise Sub Team meeting held on 19 December 2018 (18:00-19:00 UTC). Staff have posted to the wiki space the action items and notes. Please note that these are high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript. The recording, AC chat, transcript and attendance records are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-12-19+Sub+Team+for+Su…. See also the survey analysis tool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs…. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director == NOTES & ACTION ITEMS Actions: Staff will extend the nominations for Sub Team leaders/co-leaders to COB 21 December and also send to the Working Group for reference. [DONE] Staff will create Google documents for each question to which Sub Team members can add comments/suggestions. [ONGOING] Sub Team members: By 1300 UTC, Wednesday, 02 January 2018, analyze whether / how the data in "Actual & Potential Registrants", “Registry & Registrars”, and “Trademark Owners” tabs answer the agreed question 5, sub question 5(a), and all the sub questions of 5(a), in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs… and add your comments/suggestions in the summary table (to be provided, see action item 2) [BY 02 Jan] See: Question 5 (Final Charter Questions for Sunrise & Trademark Claims RPMs for Which Data is Being Sought) (a) Does the current 30-day minimum for a Sunrise Period serve its intended purpose, particularly in view of the fact that many registry operators actually ran a 60-day Sunrise Period? • Are there any unintended results? • Does the ability of Registry Operators to expand their Sunrise Periods create uniformity concerns that should be addressed by this WG? • Are there any benefits observed when the Sunrise Period is extended beyond 30 days? • Are there any disadvantages? Notes: 1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest: Susan Payne has taken the position of Secretary of the Intellectual Property Constituency. 2. Select Sub Team Leader: -- ACTION ITEM: Resend the nomination announcement until COB 21 December, also send to the full WG. -- Consider whether WG Co-Chairs could rotate. 3. Begin survey analysis -- ACTION ITEM -- Tool: Look at the refined charter questions and the Data Sub Team questions -- structured on the original data request table. Applies some structure. -- Ask Sub Team members to point out where other data applies. -- Cells F28 and G28 answer that, namely that only 4 TM owners missed the 30 day deadline. -- Cell F31 argues for 'more time', but with no tradeoff/cost attached to it, it's somewhat a weak question -- Registries and Registrars data also apply. -- Question 5 is not the place to start. -- See F28 and G28 responses. -- Don't look at the Sunrise period on its own, look at the time before it sharts (G35 on registries and registrars tab). -- F31 indicates that people believe that a 60-day period would be preferable. -- Can look at brand owner, but also at registries and registrars. Line: 33 onward. -- Haven't decided the overarching question -- is Sunrise a good thing? Is it a good thing? Propose that we go to the summary table: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20181203/0f4ad243/Ta…., -- Need to start filling in the table. -- From registrars find it too late -- don't participate. Misunderstanding of 30 days versus 60 days (30 days sunrise and 60 days are both 60 days, for the first one is a 30 day notice period). dding +30 (multiplied by something) days means registry can not start business , but paying bills. There is no way registries could do 60 days because of the first come, first-served scenario. The questions didn't provide clarity or there was no knowledge about this. -- Could run it longer than 60 days -- the durations are a minimum. -- Filter for the question was those registrars who participated in sunrise. -- Registry/Registrar -- Q15 and Q4 tabs -- costs implementing sunrise periods. Also, registry E29.

1 0

EXTENDED - ACTION REQUESTED: Nominations/Volunteers for RPM Sunrise Sub Team Leader
by Julie Hedlund Dec. 19, 2018

Dec. 19, 2018

Dear all, Per the action item from today’s meeting, the period for volunteers and nominations has been extended. Please submit to the Sub Team list any volunteers or nominations to lead the Sunrise Sub Team by COB Friday, 21 December. Best, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

1 0

REMINDER - Action Item/Links & Agenda: RPM Sunrise Sub Team Meeting 19 Dec 1700 UTC
by Julie Hedlund Dec. 19, 2018

Dec. 19, 2018

Dear RPM Sunrise Sub Team members, This is a reminder. Please see below the draft agenda for the meeting on Wednesday, 19 December at 1800 UTC for 60 minutes. Please also see the following action item, references, and links from the meeting notes below. Best, Mary, Ariel, Berry, and Julie ACTION ITEM: By Wednesday, 19 December 2018, analyze whether / how the data in Row 28-32 of the "TM & Brand Owners" tab answer the agreed question 5, sub question 5(a), and all the sub questions of 5(a), in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs…. (BY 19 DEC) See: Question 5 (Final Charter Questions for Sunrise & Trademark Claims RPMs for Which Data is Being Sought) (a) Does the current 30-day minimum for a Sunrise Period serve its intended purpose, particularly in view of the fact that many registry operators actually ran a 60-day Sunrise Period? • Are there any unintended results? • Does the ability of Registry Operators to expand their Sunrise Periods create uniformity concerns that should be addressed by this WG? • Are there any benefits observed when the Sunrise Period is extended beyond 30 days? • Are there any disadvantages? Draft Agenda: 1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest 2. Select Sub Team Leader 3. Begin survey analysis 4. AOB From: Gnso-rpm-sunrise <gnso-rpm-sunrise-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 3:55 PM To: "gnso-rpm-sunrise(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-sunrise(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-sunrise] Actions & Notes: RPM Sunrise Sub Team Meeting 12 Dec 1800 UTC Dear All, Please see below the action items and notes captured by staff from the RPM Sunrise Sub Team meeting held on 12 December 2018 (18:00-19:00 UTC). Staff have posted to the wiki space the action items and notes. Please note that these are high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript. The recording, AC chat, transcript and attendance records are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-12-12+Sub+Team+for+Su…. See also the survey analysis tool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs…. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director == NOTES & ACTION ITEMS Actions: Staff to add original numbering to the agreed questions. (DONE) Sub Team members to volunteer or nominate candidates for Sub Team leader. (ONGOING) Sub Team members: By Wednesday, 19 December 2018, analyze whether / how the data in Row 28-32 of the "TM & Brand Owners" tab answer the agreed question 5, sub question 5(a), and all the sub questions of 5(a), in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs…. (BY 19 DEC) See: Question 5 (Final Charter Questions for Sunrise & Trademark Claims RPMs for Which Data is Being Sought) (a) Does the current 30-day minimum for a Sunrise Period serve its intended purpose, particularly in view of the fact that many registry operators actually ran a 60-day Sunrise Period? • Are there any unintended results? • Does the ability of Registry Operators to expand their Sunrise Periods create uniformity concerns that should be addressed by this WG? • Are there any benefits observed when the Sunrise Period is extended beyond 30 days? • Are there any disadvantages? Notes: 1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest: No updates. 2. Select Sub Team Leader: Take as an action item to ask for volunteers/nominations on the list. 3. Introduction to the survey analysis tool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs… -- Column A: Questions based on the refined charter questions. -- Column B: Actual survey question (but without the logic). -- Some questions are asked of both actual and potential registrants, and some are related. -- Column C: Sub Team's draft question. -- Column D: Actual registrant response. -- Column E: Potential registrant response -- Column F: Findings from Analysis Group. -- Look at the table -- there are some dividers -- noting what relates to Trademark Claims and Sunrise. -- Sunrise: TM & Brand owners and Registry & Registrars. 4. Begin survey analysis: -- Suggest looking at the questions across both surveys to see how the data answer/don't answer the questions. -- Include link to the spreadsheet and indicate the questions/tabs. -- Start at column A, row 27 -- registry operator pricing, overarching questions. -- Review the data across the TM & Brand owners

3 2

REMINDER - ACTION REQUESTED: Nominations/Volunteers for RPM Sunrise Sub Team
by Julie Hedlund Dec. 17, 2018

Dec. 17, 2018

Dear all, Per action item 2 below from today’s meeting, please submit to the Sub Team list any volunteers or nominations to lead the Sunrise Sub Team by COB Tuesday, 18 December. Best, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: Gnso-rpm-sunrise <gnso-rpm-sunrise-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 3:55 PM To: "gnso-rpm-sunrise(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-sunrise(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-sunrise] Actions & Notes: RPM Sunrise Sub Team Meeting 12 Dec 1800 UTC Dear All, Please see below the action items and notes captured by staff from the RPM Sunrise Sub Team meeting held on 12 December 2018 (18:00-19:00 UTC). Staff have posted to the wiki space the action items and notes. Please note that these are high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript. The recording, AC chat, transcript and attendance records are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-12-12+Sub+Team+for+Su…. See also the survey analysis tool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs…. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director == NOTES & ACTION ITEMS Actions: Staff to add original numbering to the agreed questions. (DONE) Sub Team members to volunteer or nominate candidates for Sub Team leader. (ONGOING) Sub Team members: By Wednesday, 19 December 2018, analyze whether / how the data in Row 28-32 of the "TM & Brand Owners" tab answer the agreed question 5, sub question 5(a), and all the sub questions of 5(a), in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs…. (BY 19 DEC) See: Question 5 (Final Charter Questions for Sunrise & Trademark Claims RPMs for Which Data is Being Sought) (a) Does the current 30-day minimum for a Sunrise Period serve its intended purpose, particularly in view of the fact that many registry operators actually ran a 60-day Sunrise Period? • Are there any unintended results? • Does the ability of Registry Operators to expand their Sunrise Periods create uniformity concerns that should be addressed by this WG? • Are there any benefits observed when the Sunrise Period is extended beyond 30 days? • Are there any disadvantages? Notes: 1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest: No updates. 2. Select Sub Team Leader: Take as an action item to ask for volunteers/nominations on the list. 3. Introduction to the survey analysis tool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs… -- Column A: Questions based on the refined charter questions. -- Column B: Actual survey question (but without the logic). -- Some questions are asked of both actual and potential registrants, and some are related. -- Column C: Sub Team's draft question. -- Column D: Actual registrant response. -- Column E: Potential registrant response -- Column F: Findings from Analysis Group. -- Look at the table -- there are some dividers -- noting what relates to Trademark Claims and Sunrise. -- Sunrise: TM & Brand owners and Registry & Registrars. 4. Begin survey analysis: -- Suggest looking at the questions across both surveys to see how the data answer/don't answer the questions. -- Include link to the spreadsheet and indicate the questions/tabs. -- Start at column A, row 27 -- registry operator pricing, overarching questions. -- Review the data across the TM & Brand owners

1 0

Recordings, attendance & AC chat / RPMs Sub Team for Sunrise Registrations call / Wednesday, 12 December 2018 at 18:00 UTC
by Terri Agnew Dec. 13, 2018

Dec. 13, 2018

Dear all, Please find the attendance and AC Chat attached to this email, and the MP3 & AC recording below for the Review of all Review of all Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) Sub Team for Sunrise Registrations call held Wednesday, 12 December 2018 at 18:00 UTC. Attendance and recording of the call is also posted on agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/tgb_BQ MP3: https://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-rpm-review-sunrise-registrations-12dec18-… AC Recording: https://participate.icann.org/p3pmwo3sd4h/<https://participate.icann.org/p3pmwo3sd4h/?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=1ec115fa280f150c…> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_grou…> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-sunrise/ Main wiki page for the working group: https://community.icann.org/x/msrRAw Thank you. Kind Regards, Julie

1 0

Action Item/Links & Agenda: RPM Sunrise Sub Team Meeting 19 Dec 1700 UTC
by Julie Hedlund Dec. 12, 2018

Dec. 12, 2018

Dear RPM Sunrise Sub Team members, Please see below the draft agenda for the meeting on Wednesday, 19 December at 1800 UTC for 60 minutes. Please also see the following action item, references, and links from the meeting notes below. Best, Mary, Ariel, Berry, and Julie ACTION ITEM: By Wednesday, 19 December 2018, analyze whether / how the data in Row 28-32 of the "TM & Brand Owners" tab answer the agreed question 5, sub question 5(a), and all the sub questions of 5(a), in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs…. (BY 19 DEC) See: Question 5 (Final Charter Questions for Sunrise & Trademark Claims RPMs for Which Data is Being Sought) (a) Does the current 30-day minimum for a Sunrise Period serve its intended purpose, particularly in view of the fact that many registry operators actually ran a 60-day Sunrise Period? • Are there any unintended results? • Does the ability of Registry Operators to expand their Sunrise Periods create uniformity concerns that should be addressed by this WG? • Are there any benefits observed when the Sunrise Period is extended beyond 30 days? • Are there any disadvantages? Draft Agenda: 1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest 2. Select Sub Team Leader 3. Begin survey analysis 4. AOB From: Gnso-rpm-sunrise <gnso-rpm-sunrise-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 3:55 PM To: "gnso-rpm-sunrise(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-sunrise(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-sunrise] Actions & Notes: RPM Sunrise Sub Team Meeting 12 Dec 1800 UTC Dear All, Please see below the action items and notes captured by staff from the RPM Sunrise Sub Team meeting held on 12 December 2018 (18:00-19:00 UTC). Staff have posted to the wiki space the action items and notes. Please note that these are high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript. The recording, AC chat, transcript and attendance records are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-12-12+Sub+Team+for+Su…. See also the survey analysis tool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs…. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director == NOTES & ACTION ITEMS Actions: Staff to add original numbering to the agreed questions. (DONE) Sub Team members to volunteer or nominate candidates for Sub Team leader. (ONGOING) Sub Team members: By Wednesday, 19 December 2018, analyze whether / how the data in Row 28-32 of the "TM & Brand Owners" tab answer the agreed question 5, sub question 5(a), and all the sub questions of 5(a), in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs…. (BY 19 DEC) See: Question 5 (Final Charter Questions for Sunrise & Trademark Claims RPMs for Which Data is Being Sought) (a) Does the current 30-day minimum for a Sunrise Period serve its intended purpose, particularly in view of the fact that many registry operators actually ran a 60-day Sunrise Period? • Are there any unintended results? • Does the ability of Registry Operators to expand their Sunrise Periods create uniformity concerns that should be addressed by this WG? • Are there any benefits observed when the Sunrise Period is extended beyond 30 days? • Are there any disadvantages? Notes: 1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest: No updates. 2. Select Sub Team Leader: Take as an action item to ask for volunteers/nominations on the list. 3. Introduction to the survey analysis tool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs… -- Column A: Questions based on the refined charter questions. -- Column B: Actual survey question (but without the logic). -- Some questions are asked of both actual and potential registrants, and some are related. -- Column C: Sub Team's draft question. -- Column D: Actual registrant response. -- Column E: Potential registrant response -- Column F: Findings from Analysis Group. -- Look at the table -- there are some dividers -- noting what relates to Trademark Claims and Sunrise. -- Sunrise: TM & Brand owners and Registry & Registrars. 4. Begin survey analysis: -- Suggest looking at the questions across both surveys to see how the data answer/don't answer the questions. -- Include link to the spreadsheet and indicate the questions/tabs. -- Start at column A, row 27 -- registry operator pricing, overarching questions. -- Review the data across the TM & Brand owners

1 0

ACTION REQUESTED: Nominations/Volunteers for RPM Sunrise Sub Team
by Julie Hedlund Dec. 12, 2018

Dec. 12, 2018

Dear all, Per action item 2 below from today’s meeting, please submit to the Sub Team list any volunteers or nominations to lead the Sunrise Sub Team by COB Tuesday, 18 December. Best, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: Gnso-rpm-sunrise <gnso-rpm-sunrise-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 3:55 PM To: "gnso-rpm-sunrise(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-sunrise(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-sunrise] Actions & Notes: RPM Sunrise Sub Team Meeting 12 Dec 1800 UTC Dear All, Please see below the action items and notes captured by staff from the RPM Sunrise Sub Team meeting held on 12 December 2018 (18:00-19:00 UTC). Staff have posted to the wiki space the action items and notes. Please note that these are high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript. The recording, AC chat, transcript and attendance records are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-12-12+Sub+Team+for+Su…. See also the survey analysis tool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs…. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director == NOTES & ACTION ITEMS Actions: Staff to add original numbering to the agreed questions. (DONE) Sub Team members to volunteer or nominate candidates for Sub Team leader. (ONGOING) Sub Team members: By Wednesday, 19 December 2018, analyze whether / how the data in Row 28-32 of the "TM & Brand Owners" tab answer the agreed question 5, sub question 5(a), and all the sub questions of 5(a), in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs…. (BY 19 DEC) See: Question 5 (Final Charter Questions for Sunrise & Trademark Claims RPMs for Which Data is Being Sought) (a) Does the current 30-day minimum for a Sunrise Period serve its intended purpose, particularly in view of the fact that many registry operators actually ran a 60-day Sunrise Period? • Are there any unintended results? • Does the ability of Registry Operators to expand their Sunrise Periods create uniformity concerns that should be addressed by this WG? • Are there any benefits observed when the Sunrise Period is extended beyond 30 days? • Are there any disadvantages? Notes: 1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest: No updates. 2. Select Sub Team Leader: Take as an action item to ask for volunteers/nominations on the list. 3. Introduction to the survey analysis tool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs… -- Column A: Questions based on the refined charter questions. -- Column B: Actual survey question (but without the logic). -- Some questions are asked of both actual and potential registrants, and some are related. -- Column C: Sub Team's draft question. -- Column D: Actual registrant response. -- Column E: Potential registrant response -- Column F: Findings from Analysis Group. -- Look at the table -- there are some dividers -- noting what relates to Trademark Claims and Sunrise. -- Sunrise: TM & Brand owners and Registry & Registrars. 4. Begin survey analysis: -- Suggest looking at the questions across both surveys to see how the data answer/don't answer the questions. -- Include link to the spreadsheet and indicate the questions/tabs. -- Start at column A, row 27 -- registry operator pricing, overarching questions. -- Review the data across the TM & Brand owners

1 0