- GNSO-TPR - lists.icann.org

Proposed agenda for meeting #05 on Tuesday 8 June 2021 at 16.00 UTC
by Emily Barabas June 7, 2021

June 7, 2021

Dear Working Group members, Please find below the proposed agenda for the meeting scheduled to take place on Tuesday 8 June 2021 at 16.00 UTC. Kind regards, Emily, Julie, Caitlin, and Berry Transfer Policy Review Phase 1 - Meeting #05 Proposed Agenda Tuesday 8 June 2021 at 16.00 UTC 1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes) 2. Welcome & Chair updates (5 minutes) 3. Discussion of AuthInfo Codes (75 minutes) 4. Next steps & closing (5 minutes) Next meeting (ICANN71 session): 16 June 2021 @ 12:30 UTC Emily Barabas Policy Manager, GNSO Policy Development Support Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org/>

1 1

**REMINDER** Meeting Invitation | Transfer Policy Review PDP WG | Tuesday, 08 June 2021 at 16:00 UTC
by Julie Bisland June 7, 2021

June 7, 2021

Directions for members, alternates and observers are listed below. ************ Dear all, The next Transfer Policy Review PDP WG call is scheduled for Tuesday, 08 June 2021 at 16:00 UTC for 90 minutes. Zoom Room Information: Main Zoom Webinar link: https://icann.zoom.us/j/95363727469?pwd=N3A3OWFSaTlUME9wZzlGajk5VUI3QT09 [icann.zoom.us]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann.zoom.us/j/95363727469?pwd=N3A3OWFS…> Passcode: @TP/^*4wg# If you are joining via audio only: One tap mobile: US: +19294362866,,95363727469#,,,,*7490739013# or +13017158592,,95363727469#,,,,*7490739013# Telephone: Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 929 436 2866 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or 888 788 0099 (Toll Free) or 877 853 5247 (Toll Free) Webinar ID: 953 6372 7469 Passcode: 7490739013 International numbers available: https://icann.zoom.us/u/acdLFXPLp6 [icann.zoom.us]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann.zoom.us/u/acdLFXPLp6__;!!PtGJab4!v…> Members, alternates, and observers all have different access and participation directions, please read below! ALL: Before joining the call: Please send apologies and dial out requests to gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> only Please be sure you have read the ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en> Visit the Wiki Agenda meeting page: https://community.icann.org/x/6gjQCQ Check your time zone: https://tinyurl.com/4zds987s [tinyurl.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tinyurl.com/4zds987s__;!!PtGJab4!opzn_1s…> ONLY FOR MEMBERS & ALTERNATES: * Please join via the above Main Zoom Webinar link and staff will promote you to panelist. * Members (and alternates replacing members), please select Panelists and Attendees when posting to the chat in order for everyone to see and to be captured afterwards. * Alternate replacement confirmations – In order to keep track of alternate replacements, use the google form [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScXP3-H…> to communicate the replacement (alternate) and the duration. This information will be publicly posted to the Alternate Log-Transfer Policy Review PDP<https://community.icann.org/x/V4aUCQ> wiki page. * Alternates (not replacing a member): Please rename your line by adding THREE Zs (zzz) before your name and add, in parentheses (your affiliation - alternate) after your name. To rename in Zoom, hover over your name and click ‘rename’. * Alternates (not replacing a member) are not allowed to engage in the chat or use any of the other zoom room functionalities such as raising hands or agreeing/disagreeing. ONLY FOR OBSERVERS: * Observers will have ability to view member chat and information shared in the zoom webinar room. Observers will not be able to use chat or raise hands. Thank you. Kind regards, Julie

1 0

**Resending to full TPR WG** Meeting Invitation | Transfer Policy Review PDP WG | Tuesday, 08 June 2021 at 16:00 UTC
by Julie Bisland June 3, 2021

June 3, 2021

Meeting Invites for this group will now be sent only to the main mailing list with the ics attachments. Directions for members, alternates and observers are listed below. ************ Dear all, The next Transfer Policy Review PDP WG call is scheduled for Tuesday, 08 June 2021 at 16:00 UTC for 90 minutes. Zoom Room Information: Main Zoom Webinar link: https://icann.zoom.us/j/95363727469?pwd=N3A3OWFSaTlUME9wZzlGajk5VUI3QT09 [icann.zoom.us]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann.zoom.us/j/95363727469?pwd=N3A3OWFS…> Passcode: @TP/^*4wg# If you are joining via audio only: One tap mobile: US: +19294362866,,95363727469#,,,,*7490739013# or +13017158592,,95363727469#,,,,*7490739013# Telephone: Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 929 436 2866 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or 888 788 0099 (Toll Free) or 877 853 5247 (Toll Free) Webinar ID: 953 6372 7469 Passcode: 7490739013 International numbers available: https://icann.zoom.us/u/acdLFXPLp6 [icann.zoom.us]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann.zoom.us/u/acdLFXPLp6__;!!PtGJab4!v…> Members, alternates, and observers all have different access and participation directions, please read below! ALL: Before joining the call: Please send apologies and dial out requests to gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> only Please be sure you have read the ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en> Visit the Wiki Agenda meeting page: https://community.icann.org/x/6gjQCQ Check your time zone: https://tinyurl.com/4zds987s [tinyurl.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tinyurl.com/4zds987s__;!!PtGJab4!opzn_1s…> ONLY FOR MEMBERS & ALTERNATES: * Please join via the above Main Zoom Webinar link and staff will promote you to panelist. * Members (and alternates replacing members), please select Panelists and Attendees when posting to the chat in order for everyone to see and to be captured afterwards. * Alternate replacement confirmations – In order to keep track of alternate replacements, use the google form [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScXP3-H…> to communicate the replacement (alternate) and the duration. This information will be publicly posted to the Alternate Log-Transfer Policy Review PDP<https://community.icann.org/x/V4aUCQ> wiki page. * Alternates (not replacing a member): Please rename your line by adding THREE Zs (zzz) before your name and add, in parentheses (your affiliation - alternate) after your name. To rename in Zoom, hover over your name and click ‘rename’. * Alternates (not replacing a member) are not allowed to engage in the chat or use any of the other zoom room functionalities such as raising hands or agreeing/disagreeing. ONLY FOR OBSERVERS: * Observers will have ability to view member chat and information shared in the zoom webinar room. Observers will not be able to use chat or raise hands. Thank you. Kind regards, Julie

1 0

Transfer Policy Review PDP WG
by ICANN Policy Calendar June 3, 2021

June 3, 2021

**resending to include full TPR WG Meeting: Transfer Policy Review PDP WG Date/Time: Tuesday, 08 June 2021 at 16:00 UTC for 90 minutes Join the Zoom Webinar: https://icann.zoom.us/j/95363727469?pwd=N3A3OWFSaTlUME9wZzlGajk5VUI3QT09 Passcode: @TP/^*4wg# ALL: Before joining the call: Please send apologies and dial out requests to gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> only Please be sure you have read the ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en> Visit the Wiki Agenda meeting page: https://community.icann.org/x/6gjQCQ Check your time zone: https://tinyurl.com/4zds987s ONLY for Members & Alternates: * Please join via the above Zoom Webinar link and staff will promote you to Panelist * Alternate replacement confirmations – In order to keep track of alternate replacements, use the google form<https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScXP3-H595xH4EFgaR3ydOr-1o9BLAVGUI…> to communicate who the alternate is replacing and for which period. This information will be posted to the Alternate Log-Transfer Policy Review PDP wiki page<https://community.icann.org/x/V4aUCQ>. * Members (and alternates replacing members), please select Panelists and Attendees when posting to the chat in order for everyone to see and to be captured afterwards. * Alternates (not replacing a member): Please rename your line in Zoom by adding THREE Zs “zzz” before your name, and in parentheses, (your affiliation - alternate), after your name. To rename in Zoom, hover over your name and click ‘rename’. * Alternates (not replacing a member) are not allowed to engage in the chat or use any of the other zoom room functionalities such as raising hands or agreeing/disagreeing. ONLY for Observers: * Observers will have ability to view member chat and information shared in the zoom webinar room. Observers will not be able to use chat or raise hands. For Audio only: One tap mobile: US: +19294362866,,95363727469#,,,,*7490739013# or +13017158592,,95363727469#,,,,*7490739013# Telephone: Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 929 436 2866 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or 888 788 0099 (Toll Free) or 877 853 5247 (Toll Free) Webinar ID: 953 6372 7469 Passcode: 7490739013 International numbers available: https://icann.zoom.us/u/acdLFXPLp6

1 0

Notes and action items - TRP WG Meeting #04 - 1 June 2021
by Caitlin Tubergen June 1, 2021

June 1, 2021

Dear Transfer Policy Review Working Group, Please find below the notes and action items from today’s meeting. The next TPR WG meeting will be Tuesday, 8 June at 17:30 UTC. Best regards, Emily, Berry, and Caitlin -- Transfer Policy Review Phase 1 - Meeting #04 Proposed Agenda Tuesday 1 June 2021 at 16.00 UTC 1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes) 2. Welcome & Chair updates (5 minutes) * Today’s meeting is shortened to 60 minutes due to the GNSO Policy webinar * Short introduction of new NCSG members * ICANN71 – prep weeks starts this week, and ICANN71 starts in less than 2 weeks. We will be meeting on 16 June at 12:00 UTC. The session will be split between discussing the goals of the Transfer Policy, and the other part of the session will be dedicated to discussing auth-codes. * Support Staff will distribute the draft SO/AC outreach document to the WG shortly 3. Phase 1B Charter Topics #07 - #12 Discussion: Change of Registrant (45 mins) a. Topic #07 – Overall Policy Poll questions: * Level of Effort? High 38% Medium 50% Low 13% * Known Dependencies? Yes 25% No 75% * Note- changes of registrar needs to occur first * The rationale for the two-phased PDP is to divide the work and there were also signals that there may be overlaps between inter-registrar and inter-registrant transfers. While Phase 1A report is out for public comment, it will be necessary to review the changes to Phase 1B topics to see if anything gets broken. * Related Topics? Yes 6% No 94% * There may be an issue with transfers when resellers are involved b. Topic #08 – 60-Day Lock Level of Effort? High 18% Medium 53% Low 29% Known Dependencies? Yes 18% No 82% * This is tied into what happens during a registrar transfer, so updates to that process need to be stable before making changes to this process. Related Topics? Yes 0% No 100% c. Topic #09 – Privacy/Proxy Customers Level of Effort? High 24% Medium 65% Low 12% Known Dependencies? Yes 24% No 76% * There is a current IRT dealing with the PPSAI issue – there may be dependencies here. * Note: The PPSAI IRT is "On-Hold" pending decision by the Council on when and how to restart it. Related Topics? Yes No 100% d. Topic #10 – Designated Agent Level of Effort? High 11% Medium 53% Low 37% Known Dependencies? Yes 16% No 84% * Dependent on whether COR is retained Related Topics? Yes 0% No 100% e. Topic #11 – Additional Questions Level of Effort? High 5% Medium 47% Low 47% Known Dependencies? Yes 0% No 100% Related Topics? Yes 0% No 100% f. Topic #12 – Wave 1, Recommendation 27 * Wave 1 Report outlines the impacts on other policies from EPDP recommendations * The Final Issues Report includes all of the specific impacts noted by ICANN org Level of Effort? High 5% Medium 50% Low 45% Known Dependencies? Yes 5% No 95% * Dependent on whether COR is maintained at all Related Topics? Yes 0% No 100% - Most topics trend medium to high, which signals these are substantial discussions for the WG. In isolation, what is more important to discuss first: 60-day lock or COR process? - COR process, then 60-day lock 4. Next steps & closing (5 minutes) a. Next meeting: 8 June 2021 @ 16:00 UTC * Note: we have only scheduled calls up to ICANN71. Please let us know if this time works for everyone. If the time does not work for you, please reach out to Roger or Support Staff. We will take feedback into account before scheduling future meetings. * Support Staff will take feedback from the polls and come up with the next iteration of the project plan. In approximately one month, the WG will submit its plan to the Council as an acknowledgement that we are committing to these deliverable dates. * The early input doc currently looks like a replica of charter questions, but we may also consider additional questions. Support Staff will distribute the draft shortly. * The WG will kick off its work with auth-info code management. If any members have ideas re: how these discussions could look – please submit them to the list.

1 0

Post Call | Transfer Policy Review PDP WG | Tuesday, 01 June 2021 at 16:00 UTC
by Julie Bisland June 1, 2021

June 1, 2021

Dear all, All recordings for the Transfer Policy Review PDP WG call held on Tuesday, 01 June 2021 at 16:00 UTC can be found on the agenda wiki page <https://community.icann.org/x/6AjQCQ> (attendance included) and the GNSO Master calendar [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calen…>. These include: * Attendance (please let me know if your name has been left off the attendance list) * Audio recording * Zoom chat archive * Zoom recording (including audio, visual, rough transcript) * Transcript As a reminder only members and alternates can join the call as a Panelist, observers can join as an Attendee to listen. For additional information, you may consult the mailing list archives <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-tpr/> and the main wiki page<https://community.icann.org/x/P4aUCQ>. Thank you. With kind regards, Julie

1 0

Meeting Invitation | Observers | Transfer Policy Review PDP WG call | Tuesday, 08 June 2021 at 16:00 UTC
by Julie Bisland June 1, 2021

June 1, 2021

Dear all, The next Transfer Policy Review PDP WG call is scheduled for Tuesday, 08 June 2021 at 16:00 UTC for 90 minutes. Join the Zoom Webinar: https://icann.zoom.us/j/95363727469?pwd=N3A3OWFSaTlUME9wZzlGajk5VUI3QT09 [icann.zoom.us]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann.zoom.us/j/95363727469?pwd=N3A3OWFS…> Passcode: @TP/^*4wg# Observers will have ability to join the call via Zoom Webinar, and will be able to view members’ chat as well as information shared in the Zoom Webinar room. Observers will not be able to use chat or raise hands. The recordings and transcriptions of the calls will be posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calen…> Before joining the call: Please be sure you have read the ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2016-06-28-en> Visit the Wiki Agenda meeting page: https://community.icann.org/x/6gjQCQ Check your time zone: https://tinyurl.com/4zds987s Audio only: One tap mobile: US: +19294362866,,95363727469#,,,,*7490739013# or +13017158592,,95363727469#,,,,*7490739013# Telephone: Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 929 436 2866 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or 888 788 0099 (Toll Free) or 877 853 5247 (Toll Free) Webinar ID: 953 6372 7469 Passcode: 7490739013 International numbers available: https://icann.zoom.us/u/acdLFXPLp6 [icann.zoom.us]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann.zoom.us/u/acdLFXPLp6__;!!PtGJab4!v…> Thank you. Kind regards, Julie

1 0

Proposed agenda for meeting #04 on Tuesday 1 June 2021 at 16.00 UTC
by Emily Barabas May 27, 2021

May 27, 2021

Dear Working Group members, Please find below the agenda for the meeting scheduled to take place on Tuesday 1 June 2021 at 16.00 UTC. Please note that this meeting will only be 60 minutes in length to allow members to attend the GNSO Policy Webinar at 17.00 UTC as part of ICANN71 Prep Week. As a reminder, if you have not yet done so, please complete the Working Group background reading (see slide 19 here<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/160728655/Transfers%20Poli…> for summary) and confirm here<https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe3xz-e80x6moG8KSRDbCgYQOTN1Er6PYu…> when you have done so. Kind regards, Emily, Caitlin and Berry Transfer Policy Review Phase 1 - Meeting #04 Proposed Agenda Tuesday 1 June 2021 at 16.00 UTC 1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes) 2. Welcome & Chair updates (5 minutes) 3. Phase 1B Charter Topics #07 - #12 Discussion: Change of Registrant (45 mins) * Topic #07 – Overall Policy * Topic #08 – 60-Day Lock * Topic #09 – Privacy/Proxy Customers * Topic #10 – Designated Agent * Topic #11 – Additional Questions * Topic #12 – Wave 1, Recommendation 27 4. Next steps & closing (5 minutes) * Next meeting: 8 June 2021 @ 16:00 UTC Emily Barabas Policy Manager, GNSO Policy Development Support Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org/>

1 0

Re: [GNSO-TPR] A short note re proxy services
by Steve Crocker May 26, 2021

May 26, 2021

Thanks. One of my SSAC colleagues also pointed this out. The PPSAI report is now on the top of my reading pile. Steve Sent from my iPhone > On May 26, 2021, at 5:47 AM, Volker Greimann <vgreimann(a)key-systems.net> wrote: > > > Hi Steve, > > on this topic, you may find useful the work of the PPSAI PDP which defines the term and has already done much of the work on such services: > https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/ppsai-2016-08-18-en > https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/raa/ppsai-final-07dec15-en.pdf > > While it has not yet been implemented due to delays resulting from GDPR and other work, it may still be useful to you. > > Best, > -- > Volker A. Greimann > General Counsel and Policy Manager > KEY-SYSTEMS GMBH > > T: +49 6894 9396901 > M: +49 6894 9396851 > F: +49 6894 9396851 > W: www.key-systems.net > > Key-Systems GmbH is a company registered at the local court of Saarbruecken, Germany with the registration no. HR B 18835 > CEO: Oliver Fries and Robert Birkner > > Part of the CentralNic Group PLC (LON: CNIC) a company registered in England and Wales with company number 8576358. > > This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended only for the person(s) directly addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, transmission, distribution, or other forms of dissemination is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete this email with any files that may be attached. > > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 8:34 PM Steve Crocker <steve(a)shinkuro.com> wrote: >> Folks, >> >> I mentioned a couple of distinctions I've found useful in thinking about privacy/proxy services. These are set forth in the attached very short note on proxy/privacy services. I welcome feedback, comments, discussion, etc. >> >> Also, I'm using "proxy" and "privacy" interchangeably. Do others distinguish between these terms? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Steve >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GNSO-TPR mailing list >> GNSO-TPR(a)icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr

1 0

Notes and action items - TPR WG Meeting #3 - 25 May 2021
by Caitlin Tubergen May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

Dear All, Please find below the notes and action items from today’s Transfer Policy Review Working Group. Our next meeting will be Tuesday, 1 June at 16:00 UTC. Best regards, Emily, Berry, and Caitlin Transfer Policy Review Phase 1 - Meeting #03 Proposed Agenda Tuesday 25 May 2021 at 16.00 UTC 1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes) 2. Welcome & Chair updates (Chair) (5 minutes) * We will use a polling mechanism during this call to assist in determining initial feelings of the group, re: sizing of work, dependencies, etc. * Please note that while the poll will appear for everyone in the Zoom room, please do not respond unless you are an active member of the WG. * This poll is not meant as a scientific endeavor – we are using this to get a better temperature of the room regarding the complexity and duration of the topics before the group. It will assist the Staff Support Team in developing the project plan to ensure reasonable timelines, delivery dates, and milestones. 3. Briefly Revisit Topics from Meeting #03 Using Poll: Topic #01 (Gaining FOA), Topic #02 (Losing FOA), Topic #03 (FOA - Additional Security Measures), and Topic #04 (AuthInfo Code Management) (20 minutes) * With respect to Q1 (call hours), would like to get the group to think about how many hours of call hours are needed INSTEAD of calendar times (like six months). How long will it take for the group to deliberate the topic, form preliminary conclusions, and get the topic stabilized to move on to the next. * Our current cadence is 1.5 hours per week. If we say this is a medium topic, we are, in essence, saying it will take the group 5-7 weeks to come to preliminary conclusions on a topic. * Please also keep in mind that one meeting may have more than one topic. GAINING FOA * Level of Effort in terms of call hours? (S, M, L) * S -- 53% * M – 47% * L * Dependencies? (Is there any work that needs to be completed before discussion of this topic, is there work that needs to be done in parallel, or any future work that is dependent on this topic?) * Y – 35% * N – 65% * It may be best to look at auth-info codes first because the need for FOAs would be better reviewed after we look at the security of auth-info codes. * The Gaining and Losing FOA are very dependent on the process with auth-codes. * Changes to the Losing FOA are dependent on the auth-code, but do not believe the Gaining FOA is dependent on auth-codes. * Related Topics? * Y – 6% * N – 94% LOSING FOA * Level of Effort in terms of call hours? (S, M, L) * S – 62% * M – 46% * L – * Dependencies? (Is there any work that needs to be completed before this topic, in parallel, any future work that is dependent on this topic?) * Y – 62% * N – 38% * Related Topics? * Y – 8% * N – 92% FOA – ADDITIONAL SECURITY MEASURES * Level of Effort in terms of call hours? (S, M, L) * S – 33% * M – 60% * L – 7% * As this leans towards medium/high, will consider as part of building out the project plan, we will build in slack (extra time to consider complex topics). * Dependencies? (Is there any work that needs to be completed before this topic, in parallel, any future work that is dependent on this topic?) * Y – 40% * N – 60% * After last week, interpreting security more broadly. It may be beneficial to have a discussion re: DNSSEC vis-à-vis transfers. Should want to support secure transfers for a registrant. WG should discuss if this is or is not important as a relevant security feature to continue to include. * This topic is interesting but unsure if this is in scope. If DNSSEC is discussed, the WG should have some education on this topic so that everyone is on the same page – what is DNSSEC, can this be transferred, etc. * This could be a possible area where the group could lay down a few extra questions during the early input phase from SO/ACs. Agree that education would also be necessary for this group. If the group does determine that the topic warrants further investigation, it may not be in scope under the current charter, but project change requests do allow for changes in scope. Please note, though, project change requests are a last resort. * Related Topics? * Y – 20% * N – 80% AUTH INFO CODE MANAGEMENT * Level of Effort in terms of call hours? (S, M, L) * S – 6% * M – 50% * L – 44% * Dependencies? (Is there any work that needs to be completed before this topic, in parallel, any future work that is dependent on this topic?) * Y – 50% * N – 50% * Related Topics? * Y – 38% * N – 63% * One thing that is missing is how the registrant can actually find a way to get the auth-code. Losing registrar should submit the auth-code within five days, but there should be standardization around this. * In reading the tea leaves, it sounds like the group would like to start discuss auth code management in a general sense – registrar management, usability from a domain owner perspective. This would start to the topics on security (the previous topic), then the group would discuss the Gaining FOA and then, finally, the Losing FOA as a general cadence or approach. * Perhaps Losing FOA should be discussed before Gaining FOA – in the Tech Ops Paper, there were many items related to the Losing FOA. The Gaining FOA, on the other hand, does not have a use (and is no longer used); however probably not comfortably eliminating the Gaining FOA until we discuss the Losing FOA 4. Phase 1A Charter Topic #05 Discussion - Bulk Use of Auth-Info Codes (20 minutes) * Level of Effort in terms of call hours? (S, M, L) * S – 27% * M – 67% * L – 7% * Dependencies? (Is there any work that needs to be completed before this topic, in parallel, any future work that is dependent on this topic?) * Y – 53% * N – 47% * Important to cover auth-info code first. It’s important to understand how something is done once before understanding how this can be done in bulk. * Suspect FOA topic should be covered before this topic. * Related Topics? * Y – 33% * N – 67% * If the Team decides there is a relationship with DNSSEC, that will also impact this topic. 5. Phase 1A Charter Topic #06 - FOA - Wave 1, Recommendation 27 (20 minutes) * The Phase 1 EPDP Team noted the access to registration data is important for transfers but noted that the changes to the Transfer Policy would be handled in this group. This is mostly an inventory mechanism to make sure all of our bases were covered. * Level of Effort in terms of call hours? (S, M, L) * S – 23% * M – 62% * L – 15% * Dependencies? (Is there any work that needs to be completed before this topic, in parallel, any future work that is dependent on this topic?) * Y – 46% * N – 54% * Based on this shopping list, the group can review this list and do a sanity check – in other words, is anything missing from the Wave 1 report that the group needs to consider? * Support Staff is aware of the Phase 1 IRT’s work and will be there to ensure that the left hand and right hand are coordinated. The IRT is tasked, as a result of this Wave 1 Report, to do a terminology update. As part of implementing the Phase 1 recommendations, if there is a reference to legacy protocol of WHOIS, that needs to be converted to RDDS or registration data. Similarly, references to admin contact will be deleted. If terminology updates encroach upon policy making, they will be passed to this group. Where we stand now, there is no apparent disconnect b/w the IRT and this WG. However, Support Staff will continue to ensure coordination. * Related Topics? * Y – 15% * N – 85% 6. High-level Review of Phase 1B Charter Topics & Charter Questions (15 minutes and time permitting) * What is Change of Registrant (CoR) – Requirements that seek to prevent domain name hijacking by ensuring that certain changes to registrant information have been authorized. * What is required? Registrars must obtain confirmation from the Prior Registrant and New Registrant before a material change is made to: Prior Registrant name, Prior Registrant organization, Prior Registrant email address, and/or Administrative Contact email address, if no Prior Registrant email address. * Encourage everyone to review the associated metrics in the Final Issue Report * What elements of the CoR Policy need review? * "60-day inter-registrar transfer lock" prevents transfer to another registrar for sixty (60) days following a CoR. Registrants have difficulty with the 60-day lock, especially that they are not able to remove the lock once it is applied. * Designated Agent: an individual or entity that the Prior Registrant or New Registrant authorizes to approve a CoR. * Appear to be different interpretations of role and authority. * Compliance enforcement is being deferred in relation to CoR as it applies to removal or addition of privacy/proxy services, pending further work to clarify implementation of relevant IRTP-C provisions. * Charter<https://community.icann.org/display/TPRPDP/2.+WG+Charter> Questions (please refer to the Charter to review the full text of questions – some high-level notes are included below for reference): * First set of questions focuses on the policy overall – according to the Scoping Team Report, CoR does not achieve the stated goals – why? Are the stated goals still valid? How should the goals be achived? * Data gathered indicates that some registrants find the CoR policy burdensome – how can this be mitigated while still ensuring security for registrants? * Should there be a standalone policy for CoR instead of it being part of the Transfer Policy? * Is a 60-day lock appropriate to prevent hijacking or are there other alternatives that should be explored? * Review of Designated Agent – there seems to be differences in the understanding and authority of the Designated Agent * Changes/addition of P/P service – how should this be handled vis-à-vis CoR? * WG comments * P/P services fall into certain buckets – one is a service run by a registrar vs. an unaffiliated service where the registrar does not have access. Is that distinction included here? * The Charter questions do not go into that level of specificity, but the group can consider if new questions should be added to the WG’s scope. * Discriminators are – can you tell if a P/P service is being used or not? If you can tell, is it affiliated with the registrar or not? * One approach should be – do we actually need this policy? Then review all of the additional charter questions – should start higher level – is this policy even needed. * We are going over these questions so that the group can understand the topic and answer the polling questions from an educated perspective. * Please review the Issues Report and Charter Questions and consider what size effort this will be and if there are dependencies or related topics. 7. Next steps & closing (5 minutes) a. Next meeting 1 June 2021 @ 16:00 UTC b. Reminder to please review the Change of Registrant charter questions and consider what size effort this will be and if there are dependencies or related topics. We will begin the next meeting with polling questions on this topic.

1 0