Dear All: Upon research I find that despite all the seconding that has been going on for the various positions, seconds are not actually required, only nomination and acceptance of nomination. My apologies in particular to Robert, Jonathan, and Wolfgang. The current list is therefore as below: Nominations for Officer Positions 2007/8 Nominations Received and seconded on or before the 14th October 2007 deadline ALAC Committee Officers Chair Cheryl Langdon-Orr (accepted) Vice Chair Vanda Scartezini (accepted) Sebastien Bachollet (accepted) Robert Guerra (accepted) Rapporteur No nominations Liaisons GNSO Liaison Alan Greenberg (accepted) ccNSO Liaison Jacqueline Morris (accepted) Adam Peake (declined) Vittorio Bertola SSAC Liaison Robert Guerra (accepted) IDNs Xue Hong (accepted) WHOIS None proposed Working Groups IDNs WHOIS No nominations Registrant/Registrar Relations No nominations IPv4 – IPv6 Migration No nominations New GTLDs No nominations Ad-Hoc Positions Special Adviser on Internet Governance Policy Jonathan Zittrain Wolfgang Kleinwachter -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
Did Vittorio accepted the nomination by sending a message of acceptance to the public ALAC list, or did the person who nominated him forward such an email (9.3.) And where is the rule about the creation of ad hoc positions. It was in an earlier draft, but not the one ratified. Is there such a thing as an "ad hoc" position? Best, Adam At 5:43 PM +0200 10/17/07, Nick Ashton-Hart wrote:
Dear All:
Upon research I find that despite all the seconding that has been going on for the various positions, seconds are not actually required, only nomination and acceptance of nomination. My apologies in particular to Robert, Jonathan, and Wolfgang.
The current list is therefore as below:
Nominations for Officer Positions
2007/8
Nominations Received and seconded on or before the 14th October 2007 deadline
ALAC Committee Officers
Chair
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (accepted)
Vice Chair
Vanda Scartezini (accepted)
Sebastien Bachollet (accepted)
Robert Guerra (accepted)
Rapporteur
No nominations
Liaisons
GNSO Liaison
Alan Greenberg (accepted)
ccNSO Liaison
Jacqueline Morris (accepted)
Adam Peake (declined)
Vittorio Bertola
SSAC Liaison
Robert Guerra (accepted)
IDNs
Xue Hong (accepted)
WHOIS None proposed
Working Groups
IDNs
WHOIS No nominations Registrant/Registrar Relations No nominations IPv4 IPv6 Migration No nominations New GTLDs No nominations
Ad-Hoc Positions
Special Adviser on Internet Governance Policy Jonathan Zittrain Wolfgang Kleinwachter
-- Regards,
Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: <mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org>nick.ashton-hart@icann.org Win IM: <mailto:ashtonhart@hotmail.com>ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: <mailto:nashtonhart@mac.com>nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: <https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart>https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
At 17/10/2007 12:38 PM, Adam Peake wrote:
And where is the rule about the creation of ad hoc positions. It was in an earlier draft, but not the one ratified. Is there such a thing as an "ad hoc" position?
We have no such advisor positions at the moment. We do have provision for "other" appointments and an advisor to the committee could likely fit there, but the appointment process differs from those for officers and formal liaisons. When the subject was raised, Jacqueline pointed out that if we want such advisors, that may be fine, but they are not part of the formal elections that are being carried out and the idea can be discussed in Los Angeles (not trying to put words in Jacqueline's mouth, but that is what I remember the gist of her comments were). Alan
At 12:52 PM -0400 10/17/07, Alan Greenberg wrote:
At 17/10/2007 12:38 PM, Adam Peake wrote:
And where is the rule about the creation of ad hoc positions. It was in an earlier draft, but not the one ratified. Is there such a thing as an "ad hoc" position?
We have no such advisor positions at the moment. We do have provision for "other" appointments and an advisor to the committee could likely fit there, but the appointment process differs from those for officers and formal liaisons. When the subject was raised, Jacqueline pointed out that if we want such advisors, that may be fine, but they are not part of the formal elections that are being carried out and the idea can be discussed in Los Angeles (not trying to put words in Jacqueline's mouth, but that is what I remember the gist of her comments were).
Alan, thanks. Just wondered, it's not easy trying find a path though the rules and procedures (and also not knowing what other documents might be lurking -- I am sure the wiki is great for developing documents, but once procedures are ratified they should move to an obvious and permanent home off the alac.icann.org page. Wikis by their nature change, a stable place for important documents would be sensible.) About the "Special Adviser on Internet Governance Policy" Beau, you described the person's role as "His primary responsibility would be to advise ALAC members, the at-large community and ICANN staff on policy formulation and priority-setting, and two-way communications to the user community". This is not particularly "Internet Governance" as I understand it, more an advisor on Policy Development. Internet Governance has come to mean ICT policy generally, issues way beyond ALAC and ICANN's mission, and it would be good to prevent any potential mission creep or simple misunderstanding. Suggest "Special Adviser to the At-Large Community on Policy Development". Before deciding to spend more face to face time in LA on this, how about tying two things. 1. Discuss whether a friendly amendment to the new Rules and Procedures should be made to return the language Beau quoted from an earlier draft: Other ALAC appointments a. The ALAC may, from time to time: * attribute specific tasks or responsibilities to a given individual; [* appoint a given individual as ALAC representative in working groups, task forces, or other committees and bodies different from those to which Liaisons are appointed; *form Committees, attribute specific tasks or responsibilities to them, and appoint their members.] (I think the second and third points are covered in the new ROP document.) If the ALAC agrees it may, from time to time wish to attribute specific tasks or responsibilities to a given individual, then table a motion for a simple up/down vote in LA (two-thirds majority of the delegates present and voting.) Suggest not requiring normal rules of nomination and acceptance be applied to positions created by this process, but considered on a case by case basis. 2. About the specific recommendation to create a position Special Adviser to the At-Large Community on [Internet Governance Policy[ [Policy Development]. Suggest someone start a thread to discuss whether the position is necessary? What the tasks of the position should be? Beau's description seems good and appropriate, but as mentioned above I think the title "Internet Governance" perhaps a problem. Once discussed, if the community feels the position's necessary, and the ALAC agrees to modify the ROP to make such appointments possible, then a vote could be held to create the position. (Then someone could move to appoint Jonathan Zittrain, someone else might nominate Wolfgang, etc etc.) Most of this could be done online. Rather than over a few hours in LA. Sorry, long winded comment... Best, Adam
Alan
Truth be told, I need to spend time finishing Consumer Reports' WebWatch's statement on the GNSO's gTLD report, so perhaps discussion in LA is the best way to resolve this. I simply intended to try to bring a really bright guy into the fold to be helpful to the ALAC (and to me), not to create a debate about what his title should be, procedure, rules, etc. Beau Brendler -----Original Message----- From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Adam Peake Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:14 AM To: Alan Greenberg; Nick Ashton-Hart; At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] Revised List of Candidates At 12:52 PM -0400 10/17/07, Alan Greenberg wrote:
At 17/10/2007 12:38 PM, Adam Peake wrote:
And where is the rule about the creation of ad hoc positions. It was in an earlier draft, but not the one ratified. Is there such a thing as an "ad hoc" position?
We have no such advisor positions at the moment. We do have provision for "other" appointments and an advisor to the committee could likely fit there, but the appointment process differs from those for officers and formal liaisons. When the subject was raised, Jacqueline pointed out that if we want such advisors, that may be fine, but they are not part of the formal elections that are being carried out and the idea can be discussed in Los Angeles (not trying to put words in Jacqueline's mouth, but that is what I remember the gist of her comments were).
Alan, thanks. Just wondered, it's not easy trying find a path though the rules and procedures (and also not knowing what other documents might be lurking -- I am sure the wiki is great for developing documents, but once procedures are ratified they should move to an obvious and permanent home off the alac.icann.org page. Wikis by their nature change, a stable place for important documents would be sensible.) About the "Special Adviser on Internet Governance Policy" Beau, you described the person's role as "His primary responsibility would be to advise ALAC members, the at-large community and ICANN staff on policy formulation and priority-setting, and two-way communications to the user community". This is not particularly "Internet Governance" as I understand it, more an advisor on Policy Development. Internet Governance has come to mean ICT policy generally, issues way beyond ALAC and ICANN's mission, and it would be good to prevent any potential mission creep or simple misunderstanding. Suggest "Special Adviser to the At-Large Community on Policy Development". Before deciding to spend more face to face time in LA on this, how about tying two things. 1. Discuss whether a friendly amendment to the new Rules and Procedures should be made to return the language Beau quoted from an earlier draft: Other ALAC appointments a. The ALAC may, from time to time: * attribute specific tasks or responsibilities to a given individual; [* appoint a given individual as ALAC representative in working groups, task forces, or other committees and bodies different from those to which Liaisons are appointed; *form Committees, attribute specific tasks or responsibilities to them, and appoint their members.] (I think the second and third points are covered in the new ROP document.) If the ALAC agrees it may, from time to time wish to attribute specific tasks or responsibilities to a given individual, then table a motion for a simple up/down vote in LA (two-thirds majority of the delegates present and voting.) Suggest not requiring normal rules of nomination and acceptance be applied to positions created by this process, but considered on a case by case basis. 2. About the specific recommendation to create a position Special Adviser to the At-Large Community on [Internet Governance Policy[ [Policy Development]. Suggest someone start a thread to discuss whether the position is necessary? What the tasks of the position should be? Beau's description seems good and appropriate, but as mentioned above I think the title "Internet Governance" perhaps a problem. Once discussed, if the community feels the position's necessary, and the ALAC agrees to modify the ROP to make such appointments possible, then a vote could be held to create the position. (Then someone could move to appoint Jonathan Zittrain, someone else might nominate Wolfgang, etc etc.) Most of this could be done online. Rather than over a few hours in LA. Sorry, long winded comment... Best, Adam
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann .org At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org *** Scanned
WebWatch's statement on the GNSO's gTLD report, so perhaps discussion in LA is the best way to resolve this. I simply intended to try to bring a really bright guy into the fold to be helpful to the ALAC (and to me), not to create a debate about what his title should be, procedure, rules, etc.
In my experience, actually doing work has counted for more in the ALAC than titles. (After all, what was my title when I did those drafts last month?) "Other guy from consumer.org" would be a quite adequate title to show up and get to work. R's, John
John L ha scritto:
WebWatch's statement on the GNSO's gTLD report, so perhaps discussion in LA is the best way to resolve this. I simply intended to try to bring a really bright guy into the fold to be helpful to the ALAC (and to me), not to create a debate about what his title should be, procedure, rules, etc.
In my experience, actually doing work has counted for more in the ALAC than titles. (After all, what was my title when I did those drafts last month?) "Other guy from consumer.org" would be a quite adequate title to show up and get to work.
I agree - also the "other appointments" section was originally meant to deal with appointments that the ALAC was requested to make to other working groups (eg Whois task forces), not to create new positions out of the blue. So I think that there is no need for formal appointments other than those that are formally required. The need might arise if you then want ICANN to pay these people the expenses for attending ICANN meeting, but then, I would rather suggest that ALAC + staff work out a clearer policy on [who and how gets to decide] who gets travel funding on the At Large budget. -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------
On Oct 18, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
I would rather suggest that ALAC + staff work out a clearer policy on [who and how gets to decide] who gets travel funding on the At Large budget.
I agree. I've suggested on the NARALO list that we work out a budget for travel and then give the ALAC and individual RALOs discretionary authority over how to spend it. For example, we might decide that we'd rather spend our money to send some big name consumer advocate to a particular ICANN meeting (Michael Moore or Ralph Nader at the public mic?) or an expert like a Jonathan Zittrain or Larry Lessig than to send one of our own. Or if we had __ travel slots, into which we could slot whomever we designated, we could worry less about "titles" and more about who is appropriate to send a given meeting based on the subjects under discussion. -- Bret Fausett (skype me at "lextext") smime.p7s is a digital signature http://www.imc.org/smime-pgpmime.html -------------------------------------
Yep that's the gist. Whether they are called 'ad-hoc" or "other" - they aren't part of the election currently underway. We will discuss and decide when we get a proposal to create that position (Beau is working on it) and then, if the position is created, we will be able to enter a process to determine who that advisor would be. Jacqueline -----Original Message----- From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 12:52 To: Adam Peake; Nick Ashton-Hart; At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] Revised List of Candidates At 17/10/2007 12:38 PM, Adam Peake wrote:
And where is the rule about the creation of ad hoc positions. It was in an earlier draft, but not the one ratified. Is there such a thing as an "ad hoc" position?
We have no such advisor positions at the moment. We do have provision for "other" appointments and an advisor to the committee could likely fit there, but the appointment process differs from those for officers and formal liaisons. When the subject was raised, Jacqueline pointed out that if we want such advisors, that may be fine, but they are not part of the formal elections that are being carried out and the idea can be discussed in Los Angeles (not trying to put words in Jacqueline's mouth, but that is what I remember the gist of her comments were). Alan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.13/1075 - Release Date: 10/17/2007 09:38 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date: 10/18/2007 09:54
Jacqueline A. Morris wrote:
Whether they are called 'ad-hoc" or "other" - they aren't part of the election currently underway.
They aren' t part of _any_ election.
We will discuss and decide when we get a proposal to create that position (Beau is working on it) and then, if the position is created, we will be able to enter a process to determine who that advisor would be.
Why? Who says there can only be one? ALAC needs as much policy help as it can get. If that means taking on multiple advisors, so long as the advice is sound and relevant, so much the better for our community. There is no restriction as to how many ad-hoc appointments can be made, and absolutely no valid reason to create a competitive process where none is called for. A simple accept/reject decision for each proposal would suffice. ALAC would be well advised not to turn away sincere and appropriate offers of assistance, especially in the area of policy development. Don't just think of yourselves, but consider the needs of ALSs and public members who are starved of plain-language help on policy issues. - Evan
I seem to recall that Vittorio was nominated by Robert and seconded by Annette(even though this may not be required now), but I haven't seen anything from him about the matter. Siavash
Did Vittorio accepted the nomination by sending a message of acceptance to the public ALAC list, or did the person who nominated him forward such an email (9.3.)
And where is the rule about the creation of ad hoc positions. It was in an earlier draft, but not the one ratified. Is there such a thing as an "ad hoc" position?
Best,
Adam
At 5:43 PM +0200 10/17/07, Nick Ashton-Hart wrote:
Dear All:
Upon research I find that despite all the seconding that has been going on for the various positions, seconds are not actually required, only nomination and acceptance of nomination. My apologies in particular to Robert, Jonathan, and Wolfgang.
The current list is therefore as below:
Nominations for Officer Positions
2007/8
Nominations Received and seconded on or before the 14th October 2007 deadline
ALAC Committee Officers
Chair
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (accepted)
Vice Chair
Vanda Scartezini (accepted)
Sebastien Bachollet (accepted)
Robert Guerra (accepted)
Rapporteur
No nominations
Liaisons
GNSO Liaison
Alan Greenberg (accepted)
ccNSO Liaison
Jacqueline Morris (accepted)
Adam Peake (declined)
Vittorio Bertola
SSAC Liaison
Robert Guerra (accepted)
IDNs
Xue Hong (accepted)
WHOIS None proposed
Working Groups
IDNs
WHOIS No nominations Registrant/Registrar Relations No nominations IPv4 IPv6 Migration No nominations New GTLDs No nominations
Ad-Hoc Positions
Special Adviser on Internet Governance Policy Jonathan Zittrain Wolfgang Kleinwachter
-- Regards,
Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: <mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org>nick.ashton-hart@icann.org Win IM: <mailto:ashtonhart@hotmail.com>ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: <mailto:nashtonhart@mac.com>nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: <https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart>https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
------------------------------------------------- IPM/IRNIC P.O.Box 19395-5564, Shahid Bahonar Sq. Tehran 19548, Iran Phone: (+98 21) 22 82 80 80; 22 82 80 81, ext 113 Cell: (+98 912)104 2501 Fax: (+98 21) 22 29 57 00 Email: shahshah@irnic.ir, shahshah@nic.ir -----------------------------------------------
Where has GAC liaison position gone? izumi 2007/10/18, Nick Ashton-Hart <nick.ashton-hart@icann.org>:
Dear All:
Upon research I find that despite all the seconding that has been going on for the various positions, seconds are not actually required, only nomination and acceptance of nomination. My apologies in particular to Robert, Jonathan, and Wolfgang.
The current list is therefore as below:
Nominations for Officer Positions
2007/8
Nominations Received and seconded on or before the 14th October 2007 deadline
ALAC Committee Officers
Chair
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (accepted) Vice Chair
Vanda Scartezini (accepted)
Sebastien Bachollet (accepted)
Robert Guerra (accepted) Rapporteur
No nominations
Liaisons GNSO Liaison
Alan Greenberg (accepted) ccNSO Liaison
Jacqueline Morris (accepted)
Adam Peake (declined)
Vittorio Bertola SSAC Liaison
Robert Guerra (accepted) IDNs
Xue Hong (accepted)
WHOIS
None proposed
Working Groups
IDNs
WHOIS
No nominations
Registrant/Registrar Relations
No nominations
IPv4 – IPv6 Migration
No nominations
New GTLDs
No nominations
Ad-Hoc Positions
Special Adviser on Internet Governance Policy
Jonathan Zittrain Wolfgang Kleinwachter
-- Regards,
Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
-- >> Izumi Aizu << Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita Kumon Center, Tama University, Tokyo Japan * * * * * << Writing the Future of the History >> www.anr.org
Since there was no consensus on whether to even have one it isn't in the list - the Committee are per Jacqueline and others discussing whether to have such a position in LA. On 17 Oct 2007, at 18:57, Izumi AIZU wrote:
Where has GAC liaison position gone?
izumi
2007/10/18, Nick Ashton-Hart <nick.ashton-hart@icann.org>:
Dear All:
Upon research I find that despite all the seconding that has been going on for the various positions, seconds are not actually required, only nomination and acceptance of nomination. My apologies in particular to Robert, Jonathan, and Wolfgang.
The current list is therefore as below:
Nominations for Officer Positions
2007/8
Nominations Received and seconded on or before the 14th October 2007 deadline
ALAC Committee Officers
Chair
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (accepted) Vice Chair
Vanda Scartezini (accepted)
Sebastien Bachollet (accepted)
Robert Guerra (accepted) Rapporteur
No nominations
Liaisons GNSO Liaison
Alan Greenberg (accepted) ccNSO Liaison
Jacqueline Morris (accepted)
Adam Peake (declined)
Vittorio Bertola SSAC Liaison
Robert Guerra (accepted) IDNs
Xue Hong (accepted)
WHOIS
None proposed
Working Groups
IDNs
WHOIS
No nominations
Registrant/Registrar Relations
No nominations
IPv4 – IPv6 Migration
No nominations
New GTLDs
No nominations
Ad-Hoc Positions
Special Adviser on Internet Governance Policy
Jonathan Zittrain Wolfgang Kleinwachter
-- Regards,
Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge- lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
--
Izumi Aizu <<
Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita Kumon Center, Tama University, Tokyo Japan * * * * * << Writing the Future of the History >> www.anr.org
Having been out for a few weeks, I lost track of the mailinglist. Previously I proposed to participate in the wg Registrant/Registrar Relations and as I see nobody has been pointed out for this wg I'm proposing myself for this position. I do not know if this is still possible seen the deadline. Best regards Rudi Vansnick ISOC Belgium Izumi AIZU schreef:
Where has GAC liaison position gone?
izumi
2007/10/18, Nick Ashton-Hart <nick.ashton-hart@icann.org>:
Dear All:
Upon research I find that despite all the seconding that has been going on for the various positions, seconds are not actually required, only nomination and acceptance of nomination. My apologies in particular to Robert, Jonathan, and Wolfgang.
The current list is therefore as below:
Nominations for Officer Positions
2007/8
Nominations Received and seconded on or before the 14th October 2007 deadline
ALAC Committee Officers
Chair
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (accepted) Vice Chair
Vanda Scartezini (accepted)
Sebastien Bachollet (accepted)
Robert Guerra (accepted) Rapporteur
No nominations
Liaisons GNSO Liaison
Alan Greenberg (accepted) ccNSO Liaison
Jacqueline Morris (accepted)
Adam Peake (declined)
Vittorio Bertola SSAC Liaison
Robert Guerra (accepted) IDNs
Xue Hong (accepted)
WHOIS
None proposed
Working Groups
IDNs
WHOIS
No nominations
Registrant/Registrar Relations
No nominations
IPv4 – IPv6 Migration
No nominations
New GTLDs
No nominations
Ad-Hoc Positions
Special Adviser on Internet Governance Policy
Jonathan Zittrain Wolfgang Kleinwachter
-- Regards,
Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
participants (12)
-
Adam Peake -
Alan Greenberg -
Brendler, Beau -
Bret Fausett -
Evan Leibovitch -
Izumi AIZU -
Jacqueline A. Morris -
John L -
Nick Ashton-Hart -
Rudi Vansnick -
Siavash Shahshahani -
Vittorio Bertola