- atrt2 - lists.icann.org

Tonights call - GAC related recommendations
by Jørgen C Abild Andersen Dec. 17, 2013

Dec. 17, 2013

Dear all Unfortunately I am prevented from attending the conference call tonight. Sorry about that - not least because I have few remarks/questions regarding the GAC-related recommendations, more specifically "Final recommendation: - Increased transparency of GAC related activities 1, g) and h)". I am sorry if I have missed possible answers to my questions in previous calls. Would it be possible to provide further background on the reasoning behind adding the two points (1 g) and h))? Reading through the corresponding paragraphs explaining facts and community input I wasn't able to identify the references that explain/provide basis for these new recommendations. Secondly, I am not completely sure that I understand the precise scope and meaning of the language of 1 g) "the role of GAC leadership" and again I apologise if I have missed information in any of the previous calls, but are we referring to a particular problem identified by the community? If that is not the case I am a bit reluctant inserting this point at this stage. My third point is related to the term "particular entity" used in 1 h) - again I am uncertain about the exact meaning as the term is very broad. If the reference is to the AC/SO's it might be helpful to clarify this in the next. I think it would be helpful for the implementation of the recommendations if we could provide more information explaining the rationale and facts if these new recommendations should be added to the final report. Best regards Jørgen

3 2

Re: [atrt2] ATRT2 Final Report - Draft #1
by Alan Greenberg Dec. 17, 2013

Dec. 17, 2013

Fiona, I did consider this carefully, and I addressed it when I sent out my updates on the 13th. >The AoC references cross-community deliberations >in regard to policy development. We have heard a >number of times, that things are working quite >well in regard to the ASO and the ccNSO, so it >would appear that the GNSO is the only area that >we really need to be focusing energy at this >point, and the only one where we have been >presented with evidence that we have a problem >that warrants an ATRT recommendation. Let's discuss it on the call if you feel there is still a need, so that I can better understand what needs to change. Alan At 17/12/2013 12:26 PM, Fiona Alexander wrote: >Thank you Larissa. > >One question with respect to new recommendation >9. The topic is cross community deliberations >but the recommendations focus exclusively on the >GNSO and the GNSO pdp process. On a call a few >weeks this was raised and I thought adjustments >were to be made to broaden this out? > >Fiona >________________________________________ >From: atrt2-bounces(a)icann.org >[atrt2-bounces(a)icann.org] On Behalf Of Larisa B. >Gurnick [larisa.gurnick(a)icann.org] >Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 11:29 AM >To: ATRT2 (atrt2(a)icann.org) >Subject: [atrt2] ATRT2 Final Report - Draft #1 > >Dear Review Team Members, >Attached is the Final Report Draft #1 for your >review. It incorporates all changes submitted >to date. Staff would appreciate your review to >ensure that your edits were accurately reflected in the report. > >Several aspects of the report require further work: > >· Executive Summary language to be updated ATRT2 > >· Summary of public comment for several >recommendations to be added ATRT2 > >· Synchronization of final >recommendations between Executive Summary and body of the report - staff > >· Formatting clean up Table of >Contents update, links from Executive Summary to >the body of the report, etc. - staff > >Staff proposes that the Review Team discuss and >resolve the following points during the upcoming call: > >1. Inclusion of Draft Recommendations, >along with Final Recommendations, in the body of the report > >2. Boilerplate text if there's nothing to >report for Public Comment section. Pauls >suggestion: "There were no specific public >comments on this issue, and/or any comments >received were in agreement with the Report's findings." > >3. Posting of Final Report with or >without translations? In considering the >timing, please note that ICANN is closed for >the holidays 24 December through 1 Jan and some >staff may not be available during this time. > >Best regards, > >Larisa B. Gurnick >Consultant/Senior Director, Organizational Reviews >Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >larisa.gurnick(a)icann.org<mailto:larisa.gurnick@icann.org> >310 383-8995 >_______________________________________________ >atrt2 mailing list >atrt2(a)icann.org >https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2

1 0

ATRT2 Final Report - Draft #1
by Larisa B. Gurnick Dec. 17, 2013

Dec. 17, 2013

Dear Review Team Members, Attached is the Final Report - Draft #1 for your review. It incorporates all changes submitted to date. Staff would appreciate your review to ensure that your edits were accurately reflected in the report. Several aspects of the report require further work: * Executive Summary language to be updated - ATRT2 * Summary of public comment for several recommendations to be added - ATRT2 * Synchronization of final recommendations between Executive Summary and body of the report - staff * Formatting clean up - Table of Contents update, links from Executive Summary to the body of the report, etc. - staff Staff proposes that the Review Team discuss and resolve the following points during the upcoming call: 1. Inclusion of Draft Recommendations, along with Final Recommendations, in the body of the report 2. Boilerplate text if there's nothing to report for Public Comment section. Paul's suggestion: "There were no specific public comments on this issue, and/or any comments received were in agreement with the Report's findings." 3. Posting of Final Report - with or without translations? In considering the timing, please note that ICANN is closed for the holidays 24 December through 1 Jan and some staff may not be available during this time. Best regards, Larisa B. Gurnick Consultant/Senior Director, Organizational Reviews Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) larisa.gurnick(a)icann.org<mailto:larisa.gurnick@icann.org> 310 383-8995

2 1

Edits to Recommendation 12 Finances
by Lise Fuhr Dec. 16, 2013

Dec. 16, 2013

Dear all, Attached is the revised version of recommendation 12 including the latest comments. There is a change to recommendation 12.3 because of the comments (in the final recommendation part). Please review and comment. Best, Jørgen and Lise

1 0

Edits post meeting of Friday the 13th.
by Avri Doria Dec. 15, 2013

Dec. 15, 2013

Hi, I made my changes in the file indicated by staff on Friday. I took some of the Staff recommended language, but in some cases either left the original language or produced new language that tried to take concerns brought up by the Staff and community comment into account. I have not yet gone back and updated the template based sections based on community comments. After finishing the reading will go back and do that. avri

1 1

Re: [atrt2] Cross Community Recommendation
by Alan Greenberg Dec. 15, 2013

Dec. 15, 2013

Forgot to add, this includes all incorporation of changes based on comments received (and there were a lot of them). At 15/12/2013 12:14 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote: >References and such will follow. Alan

1 0

Cross Community Recommendation
by Alan Greenberg Dec. 15, 2013

Dec. 15, 2013

References and such will follow. Alan

1 0

Revised GAC related recommendations
by Fiona Alexander Dec. 13, 2013

Dec. 13, 2013

Attached please find the GAC related recommendations template. The new additions are left in redline for ease of identification and begin on page 12. This includes a summary of the relevant public comments received up till 4 pm today. Fiona

2 3

Base document for current edits.
by Avri Doria Dec. 13, 2013

Dec. 13, 2013

Hi, I have no idea what the current base version of the document is for edits. Can someone please give me a clue. thanks avri

2 1

Board/GAC joint work on ATRT 2 reccs: suggested language
by Heather.Dryden＠ic.gc.ca Dec. 13, 2013

Dec. 13, 2013

Dear colleagues, As you know, there has been some back and forth to find the right wording for the ATRT 2 to make recommendations to the Board regarding the GAC. In the discussion the ATRT 2 held with the GAC in Buenos Aires, the Egyptian co-chair of the Board-GAC Recommendation Implementation Working Group reminded the RT about the successful joint effort in the WG to consider and implement the ATRT 1 reccs. Since this approach worked very well, the BGRI could again serve as the channel for such joint consideration of the ATRT 2 reccs, which leads me propose text along the lines of, "The ATRT recommends that the Board work jointly with the GAC to consider...". Best, Heather

1 0