September 2022 - CPWG - lists.icann.org

Re: [CPWG] Are Blockchain Domains within the Mission of ICANN - WAS RE: Questions to the board about distributed DNS
by Chokri Ben Romdhane Oct. 18, 2024

Oct. 18, 2024

Dear Friends, Please find the record of the Emerging Identifier Technologies <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/4ZhSDuzFnVqw66kYgnTuHdDzi_RH0IFCKqKuAzmmcFy7…> session , held during the ICANN75 meeting, it provides some use cases of the emerging identifiers technologie. Thank you @MOULOUD KHELIF <kelif(a)hotmail.com> for the reminder. Friendly regards Chokri Le sam. 27 août 2022 à 19:17, Evan Leibovitch <evan(a)telly.org> a écrit : > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 5:39 AM Chokri Ben Romdhane <chokribr(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> But be aware if you confirm that the collision issues is/will never >> happened , as you have mentioned in your previous mail, and cross your >> finger that the regular DNS market will continue to attract more customers, >> compared to those NFT, Blockchain TLDs considering the ease of DNS >> management and security they are conferred to end users. >> > > Hi again, > > You made one fatal error in your assessment above: Internet end-users are > not registrants. > > End users don't care about DNS management, and the security THEY seek is > access to registrant details in the case of domains used for abuse. > The "security" you mention protects registrants and works against the > interests of end-users. > > It's totally possible that the hubris of DNS alternatives may lead to > collisions, but end-users will never see the effect of that, Browsers > continue to use the ICANN root and to date have never seen the benefit of > pointing to alternames. Plus, two of the biggest browser makers, Google and > Microsoft, have a deep vested interest in obstructing any alternative DNS. > Any alternate DNS hoping to be successful would need to create its own > browser, which is what the TOR project did. > > So even if alternative DNSs create TLDs that duplicate ICANN's they will > never present any collision or confusion to end-users. The only losers will > be registrants in the alternate systems. I have zero pity for them and they > are certainly not ALAC's concern or even ICANN's. > > Cheers, > - Evan > >

11 33

Meeting invitation: At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Call on Wednesday, 05 October 2022 at 13:00 UTC
by ICANN At-Large Staff Sept. 28, 2022

Sept. 28, 2022

***If you require a dial out or need to state an apology, please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> with your preferred number*** Dear All, The next At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Call is scheduled for Wednesday, 05 October 2022 at 13:00 UTC for 90 mins. For other times: https://tinyurl.com/2nbxctkj The agenda (to be updated) and call details can be found at: https://community.icann.org/x/aoK8D<https://community.icann.org/x/EYSLD> Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/j/765717566?pwd=UTJCdWRSZVdJNEhOYW02OVBqQVQ1Zz09 / Passcode: #CPWG2345* Real time transcription (RTT) available at (subject to availability): https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=ICANN ADIGO Conference Bridge: EN, ES, FR: 3535 Toll-free access number (US and Canada): 800 550 6865 Other toll-free numbers: https://www.adigo.com/icann At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Wiki Space: https://community.icann.org/x/jYDpB If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Thank you. Kind Regards, At-Large Staff ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 1

NextGen Meeting Rooms
by Gisella Gruber Sept. 16, 2022

Sept. 16, 2022

Dear All, Please see locations hereafter: * Sunday 18 at 2:30 UTC (10:30 local time) – BANQUET HALL (conflict with At-Large Operations update) * Monday 19 at 7:00 UTC (15:00 local time) - this is when the ENS/DNS presentation will take place - CONFERENCE HALL 1 (conflict with ICANN Board and ALAC) * Monday 19 at 8:30 UTC (16:30 local time) – CONFERENCE HALL 1 (conflict with At-Large Diversity Survey on ICANN Leadership Groups) Thank you. Kind regards, Gisella From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of CPWG <cpwg(a)icann.org> Reply to: Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> Date: Thursday, 15 September 2022 at 20:54 To: CPWG <cpwg(a)icann.org> Subject: [CPWG] About ENS Dear all, As a follow up of the discussion on Blockchain domains, may I report that one of the NextGen presentations will address the “ENS vs. DNS” issue. I believe that it is worth noting that this topic is of interest to the newcomers. I believe that it could be interesting for the members of this group to check the NextGen presentations and meet the new generation. Actually, I believe that to listen to NextGen is worth regardless the topic of their presentation. The NextGen presentation will be in three parts: * Sunday 18 at 2:30 UTC (10:30 local time) * Monday 19 at 7:00 UTC (15:00 local time) - this is when the ENS/DNS presentation will take place * Monday 19 at 8:30 UTC (16:30 local time) Cheers, Roberto

2 2

About ENS
by Roberto Gaetano Sept. 15, 2022

Sept. 15, 2022

Dear all, As a follow up of the discussion on Blockchain domains, may I report that one of the NextGen presentations will address the “ENS vs. DNS” issue. I believe that it is worth noting that this topic is of interest to the newcomers. I believe that it could be interesting for the members of this group to check the NextGen presentations and meet the new generation. Actually, I believe that to listen to NextGen is worth regardless the topic of their presentation. The NextGen presentation will be in three parts: * Sunday 18 at 2:30 UTC (10:30 local time) * Monday 19 at 7:00 UTC (15:00 local time) - this is when the ENS/DNS presentation will take place * Monday 19 at 8:30 UTC (16:30 local time) Cheers, Roberto

2 2

IEEE SSIT ISTAS 2022 & 50 Years of IEEE SSIT - Virtual Conference - 10 to 12 November 2022
by gopal Sept. 14, 2022

Sept. 14, 2022

Dear All, On behalf of the Conference Committee of IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY 2022 (ISTAS22), I extend a warm welcome to the Virtual Conference scheduled between 10 - 12 November 2022, localized at Hong Kong. ISTAS is the flagship conference of IEEE Society on Social Implications of Technology [SSIT] We are very happy to have the celebrations of the 50 years of IEEE SSIT coinciding with ISTAS 2022. Please visit: https://www.istas22.org/ ISTAS 2022 has 11 tracks and two co-located full day events. Please visit: https://www.istas22.org/program/ I draw your attention to: Track 7: Town Hall on “Internet Governance” https://www.istas22.org/program/track-7/ with Prof. Izumi Aizu as the lead. The online registration is at: https://www.istas22.org/registration/ We solicit active participation from ICANN. Sincerely, Gopal T V ISTAS 2022 - Chair, Technical Programme Committee 0 9840121302 https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545 https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr. T V Gopal Professor Department of Computer Science and Engineering College of Engineering Anna University Chennai - 600 025, INDIA Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340 (Res) 24454753 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

GNSO TPR PDP meeting on Sep 5, 2022
by Steinar Grøtterød Sept. 13, 2022

Sept. 13, 2022

Dear all, Due to the cancellation of the CPWG meeting on Sep 7, 2022, I will inform the CPWG of the outcome of the CPWG informal letter to the TPR WG. >From the minutes * Update from Steiner on the At-Large summary of the CPWG discussion on Change of Registrant policy. See attached. * Had a fruitful discussion last week on the CPWG call. * Based on that discussion, if we are going to change anything on the transfer lock the CPWG would like some statistics/data supporting removing that part of the policy. But we don’t have any statistics. If we will have transfer lock period it might be reduced to less than 60 days. Specifically: “Input to the discussion were mostly connected to the question whether the present 60-days transfer lock after a change of registrant data is preventing domain name hijacking. Further - the majority of the CPWG attendees requested data about the volume of hijacked domain names. These statistics - if available, may indicate if the transfer lock after a change of registrant is needed. The discussion also covered whether a transfer lock is needed for mitigation of domain name hijacking.” * Discussion: * Wonder if Compliance has some data? * Registrars have indicated that they don’t have data. * Without data we should remove it. * From staff re: question about data: Compliance has provided data related to complaints about the lock itself in Phase 1A, but not specific enough in terms of hijacking. As to data to “prove” that a lock is necessary or not, we don’t have that level of breakdown/tracking to speak to that issue. * Compliance tracks transfer complaints in general, but does not break down to “inter registrar" vs. “COR”. * The best you can get is the NACK statistics from the Open Data Initiative, but only limited years and not recent. Does show significant use of the NACK, but can’t correlate it to hijacking. * Not sure that we can get valuable data as to why there was a NACK in the first place. * Registrars offer different levels of security and registrant can pick the model that fits their needs/shop around to get what they are looking for. * I also remember most complaints about COR to Compliance were people annoyed by not being to unlock their domains. For hijacked domains, the hijack happened even with COR process (which hijackers were able to bypass). * It’s a very interesting perspective. As registrars can and do provide security that is superior to minimum requirements under the Transfer Policy. Accordingly, it may be that this is the answer; leave it to registrants to select a registrar with desirable security protocols to prevent unauthorized transfer. All recordings for the Transfer Policy Review PDP WG call held on Tuesday, 06 September 2022 at 16:00 UTC can be found on the agenda wiki page <https://community.icann.org/x/BwVpD> (attendance included) and the GNSO Master calendar <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calen…> . Regards, Steinar Grøtterød

4 3

"Hindi Divas" - Universal Access and Multilingualism
by gopal Sept. 13, 2022

Sept. 13, 2022

gopal has shared a OneDrive for Business file with you. To view it, click the link below. <https://annauniv0-my.sharepoint.com/:i:/g/personal/gopal_annauniv_edu/ETdIn…> [https://r1.res.office365.com/owa/prem/images/dc-jpg_20.png]<https://annauniv0-my.sharepoint.com/:i:/g/personal/gopal_annauniv_edu/ETdIn…> Hindi_DIvas_14September2022.jpg<https://annauniv0-my.sharepoint.com/:i:/g/personal/gopal_annauniv_edu/ETdIn…> Dear All, Those interested in this subject may please see the attachment announcing a virtual event on 14 September 2022 [2.00 PM to 4.00 PM IST]. Presently, I am with the: FICCI - INDIAN LANGUAGE INTERNET ALLIANCE Sincerely, Gopal T V 0 9840121302 https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545 https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr. T V Gopal Professor Department of Computer Science and Engineering College of Engineering Anna University Chennai - 600 025, INDIA Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340 (Res) 24454753 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1 0

Meeting invitation: At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Call on Wednesday, 07 September 2022 at 18:00 UTC
by ICANN At-Large Staff Sept. 6, 2022

Sept. 6, 2022

***If you require a dial out or need to state an apology, please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> with your preferred number*** Dear All, The next At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Call is scheduled for Wednesday, 07 September 2022 at 18:00 UTC for 90 mins. For other times: https://tinyurl.com/y3mau43c The agenda (to be updated) and call details can be found at: https://community.icann.org/x/KYC8D<https://community.icann.org/x/EYSLD> Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/j/765717566?pwd=UTJCdWRSZVdJNEhOYW02OVBqQVQ1Zz09 / Passcode: #CPWG2345* ADIGO Conference Bridge: (Please note, there will not be interpretation due to ICANN75 Prep week) EN: 3535 Toll-free access number (US and Canada): 800 550 6865 Other toll-free numbers: https://www.adigo.com/icann At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Wiki Space: https://community.icann.org/x/jYDpB If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Thank you. Kind Regards, At-Large Staff ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 1

REMINDER / Meeting invitation: At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Call on Wednesday, 07 September 2022 at 18:00 UTC
by ICANN At-Large Staff Sept. 6, 2022

Sept. 6, 2022

***If you require a dial out or need to state an apology, please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> with your preferred number*** Dear All, The next At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Call is scheduled for Wednesday, 07 September 2022 at 18:00 UTC for 90 mins. For other times: https://tinyurl.com/y3mau43c The agenda (to be updated) and call details can be found at: https://community.icann.org/x/KYC8D Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/j/765717566?pwd=UTJCdWRSZVdJNEhOYW02OVBqQVQ1Zz09 / Passcode: #CPWG2345* ADIGO Conference Bridge: (Please note, there will not be interpretation due to ICANN75 Prep week) EN: 3535 Toll-free access number (US and Canada): 800 550 6865 Other toll-free numbers: https://www.adigo.com/icann At-Large Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) Wiki Space: https://community.icann.org/x/jYDpB If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Thank you. Kind Regards, At-Large Staff ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 0

Updated CoR poll question
by Steinar Grøtterød Sept. 2, 2022

Sept. 2, 2022

Dear all, CPWG members requested an updated question #4 to be sent to the mailing list. You may respond back with your input to Poll question #4 (updated): Question #4: Updates to Registrant data: Which information, if any, should result in a transfer lock? 1. Registrant Email Address 2. Registrant Name 3. Registrant Organization 4. All of the above 5. Other: Please state what your preference I have drafted a response to the TRP PDP working group. Comments are appreciated to https://docs.google.com/document/d/1md4V5y69CA8-DwgiAo4A-Srfp5WNCueKj7oseCt…. The draft do not include the poll question #4. The response will be sent to the TRP PDP WG on Monday Sept. 5, 2022. Regards, Steinar Grøtterød

1 0