[Gnso-edpd-team] Draft Use Cases from SSAC
Greetings ePDP team, With apologies for the missed deadline, please find attached 3 use cases from SSAC for your review. As discussed in Marrakech, the hope is that these can help inform our future discussions on disclosure of non-public registration data to security practitioners, reputation providers, and operational security teams. We look forward to discussion of these and other use cases in the small teams and/or in plenary. Thank You. -Ben and Greg, On behalf of SSAC ePDP support team
Sanctions will be imposed on SSAC for violating the use case nonprofileration agreement – and being late, too! More seriously, here is my take on the earlier use cases. I really think we only need to be discussing 4 or 5 of them, though I have not reviewed the late SSAC cases. TM Continue LEA1 OK to discuss LEA2 OK to discuss IPC-Copyright-Civil How is it different from TM case? IPC-Copyright-Criminal Duplicates LEA1, LEA2 IPC-TM-Criminal Duplicates LEA1, LEA2 IPC-UDRP-URS-Due-Process OK to discuss BC-1 Duplicates LEA1, LEA2 BC-2 ?? BC-3 Duplicates IPC-Copyright-Civil BC-4 Unnecessary BC-5 ?? BC-6 Out of mission BC-7 Unnecessary BC-8 Out of mission BC-9 Unnecessary and out of mission From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Ben Butler Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 12:31 AM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] [Gnso-edpd-team] Draft Use Cases from SSAC Greetings ePDP team, With apologies for the missed deadline, please find attached 3 use cases from SSAC for your review. As discussed in Marrakech, the hope is that these can help inform our future discussions on disclosure of non-public registration data to security practitioners, reputation providers, and operational security teams. We look forward to discussion of these and other use cases in the small teams and/or in plenary. Thank You. -Ben and Greg, On behalf of SSAC ePDP support team
It will be a good discussion today, since we strongly disagree with this assessment. Or that one person gets to decide which use cases are valid. Conflating BC-1 with LEA is a good example of a common misunderstanding, for example. From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Mueller, Milton L Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 12:20 AM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] [Gnso-edpd-team] Draft Use Cases from SSAC Sanctions will be imposed on SSAC for violating the use case nonprofileration agreement – and being late, too! More seriously, here is my take on the earlier use cases. I really think we only need to be discussing 4 or 5 of them, though I have not reviewed the late SSAC cases. TM Continue LEA1 OK to discuss LEA2 OK to discuss IPC-Copyright-Civil How is it different from TM case? IPC-Copyright-Criminal Duplicates LEA1, LEA2 IPC-TM-Criminal Duplicates LEA1, LEA2 IPC-UDRP-URS-Due-Process OK to discuss BC-1 Duplicates LEA1, LEA2 BC-2 ?? BC-3 Duplicates IPC-Copyright-Civil BC-4 Unnecessary BC-5 ?? BC-6 Out of mission BC-7 Unnecessary BC-8 Out of mission BC-9 Unnecessary and out of mission From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Ben Butler Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 12:31 AM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] [Gnso-edpd-team] Draft Use Cases from SSAC Greetings ePDP team, With apologies for the missed deadline, please find attached 3 use cases from SSAC for your review. As discussed in Marrakech, the hope is that these can help inform our future discussions on disclosure of non-public registration data to security practitioners, reputation providers, and operational security teams. We look forward to discussion of these and other use cases in the small teams and/or in plenary. Thank You. -Ben and Greg, On behalf of SSAC ePDP support team
participants (3)
-
Ben Butler -
Mark Svancarek (CELA) -
Mueller, Milton L