Gnso-ncph-leadership

Download

gnso-ncph-leadership@icann.org

January 2015

10 participants
2 discussions

Buenos Aires Conference?
by William Drake Jan. 29, 2015

Jan. 29, 2015

Hello We talked in DC about the possibility of doing a joint conference on the Friday before the BA meeting. Most people seemed favorably inclined. It would be pretty easy to organize, and there are various options, the path of least resistance being for the three CSG constituencies + NCUC NPOC and NCSG to each organize their own one hour session with some thematic coordination, perhaps complemented by a keynoter, lunch and reception. Alternatively, we could compress it to just an afternoon thing, but then would have to decide how to divide up the time and participation. If we are serious about pursing this, budget requests are due 28 February. In which case it might make sense for the respective groupings to discuss it a bit at their Constituency Day meetings in order to identify their preferred topic and designate someone to help with the budget request. If instead people are having second thoughts, please let the rest of us know so we can consider whether to proceed on a different basis. Thanks Bill *********************************************** William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN, www.ncuc.org william.drake(a)uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake(a)gmail.com (lists), www.williamdrake.org ***********************************************

5 5

Statement from NCPH meeting
by Avri Doria Jan. 27, 2015

Jan. 27, 2015

Hi, (trying this list as it was mentioned in the house meeting - though i do not know if everyone there is on the list) Can someone post the final copy of the letter to this list? Would like to forward it to the GNSO Review Team as well. Something I sent to the GNSO Review Team list: > > Another thing that was mentioned to me that we might want to explore. > An unnamed member of the staff did wonder why we wait around on the > review and on the SIC for revisions to the GNSO structure &c. Why, if > we do our own review and figure out the changes we want to make, > doesn't the GNSO just tell the the SIC what we want. > > I had to answer that I did not know why we show so little initiative, > and started to feel that maybe the GNSO is like one of those elephants > that are chained at birth when they can't break the chain and remain > chained as adults even though they could easily break the chains. cheers avri

6 12

Results per page: