July 2019 - IDN-WG - lists.icann.org

Re: [IDN-WG] [Bpf-localcontent] IGF 2019: Request Bilateral Rooms during the 14th IGF in Berlin
by Satish Babu July 29, 2019

July 29, 2019

Thanks Roberto! satish On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 7:13 PM Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi all. > I requested the room yesterday, please see > https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/alac-idn-working-group. > For the time being, the status is pending. > Will keep you informed. > Cheers, > Roberto > > > On 27.07.2019, at 04:17, Satish Babu <sb(a)inapp.com> wrote: > > Pls make the reservation for an hour. I think sometime on Day 2 would be > fine (since we do not have the full schedule at this time, it is hard to be > more specific...) > > > > > > > satish > > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 2:29 AM Roberto Gaetano < > roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Satish, >> Any preference for date/time? >> The rooms are filling in rapidly, so I would like to make a reservation >> latest 12:00 UTC tomorrow (Saturday). >> I will make sure that we do not overlap with any other UA or IDN sessions. >> I assume we ask for one full hour. >> Cheers, >> Roberto >> >> >> On 25.07.2019, at 03:31, Satish Babu <sb(a)inapp.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Roberto >> >> I would also prefer an open meeting, so that we take the message to the >> widest possible set of people. >> >> Would you be able to request for a room for this meeting? Thanks! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> satish >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 3:35 AM Roberto Gaetano < >> roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Satish >>> I was rather thinking about an open meeting, in conjunction with a call >>> for interest, to take the opportunity to get also people who are not in the >>> ICANN circles but in the wide stakeholder community. I bet that a lot of >>> them will be just users, that we can even get onboard. >>> Of course, if there are issues that require, for instance, a vote of the >>> WG, only members will be allowed to do so, but in general terms I believe >>> that wider participation will be beneficial to the WG. >>> Anyway, a closed meeting would be also OK. In either case, I believe >>> that we need to submit a request. I don’t think that we need to specify in >>> the request all the details about the meeting, but I am sure that we need >>> to provide an idea about the size of the room. >>> OTOH, I am not sure whether we are still on time to ask for a Flash >>> Session - I believe that the programme has been already drafted and is in a >>> sort of “last call for comments” status, which means that it will be >>> extremely unlikely that requests for new sessions are accepted - unless >>> already approved sessions are cancelled. >>> A DC-DNSI (Dynamic Coalition on DNS Issues) session will also take >>> place, but their focus will be different than the broad view of the >>> Internet Users. >>> Cheers, >>> Roberto >>> >>> >>> On 24.07.2019, at 16:28, Satish Babu <sb(a)inapp.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Roberto, >>> >>> I am fully in support of a meeting in Berlin, although it will not be an >>> official workshop. I wonder if we can try for a Flash session on UA as >>> well, for the general public (as I presume our meeting will be a >>> closed-door meeting). >>> >>> With kind regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> satish >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 7:49 PM Roberto Gaetano < >>> roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Folks, >>>> Shall we plan for a face-to-face meeting in Berlin? >>>> There is a growing interest about UA and multilingualism - for >>>> instance, a LACRALO WG has just started few weeks ago. >>>> I strongly believe that the role of users is becoming very important, >>>> because we can put pressure at multiple levels to check compliance and push >>>> for solutions. >>>> I am also wondering whether we should ask for a new call for >>>> participation because I am not sure that our existence is well-known. I >>>> copy the leadership for advice. >>>> Another, separate, issue is whether we should review the charter of the >>>> WG to adapt it to reflect the new priorities. >>>> Cheers, >>>> Roberto >>>> >>>> >>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>> >>>> From: Anja Gengo <anja.gengo(a)un.org<mailto:anja.gengo@un.org>> >>>> Subject: [Bpf-localcontent] IGF 2019: Request Bilateral Rooms during >>>> the 14th IGF in Berlin >>>> Date: 23. July 2019 at 17:23:07 CEST >>>> To: Undisclosed recipients:; >>>> >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> The IGF Secretariat is accepting requests to reserve bilateral meeting >>>> rooms at the 14th IGF in Berlin< >>>> https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/>. Requests can be submitted >>>> by 15 September 2019 through the IGF website: >>>> https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/room_reservations/11/25 The >>>> bilateral rooms will be available at the meeting venue< >>>> https://www.igf2019.berlin/IGF/Navigation/EN/be-there/be-there.html> >>>> from Day 0 (25 November) through Day 4 (29 November). >>>> >>>> Please note that all requests will be subject to the approval of the >>>> IGF Secretariat, depending on the demand and available capacity. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> IGF Secretariat >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Igfregionals mailing list >>>> Igfregionals(a)intgovforum.org<mailto:Igfregionals@intgovforum.org> >>>> To unsubscribe or manage your options please go to >>>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfregionals_intgovforum.org >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Bpf-localcontent mailing list >>>> Bpf-localcontent(a)intgovforum.org >>>> To unsubscribe or manage your options please go to >>>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf-localcontent_intgovforum.org >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> IDN-WG mailing list >>>> IDN-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg >>>> >>>> IDN WG Wiki: >>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >>>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >>>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) >>>> and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) >>>> You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >>>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >>>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >>> >>> >>> >> >

1 0

Fwd: [Bpf-localcontent] IGF 2019: Request Bilateral Rooms during the 14th IGF in Berlin
by Roberto Gaetano July 24, 2019

July 24, 2019

Folks, Shall we plan for a face-to-face meeting in Berlin? There is a growing interest about UA and multilingualism - for instance, a LACRALO WG has just started few weeks ago. I strongly believe that the role of users is becoming very important, because we can put pressure at multiple levels to check compliance and push for solutions. I am also wondering whether we should ask for a new call for participation because I am not sure that our existence is well-known. I copy the leadership for advice. Another, separate, issue is whether we should review the charter of the WG to adapt it to reflect the new priorities. Cheers, Roberto Begin forwarded message: From: Anja Gengo <anja.gengo(a)un.org<mailto:anja.gengo@un.org>> Subject: [Bpf-localcontent] IGF 2019: Request Bilateral Rooms during the 14th IGF in Berlin Date: 23. July 2019 at 17:23:07 CEST To: Undisclosed recipients:; Dear All, The IGF Secretariat is accepting requests to reserve bilateral meeting rooms at the 14th IGF in Berlin<https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/>. Requests can be submitted by 15 September 2019 through the IGF website: https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/room_reservations/11/25 The bilateral rooms will be available at the meeting venue<https://www.igf2019.berlin/IGF/Navigation/EN/be-there/be-there.html> from Day 0 (25 November) through Day 4 (29 November). Please note that all requests will be subject to the approval of the IGF Secretariat, depending on the demand and available capacity. Best regards, IGF Secretariat _______________________________________________ Igfregionals mailing list Igfregionals(a)intgovforum.org<mailto:Igfregionals@intgovforum.org> To unsubscribe or manage your options please go to http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfregionals_intgovforum.org _______________________________________________ Bpf-localcontent mailing list Bpf-localcontent(a)intgovforum.org To unsubscribe or manage your options please go to http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf-localcontent_intgovforum.org

5 6

Please add me to this wg list
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org July 17, 2019

July 17, 2019

I´d like to be part of this group tks Sylvia Herlein Leite internauta Brasil sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org

1 0

Fwd: [UA-Measurement] Independent evaluation work in LAC starting
by Roberto Gaetano July 11, 2019

July 11, 2019

Hi all. I have received this message that puzzles me a bit. How come there has been no information in our WG about this LACRALO initiative? Thanks, Roberto Begin forwarded message: From: "Mark W. Datysgeld" <mark(a)governanceprimer.com<mailto:mark@governanceprimer.com>> Subject: [UA-Measurement] Independent evaluation work in LAC starting Date: 11. July 2019 at 01:17:25 CEST To: "ua-measurement(a)icann.org<mailto:ua-measurement@icann.org>" <ua-measurement(a)icann.org<mailto:ua-measurement@icann.org>> Hello everyone, an independent IDNs study group was assembled within ALAC-LACRALO. They showed excitement for multilingualism when I first presented it at LAC DNS Forum last year, and are now moving into working on the subject. Their initial aim is to perform regional evaluations for e-mail acceptance in top local websites of different LAC countries, like the one my team did in Brazil last year (attached). My key concern is that, as we galvanize UA, interest in these smaller studies will grow, and there is a need to keep all that information useful and accessible. There are two priorities I am currently working on: 1) Creating a 1-page document describing which websites are supposed to be tested and how people should do it. We have followed some guidelines excluding malware domains but not discriminating websites due to their content, for example. 2) In anticipation of the global e-mail tests report that I hope will be released this week, I think any measurement report moving forward should follow an appropriate metadata schema that allows us to aggregate data over the years and across all regions. I am including a copy of the one we developed attached to this e-mail (it is an excerpt from the full report). I would appreciate any information on how this collides with any preexisting UA documents, as well as people or teams that are potentially working in parallel in similar matters, and so on. I think it's vital to be proactive at this early stage. Regards, -- Mark W. Datysgeld from Governance Primer [www.markwd.website<http://www.markwd.website>] Representing businesses in IG together with AR-TARC and ABES _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

1 0