Enclosed is a draft of the presentation. The draft is not the template required (?) by ICANN. I decided to focus on content first, especially since the ICANN template is quite limiting and demanding. The slides I have made are in a template without any "style". This is probably too much, but kind of includes the entire presentation. I will process it again tomorrow and on Wednesday. We are expected meet again for one long session, but I have not got any invitation. I think it is now on Thursday 2021-09-23. Is that correct? 16h00-18h00 UTC? Mats -- --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se Technical Expert Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/ From: Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Reply to: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 14 September 2021 at 21:43 To: ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Subject: [Latingp] ICANN72 Prep Week - RZ-LGR Update Dear Mats, and all Latin GP members, Please find attached the template for ICANN 72 Prep Week presentation slide. The session information are tentatively as follows. Session Date and Time: 14 October 2021, 18.00 – 19.00 UTC. Session Name: Root Zone Label Generation Rules (RZ-LGR) Update Agenda: 1. Overview of Latin Script RZ-LGR Proposal (20mins) (Latin GP) 2. Overview of Japanese Script RZ-LGR Proposal (20mins) (J-GP) 3. RZ-LGR version 5 (20mins) (IP) We propose that the Q&A is included in the 20 minutes of each agenda item. Therefore, kindly prepare a 10-15 minute presentation material and allow 5-10 minutes for Q&A. Should you have any questions, please let us know. Regards, Pitinan
Hi Mats, A couple of comments: - Slide 5. We might want to mention that the IP has added a couple of characters to the MSR at our suggestion. - Slide 6: We will need to explain briefly what EGDIS is. However I think that explanation can be done in the presentation, without needing to be on the slide. - Slide 7: For clarity, title the slide "Chapter 4 - continued" - Slide 8: I think we want to state that, if a letter plus diacritic exists as a Unicode codepoint, - Slides 9, 10, and 12: As with Slide 7, not that this is a continuation of the previous slide for the same chapter. - Slide 9, bullet 4: Shouldn't we delete the "too" at the end? - Slide 11, last bullet: Change "is" to "are: - Slide 13: It might help to modify the text to say "theyare considered by some members of the Latin GP to have enough similarity to be considered to be"visually confusable"." Bill On Monday, September 20, 2021, 01:12:59 PM PDT, Mats Dufberg via Latingp <latingp@icann.org> wrote: <!--#yiv0008276032 _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv0008276032 #yiv0008276032 p.yiv0008276032MsoNormal, #yiv0008276032 li.yiv0008276032MsoNormal, #yiv0008276032 div.yiv0008276032MsoNormal {margin:0cm;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv0008276032 span.yiv0008276032EmailStyle19 {font-family:"Courier New";color:windowtext;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none none;}#yiv0008276032 .yiv0008276032MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered {}#yiv0008276032 div.yiv0008276032WordSection1 {}#yiv0008276032 _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv0008276032 ol {margin-bottom:0cm;}#yiv0008276032 ul {margin-bottom:0cm;}--> Enclosed is a draft of the presentation. The draft is not the template required (?) by ICANN. I decided to focus on content first, especially since the ICANN template is quite limiting and demanding. The slides I have made are in a template without any "style". This is probably too much, but kind of includes the entire presentation. I will process it again tomorrow and on Wednesday. We are expected meet again for one long session, but I have not got any invitation. I think it is now on Thursday 2021-09-23. Is that correct? 16h00-18h00 UTC? Mats -- --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se Technical Expert Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/ From:Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Reply to: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 14 September 2021 at 21:43 To: ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Subject: [Latingp] ICANN72 Prep Week - RZ-LGR Update Dear Mats, and all Latin GP members, Please find attached the template for ICANN 72 Prep Week presentation slide. The session information are tentatively as follows. Session Date and Time: 14 October 2021, 18.00 – 19.00 UTC. Session Name: Root Zone Label Generation Rules (RZ-LGR) Update Agenda: - Overview of Latin Script RZ-LGR Proposal (20mins) (Latin GP) - Overview of Japanese Script RZ-LGR Proposal (20mins) (J-GP) - RZ-LGR version 5 (20mins) (IP) We propose that the Q&A is included in the 20 minutes of each agenda item. Therefore, kindly prepare a 10-15 minute presentation material and allow 5-10 minutes for Q&A. Should you have any questions, please let us know. Regards, Pitinan _______________________________________________ Latingp mailing list Latingp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi Mats, thank you very much for your work. Apart from the items already mentioned by Dennis and Bill, I found the following worth mentioning: * page 3: typo in "Appendicies" => "Appendices" * page 4: trailing comma at last bullet point * page 4: agree with Dennis, maybe change "binding" to "authoritative"? * page 6: it's not just level 4, but also the ones above (below?), maybe change this to: "... those on levels 1 - 4 on the ..." * page 7: "..., they but can be found ..." sounds strange to me; unless the native speakers object, I'd change it to "..., but they can be found ..." * page 10: Agree with Dennis, please rephrase as we already did include characters not in MSR, thereby creating a new version of MSR. * page 12: Instead of 'Sharp S and "s"' I guess it should be 'Sharp S and "ss"' * page 13: "The appendix contain" -> "The appendix contains" (+ s). * page 13: I would remove the second "considered to be", because it's already stated before that they are "considered to have". So, just write 'they are considered to have enough similarity to be "visually confusable".' Cheers, Michael -- ____________________________________________________________________ | | | knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH ------- Technologiepark Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9 44227 Dortmund Germany Dipl.-Informatiker Fon: +49 231 9703-0 Fax: +49 231 9703-200 Dr. Michael Bauland SIP: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Software Development E-mail: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Register Court: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728 Chief Executive Officers: Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp
Slide 6: As Michael said, Languages with EGIDS level 4 and above were studied (and of course some of Level 5)x, and agree with Bill to be prepared to give a short description of what EGIDS means. Last line “...EGIDS level...” I have updated to "EGIDS scale value". Fine? Slide 7: “....documented in the report, but they can be found ....” Fixed. Slide 12: “ß” could be added after “Sharp S”, and as Michael mentioned its “ss” Fixed. Slide 13: “The appendix contains candidate variant...”, and “The appendix is for reference for anybody doing...” Fixed. Thank you for the comments. The new version is sent in a separate email Mats -- --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se Technical Expert Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/ From: Hazem Hezzah <hhezzah.las@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, 22 September 2021 at 02:16 To: Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se> Cc: ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Subject: RE: [Latingp] ICANN72 Prep Week - RZ-LGR Update Hello Mats, Appreciate your effort. After the 3 previous mails with comments, here my notes. * Slide 6: As Michael said, Languages with EGIDS level 4 and above were studied (and of course some of Level 5)x, and agree with Bill to be prepared to give a short description of what EGIDS means. Last line “...EGIDS level...” * Slide 7: “....documented in the report, but they can be found ....” * Slide 12: “ß” could be added after “Sharp S”, and as Michael mentioned its “ss” * Slide 13: “The appendix contains candidate variant...”, and “The appendix is for reference for anybody doing...” Reagrds, Hazem Hezzah From: Michael Bauland via Latingp<mailto:latingp@icann.org> Sent: 21 September 2021 08:37 To: Mats Dufberg<mailto:mats.dufberg@iis.se> Cc: latingp@icann.org<mailto:latingp@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Latingp] ICANN72 Prep Week - RZ-LGR Update Hi Mats, thank you very much for your work. Apart from the items already mentioned by Dennis and Bill, I found the following worth mentioning: * page 3: typo in "Appendicies" => "Appendices" * page 4: trailing comma at last bullet point * page 4: agree with Dennis, maybe change "binding" to "authoritative"? * page 6: it's not just level 4, but also the ones above (below?), maybe change this to: "... those on levels 1 - 4 on the ..." * page 7: "..., they but can be found ..." sounds strange to me; unless the native speakers object, I'd change it to "..., but they can be found ..." * page 10: Agree with Dennis, please rephrase as we already did include characters not in MSR, thereby creating a new version of MSR. * page 12: Instead of 'Sharp S and "s"' I guess it should be 'Sharp S and "ss"' * page 13: "The appendix contain" -> "The appendix contains" (+ s). * page 13: I would remove the second "considered to be", because it's already stated before that they are "considered to have". So, just write 'they are considered to have enough similarity to be "visually confusable".' Cheers, Michael -- ____________________________________________________________________ | | | knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH ------- Technologiepark Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9 44227 Dortmund Germany Dipl.-Informatiker Fon: +49 231 9703-0 Fax: +49 231 9703-200 Dr. Michael Bauland SIP: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Software Development E-mail: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Register Court: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728 Chief Executive Officers: Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp _______________________________________________ Latingp mailing list Latingp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
* page 3: typo in "Appendicies" => "Appendices" Fixed. * page 4: trailing comma at last bullet point Fixed. * page 4: agree with Dennis, maybe change "binding" to "authoritative"? "normative"? * page 6: it's not just level 4, but also the ones above (below?), maybe change this to: "... those on levels 1 - 4 on the ..." Fixed. * page 7: "..., they but can be found ..." sounds strange to me; unless the native speakers object, I'd change it to "..., but they can be found ..." Agree. Fixed. * page 10: Agree with Dennis, please rephrase as we already did include characters not in MSR, thereby creating a new version of MSR. You are focusing on our process. In our proposal, which is what the reader reads, we do not include any code point outside of MSR at the date of the proposal. * page 12: Instead of 'Sharp S and "s"' I guess it should be 'Sharp S and "ss"' Fixed. * page 13: "The appendix contain" -> "The appendix contains" (+ s). Fixed. * page 13: I would remove the second "considered to be", because it's already stated before that they are "considered to have". So, just write 'they are considered to have enough similarity to be "visually confusable".' Already updated. I hope the new version is good. Thanks for comments. I will send the updated presentation when I have processed all comments. Mats -- --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se Technical Expert Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/ -----Original Message----- From: Michael Bauland <Michael.Bauland@knipp.de> Date: Tuesday, 21 September 2021 at 08:36 To: Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se> Cc: ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Latingp] ICANN72 Prep Week - RZ-LGR Update Hi Mats, thank you very much for your work. Apart from the items already mentioned by Dennis and Bill, I found the following worth mentioning: * page 3: typo in "Appendicies" => "Appendices" * page 4: trailing comma at last bullet point * page 4: agree with Dennis, maybe change "binding" to "authoritative"? * page 6: it's not just level 4, but also the ones above (below?), maybe change this to: "... those on levels 1 - 4 on the ..." * page 7: "..., they but can be found ..." sounds strange to me; unless the native speakers object, I'd change it to "..., but they can be found ..." * page 10: Agree with Dennis, please rephrase as we already did include characters not in MSR, thereby creating a new version of MSR. * page 12: Instead of 'Sharp S and "s"' I guess it should be 'Sharp S and "ss"' * page 13: "The appendix contain" -> "The appendix contains" (+ s). * page 13: I would remove the second "considered to be", because it's already stated before that they are "considered to have". So, just write 'they are considered to have enough similarity to be "visually confusable".' Cheers, Michael -- ____________________________________________________________________ | | | knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH ------- Technologiepark Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9 44227 Dortmund Germany Dipl.-Informatiker Fon: +49 231 9703-0 Fax: +49 231 9703-200 Dr. Michael Bauland SIP: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Software Development E-mail: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Register Court: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728 Chief Executive Officers: Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp
• Slide 5. We might want to mention that the IP has added a couple of characters to the MSR at our suggestion. Updated. • Slide 6: We will need to explain briefly what EGDIS is. However I think that explanation can be done in the presentation, without needing to be on the slide. Already updated. • Slide 7: For clarity, title the slide "Chapter 4 - continued" Updated, and a few more places. • Slide 8: I think we want to state that, if a letter plus diacritic exists as a Unicode codepoint, Incomplete comment. What? • Slides 9, 10, and 12: As with Slide 7, not that this is a continuation of the previous slide for the same chapter. Done. • Slide 9, bullet 4: Shouldn't we delete the "too" at the end? Done. • Slide 11, last bullet: Change "is" to "are: Done. • Slide 13: It might help to modify the text to say "they are considered by some members of the Latin GP to have enough similarity to be considered to be "visually confusable"." I've already updated based on Dennis' comment. Does the new text work? Thanks for comments. I will send the updated presentation when I have processed all comments. Mats -- --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se Technical Expert Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/ From: Bill Jouris <b_jouris@yahoo.com> Date: Monday, 20 September 2021 at 23:27 To: ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>, Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se> Subject: Re: [Latingp] ICANN72 Prep Week - RZ-LGR Update Hi Mats, A couple of comments: * Slide 5. We might want to mention that the IP has added a couple of characters to the MSR at our suggestion. * Slide 6: We will need to explain briefly what EGDIS is. However I think that explanation can be done in the presentation, without needing to be on the slide. * Slide 7: For clarity, title the slide "Chapter 4 - continued" * Slide 8: I think we want to state that, if a letter plus diacritic exists as a Unicode codepoint, * Slides 9, 10, and 12: As with Slide 7, not that this is a continuation of the previous slide for the same chapter. * Slide 9, bullet 4: Shouldn't we delete the "too" at the end? * Slide 11, last bullet: Change "is" to "are: * Slide 13: It might help to modify the text to say "they are considered by some members of the Latin GP to have enough similarity to be considered to be "visually confusable"." Bill On Monday, September 20, 2021, 01:12:59 PM PDT, Mats Dufberg via Latingp <latingp@icann.org> wrote: Enclosed is a draft of the presentation. The draft is not the template required (?) by ICANN. I decided to focus on content first, especially since the ICANN template is quite limiting and demanding. The slides I have made are in a template without any "style". This is probably too much, but kind of includes the entire presentation. I will process it again tomorrow and on Wednesday. We are expected meet again for one long session, but I have not got any invitation. I think it is now on Thursday 2021-09-23. Is that correct? 16h00-18h00 UTC? Mats -- --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se Technical Expert Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/ From: Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Reply to: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 14 September 2021 at 21:43 To: ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Subject: [Latingp] ICANN72 Prep Week - RZ-LGR Update Dear Mats, and all Latin GP members, Please find attached the template for ICANN 72 Prep Week presentation slide. The session information are tentatively as follows. Session Date and Time: 14 October 2021, 18.00 – 19.00 UTC. Session Name: Root Zone Label Generation Rules (RZ-LGR) Update Agenda: 1. Overview of Latin Script RZ-LGR Proposal (20mins) (Latin GP) 2. Overview of Japanese Script RZ-LGR Proposal (20mins) (J-GP) 3. RZ-LGR version 5 (20mins) (IP) We propose that the Q&A is included in the 20 minutes of each agenda item. Therefore, kindly prepare a 10-15 minute presentation material and allow 5-10 minutes for Q&A. Should you have any questions, please let us know. Regards, Pitinan _______________________________________________ Latingp mailing list Latingp@icann.org<mailto:Latingp@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi Mats, Sorry about the truncated comment on Slide 8. What I intended to say was: I think we want to state that, if a letter plus diacritic exists as a Unicode codepoint, that will be used in preference to the letter codepount plus a combining diacritic codepoint. Bill Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 3:02 PM, Mats Dufberg<mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se> wrote: <!--#yiv7818032251 _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv7818032251 #yiv7818032251 p.yiv7818032251MsoNormal, #yiv7818032251 li.yiv7818032251MsoNormal, #yiv7818032251 div.yiv7818032251MsoNormal {margin:0cm;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv7818032251 a:link, #yiv7818032251 span.yiv7818032251MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv7818032251 p.yiv7818032251msonormal, #yiv7818032251 li.yiv7818032251msonormal, #yiv7818032251 div.yiv7818032251msonormal {margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv7818032251 span.yiv7818032251EmailStyle25 {font-family:"Courier New";color:windowtext;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none none;}#yiv7818032251 .yiv7818032251MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered {}#yiv7818032251 div.yiv7818032251WordSection1 {}#yiv7818032251 _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv7818032251 ol {margin-bottom:0cm;}#yiv7818032251 ul {margin-bottom:0cm;}--> • Slide 5. We might want to mention that the IP has added a couple of characters to the MSR at our suggestion. Updated. • Slide 6: We will need to explain briefly what EGDIS is. However I think that explanation can be done in the presentation, without needing to be on the slide. Already updated. • Slide 7: For clarity, title the slide "Chapter 4 - continued" Updated, and a few more places. • Slide 8: I think we want to state that, if a letter plus diacritic exists as a Unicode codepoint, Incomplete comment. What? • Slides 9, 10, and 12: As with Slide 7, not that this is a continuation of the previous slide for the same chapter. Done. • Slide 9, bullet 4: Shouldn't we delete the "too" at the end? Done. • Slide 11, last bullet: Change "is" to "are: Done. • Slide 13: It might help to modify the text to say "they are considered by some members of the Latin GP to have enough similarity to be considered to be "visually confusable"." I've already updated based on Dennis' comment. Does the new text work? Thanks for comments. I will send the updated presentation when I have processed all comments. Mats -- --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se Technical Expert Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/ From: Bill Jouris <b_jouris@yahoo.com> Date: Monday, 20 September 2021 at 23:27 To: ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>, Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se> Subject: Re: [Latingp] ICANN72 Prep Week - RZ-LGR Update Hi Mats, A couple of comments: - Slide 5. We might want to mention that the IP has added a couple of characters to the MSR at our suggestion. - Slide 6: We will need to explain briefly what EGDIS is. However I think that explanation can be done in the presentation, without needing to be on the slide. - Slide 7: For clarity, title the slide "Chapter 4 - continued" - Slide 8: I think we want to state that, if a letter plus diacritic exists as a Unicode codepoint, - Slides 9, 10, and 12: As with Slide 7, not that this is a continuation of the previous slide for the same chapter. - Slide 9, bullet 4: Shouldn't we delete the "too" at the end? - Slide 11, last bullet: Change "is" to "are: - Slide 13: It might help to modify the text to say "they are consideredby some members of the Latin GP to have enough similarity to be considered to be "visually confusable"." Bill On Monday, September 20, 2021, 01:12:59 PM PDT, Mats Dufberg via Latingp <latingp@icann.org> wrote: Enclosed is a draft of the presentation. The draft is not the template required (?) by ICANN. I decided to focus on content first, especially since the ICANN template is quite limiting and demanding. The slides I have made are in a template without any "style". This is probably too much, but kind of includes the entire presentation. I will process it again tomorrow and on Wednesday. We are expected meet again for one long session, but I have not got any invitation. I think it is now on Thursday 2021-09-23. Is that correct? 16h00-18h00 UTC? Mats -- --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se Technical Expert Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/ From:Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Reply to: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 14 September 2021 at 21:43 To: ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Subject: [Latingp] ICANN72 Prep Week - RZ-LGR Update Dear Mats, and all Latin GP members, Please find attached the template for ICANN 72 Prep Week presentation slide. The session information are tentatively as follows. Session Date and Time: 14 October 2021, 18.00 – 19.00 UTC. Session Name: Root Zone Label Generation Rules (RZ-LGR) Update Agenda: - Overview of Latin Script RZ-LGR Proposal (20mins) (Latin GP) - Overview of Japanese Script RZ-LGR Proposal (20mins) (J-GP) - RZ-LGR version 5 (20mins) (IP) We propose that the Q&A is included in the 20 minutes of each agenda item. Therefore, kindly prepare a 10-15 minute presentation material and allow 5-10 minutes for Q&A. Should you have any questions, please let us know. Regards, Pitinan _______________________________________________ Latingp mailing list Latingp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
I updated slide 8. Is that fine? New version of the slide deck is enclosed. Mats -- --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se Technical Expert Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/ From: Bill Jouris <b_jouris@yahoo.com> Reply to: "b_jouris@yahoo.com" <b_jouris@yahoo.com> Date: Friday, 24 September 2021 at 02:18 To: Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se>, ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Latingp] ICANN72 Prep Week - RZ-LGR Update Hi Mats, Sorry about the truncated comment on Slide 8. What I intended to say was: I think we want to state that, if a letter plus diacritic exists as a Unicode codepoint, that will be used in preference to the letter codepount plus a combining diacritic codepoint. Bill Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android<https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_Andr...> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 3:02 PM, Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se> wrote: • Slide 5. We might want to mention that the IP has added a couple of characters to the MSR at our suggestion. Updated. • Slide 6: We will need to explain briefly what EGDIS is. However I think that explanation can be done in the presentation, without needing to be on the slide. Already updated. • Slide 7: For clarity, title the slide "Chapter 4 - continued" Updated, and a few more places. • Slide 8: I think we want to state that, if a letter plus diacritic exists as a Unicode codepoint, Incomplete comment. What? • Slides 9, 10, and 12: As with Slide 7, not that this is a continuation of the previous slide for the same chapter. Done. • Slide 9, bullet 4: Shouldn't we delete the "too" at the end? Done. • Slide 11, last bullet: Change "is" to "are: Done. • Slide 13: It might help to modify the text to say "they are considered by some members of the Latin GP to have enough similarity to be considered to be "visually confusable"." I've already updated based on Dennis' comment. Does the new text work? Thanks for comments. I will send the updated presentation when I have processed all comments. Mats -- --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se Technical Expert Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/ From: Bill Jouris <b_jouris@yahoo.com> Date: Monday, 20 September 2021 at 23:27 To: ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org>, Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se> Subject: Re: [Latingp] ICANN72 Prep Week - RZ-LGR Update Hi Mats, A couple of comments: * Slide 5. We might want to mention that the IP has added a couple of characters to the MSR at our suggestion. * Slide 6: We will need to explain briefly what EGDIS is. However I think that explanation can be done in the presentation, without needing to be on the slide. * Slide 7: For clarity, title the slide "Chapter 4 - continued" * Slide 8: I think we want to state that, if a letter plus diacritic exists as a Unicode codepoint, * Slides 9, 10, and 12: As with Slide 7, not that this is a continuation of the previous slide for the same chapter. * Slide 9, bullet 4: Shouldn't we delete the "too" at the end? * Slide 11, last bullet: Change "is" to "are: * Slide 13: It might help to modify the text to say "they are considered by some members of the Latin GP to have enough similarity to be considered to be "visually confusable"." Bill On Monday, September 20, 2021, 01:12:59 PM PDT, Mats Dufberg via Latingp <latingp@icann.org> wrote: Enclosed is a draft of the presentation. The draft is not the template required (?) by ICANN. I decided to focus on content first, especially since the ICANN template is quite limiting and demanding. The slides I have made are in a template without any "style". This is probably too much, but kind of includes the entire presentation. I will process it again tomorrow and on Wednesday. We are expected meet again for one long session, but I have not got any invitation. I think it is now on Thursday 2021-09-23. Is that correct? 16h00-18h00 UTC? Mats -- --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se Technical Expert Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/ From: Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Reply to: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 14 September 2021 at 21:43 To: ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Subject: [Latingp] ICANN72 Prep Week - RZ-LGR Update Dear Mats, and all Latin GP members, Please find attached the template for ICANN 72 Prep Week presentation slide. The session information are tentatively as follows. Session Date and Time: 14 October 2021, 18.00 – 19.00 UTC. Session Name: Root Zone Label Generation Rules (RZ-LGR) Update Agenda: 1. Overview of Latin Script RZ-LGR Proposal (20mins) (Latin GP) 2. Overview of Japanese Script RZ-LGR Proposal (20mins) (J-GP) 3. RZ-LGR version 5 (20mins) (IP) We propose that the Q&A is included in the 20 minutes of each agenda item. Therefore, kindly prepare a 10-15 minute presentation material and allow 5-10 minutes for Q&A. Should you have any questions, please let us know. Regards, Pitinan _______________________________________________ Latingp mailing list Latingp@icann.org<mailto:Latingp@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Enclosed is an updated presentation based on the comments by you. Please re-review. The presentation will also be put into the ICANN template. The presentation should probably be slimmed too. Who will give the presentation at ICANN 72? I am willing to do it, but let's decide on Thursday. Mats -- --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se Technical Expert Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/ From: Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Reply to: Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se> Date: Monday, 20 September 2021 at 22:13 To: ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Latingp] ICANN72 Prep Week - RZ-LGR Update Enclosed is a draft of the presentation. The draft is not the template required (?) by ICANN. I decided to focus on content first, especially since the ICANN template is quite limiting and demanding. The slides I have made are in a template without any "style". This is probably too much, but kind of includes the entire presentation. I will process it again tomorrow and on Wednesday. We are expected meet again for one long session, but I have not got any invitation. I think it is now on Thursday 2021-09-23. Is that correct? 16h00-18h00 UTC? Mats -- --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se Technical Expert Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/ From: Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Reply to: Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 14 September 2021 at 21:43 To: ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org> Subject: [Latingp] ICANN72 Prep Week - RZ-LGR Update Dear Mats, and all Latin GP members, Please find attached the template for ICANN 72 Prep Week presentation slide. The session information are tentatively as follows. Session Date and Time: 14 October 2021, 18.00 – 19.00 UTC. Session Name: Root Zone Label Generation Rules (RZ-LGR) Update Agenda: 1. Overview of Latin Script RZ-LGR Proposal (20mins) (Latin GP) 2. Overview of Japanese Script RZ-LGR Proposal (20mins) (J-GP) 3. RZ-LGR version 5 (20mins) (IP) We propose that the Q&A is included in the 20 minutes of each agenda item. Therefore, kindly prepare a 10-15 minute presentation material and allow 5-10 minutes for Q&A. Should you have any questions, please let us know. Regards, Pitinan
participants (4)
-
Bill Jouris -
Hazem Hezzah -
Mats Dufberg -
Michael Bauland