June 2015 - cc-humanrights - lists.icann.org

report and HR schedule
by Niels ten Oever June 18, 2015

June 18, 2015

Hi all, Tomorrow we'll launch the issue report for the CCWP on the Article19 website, but you can already find it attached. Please find here a list of activities where Human Rights will be on the agenda: Monday 14 - 15 GAC WG on Human Rights (NtO will inform about progress in CCWP) Tuesday 10:00 - 10:15 CSG (NtO & MZ will inform about progress in CCWP) 14:00 - 14:30 14:00-14:30 : Human Rights and International Law Working Group update in the GAC 15:45 - 16:00 ISPCP (NtO & MZ will inform about progress in CCWP) 16:15 - 16:30 IPC (NtO & MZ will inform about progress in CCWP) Wednesday 9:30 - 11:00 HR public meeting 17:00 - 18:00 CCWP working session Looking forward to see you all and discuss in Buenos Aires! Best, Niels -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9

1 0

update to agenda public session
by Niels ten Oever June 18, 2015

June 18, 2015

Dear all, Please find attached an updated agenda for the public session on ICANNs Social and Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights. All comments are welcome of course. Maryam, could you please be so kind to update this on the website? Thanks in advance, Niels -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9

3 2

updated agenda of public ICANN HR session
by Niels ten Oever June 15, 2015

June 15, 2015

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Dear all, Please find underneath the update agenda for the public session on Wednesday at ICANN in Buenos Aires. Please let me know if you think people or specific issues are missing. Rafik, have you been able to move the working session to right after the public meeting? Welcome and introductions Niels ten Oever (Article19 and Chair of the CCWP) Rafik Dammak (NCSG chair) Presentation of new issue report Monika Zalnieriute (European University) Discussion and gathering of recommendations on report from audience and panel Update on the GAC Human Rights and International Law Working Group Co-Chairs of the GAC WG, UK & Peru Update and presentation on the ICANN report by Council of Europe Lee Hibbard (Council of Europe) Discussion on how and where human rights policies and assessment could be established in ICANN and its policy process. Patrik Fallstrom (SSAC) Avri Doria (former member of ATRT2 team) Alan Greenberg (ALAC) Greg Shatan (IPC) Michele Neylon (RrSG) Bill Drake (NCUC) Rafik Dammak (NCSG) Wolfgang Kleinwachter (Board) GAC working group representative Summary - Marilia Maciel I hope to be able to send out the final version of the report tonight. Best, Niels - -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVft+rAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpJ/UH/jdfcBjY1H/V9aQ1oJXnAD67 oEoU8P37eFZWHQX1+BiE6JNyl4LDg0UUJKjzMbQCqu08qf+zsBJhksPiays5znSb P2lJ5HxS/MoWcbivK1V9wtFwwNWwq+r300g91CTVC9iuQOEVPgs5PUJnd8vly343 UXyC/Sigvjap5WPgxHZsdyGRjS8d+2UcjjXGmFMaAVETQZcfqry5j+s8SMWqv6Gh 3V7edGU7RQhxU7ay8IZEYMxL9grstTURKKwGOHZY1/aw275u1cpdAwUPkBUrNhJB XCLZ1/+XLdbj13eqhvqB7ziQJKO/zlTVscbYdyoJy7P9435iWurI9N2VH2t8tP4= =mKWK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

ICANN report integrated comments
by Niels ten Oever June 12, 2015

June 12, 2015

Hi all, Thank you very much for you comments. We integrated them as well as we could. We will have a last editing session over the weekend and then we will make the final decisions on Monday before the report goes to the editor and designer on Tuesday. If you have any final comments it would be great if you could make them before Monday 12:00 (noon) UTC. Thanks in advance, Niels -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9

2 1

Buenos Aires
by William Drake June 8, 2015

June 8, 2015

Hi The BA schedule is up and there are actually three HR events: GAC Human Rights and International Law Working Group Mon, 22 June 2015 - 14:00 to 15:00 Room: Atalaya http://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-human-rights-law <http://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-human-rights-law> NCSG - ICANNs Corporate and Social Responsibility to Respect Human Rights Wed, 24 June 2015 - 09:30 to 11:00 Room: Retiro B http://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-ncsg-human-rights <http://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-ncsg-human-rights> NCSG-CC Working Party on Human Rights Wed, 24 June 2015 - 17:00 to 18:00 Room: Retiro A http://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-ccwp-human-rights <http://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-ccwp-human-rights> Unfortunately, the third one is programmed at the same time as the Cross Community WG on Internet Governance, in which many of us participate. I’m wondering whether it might be advisable to move the WP up an hour or even to the morning, as the room is shown as free. Up to you all and Rafik’s persuasive powers, but I think this bit of counter-programming is unfortunate, as the CCWGIG really has some important decisions to discuss as to its future. Best Bill ********************************************************* William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN, www.ncuc.org william.drake(a)uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake(a)gmail.com (lists), www.williamdrake.org Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap http://goo.gl/sRR01q *********************************************************

3 3

Fwd: [CCWG-ACCT] Council of Europe PR - almost in time for our public comment
by Rafik Dammak June 5, 2015

June 5, 2015

hi everyone, the CoE declaration on ICANN was released. Rafik ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill(a)afnic.fr> Date: 2015-06-06 0:44 GMT+09:00 Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Council of Europe PR - almost in time for our public comment To: "accountability-cross-community(a)icann.org" < accountability-cross-community(a)icann.org> Dear Colleagues, FYI below is a PR from the Council of Europe issued on June 3rd (could have been in time for the public comment period). https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=DC-PR086%282015%29&Language=lanEnglish&… The Council of Europe has called upon its 47 member states to ensure that the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN <https://www.icann.org/>), which manages Internet domain names globally, creates adequate mechanisms to identify, prevent and mitigate possible breaches to human rights in its work, notably the rights to freedom of expression and privacy. [...] -- ***************************** Mathieu WEILL AFNIC - directeur général Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06mathieu.weill(a)afnic.fr Twitter : @mathieuweill ***************************** _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

1 0

ICANN & Human Rights Recordings
by Maryam Bakoshi June 3, 2015

June 3, 2015

Dear All, Please find attached and below recordings of the ICANN & Human Rights Call of 29 May 2015. mp3: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/8hf8xi34aswxx22vr187q5a6z8p53plt.mp3<http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=zZ8xDDIU4PY795Cika7Nmy-2FNugFnAwo9a…> AC Chat: Maryam Bakoshi:Dear all, welcome to the ICANN and HR call on Friday 29th May 2015 Maryam Bakoshi:Rafik Dammak and Niels Ten Oever have joined the meeting Maryam Bakoshi:Welcome Marilia Maciel:Hello all! Maryam Bakoshi:Welcome Marilia rafik:non Maryam Bakoshi:Monika has joined rafik:maybe she is shy :) Monika Zalnieriute:00370 628 52 809 Monika Zalnieriute:I also right it here:) Monika Zalnieriute:haha, I read that I am shy here:) Monika Zalnieriute:ok, I wait for the call then! Niels ten Oever - Article19:Monika, can you pick up? Monika Zalnieriute:I still did not get a call rafik:who joined? Maryam Bakoshi: Pranesh Prakash Monika Zalnieriute:but I can hear You though, Maryam Bakoshi:Vipul Karbhanda Maryam Bakoshi:have both joined Monika Zalnieriute:mayeb someone know, what I should click to make my mic work? Niels ten Oever - Article19:Clicl on the mic Monika Alexandra:hi! Maryam Bakoshi:Alexandra please could you state your full name for record purposes. Thank you Alexandra:Maryam, it's Alexandra Kulikova Marilia Maciel:Please start the recording Monika Zalnieriute:yes, I can, Marilia Maciel:Please, can we let the ppl on the phone introduce themselves? Alexandra:i'm not sure I won't be able to speak though unfortunately( Marilia Maciel:Please, mute your mics rafik:niels shoulds disable the mic for his adobe connect :) Marianne F:Hi all , there is feedback so we are hearing Niels twice Marianne F:You're welcom Monika, apologies for the lengthy email nonetheless! :) Marilia Maciel:What is the deadline to comment? Niels ten Oever - Article19:Depends if we want to print it nicely Niels ten Oever - Article19:If we want it to be gone via editor, design and print, we will need to have it done by Monday rafik:@Niels it is a working document for CCWP to continue the discussion, expecting the CCWP to produce its first delvierable Niels ten Oever - Article19:Indeed, so we need to agree on a approval procedure (point 1.3 :) ) rafik:I would see it as an "issue report" not necessarily needed an approval , it is more research work to give input Niels ten Oever - Article19:let's discuss this under the next point Pranesh Prakash:If we don't make a strong defence of HR, who will? :-) Having said that I don't think there's a need to establish a duty to protect on ICANN's part. Marianne F:OF course, they do have this responsibility just we need to proceed step by step. So if the point is made in a note then it is there on the record to be used and referred to later if need be (just reiterating verbal point in writing) Niels ten Oever - Article19:+1 Pranesh Prakash:+1 Maryam Bakoshi:Nigel Hickson has joined Marilia Maciel:Audio issues here. Will have to go out and enter again, sorry Marianne F:+1 from me for leaving it in as example; just to edit and tighten up for now and indicate there option of more detailed analysis later Pranesh Prakash:+1 to Marianne Monika Zalnieriute:Guys, I agree to have it as an example: would You like to have it a shorter part though for now? Monika Zalnieriute:in this particular report? Monika Zalnieriute:+ Lee; it might be too much stuff. Monika Zalnieriute:All at once. Marianne F:Hi, if the feeling is to keep it in then perhaps as a note? But Lee is pointing out the timing issue so I would defer to those who know ICANN better than I do Marianne F:Please mute mics when typing! :) Marianne F:If in doubt leave it out Alexandra:Agree that the UDRP part might draw attention from the substantial issues int he first partin the shape it is now Alexandra:I might have missed it - could smb please remind again how GAC is going to be engaged? Pranesh Prakash:Apologies. I have to leave now. But would just like to reiterate that we mustI (strategically) bear the burden of being the people who take positions on sensitive commercial issues. If we don't, no one else will. We can build bridges after we have some rough position. Marianne F:+1 from me Pranesh; point well taken, cheerio! rafik:@Alexandra we have some GAC members in the CCWP, it has its own working group and Lee is basically doing the liaison. maybe Lee can elaborate here Marilia Maciel:Maybe we could move to the session in BA? Monika Zalnieriute:So I would like to get the idea what do we do?: please type in here, so I could briefly have an idea who is for LEAVING the UDRP and who is for TAKING OUT Niels ten Oever - Article19:The consensus seems to be that it could be mentioned as an short example, but we leave ourt the longer expose. Alexandra:sorry Marilia Maciel:Yes, that is my feeling too Alexandra:I'll type rafik:@monika in few words more coming work for you :) Monika Zalnieriute:Ok, how long - and how detailed - simply a page or so or approx how long? Niels ten Oever - Article19:Shorter Marianne F:Mention it, keep it short as a concrete example vs. a full expose. Monika Zalnieriute:yes, yes, so simply a single refernece, You mean - thats it? Monika Zalnieriute:shorter than a page, You mean? Niels ten Oever - Article19:Yes Monika Zalnieriute:simply like an example mentione, in a sentence?:) Alexandra:guys, just a quick comment/observation: an elaborate description of this one case study now will definitely attract criticism from Russian GAC representatives - as at the Signapore meeting they were very vocal on the Crimean domains issue from the HR perspective. It's a very debateable issue in terms of how exactly that relates to the ICANN remit, but if the HRtalk starts with UDRP in detail I can expect the reaction :) what I mean is that there seems to be a strong link for them berween ICANN and that incidet in the HR context. I can expect there will be efforts to stick it in Marianne F:.. I see your point but won't there be this sort of push back anyway? If this example really could become a red herring (forgive the pun) then leave it out for now. We can always put it back in... Alexandra:yeah I guess you're right.. But it would be good to at least formulate some stance on the issue from the group? or have a longer least of potential case studies for future Alexandra:*list rafik:there will be pish back for many topics, that is why we have to work on consensus and "educate" Marilia Maciel:Yes, open to collaboration/endorsements rafik:we need to get CCWP to have ownership on itw own deliverable Marianne F:I agree; send the final version of the report to the CCWP for comments. People comment best when there is something concrete to comment on. rafik:the public session is not clashing with important sessions rafik:kathy is not coming to BA Marilia Maciel:I would go bit further and ask them for their aseesment Marilia Maciel:some sort of responsibility to speak Marilia Maciel:great Marilia Maciel:Perfect Alexandra:thanks Niels Marianne F:Thanks Niels, thanks all for a great meeting Marilia Maciel:Thanks all Marilia Maciel:Bye all! Alexandra:thanks everyone and bye! Many thanks, -- Maryam Bakoshi Secretariat Support - NCSG, NCUC, NPOC Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: maryam.bakoshi(a)icann.org<mailto:maryam.bakoshi@icann.org> Mobile: +44 7737 698036 Skype: maryam.bakoshi.icann

1 0

Re: [cc-humanrights] Fwd: Fwd: Re: More comments.
by Niels ten Oever June 2, 2015

June 2, 2015

Dear Stephanie, Latest version is the one in which Marilia commented, attached for your convenience. Kathy can be added as a member at this link: https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights Best, Niels On 02-06-15 16:24, Stephanie Perrin wrote: > trying again. Where is the latest draft so I can edit only once? > Kathy is still not on the group list, so I have to insert her comments > too. Please send latest version > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Fwd: Re: [cc-humanrights] More comments. > Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 14:33:40 -0400 > From: Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin(a)mail.utoronto.ca> > To: Monika.Zalnieriute(a)eui.eu <Monika.Zalnieriute(a)eui.eu>, Kathy > Kleiman <kathy(a)kathykleiman.com> > > > > Hi Monika, Kathy here (who was around for the setup of the UDRP and > fought to keep it less bad than it might have been), had a couple of > comments on your excellent report. I can add them when I edit, or she > could tell you. I have tried twice now to get her added to the human > rights list, if you have any idea how to get her on the list, please > yell. Kathy has a lot of deep first hand experience with ICANN on this > stuff, and we need her. > cheers Steph > PS she also agrees with publishing now.....not waiting, as Michele > suggested. > Sorry to have missed the call but I had kids and thesis advisor issues > that trumped it.... > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: [cc-humanrights] More comments. > Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 10:36:56 -0400 > From: Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin(a)mail.utoronto.ca> > To: cc-humanrights(a)icann.org, Kathy Kleiman <kathy(a)kathykleiman.com> > > > > My apologies for missing the call, I had an unexpected event here. > I would be happy to help with final edits, as I expect there were more > revisions suggested on the call. I am ccing Kathy as I am not sure > whether you have added her to the list as yet. > Kind regards, Stephanie P > On 2015-05-29 8:46, zalnieriute . wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> Would it be fine if I address Marianne's and Gabrielle's comments into >> the document first, and then we give to Stephanie for grammatical >> edits she promised in an earlier e-mail? >> >> Let me know as we dont want to have several parellell versions at the >> same time, >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Monika >> >> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Marianne Franklin >> <m.i.franklin(a)gold.ac.uk <mailto:m.i.franklin@gold.ac.uk>> wrote: >> >> Dear all >> >> Just wanted to say hello, rather late into this really interesting >> and productive conversation on this CCWP for ICANN. The thread was >> quite long and substantial so have had to take time to get up to >> speed; nothing like a long train-ride to enable that!. >> >> Being relatively new to ICANN at this level of work, it is quite >> encouraging to see how far this work has gone. >> >> I have not much to add in terms of the discussions around the >> title of the document, and also the symbolic and legally >> substantive issues around Human Rights as enshrined in >> international law and CSR. All the points raised are for a >> non-expert make sense. >> >> A couple of comments if I may though on the document as it is >> readied for circulation to the iCANN community; based on reading >> the penultimate draft but hopefully still relevant for the final >> tweaks, and future references. >> >> 1) The revised preamble/framing of this initiative for ICANN folk: >> this works pretty well now as long as there remains room for >> eventual inclusion of later human rights treaties and covenants >> that tend to drop off the list e.g. those on disability, the >> rights of women, rights of children etc. ICANN may want to, at >> this very early stage, restrict its thinking to privacy and >> freedom of expression, or focus on consumer rights at the expense >> of more inclusive human rights norms and keep stipulating this, >> particularly in terms of consumer rights and CSR frameworks. >> Nonetheless, revising this project in a way that continues to more >> inclusive is in the long term the right way to go even if there >> may be push-back: international human rights law and norms do not >> stop with the ICCPR and ICESCR, and norms change slowly over time >> as do legal instruments such as the UN Bill of Rights .... :) . >> >> a) So moving from there to the current introduction; where a clear >> distinction is made between protecting and respecting human >> rights. This makes sense so do make sure that the remaining >> references to 'protecting' human rights are redacted later in the >> document (e.g. page 18). >> >> b) That said and recalling point 1 above, the strong emphasis on >> how this initiative will only acknowledge"human rights content >> [that] is limited to internationally recognized human rights..." >> (page 8) strikes me as a bit too restrictive in that international >> recognition of the full range of human rights instruments that >> have been put in place since the UDHR varies across these treaties >> and covenants. >> >> This prominent place given to limitations and restrictions on >> which human rights instruments will be taken on board, even if for >> strategic purposes, This could in the future put this whole >> initiative on to the back foot as these "later" human rights >> instruments become relevant to ICANN's work. >> >> I am not a legal expert nor scholar of international human rights >> law but could this second limitation on page 8 perhaps be >> rephrased to accommodate just these nuances and in way that does >> not scare the horses (so to speak) but also does not shut the door >> for future developments. Not sure how to rephrase this but >> something like "human rights content refers specifically to >> recognized international human rights law and norms....." >> >> 2) The latter point affects what follows in the document and how >> different stakeholders will respond: So If I could just make one >> longer comment on the current text in light of comments related to >> the IRPC Charter. And, as some of you know, what comes next is >> from the point of view of the work of the IRP Coalition and its >> Charter of Human Rights and Principles of the Internet. This is >> mentioned, and referenced on page 12; >> >> It was suggested that the IRPC Charter does not have the requisite >> status because some of its Clauses "fall below international >> standards". The legal point - and ensuing debates - raised here >> notwithstanding (which Gabrielle provided for the IRPC Charter >> review at the 2014 IGF so they are well taken), I would like to >> note that seeing the IRPC Charter given its due place in the final >> draft confirms that these reservations need not preclude mention >> of the IRPC Charter in the context of this new opening for ICANN. >> >> This is because whatever the verdict on its content at present may >> be (Version 1.1) in the ICANN work the IRPC Charter is being >> rightly attributed its role as a foundational framework for >> thinking about human rights (broadly defined) within the more >> technically focused IG spaces - within and beyond ICANN. This is >> because it is arguably the first document that takes international >> law seriously as well as those more ethical though less legally >> rigorous positions advocated in civil society spaces i.e. the IRPC >> Charter links human rights (in toto) obligations for states to >> those articulated for corporations through CSR undertaking. For >> this reason alone it deserves this mention. >> >> What do I mean here? The critical points about some parts of the >> IRPC Charter referring to emerging rather than existing rights >> reach back to the earliest days of the IRPC Charter drafting >> process back in 2009; a period of starting out that saw >> discussions not unlike the ones we have had on this thread for the >> ICANN application of human rights in its work 5-6 years, and >> several UN resolutions etc, later. But even with these >> imperfections the IRPC Charter, in its own terms a "living >> document" (taking its cue from the UDHR) is a formative part of >> the ethical and legal landscape in which this ICANN-based >> initiative has emerged. >> >> So good to see that the IRPC Charter reference is still there >> though could I suggest the following revision of this paragraph on >> page 12 for accuracy: >> >> "Within the framework of the Internet Governance Forum, the >> Internet Rights & Principles Coalition was created in 2009 with >> the mission ÃÂÃÂto make rights on the Internet and their >> related duties, specified from the point of view of individual >> users, a central theme of the internet governance debate held in >> the IGF context". In 2010-11 the Internet Rights & Principles >> Coalition developed its Charter of Human Rights and Principles for >> the Internet, distilling its 21 clauses into 10 Rights and >> Principles for the Internet based on international human rights >> laws and norms.." >> >> 3) A minor editing point: Page 12, note 29 is incomplete so a >> minor edit could be "The IRPC Charter is available, in booklet >> form, in 8 languages, at http://internetrightsandprinciples.org/site/" >> >> 4) And on fiddly things like spelling and typos: Other edits too >> are needed to have consistent spelling (US or UK Spelling) and >> there are still some typos still need correcting. >> >> 5) On Stephanie's points about human rights scaring people; too >> true. So all the more reason for this initiative in ICANN to take >> courage; they scare not only the very states that are supposed to >> uphold them and in so doing protect their citizens, by law and in >> principle, but also powerful corporations, and ICANN is one, who >> too often fudge fundamental freedoms under CSR waffle or step back >> from "respecting" human rights in deed as well as words by >> appealing to the limits set on them by various sorts of national >> jurisdictions.. :) >> >> Will try and make the upcoming call tomorrow. Thanks Niels for all >> this great text-shepherding work. >> >> best wishes >> Marianne F >> >> >> On 27/05/2015 16:32, Niels ten Oever wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> For your information, please find the comments from Gabrielle attached. >>> Would be great to see the comments from Stephanie as well. >>> >>> If we want to make this a product of the CCWP, it would be great to have >>> a bit more people. >>> >>> Also happy to discuss this at our call on Friday. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Niels >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cc-humanrights mailing list >>> cc-humanrights(a)icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights >> >> -- >> Marianne Franklin, PhD >> Professor of Global Media and Politics >> Convener: Global Media & Transnational Communications Program >> Goldsmiths (University of London) >> Department of Media & Communications >> New Cross, London SE14 6NW >> Tel: +44 20 7919 7072 <tel:%2B44%2020%207919%207072> >> <m.i.franklin(a)gold.ac.uk> <mailto:m.i.franklin@gold.ac.uk> >> @GloComm >> https://twitter.com/GloComm >> http://www.gold.ac.uk/media-communications/staff/franklin/ >> https://www.gold.ac.uk/pg/ma-global-media-transnational-communications/ >> Chair of the Global Internet Governance Academic Network (GigaNet) >> Steering Committee/Former Co-Chair Internet Rights & Principles Coalition (UN IGF) >> www.internetrightsandprinciples.org <http://www.internetrightsandprinciples.org> >> @netrights >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cc-humanrights mailing list >> cc-humanrights(a)icann.org <mailto:cc-humanrights@icann.org> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Monika Zalnieriute >> Centre for Internet & Human Rights >> European University Viadrina >> Mittelweg 50, 12053 Berlin, Germany >> e-mail: monika.zalnieriute(a)eui.eu <mailto:monika.zalnieriute@eui.eu> >> https://cihr.eu <https://cihr.eu/> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cc-humanrights mailing list >> cc-humanrights(a)icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights > > > > >

2 3

short overview issues discussed on the call
by Niels ten Oever June 2, 2015

June 2, 2015

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Dear all, Please find here my short notes from the call we had last Friday, if something is missing, please feel free to add: - - Monika, Gabrielle and Niels with the useful comments from the list prepared a draft report for the next ICANN meeting with clear recommendations. This report is a follow up to the CoE and previous Article19 report. - - It was decided that the report will not be an official product of the CCWP just yet, it will be an issue report prepared by Article19 for the CCWP, which the CCWP subsequently can adopt and discuss in BA. - - The deadline for comments and input on the report (which would be very much valued is Tuesday June 2 COB. - - The UDRP part of the current report will be left out in its current form and probably used as separate issue report later on to ensure that issues are not conflated. UDRP will however be mentioned as an example. - - Niels will propose an agenda for the public session in BA - - The working session in BA will be used to evaluate the public session and set the scope of the upcoming work. - - The Council of Europe report is going forward, Lee will forward it when it can be made public. It's expected before the meeting in BA. - - The GAC Human Rights working group is almost done with its charter, Lee will inform us when it's ready. - - Niels will contact Bill Drake about a possible contribution of the CCWP to the civil society pre-event at the ICANN BA meeting. Maryam will also provide us with the recordings and the transcript soon. Best, Niels - -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVbEMeAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpBX8H/iPZK0jfVMchYITsHQKvvFDh 1ifFzjcZFh8kJFE/ENo/RDF9TSWGYsr9FOcXqe6TqfHZqboM+K5fEwxOQQAetLwS L3sw8mV+cT17/ZDtO8i0ALAFaDtaAEhrId8QSvvpKE0dTzXr6z5sLraDq3j30/Mt yT1YV4nMOMmVjk+ea/El/TILIHMPMef+KJVUtpPQ53MjwEp/jQGQu/cPlgbFq/u/ SgG6RPYwcn8avXGq7zrSF4r4QYAXRpsMT3d995T9lae77RwqGJlaM2C4RV7mohLt 9B8K9jxnmZ2tcjNrZDxyxhZILS+9dCLFMGO+6yPNcZyFoiVDfmGzqtLpO1FdpGk= =vRDz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 3

More comments.
by Niels ten Oever June 1, 2015

June 1, 2015

Hi all, For your information, please find the comments from Gabrielle attached. Would be great to see the comments from Stephanie as well. If we want to make this a product of the CCWP, it would be great to have a bit more people. Also happy to discuss this at our call on Friday. Best, Niels

5 7